CHARGER 120W HANYA 24rb-39rb || LANGSUNG BONGKAR & CEK ISI NYA!!!
Summary
TLDRIn this video, the presenter unboxes and tests a suspiciously cheap 120W charger priced at IDR 39,000. Despite its claims of fast charging with QC 3.0 and PD, the charger underperforms and fails to deliver the promised power, with inconsistent results and no clear wattage indication. The presenter compares this charger with a reliable 120W model from Baseus, highlighting significant differences in quality and performance. The video serves as a cautionary tale for consumers, urging them to be cautious when buying low-cost chargers that might not meet safety standards or work as advertised.
Takeaways
- 😀 The charger in question claims to be 120 watts but is priced at just IDR 39,000, which raises doubts about its actual quality.
- 😀 The physical design of the charger looks decent, but it feels light and cheap, which is a red flag when considering its performance.
- 😀 The charger advertises QC 3.0 and PD (Power Delivery) support, but in testing, it fails to show accurate power output or function as expected.
- 😀 Despite claiming to deliver 120 watts, the charger does not show any wattage reading when connected to devices, indicating it may not meet its advertised specs.
- 😀 When tested with USB-A ports, the charger performs poorly, showing only red indicators instead of a proper charging connection.
- 😀 The build quality inside the charger is very basic, with subpar soldering and components, making it highly unreliable for prolonged use.
- 😀 The charger’s '120 watts' claim is misleading, as its internal components don't appear capable of delivering the promised power.
- 😀 The video emphasizes the importance of not falling for misleading marketing, especially when a product is too cheap to meet its claimed specs.
- 😀 The presenter compares this subpar charger with a reputable brand (Baseus), illustrating how real 120-watt chargers function and how they differ in quality.
- 😀 The main takeaway is to be cautious when buying inexpensive chargers that make bold claims like 'superfast charging' without offering concrete evidence or features that back it up.
- 😀 The video concludes with a reminder to prioritize your gadget’s safety and not to rely on unreliable chargers, even if they seem like a good deal.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video?
-The main focus of the video is a review of a 120W charger priced at IDR 39,000, which the reviewer finds suspicious due to its build quality and the accuracy of its claimed specifications.
What are the key concerns raised by the reviewer about the charger?
-The reviewer raises concerns about the charger being too lightweight and flimsy, its inability to display accurate wattage, and the unclear meaning of the term 'Gun' on the product. Additionally, the charger fails to live up to its 120W claim.
How does the reviewer describe the physical characteristics of the charger?
-The reviewer describes the charger as light and flimsy, weighing only 49 grams, which contributes to a sense of doubt about its reliability and durability.
Why does the reviewer question the legitimacy of the charger's claimed 120W capacity?
-The reviewer questions the legitimacy because, when plugged in, the charger fails to display the expected wattage, showing 'none' instead. This makes the claim of 120W appear misleading or false.
What does the reviewer say about the term 'Gun' on the charger?
-The reviewer is confused by the term 'Gun' written on the charger, stating that it's not explained anywhere on the product, which only adds to the confusion about its authenticity and quality.
What was the result of testing the charger's PD (Power Delivery) feature?
-The reviewer found that the charger’s PD feature works to some extent (e.g., it charges Apple devices), but it does not display the expected wattage, which is a crucial piece of information for evaluating its true performance.
How does the reviewer plan to further test and compare the 120W charger?
-The reviewer plans to compare the 120W charger with a more reliable, branded charger from Baseus in a future video to show the differences in quality and functionality.
What does the reviewer think about the pricing of the charger?
-While the price of IDR 39,000 is very low, the reviewer warns that such a cheap charger might not be worth it, especially given its questionable build quality and lack of proper fast charging capabilities.
What is the reviewer's stance on using cheap third-party chargers?
-The reviewer cautions against using cheap, unbranded chargers, especially those making unrealistic claims, as they can damage your device and fail to deliver the expected performance.
What is the purpose of the reviewer's comparison between the two chargers?
-The purpose of the comparison is to provide viewers with a clearer understanding of what a legitimate 120W charger looks like and how it performs versus a low-cost, unreliable alternative.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
Qi vs Qi2 vs MagSafe - Ultimate Wireless Charging Test!
USB-Charging Test of Dell Inspiron 15 7000 (7590) - 6 Chargers Tested
Baseus Particular Digital Display QC+PPS Dual Quick Charger Car Charger 65W Огляд + тест
iPhone 15 Pro Max Charge Test: 35W vs 30W vs 20W vs 12W vs 5W (Apple)
Best new smart charger in the market? SkyRC B6 NEO
Rp3.299 JUTA! Unboxing vivo V40 Lite Indonesia!
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)