Breaking News : Supreme Court Calls for Major Overhaul of SC/ST Reservation Policy | By Krati Mam

Summary

The script discusses the Supreme Court's judgment on the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes reservation in India. It highlights the evolution of the reservation policy, starting from the Mandal Commission's recommendations in 1990 to the 2004 Andhra Pradesh case. The Supreme Court's recent review emphasizes the need for rational classification within the reservation system, maintaining the 15% quota but allowing for the addition of more communities if needed. The script also touches on the role of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and the importance of the Article 341 in empowering the President to include communities within these classifications.

Takeaways

• 📜 The script discusses a burning session about the Supreme Court's judgment on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes reservation and their categorization within the community.
• 🏛 The Supreme Court has the power under Article 341 to include any person or community within the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, which is a significant aspect of the judgment.
• 📊 There is a distinction made between criminal and non-criminal layers within the reservation system, with certain income limits also playing a role in determining eligibility for reservation benefits.
• 📋 The Andhra Pradesh case of 2004, I.V. Chinnaya vs State of Andhra Pradesh, is highlighted as a pivotal moment in the evolution of the reservation policy for Scheduled Castes and Tribes.
• 🏛️ The Supreme Court's judgment in 2004 stated that there was no need to create separate categories within the Scheduled Castes and Tribes, emphasizing that they are large communities in themselves.
• 🔄 A review of the 2004 case has been undertaken by the Supreme Court, with the new judgment suggesting a reevaluation of the categorization within the reservation system.
• 🗳️ The Supreme Court's new judgment emphasizes the principle of rational classification and the need for a clear rationale for any classification made within the Scheduled Castes and Tribes reservation.
• 📈 It is clarified that the percentage of reservation will remain at 15%, but there will be a detailed categorization within this percentage to include all communities that require reservation.
• 🏢 The states have been given the authority to make divisions within the reservation categories, adding any new categories as needed.
• 👥 The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes are constitutional bodies that will play a role in overseeing the implementation of these reservation policies.
• 📝 The script also mentions Articles 338 and 338A, which provide the framework for these commissions and their responsibilities in the reservation system.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the video script?

The main topic discussed in the video script is the Supreme Court's judgment on the reservation system for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in India.

What does the term 'Scheduled Caste' refer to in the context of the Indian reservation system?

In the context of the Indian reservation system, 'Scheduled Caste' refers to the historically disadvantaged groups that are officially recognized and given special provisions, including reservations in education and public sector employment.

What is the significance of Article 341 in the script?

Article 341 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to specify the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, which are eligible for reservation benefits.

What was the case that brought the reservation issue to the Supreme Court in 2004?

The case that brought the reservation issue to the Supreme Court in 2004 was 'I.V. Chinnaya vs State of Andhra Pradesh'.

What was the Supreme Court's judgment in the 2004 case regarding the reservation categories?

The Supreme Court's judgment in the 2004 case stated that there was no need to create separate categories within the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, as they already constitute large communities that require reservation.

What is the principle of 'Rational Classification' mentioned in the script?

The principle of 'Rational Classification' mentioned in the script refers to the need for any classification made for the purpose of providing benefits, such as reservations, to be based on logical and reasonable criteria.

What is the role of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as discussed in the script?

The role of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, as discussed in the script, is to serve as a constitutional body that oversees the welfare and rights of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, including the implementation of reservation policies.

What is the significance of the 'Right to Equality' in the context of the reservation system discussed in the script?

The 'Right to Equality' is significant in the context of the reservation system as it is a fundamental right in the Indian Constitution that aims to prevent discrimination and ensure equal opportunities for all citizens, including those from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the division of categories within the reservation system in the recent judgment mentioned in the script?

The Supreme Court's recent judgment decided that all categories within the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes reservation system should be divided, and if any community requires reservation, it should be included within this system.

What is the role of the state in the reservation system according to the script?

According to the script, the state has the responsibility to divide the reservation system into different categories, add any new categories if needed, and ensure that the reservation system is implemented effectively.

What is the 'Majority Ruling' principle mentioned in the script in relation to the Supreme Court's decision?

The 'Majority Ruling' principle mentioned in the script refers to the decision-making process in the Supreme Court where the majority opinion among the judges determines the final judgment, which in this case was a 6:1 voting in favor of the new classification within the reservation system.