Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Pemerintahan Orde Baru!
Summary
TLDRThis video explores the controversial history of Indonesia's New Order era under President Suharto, highlighting its dual nature. On one hand, the regime brought relative stability, economic growth, and advancements like the Green Revolution and infrastructure projects. On the other hand, it faced severe criticisms for rampant corruption, human rights violations, and a significant national debt. The host encourages viewers to reflect on these complexities and engage in discussion, showcasing the significant impact of this period on Indonesia's development and societal dynamics.
Takeaways
- đ The New Order regime in Indonesia, led by President Suharto, began after the Supersemar event on March 11, 1966.
- đ Suharto's rule lasted for 32 years, marked by significant development but also controversies surrounding human rights.
- đ The New Order era was considered relatively safe and politically stable compared to present times, with lower crime rates.
- đ The Green Revolution, initiated in 1979, helped Indonesia achieve food security and made it a rice-exporting country.
- đ Infrastructure development, such as the construction of toll roads and buildings, was a hallmark of Suharto's regime.
- đ However, corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN) were rampant, making it difficult for ordinary citizens to succeed without connections.
- đ Human rights abuses were prevalent, with minorities and dissenters facing discrimination and persecution.
- đ Indonesia's national debt increased significantly during the New Order, leading to economic vulnerability and crises.
- đ Development efforts were often concentrated in Java, leaving other regions neglected and exacerbating inequality.
- đ The discussion encourages viewers to reflect on the complexities of Suharto's regime and contribute their thoughts in the comments.
Q & A
What is the significance of Supersemar in the New Order era?
-Supersemar, or Surat Perintah 11 Maret, is a pivotal event marking the transition from President Sukarno's leadership to President Suharto's regime. It is seen as the legitimizing factor for Suharto's rise to power, initiating a 32-year period of governance.
What are some positive aspects of Suharto's New Order administration?
-The New Order era is noted for increased political stability, lower crime rates, significant economic growth through agricultural advancements like the Green Revolution, and substantial infrastructure development, including the construction of toll roads and public transport systems.
What was the Green Revolution, and how did it impact Indonesia?
-The Green Revolution was a significant agricultural initiative that introduced modern farming techniques, fertilizers, and pesticides in Indonesia. It led to increased food production, making the country self-sufficient in rice and turning it into an exporter.
How did the New Order regime manage crime rates compared to today?
-During the New Order, crime rates were reportedly lower than they are today, with many citizens from that era feeling safer due to effective government measures against criminal activities.
What criticisms did the New Order face regarding corruption?
-The New Order was criticized for rampant corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN), making it difficult for individuals without connections to engage in politics or business, thus favoring the elite and well-connected individuals.
What were some of the human rights issues during the New Order era?
-Despite maintaining order, the New Order was marked by significant human rights violations, including discrimination against ethnic minorities, especially the Chinese community, and the suppression of dissenting voices.
What role did infrastructure play in Indonesia's development during the New Order?
-Infrastructure projects, such as the Jagorawi toll road and MRT Jakarta, were critical for modernizing Indonesia, improving transportation efficiency, and facilitating economic growth during the New Order.
What were the economic consequences of the New Order's focus on development?
-The focus on rapid development led to significant national debt, which culminated in the Asian financial crisis of 1998. The excessive borrowing was often criticized for resulting in a lack of sustainable economic practices.
How did the New Order address regional disparities in development?
-Development efforts during the New Order were heavily centered on Java, often neglecting other regions, which led to imbalances and complaints about unequal resource distribution across the country.
What legacy does the New Order era leave for contemporary Indonesia?
-The New Order leaves a mixed legacy, marked by both impressive achievements in stability and development and significant challenges related to human rights abuses and corruption, which continue to influence political discussions in contemporary Indonesia.
Outlines
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantMindmap
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantKeywords
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantHighlights
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantTranscripts
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantVoir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Sistem dan Struktur Politik Ekonomi Indonesia Masa Orde Baru
Perekonomian Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa
Masa Demokrasi Terpimpin. (PART II ) : Dari Konfrontasi Malaysia hingga Masalah Ekonomi Terpimpin
Singkat Cerita Jatuhnya Soeharto & Terbentuknya Sejarah Era Orde Baru dan Orde Lama
MASA ORDE BARU DI INDONESIA (1966-1998)
SEJARAH DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)