Ruhut Sitompul: Rakyat Indonesia Sedih Lihat Cara Cawapres Gibran Debat Lawan Mahfud MD

Summary

Ruhud Sitompul, spokesperson for presidential candidate Ganjar Pranowo, commented on Gibran Rakabuming's performance in the fourth vice presidential debate. He questioned if Indonesians were saddened seeing Gibran's appearance, recalling President Jokowi's desire to change the debate format. Ruhud felt the debate was substantive, covering agrarian and environmental issues, but Gibran's presentation was forced, with many inaccurate answers. Previously, Gibran had used foreign terms, leading his opponent Mahfud MD to request clarification per KPU rules. Jokowi had advised against bringing personal issues into the debates, but Ruhud felt it was Gibran doing so.

Takeaways

• 💬 Gibran's performance in the fourth vice-presidential debate at JCC Senayan on January 21 received public attention, including comments from Ganjar Pranowo's national campaign team spokesperson and Mahfud MD.
• 🔥 Ruhud Sitompul critiqued Gibran's debate performance, questioning if Indonesians were saddened by it and accused Gibran of bringing personal issues into the debate, contrary to President Jokowi's wishes for format changes by the Election Commission.
• 📈 The debate topics were praised for covering important issues such as agrarian and environmental matters, yet Ruhud felt Gibran's performance lacked substance and seemed forced.
• 🙄 Critics argued that Gibran's use of foreign terms like 'Green inflation' during the debate seemed pretentious and his explanations were deemed unsatisfactory.
• 📝 Mahfud MD requested Gibran to clarify the term 'Green inflation', which Gibran explained as 'green inflation', but Mahfud's response did not meet Gibran's expectations.
• 💁‍♂️ Gibran's gesture of searching for answers from Mahfud was highlighted as a notable moment, suggesting a disconnect in their debate interaction.
• 🚫 Concerns were raised about the debate's focus on personal issues, contradicting President Jokowi's advice to keep personal matters out of the debate discourse.
• 🙂 Despite the criticisms, the debate was acknowledged for its coverage of significant topics like agrarian issues and the environment.
• 🚮 Gibran's debate strategy, including the forced appearance of intelligence and the use of jargon, was criticized for detracting from the debate's quality.
• 💡 The discussion highlighted a broader concern about the maturity and readiness of candidates in handling public debates on complex issues.

Q & A

What was the main topic of discussion in the vice presidential debate?

The main topic of the vice presidential debate was agrarian and environmental issues.

What criticism did Ruhud Sitompul have regarding Gibran's debate performance?

Ruhud criticized Gibran's debate performance as seeming forced, like he was trying too hard to appear smart, when in reality many of his answers were inaccurate.

What rule did Gibran allegedly break during the debate?

Gibran allegedly broke the rule established by the General Election Commission (KPU) to not bring up personal matters in the debate.

What change did President Jokowi suggest the KPU make regarding the debate format?

President Jokowi suggested the KPU change the debate format so that candidates do not bring up personal matters.

What foreign terminology did Gibran use that drew criticism?

Gibran used the foreign terminology "Green inflation," which drew criticism from his opponent Mahfud MD.

How did Mahfud MD respond when Gibran used the term "Green inflation"?

Mahfud MD asked Gibran to clarify the meaning of the term in accordance with KPU debate rules.

How did Gibran justify his use of the term "Green inflation"?

Gibran claimed he did not need to clarify the meaning because Mahfud already held a professor title.

What was Mahfud's response regarding the meaning of "Green inflation"?

Mahfud provided an answer about the meaning of "Green inflation" that did not align with Gibran's expectations.

What gesture did Gibran make in response to Mahfud's answer?

Gibran made a gesture suggesting he could not find or did not agree with Mahfud's explanation of "Green inflation".

What was the overall reaction to Gibran's debate performance?

The overall reaction was that Gibran's debate performance seemed forced, like he was trying too hard to appear smart when he lacked the qualifications, and many of his answers were inaccurate.