Ganjar Muncul di Azan, Bentuk Implementasi Sila Pertama di Pancasila

SINDOnews
13 Sept 202316:32

Summary

TLDRThe discussion focuses on presidential candidate Ganjar Pranowo's appearance in a Maghrib prayer broadcast, which sparked debate ahead of Indonesia's 2024 elections. While some criticized it as a potential campaign tactic, others, including political and religious figures, defended it as an expression of Ganjar's religious identity. The conversation delves into the concept of identity politics, religious expression in politics, and the role of religion in Indonesian leadership. Key figures like MUI Secretary General Anwar Abbas and political communication experts stress the importance of showing religious values in alignment with Indonesia's national philosophy, Pancasila.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Ganjar Pranowo’s appearance in the Maghrib prayer broadcast sparked debates regarding its timing before the 2024 Presidential Election.
  • 😀 Some argue that Ganjar’s appearance was a harmless way to show his religious identity, as he is a devout Muslim.
  • 😀 The debate centers around whether showing religious identity on TV could be perceived as a political strategy ahead of the elections.
  • 😀 Critics question if the broadcast violated election rules, as it could be seen as an unofficial campaign act, despite lacking political party symbols.
  • 😀 Supporters defend Ganjar's actions, asserting that inviting people to prayer is a positive gesture, not a campaign tactic.
  • 😀 Buya Anwar Abbas from the MUI emphasized that it is important for presidential candidates to demonstrate their religious identity in line with Indonesia's Pancasila principles.
  • 😀 The concept of 'identity politics' is discussed, with a distinction made between 'political identity' (normal) and 'identity politics' (which can create divisions).
  • 😀 Emrus Sihombing, a political communication expert, argued that while religion should not be exploited politically, it’s natural for a candidate to show their religious identity.
  • 😀 There is an appeal to focus on the positive actions of candidates and not criticize religious expressions, especially in a country like Indonesia, where religion is integral to its identity.
  • 😀 The conversation concludes with a call for politicians to be open about their religious beliefs, given that Indonesia is not a secular state, and religion plays a key role in its national identity.

Q & A

  • What was the controversy surrounding Ganjar Pranowo's appearance during the Maghrib prayer broadcast?

    -The controversy stemmed from the fact that Ganjar Pranowo appeared on two private television stations during the Maghrib prayer, which sparked discussions about whether it was politically appropriate ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Some questioned whether it violated election laws, while others argued that it was not an issue since the official campaign period had not started.

  • How does the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) view Ganjar's appearance on the prayer broadcast?

    -Buya Anwar Abbas from the MUI emphasized that it was not problematic from the perspective of religious practice. He argued that showcasing religious identity, such as participating in a call to prayer, was a demonstration of one’s belief and was in line with Indonesia’s national philosophy, Pancasila, particularly its first principle of belief in one God.

  • What is the concept of identity politics in the context of the discussion?

    -Identity politics refers to the use of religious or personal identity to gain political advantage. The speakers in the discussion differentiate between 'political identity' (which is normal and common) and 'identity politics,' where identity is used to create division or exclusivity between groups.

  • Did Ganjar Pranowo’s appearance violate any provisions of the Election Law according to the panelists?

    -The panelists, including Ganjar's volunteers and political experts, agreed that his appearance did not violate any election laws. Since the campaign period had not yet officially begun and there were no political symbols involved, they considered the broadcast as simply a personal expression of religious devotion.

  • What was the role of religion in the discussion of Ganjar's appearance on the broadcast?

    -Religion was seen as an important aspect of national identity and leadership in Indonesia. The discussion highlighted the significance of presidential candidates showing their religious identity, especially in a religious country like Indonesia, as it aligns with the principles of Pancasila and contributes to national unity.

  • Why did some parties criticize Ganjar's call to prayer broadcast?

    -Some parties criticized the broadcast because they viewed it as potentially exploiting religious imagery for political gain. They raised concerns that it could be interpreted as part of an early presidential campaign, despite the fact that no political symbols were involved and the campaign period had not started.

  • How did the discussion address the role of religion in politics in Indonesia?

    -The panelists argued that religion should play a role in politics in Indonesia, as the country is not secular but religious. They emphasized that it is important for political leaders to openly show their religious values, as this is in accordance with Pancasila and the national identity.

  • What did the speakers think about religious leaders using their platform for political purposes?

    -The panelists expressed that religious figures should use their platform to promote goodness and unity, not to incite division or violence. They argued that as long as religion is used to encourage positive actions, such as inviting people to prayer, it is acceptable and beneficial.

  • How did the panelists react to the idea that religion should not be part of politics?

    -The panelists disagreed with the notion that religion should be excluded from politics. They argued that Indonesia, as a religious country, should embrace the intersection of religion and politics. They emphasized that presidential candidates should express their religious beliefs as part of their public identity.

  • What example of Ganjar Pranowo's religious commitment was mentioned by the panelists?

    -The panelists mentioned that Ganjar Pranowo had previously been seen participating in religious activities, such as praying during Eid with President Jokowi and regularly engaging in religious practices like reciting sholawatan. This was cited as evidence of his consistent religiosity and devotion, not just a political strategy.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Ganjar Pranowo2024 ElectionReligion in PoliticsMUIIdentity PoliticsPublic OpinionPolitical CommunicationPancasilaIndonesian PoliticsIslamic IdentityPresidential Candidates