Kipas angin 300 ribu vs Kipas angin 13 JUTA!!!

Summary

In this video, David compares two drastically different fans: the Cosmos Wadesta (priced at 300k IDR) and the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 (priced at nearly 13 million IDR). He unboxes and reviews both, highlighting the Cosmos as a reliable budget fan with strong airflow, while the Dyson stands out for its sleek, bladeless design, air purification technology, and premium features. Despite its luxury appeal, David questions whether the Dyson is worth the 40x price difference, emphasizing its design and prestige more than its functional advantages over the Cosmos.

Takeaways

• 👋 Introduction: David introduces two fans, Cosmos Wadesta for 300,000 IDR and Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 for nearly 13 million IDR.
• 💰 Price Comparison: There's a significant price difference between the two fans, with Dyson being 40 times more expensive than Cosmos.
• 🤔 Curiosity: David expresses curiosity about the Dyson fan's performance and design, especially its bladeless technology.
• 📦 Unboxing Cosmos: He starts by unboxing the Cosmos Wadesta fan, highlighting its features like the super spread blades and SNI certification.
• 🌀 Performance: The Cosmos fan is known for its strong airflow and has a 3-in-1 mounting capability (wall, desk, floor).
• 📜 Nostalgia: David reminisces about seeing Cosmos Wadesta ads on TV over ten years ago, showing its long-standing presence in the market.
• 📦 Unboxing Dyson: He then unboxes the Dyson fan, noting its sleek design, lightweight build, and advanced packaging.
• 🛠️ Technology: Dyson's technology includes Air Multiplier and HEPA filtration, capable of filtering 99.97% of particles, including formaldehyde.
• 🌬️ Airflow: Dyson’s airflow is described as elegant and widespread, compared to Cosmos’s more focused and stronger direct airflow.
• 🔋 Energy Efficiency: Dyson is more energy-efficient, consuming significantly less power than Cosmos.
• 📈 Features: Dyson includes additional features like app connectivity, air purification, and a smooth oscillation mechanism.
• 🏠 Target Audience: Dyson is ideal for high-income individuals or those with highly aesthetic homes, while Cosmos offers great value for general use.
• 🔍 Conclusion: Dyson excels in design and additional features but at a high cost, whereas Cosmos provides powerful airflow at an affordable price.

Q & A

What are the two types of fans compared in the video?

The video compares the Cosmos Wadesta fan, which costs around 300,000 IDR, with the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 fan, priced at nearly 13 million IDR.

Why is the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 significantly more expensive than the Cosmos Wadesta?

The Dyson fan is more expensive due to its advanced technology, research and development, brand prestige, and features like air purification and bladeless design.

What key feature makes the Dyson fan stand out in terms of design?

The Dyson fan has a bladeless design, which creates airflow using the 'Air Multiplier Technology,' making it look sleek and different from traditional fans.

How does the Cosmos Wadesta fan perform in terms of airflow?

The Cosmos Wadesta fan delivers strong airflow, with a speed of around 3m/s on level 1, which is already quite powerful for a basic fan.

What additional functionality does the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 offer compared to the Cosmos fan?

Besides being a fan, the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 also functions as an air purifier, filtering out particles and harmful gases like formaldehyde.

What kind of air filtration system does the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 use?

The Dyson fan uses a HEPA 13 filter, which can capture 99.97% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, including pollutants like smoke and formaldehyde.

How is the airflow generated in the Dyson Purifier Cool TP 09 if it is bladeless?

The Dyson fan uses hidden internal blades that push air through the base, which is then amplified and directed through small slits, creating smooth airflow.

What is the difference in power consumption between the Cosmos Wadesta and Dyson fans?

The Cosmos Wadesta consumes around 40-53 watts, depending on the speed, while the Dyson uses only about 3.7 watts on low and up to 30 watts on its highest setting.

What does the creator suggest about the practicality of the Dyson fan for average users?

The creator suggests that while the Dyson fan is elegant and advanced, it's only practical for users who prioritize aesthetics and technology, or those with high incomes, as its primary value lies in design and luxury.

What personal memory does the creator share while assembling the Cosmos Wadesta fan?

The creator recalls helping their mother clean the blades of a similar fan when they were a child, which they now connect to their current interest in building things like PCs.