Qi vs Qi2 vs MagSafe - Ultimate Wireless Charging Test!
Summary
TLDRIn this video script, the presenter compares different iPhone chargers, including the official Apple charger, the new ch2, and a cheaper third-party option. The test evaluates charging speeds, wattage, temperature, and overall performance. The ch2 charger, priced at $22, demonstrates impressive 15W charging capabilities and faster charging times compared to the 7.5W chargers, despite heating the phone more. The official Apple charger is found to have the lowest heat generation, but at a higher cost. The conclusion suggests that for efficiency and speed, the ch2 is a valuable option, while the Apple charger remains a preferred choice for heat management.
Takeaways
- 🔋 The new ch2 charger offers the same 15W charging capability as the official Apple charger but at a lower cost.
- 💡 The test compared charging speeds, wattage, and temperature of different chargers, including the official Apple charger, ch2, and a cheaper 7.5W option.
- 📈 The ch2 charger turned on the iPhones faster than the official Apple charger and significantly outperformed the 7.5W charger.
- 🔌 At 15 minutes, the ch2 charger charged 30% more than the original Chi, which only managed 2%.
- 🌡️ Both the 15W chargers (max safe and ch2) pulled over 18W, but ch2 maintained a faster charging rate at around 12W compared to max safe's 11W.
- 📊 The 7.5W charger had the slowest charging rate and was the last to reach 100% charge, taking 4 hours.
- 💰 The ch2 charger is priced at $22, which is a good deal considering its 15W charging capability and included 5ft cable.
- 📏 The max safe charger comes with a 3ft cable, while the cheaper 7.5W charger includes a 6ft cable with a tie.
- 🌟 The max safe charger was found to have the least heat generation overall, making it potentially better for the iPhone's battery health.
- 🔥 Contrary to expectations, faster charging (15W) was found to be better for battery health than a consistent 7.5W load, as long as charging is slowed down when the phone gets hot.
Q & A
What are the key differences between the official Apple charger, the new ch2 charger, and the 7.5W third-party chargers for iPhones?
-The official Apple charger has a 7.5W charging capacity, while the new ch2 charger offers a faster 15W charging speed. Third-party 7.5W chargers are generally cheaper but slower. The ch2 charger also comes with a longer cable and a stronger magnet compared to Apple's charger.
How did the charging speeds of the 15W chargers compare in the initial test with completely dead iPhones?
-The new ch2 charger turned on the iPhone in 2 minutes, while the official Apple charger took a minute and a half. The 7.5W charger took significantly longer, about 10 minutes, to turn on the phone.
What was the charge percentage of the iPhones after 15 minutes of charging with the different chargers?
-The official Apple charger reached 10%, the ch2 charger charged 30% more at 13%, and the original chi charger only hit 2%.
How much power do the 15W chargers pull to achieve faster charging speeds?
-Both the max safe and the chi2 chargers, which output 15W, pull just over 18 watts to achieve faster charging speeds.
What was the temperature difference observed among the chargers when used with iPhones?
-The chi2 charger hit 38 Celsius, the max safe was at 35 Celsius, and the 7.5W charger peaked at 37 degrees Celsius. The max safe charger had the least heat overall.
What is the benefit of fast charging initially and then slowing down as the phone gets hot?
-Fast charging initially followed by a slower charge when the phone gets hot appears to be better for the battery health compared to a consistent 7.5W load, as it charges the phone more quickly without causing excessive heat buildup.
How long did it take for the different chargers to charge the iPhones to 100%?
-The ch2 charger and the official Apple charger both took 3 hours to charge the iPhones to 100%, while the 7.5W charger took 4 hours.
What are the implications of using a 7.5W charger for long charging sessions?
-Using a 7.5W charger for long sessions results in slower charging times, more heat buildup in the phone, and potentially slower charging speeds as the phone tries to cool down.
What additional benefits does the official Apple charger offer over third-party chargers?
-The official Apple charger is compatible with a variety of cheap stands and holders, which third-party chargers may not fit into. It also tends to generate less heat overall, which could be beneficial for the device's battery health.
What is the price difference between the official Apple charger and the new ch2 charger?
-The official Apple charger costs $40, while the new ch2 charger is priced at $22, making it a more affordable option with faster charging capabilities.
What are the main considerations when choosing between the official Apple charger, the ch2 charger, and the 7.5W third-party chargers?
-Factors to consider include charging speed, price, cable length, build quality, heat management, and compatibility with stands and holders. The ch2 charger offers a balance of speed, affordability, and functionality, while the official Apple charger provides the best heat management and compatibility.
Outlines
🔋 Comparing iPhone Chargers: Official vs. Third-Party
This paragraph discusses a detailed comparison between official Apple chargers and third-party alternatives, specifically the new ch2 charger. The author presents a test involving the charging speeds, wattage, temperature, and overall performance of different chargers, including the official Max safe, ch2, and a 7.5-watt third-party charger. The ch2 charger demonstrates impressive results, charging faster and being more cost-effective at $22 compared to the $40 Max safe charger. The test also reveals that the 7.5-watt charger takes significantly longer to charge devices and may not be as beneficial for battery health as previously thought, due to higher temperatures recorded after 45 minutes of charging.
📈Charging Performance and Heat Dissipation Analysis
The second paragraph delves into the analysis of charging performance and heat dissipation among the tested chargers. It highlights the surprising finding that fast chargers, such as the Max safe and ch2, are able to catch up and even surpass the slower 7.5-watt charger over time. The author notes that the 7.5-watt charger, despite its slower speed, heats up the device more than the fast chargers. By the end of the test, all chargers reach 100% charge, but the 7.5-watt charger takes significantly longer. The paragraph also discusses the materials and build quality of the chargers, with the Max safe charger being cooler to the touch and potentially a better choice for temperature-conscious users. The ch2 charger, while faster and cheaper, heats the phone more due to its thicker design and less metal construction.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Mac safe Chargers
💡ch2
💡Charging Speeds
💡Wattage
💡Temperature
💡Magnetic Strength
💡Price
💡Cable Length
💡Heat Dissipation
💡Optimized Charging
💡Battery Health
Highlights
The test compares official Apple MagSafe chargers, the new Chi2 charger, and other third-party 7.5W chargers for iPhones.
The Chi2 charger, which Apple helped create, offers the same 15W charging capability at a cheaper price compared to the official MagSafe.
The test evaluates charging speeds, wattage, and temperature to determine the efficiency of different chargers.
The official MagSafe was the last to start charging but managed to turn on the iPhone in first place within a minute and a half.
The Chi2 charger took only 2 minutes to start charging and led the test in terms of charging speed.
The 7.5W chargers took significantly longer, up to 10 minutes, to turn on and start charging the iPhones.
At the 15-minute mark, the Chi2 charger charged 30% more compared to the original Chi charger that only hit 2%.
Both the 15W chargers, Chi2 and MaxSafe, can pull over 18 watts to achieve faster charging.
The original Chi1 charger maintained its full 7.5-watt output instead of throttling, unlike the 15W chargers.
The Chi2 charger costs only $22, making it a great deal compared to the more expensive Apple MagSafe.
The Chi2 charger comes with a 5-foot cable, which is more convenient than the 3-foot cable that comes with the official MagSafe.
The Chi2 charger's thickness does not necessarily help with heat dissipation as it got hotter than the other chargers during testing.
Fast charging initially followed by a slower pace when the phone gets hot appears to be better for the iPhone's battery health than a consistent 7.5-watt load.
By the 1-hour mark, the Chi2 and MaxSafe chargers were catching up to the 7.5W charger in terms of charge percentage.
After 2 hours, both Chi2 and MaxSafe chargers hit 79%, while the 7.5W charger only reached 58%.
At 2 and a half hours, the Chi2 charger took the lead with 93%, while the MaxSafe charger was at 94%.
The Chi1 charger, rated for half the output, only hit 80% after 2 hours and 45 minutes.
In the end, the Chi2 charger took the same amount of time to charge the iPhone as the official MagSafe charger, but with quicker short-term charging.
The MaxSafe charger, despite its higher cost, had the lowest heat generation among the chargers tested.
Transcripts
should you spend your money on official
Mac saave Chargers or get the brand new
ch2 which Apple helped make happen and
is actually cheaper while having the
same 15w charging instead of 7.5 with
every other third-party charger for
iPhones let me tell you that my mind was
blown when I was doing this test because
I looked at everything charging speeds
wattage temperature and I know that you
will not be expecting these results now
I tested these Max safe pucks but these
results also apply for three in-one
Chargers and car chargers because most
of them are only 7.5 unless you spend
way more money or get the new chi2 I
also ordered anor's new 15 wat Mago ch2
battery pack which is the first true 15
wat wireless battery so make sure to
subscribe for that video let's start
with the first test that really
surprised me I used three 15 Pro Maxes
which were completely dead and laid out
the charger starting with a the Maxie on
the left Then ch2 followed by the
original chap Puck I plugged them all in
into an outlet bank with a button to
turn them on to make it perfectly fair
and my first test was to see how long it
would take for the iPhones to turn on
surprisingly official Max safe was the
last one to start charging the iPhone
but when I waited for the phones to turn
on it didn't disappoint it took only
about a minute and a half to turn the
phone on being in first place following
that was the new ch2 charger which took
about 2 minutes and then started the
grueling weight for the 7.5 W charger by
the way all of these were plugged into
identical 30 W Taurus T ice power
adapters to make sure there are no
differences and more than enough power
for the Chargers time was going and I
was getting tired of holding the camera
starting to think that I had a bad 7.5
watt Puck but it was working and the
last 15 Pro Max finally turned on after
a crazy long 10 minutes so we have a
huge difference in the time it takes for
your phone to turn on so you can
actually use it then of course I made
sure the brightness levels were the same
and the phones were set to do not
disturb mode and I turned off the always
on display to make sure we have no
differences at 15 minutes I logged the
charge percentage and maave hit 10% ch2
charged 30% more at 133% while the
original Chi only hit an embarrassing 2%
now if you think it was broken like I
did just wait a little bit both the max
safe and anchors magoi 2 which output 15
wats will pull just over 18 watts to
make this happen but at roughly the 20
minute Mark I couldn't believe that they
are both throttled already with maxi
pulling around 11 Watts but ch2 was
pulling 12 which is why it is charging
faster now you would think that the
original ch1 would be pulling about half
of that but it wasn't it was pulling
over eight so was still maintaining its
full 7.5 watt output instead of
throttling at the 30-minute Mark Maxi
hit 22% but ch2 was able to hit 26 so
it's clearly taking the lead and chi1
was at a measly 12% but that's to be
expected because it's half of the rated
output nowadays 7.5 WT pucks are cheap
and this one only cost 13 bucks compared
to 40 for Max safe but now that ch2 is
out and it's 15 watts you can get one
for only 22 bucks so it is a great deal
compared to Apples Max safe also only
comes with a 3-ft cable which could be
limiting if you want to use your phone
while charging compared to 5 ft with
anchors and the cheap one actually gives
you a 6t cable with this little tie so
that is nice now both apples and anchors
are made out of metal while the cheap
one is plastic and another difference is
how thick these things are the max8 Puck
is very thin compared to the others and
anchor is about twice the thickness so I
thought it would help dissipate heat
better but using my thermal camera you
could see how much more heat was
transferred and trapped to the iPhone
with the anchor it hit 38 celsius
compared to 35 for the others at their
hottest spot and maxafe was actually
having the least heat overall as you
could see in the thermal video at the
45-minute Mark both Max safe and ch2
gained 11% while chi1 G9 which is not
surprisingly bad because it is rated for
half now most people say that slow
charging is better for your iPhone's
battery health because it will have less
heat so some people actually buy these
cheaper 7.5 Watts because of that slower
charging but what shocked me was that
when I tested the heat after 45 minutes
the 7.5 watt cheat was actually the
hottest now at 37° C followed by the
faster 36° ch2 and Max safe being the
coolest at
34° and with much less heat spreading
around so it looks like you're actually
better off doing fast charging at first
and then slowly tapering off when the
phones get hot than having a consistent
7.5 watt load now I did not expect that
at all and there will be a few more
surprises coming out after 1 hour max sa
started to catch up with chi2 being at
43% compared to 45 with original Chi
hitting 28% gaining only 7% in 15
minutes and I think that is because of
heat at 1 hour and 15 minutes we have
53% and 54% for the fast Chargers and
only 33 for the 7.5 watt so at this
point it is already about half an hour
behind in the next 15 minutes
surprisingly all three gain 9% so looks
like the phone's cooled off a bit and
we're all charging at roughly 7.5 Watts
at the 1 hour and 45 minute Mark we have
71% 7 22% and 50 for G1 fun fact if you
using a wired USBC cable you would hit
50% in just 30 minutes at 2 hours max a
finally caught up with ch2 and both hit
79% and 58 for the slow one now 15
minutes later we have 87 87 and 67 so
7.5 watt is consistenly about 20% behind
which at least isn't half the speed like
some might think after 2 and 1/2 hours
max saafe actually took the lead at 94%
compared to 93 and 73 and at 2 hours and
45 chi1 finally hit 80% where charging
speed start to slow down while the
others were almost done at 97 and 96 now
the most insane thing is that in the
next 15 minutes chi1 only gained 1% and
no optimized charging was disabled on
all these phones I think it was just
chilling trying to cool down down the
others were almost charged and then just
after the 3-hour mark they both hit 100%
compared to 81 so for those of you
curious folks ch2 takes the same amount
of time to charge your phone as Max
saave does and in the short term it is
actually quicker which is nice it also
costs only 22 bucks which is a bargain
and the magnet is actually stronger than
Apples and it also comes with that 5T
cable but it definitely Heats your phone
more when and I would expect it to be
cooler being this thick I think that the
inside of it might be more Hollow just
like the cheap G1 Chargers and it
actually uses less metal than Max safe
so I think more of the heat just stays
in your phone with that said I measured
the temps of the pucks themselves right
when the first two hit 100% And maxfe
was a lot cooler overall and it peaked
at 35 watt CSUS compared to 37 for the
other two so if you care about
temperatures you should definitely stick
with genuine Max safe unless you find a
cooler uh that comes with some of these
Chi ones some of them have fans like
esrs now the other benefit of Max safe
is that there are ton of cheap stands
and holders that they will fit into
where the third-party ones won't now the
7.5 wat1 hit 86% at 3 hours and 15
minutes and it basically just crawled in
charging speed finally reach ing 100%
after 4 hours of charging with that it
heated up the phone more so than the
others and it took absolutely forever
for the phone to turn on when we first
started the test so even though it only
cost 13 bucks there is no way that I
would recommend it when anker's new mag
GOI 2 only cost $9 more by the way I
bought all of these myself and no brands
are sponsoring this video so if you want
to pick up one of these I'll just go
ahead and Link them down below now let
me know your thoughts and make sure you
subscribe to see how Apple's Max safe
battery pack which they themselves limit
to 7.5 Watts compares to anor's new 15
wat mag go Che 2 battery pack which cost
less money click right up there to
subscribe and check out one of those
excellent videos right over there this
has been Max and I'll see you in the
next
[Music]
video
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)