Fakta-fakta Mahfud MD Dilaporkan ke Bawaslu Dianggap Hina Gibran

Tribun Jateng

28 Jan 202406:42

Summary

TLDRThe election oversight group Awaslu reported presidential candidate pair number 3 Mahfud MD to the elections supervisory agency for allegedly insulting vice presidential candidate number 2 Gibran Rakabuming Raka. Mahfud is accused of calling Gibran 'crazy' and 'garbage' during the candidate debate on January 21, 2024. Awaslu claims Mahfud violated election campaign regulations prohibiting candidates from insulting other candidates. Mahfud's team is unfazed, saying previous complaints against him were dismissed. Gibran's team doesn't agree with reporting Mahfud over a normal debate exchange.

Takeaways

😡 A group called Election Observer Advocates (Awaslu) reported cowapres candidate Mahfud MD to the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) for allegedly insulting opponent Gibran Rakabuming during a debate.
🗣 Mahfud MD allegedly called Gibran "crazy" and "leftovers" during the vice presidential candidate debate on January 21, 2024.
📜 Awaslu accused Mahfud MD of violating election and campaign regulations that prohibit insulting other candidates.
📃 Awaslu filed an official complaint against Mahfud MD with report number 039/lp/pp/RI.g00.00/1.i/2024 on January 25, 2024.
😕 Mahfud MD said he did not care about the report filed against him, saying previous complaints never got followed up on.
👂 Mahfud MD claimed Gibran was trained to ask tricky debate questions in order to embarrass him.
🎤 During the debate, Gibran asked Mahfud about 'green inflation' which Mahfud did not answer directly.
😠 Mahfud called Gibran's question 'nonsense' and 'unimportant'.
🗣 The presidential campaign team for Prabowo-Gibran disagreed with reporting Mahfud MD to the election commission.
✅ The election oversight commission confirmed it had received a complaint against Mahfud MD on the morning of January 25, 2024 and would review it.

Q & A

Who reported Mahfud MD to the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu)?
-A group of election watchdog lawyers known as Election Supervisors (Awaslu) reported Mahfud MD to Bawaslu.
What was Mahfud MD accused of?
-Mahfud MD was accused of insulting vice presidential candidate #2 Gibran Rakabuming Raka during the vice presidential debate on January 21, 2024.
What did Mahfud MD allegedly say about Gibran Rakabuming Raka?
-Mahfud MD allegedly called Gibran "crazy" and "garbage" during the debate.
What laws did Awaslu accuse Mahfud MD of violating?
-Awaslu accused Mahfud MD of violating Article 280 paragraph 1 letter C in conjunction with Article 521 of Law no. 7 of 2017 on elections and Article 72 paragraph 1 letter C of KPU Regulation no. 20 of 2023 concerning election campaigns.
What are the potential penalties Mahfud MD faces?
-The laws Mahfud MD is accused of violating carry a maximum penalty of 2 years in prison and a Rp 20 million fine.
How did Mahfud MD respond to the accusations?
-Mahfud MD said he didn't care about the accusations because previous complaints filed against him were often dismissed by Bawaslu.
What was the context around Mahfud MD's comments about Gibran?
-Mahfud MD made the comments after feeling Gibran intentionally tried to embarrass him during the debate by asking him an irrelevant question.
What was the topic of the vice presidential debate?
-The debate topic was sustainable development, natural resources, environment, energy, food, agrarian, indigenous communities, and villages.
Where and when did the debate take place?
-The fourth presidential debate took place at the Jakarta Convention Center on Sunday, January 21, 2024.
How did Prabowo's campaign team respond to the accusations against Mahfud MD?
-Prabowo's campaign team said debates involve rebuttals and criticism, which are normal in a democracy, and they would leave it to the public to judge the truth of the candidates' statements.

Outlines

00:00

📣 Election Oversight and Accusations of Insult in Political Debate

The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) received a report accusing Mahfud MD of insulting Gibran Rakabuming Raka during a vice presidential debate on January 21, 2024. A group of election watchdog advocates reported Mahfud for allegedly using derogatory language against Gibran. Bawaslu had previously reported other candidates for potential violations following debates. The accusations against Mahfud include potential violations of election laws prohibiting insults based on religion, race, ethnicity, or participant status, with penalties up to two years in prison and fines. Despite the report, Mahfud dismissed the accusations, attributing them to political maneuvering and maintained his focus on the campaign's substantive issues.

05:01

🗣 Political Responses to Debate Conduct and Election Oversight

The Prabowo-Gibran campaign and Habibur Rahman from the Gerindra Party addressed the controversy around Mahfud MD's remarks during the vice presidential debate, arguing that exchanges in such debates are part of democratic processes. Despite potential implications of Mahfud's comments, they emphasized the importance of allowing the public to judge the debate's content. Bawaslu confirmed receipt of the complaint against Mahfud MD, indicating a review process for alleged violations. The segment concludes with a call to action for viewers to engage with the media outlet's social platforms, emphasizing the importance of local news in the Indonesian context.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡election

The transcript seems to discuss an election in Indonesia, potentially the 2024 presidential election. Multiple references are made to candidates, debates, violations, etc.

💡candidate

Multiple candidates are mentioned, including some running for president and vice president. Debates and discussions between candidates are referenced.

💡violation

There is a discussion of a violation reported against one vice presidential candidate for insulting another candidate.

💡insult

One candidate is reported to have insulted another candidate by calling them things like "crazy" and "garbage" during a debate.

💡debate

The candidates participated in multiple debates which are discussed.

💡election commission

An election oversight commission received complaints against candidates and monitors violations.

💡campaign

Rules around campaigning are referenced when discussing violations candidates committed.

💡fact

The end summarizes the facts around the key events discussed.

💡violation report

A violation report against one candidate was filed over the debate insults.

💡oversight

The election commission provides oversight on campaigning and election rules.

Highlights

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.