"Obama Belongs In Jail!" Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Entire Russiagate Hoax

Summary

This video script discusses the controversial RussiaGate narrative, alleging that top U.S. intelligence officials like Brennan, Comey, and Clapper orchestrated a false narrative about Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. It highlights how this misinformation influenced key political events such as the Mueller investigation, the Ukraine impeachment, and President Trump’s inauguration. The script also touches on declassified documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, which further suggest that this effort was a politically motivated attempt to undermine Trump's presidency from the start. The story is framed as an example of elite manipulation to prevent his success.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Russia Gate narrative was largely based on false intelligence assessments pushed by the Obama administration to undermine Donald Trump's presidency.
• 😀 Despite initial intelligence reports stating that Russia did not hack the 2016 election, Obama officials pushed for a new assessment that contradicted this conclusion.
• 😀 The leaked Steele dossier, which was discredited, was used as a source in the intelligence assessment that accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 election.
• 😀 The Obama administration's efforts to politicize intelligence led to a years-long media campaign and political investigation against President Trump, starting before his inauguration.
• 😀 Donald Trump claims that the Obama administration orchestrated a treasonous plot to sabotage his presidency, accusing Obama and others like Hillary Clinton of being involved.
• 😀 Tulsi Gabbard, now Director of National Intelligence, released declassified documents confirming the coordinated efforts by high-ranking officials to create a false narrative of Russian interference.
• 😀 There was a deliberate effort to shield former President Obama from scrutiny, with media outlets complicit in covering up his involvement in the Russia Gate narrative.
• 😀 Despite widespread media claims about Russian interference, no concrete evidence linking Trump to Russia was ever found during the investigations, including the Mueller Report.
• 😀 The origin of the Russia Gate narrative can be traced back to the Clinton campaign’s strategy of accusing Trump of collusion with Russia, amplified by the media.
• 😀 The Russia Gate saga escalated with the creation of a new, politicized intelligence report in December 2016, which was then used as a basis for ongoing investigations against Trump.

Q & A

What was the core claim made by the transcript regarding the RussiaGate narrative?

The core claim is that the RussiaGate narrative, which alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, was fabricated by top officials in the U.S. government, including the CIA, FBI, and Obama's White House, as part of a coordinated operation to undermine President Trump's presidency.

What was the intelligence community's initial stance on Russian election interference before the 2016 election results were finalized?

Before the 2016 election results were finalized, the intelligence community found no evidence that Russia had the intent or capability to hack U.S. elections. However, this assessment was reportedly buried after President Trump's victory.

What significant event on December 8, 2016, changed the narrative around Russian election interference?

On December 8, 2016, top U.S. intelligence officials prepared an assessment stating that Russia did not affect the election results through cyber attacks. However, this assessment was abruptly pulled, and a new intelligence assessment was created under pressure from the Obama administration, claiming Russian interference.

How did the media play a role in propagating the RussiaGate narrative?

The media, particularly through leaks from anonymous intelligence sources, played a crucial role in amplifying the RussiaGate narrative. They reported that Russia interfered to help Trump win, despite there being little to no concrete evidence supporting these claims.

What role did the Steele Dossier play in the RussiaGate narrative?

The Steele Dossier, a compilation of allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia, was used by intelligence officials to back up the claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election. The dossier was later revealed to be unreliable and baseless, but it was instrumental in shaping the narrative.

What does Tulsi Gabbard’s involvement in the recent declassification of documents indicate?

Tulsi Gabbard, as the director of national intelligence, recently declassified documents that revealed how the RussiaGate hoax was orchestrated within the U.S. government, shedding light on the actions of Obama administration officials who allegedly worked to subvert Trump’s presidency.

What does Donald Trump's response to the declassified documents suggest about his stance on the RussiaGate narrative?

Donald Trump has called for investigations into President Obama and other individuals involved in the RussiaGate narrative, asserting that the entire operation was a form of treason and a deliberate attempt to steal the 2016 election from him.

Why did some intelligence officials, like Admiral Rogers of the NSA, disagree with the new assessment on Russian interference?

Admiral Rogers, along with other dissenting officials, disagreed with the new assessment because it lacked substantial evidence. The NSA, which monitors vast amounts of signals intelligence, reportedly found no proof that Russia had interfered in the election, but these concerns were ignored in favor of the politicized narrative.

How did the 2016 DNC email leaks contribute to the emergence of the RussiaGate narrative?

The DNC email leaks, which were attributed to Russian hacking, revealed internal conflicts within the Democratic Party, including attempts to undermine Bernie Sanders' candidacy. The leaks were framed by the media and political figures as evidence of Russian interference, despite the lack of direct evidence linking Russia to the hacks.

What is the significance of the media’s portrayal of Russian involvement in the 2016 election, especially regarding RT (Russia Today)?

The media's portrayal of Russian involvement was heavily influenced by narratives that included RT's role in the election. The media claimed that RT's coverage of the election was a form of foreign interference, which was used to justify broader claims of Russian attempts to meddle in U.S. politics.