Panorama : Scandal at the Post Office BBC Documentary 2020

smartC
12 Jun 202029:11

Summary

TLDRThe video script details a scandal involving the UK's Post Office, where hundreds of postmasters were wrongfully accused of stealing money due to bugs in the Horizon computer system. Despite internal knowledge of these issues, the Post Office pursued prosecutions, leading to imprisonment and financial ruin for many. A campaign by affected postmasters, bolstered by investigative journalism, eventually led to a High Court ruling acknowledging the system's flaws. The Post Office has agreed to pay £58 million in compensation, and the Court of Appeal is reviewing dozens of convictions. The scandal has raised serious questions about corporate accountability and the need for transparency and justice within institutions.

Takeaways

  • 📰 The Post Office scandal involved the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of postmasters for alleged theft, based on faulty evidence from a flawed computer system called Horizon.
  • 🚨 Post Office management was aware of the Horizon system's vulnerabilities and yet accused staff of stealing, leading to severe consequences including imprisonment.
  • 💻 The Horizon computer system was known to have bugs that could cause discrepancies in financial accounts, but the Post Office continued to use it as evidence against postmasters.
  • 🤫 There was a culture of secrecy within the Post Office, and they were criticized for their lack of transparency and denial of the system's flaws.
  • 💰 The Post Office has agreed to pay £58 million in compensation and legal fees, but the extent of the scandal suggests that more may be owed to those affected.
  • 🏛️ The Court of Appeal is reviewing the convictions of 47 postmasters, and the Post Office is reassessing 900 prosecutions that may have involved flawed Horizon evidence.
  • 🤔 The scandal raises questions about the integrity of the Post Office's leadership and its commitment to justice and transparency.
  • 📉 Public trust in the Post Office has been severely damaged by the scandal, with calls for a public inquiry into the institution's actions.
  • 🛡️ The Post Office's refusal to acknowledge the Horizon system's issues and to provide adequate support to postmasters has had devastating effects on the accused and their families.
  • 📋 Internal documents and evidence indicate that the Post Office was aware of the Horizon system's problems but chose not to disclose this information, leading to potential cover-ups.
  • 🚨 The case highlights the importance of robust oversight and accountability in institutions, especially when they hold the power to significantly impact individuals' lives.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is a national scandal involving the Post Office, where hundreds of postmasters were wrongly accused of stealing money due to bugs and errors in the Horizon computer system.

  • What was the role of the Horizon computer system in this scandal?

    -The Horizon computer system was used by the Post Office to manage accounts and transactions. However, it had bugs and errors that caused discrepancies, making it appear as though money had gone missing, leading to false accusations against postmasters.

  • What was the consequence for the postmasters who were wrongly accused?

    -Many postmasters were jailed, some were forced to pay back large sums of money, and their lives were severely impacted, with some losing their homes and others experiencing personal and professional ruin.

  • How did the Post Office respond to the scandal when it first emerged?

    -Initially, the Post Office denied any wrongdoing and insisted that the Horizon system was robust. They accused postmasters of theft and continued to prosecute them, despite evidence of the system's flaws.

  • What was the outcome of the High Court case brought by 557 postmasters?

    -The High Court ruled in favor of the postmasters, finding that bugs in the Horizon system could make it look like money had disappeared. The Post Office was criticized for its culture of secrecy and for insisting on the system's reliability despite evidence to the contrary.

  • What compensation has been agreed upon for the affected postmasters?

    -The Post Office has agreed to pay £58 million in compensation and legal fees. Additionally, the Court of Appeal will review the convictions of 47 postmasters, and 900 prosecutions may involve Verizon evidence.

  • What was the role of the BBC Panorama programme in uncovering the scandal?

    -The BBC Panorama programme played a crucial role by presenting evidence of remote access to the Horizon system without postmasters' knowledge, which was later deemed significant in the High Court case and contributed to the postmasters' victory.

  • What did the investigators, Second Sight, uncover during their investigation?

    -Second Sight, the independent investigators appointed by the Post Office, uncovered evidence suggesting a cover-up within the Post Office. They found that legal files were withheld, and there was evidence of remote access to postmasters' accounts, which was not disclosed to the accused postmasters during their trials.

  • What was the reaction of Paula Vennells, the former CEO of the Post Office, to the scandal?

    -Paula Vennells expressed regret over the situation and the impact on the colleagues and their families. However, she did not provide direct answers to questions regarding her tenure and the Post Office's actions during the scandal.

  • What are the demands from the public and politicians regarding this scandal?

    -There are calls for a public inquiry into the scandal, with demands for transparency, accountability, and justice for the affected postmasters. Politicians and the public want to see those responsible held accountable for the miscarriage of justice.

  • What steps is the Post Office taking in response to the scandal?

    -The Post Office has launched a scheme to offer redress for those who may have experienced shortfalls due to the Horizon system. The new leadership is promising fundamental change and greater transparency to address the issues raised by the scandal.

Outlines

00:00

📰 Post Office Scandal: Lives Ruined by Faulty System

The first paragraph discusses a national scandal involving the Post Office, where hundreds of lives were ruined due to a faulty computer system that made money appear to go missing. Postmasters were accused of stealing, and some were jailed. The Horizon computer system was at the center of the issue, with evidence suggesting that the Post Office was aware of its flaws yet continued to prosecute staff. The narrative follows individuals like Janet Skinner, who was sentenced to jail despite her insistence on innocence. The scandal is described as potentially one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in British history.

05:00

💼 The Post Office's Culture of Secrecy and Miscarriages of Justice

This paragraph delves into the Post Office's culture of secrecy and the consequences it had on postmasters. The Horizon system's bugs were proven in court to cause discrepancies, leading to the Post Office agreeing to pay £58 million in compensation. The Court of Appeal is set to review the convictions of 47 postmasters. The Post Office's initial denial and subsequent admission of the Horizon system's issues are highlighted, along with the revelation that the Department for Post Office Affairs was aware of problems with the system, which was not disclosed to those affected.

10:02

🤔 Cover-Up Allegations and the Search for Truth

The third paragraph focuses on allegations of a cover-up within the Post Office regarding the Horizon system's problems. Internal documents reveal a pattern of errors and a lack of transparency, with postmasters like Alan Bates fighting to prove the system's flaws. The post office's refusal to release legal files to independent investigators is also mentioned, suggesting a deliberate obstruction of justice. The narrative includes accounts from those who have suffered as a result of the scandal and the ongoing quest for the truth and justice.

15:04

🚨 Uncovering the Truth: The Role of Legal Files and Evidence Suppression

This section discusses the critical role of legal files and the suppression of evidence in the scandal. It tells the story of Seema Mishra, a postmaster who was wrongfully convicted of theft, highlighting how key evidence that could have proven her innocence was withheld from her trial. The paragraph also describes how an email from the Post Office security team about a bug in the Horizon system was not disclosed, which could have impacted the outcome of her case and others. The post office's denial of any wrongdoing and its claim to have always accepted legal obligations are also covered.

20:04

🛠️ Remote Access and the Integrity of the Horizon System

The fifth paragraph uncovers the possibility of remote access to the Horizon system, which could have allowed financial records to be altered without postmasters' knowledge. This revelation points to potential human error or theft by those with secret access. Despite initial denials, evidence presented was crucial to the postmasters' victory in the High Court. The Post Office's subsequent admission of misleading statements and the Ernst & Young report from 2011, which warned of Fujitsu staff's unrestricted access, are also detailed. The paragraph concludes with the Post Office's commitment to reviewing its disclosure practices.

25:04

🏛️ Calls for Accountability and a Public Inquiry

The final paragraph addresses the demand for accountability and transparency from the Post Office, with calls for a public inquiry into the scandal. It discusses the impact on the lives of those affected, including imprisonment and loss of livelihoods. The paragraph highlights the government's stance on the issue, the Post Office's new leadership promising change, and the refusal of the former CEO, Paula Vennells, to answer questions regarding her tenure. The victims' insistence on uncovering the truth and holding someone accountable is emphasized, with the story serving as a stark reminder of the importance of justice and integrity in national institutions.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Post Office Scandal

The Post Office Scandal refers to a situation where the UK's Post Office wrongly accused and prosecuted hundreds of postmasters for alleged financial discrepancies, which were later found to be caused by faults in the Post Office's Horizon computer system. This scandal is the central theme of the video, highlighting a grave injustice.

💡Horizon Computer System

The Horizon Computer System is the software used by the Post Office to manage its branch accounts. It is central to the scandal as the system's bugs and errors led to false accusations of theft against postmasters. The system's flaws are a primary focus of the video's investigation.

💡False Accusations

False Accusations are the wrongful charges of theft brought against postmasters by the Post Office based on the flawed Horizon system's data. These accusations are a key element of the scandal, as they led to severe consequences for the accused, including imprisonment and financial ruin.

💡Postmasters

Postmasters are the managers of individual post offices. In the context of the video, they are the victims of the scandal, having been wrongly accused of financial crimes due to the Horizon system's defects. Their stories form the human narrative of the injustices uncovered.

💡Compensation

Compensation refers to the financial remedy provided to those who have suffered a loss or injury. In the video, the Post Office agreed to pay £58 million in compensation and legal fees to the affected postmasters, reflecting an acknowledgment of the harm caused.

💡Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal is a judicial body that reviews the convictions of individuals, especially in cases where new evidence or procedural errors have come to light. In the video, it is mentioned as the entity that will review the convictions of 47 postmasters, potentially rectifying past injustices.

💡Cover-up

A cover-up is an attempt to hide the truth or conceal wrongdoing. The video suggests that the Post Office may have engaged in a cover-up by not disclosing known issues with the Horizon system and by allegedly altering legal files and evidence, which contributed to the wrongful convictions.

💡Whistleblower

A whistleblower is an individual who exposes illegal, unethical, or incorrect practices, especially within an organization. In the context of the video, a whistleblower from Fujitsu, the company that ran the Horizon system, revealed that financial records could be altered remotely, which was a significant revelation in the case.

💡Redress Scheme

A redress scheme is a system established to provide remedies for those who have been wronged. The Post Office launched such a scheme to offer compensation to postmasters affected by the Horizon system's issues, indicating a step towards acknowledging and rectifying the scandal.

💡Public Inquiry

A public inquiry is an official investigation conducted into a particular matter of public interest or concern. The video mentions calls for a public inquiry into the Post Office scandal to fully uncover the extent of the wrongdoing and to hold those responsible accountable.

💡Accountability

Accountability is the obligation to report, explain, and be responsible for one's actions. In the video, the demand for accountability is expressed by those affected by the scandal, as they seek to ensure that the individuals and entities responsible for the injustices are held responsible.

Highlights

The Post Office scandal has been described as one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in British history.

Hundreds of postmasters were prosecuted over missing money, with evidence coming from a faulty Post Office computer system called Horizon.

Post Office management accused staff of stealing, despite knowing that the Horizon system could cause money to go missing on its own.

Postmasters were jailed and faced financial ruin, with some being forced to pay back large sums based on the system's errors.

A ten-year investigation revealed a culture of secrecy and denial within the Post Office regarding the Horizon system's flaws.

Janet Skinner, a postmaster, was jailed for nine months after the Horizon system showed discrepancies in her accounts.

Alan Bates, a former postmaster, spent 20 years fighting to prove that Horizon's bugs caused money to vanish from his post office.

557 postmasters took the Post Office to court, resulting in the Post Office agreeing to pay £58 million in compensation and legal fees.

The Court of Appeal is reviewing the convictions of 47 postmasters, including those featured in the program.

Internal documents show that the Post Office was aware of serious problems with Horizon, contradicting their claims that the system was robust.

A whistleblower revealed that Fujitsu staff could change financial records remotely without postmasters' knowledge, affecting account balances.

The Post Office initially denied the possibility of remote access but later admitted to misleading the court.

The Horizon system's errors and the Post Office's handling of the scandal led to a national outcry and calls for a public inquiry.

Paula Vennells, who ran the Post Office during the scandal, expressed regret but did not address specific questions about the Post Office's actions.

The Post Office has launched a scheme to provide redress for those affected and is promising greater transparency and fundamental change.

Politicians and victims are demanding accountability, with some calling for a judge-led public inquiry into the scandal.

The scandal has transformed a much-loved national institution into a national disgrace, with lives shattered by the Post Office's actions.

Transcripts

play00:02

tonight on panorama shocking new

play00:05

evidence about a national scandal I've

play00:08

never heard of anything like it at all

play00:09

it's a quite extraordinary story we

play00:14

reveal how the post office ruined

play00:16

hundreds of lives

play00:18

they're been lying not just of the

play00:20

supposed must have to everybody they've

play00:23

been lying from day one the post office

play00:26

knew its computer system could make

play00:28

money go missing but they accuse staff

play00:31

of stealing anyway

play00:32

it's chilling I mean my blood run cold

play00:35

and postmasters were jailed because

play00:38

bosses kept the truth from coming out

play00:40

okay cool

play00:42

it's kind of injustice on people and

play00:45

then just walk away with it scot-free

play00:49

[Music]

play01:07

for ten years I've been investigating a

play01:10

scandal at one of our most loved

play01:12

institutions it may turn out to be one

play01:15

of the biggest miscarriages of justice

play01:17

in British history the post office

play01:20

prosecuted hundreds of postmasters over

play01:23

missing money post masters like Janet

play01:27

Skinner and then just repeatedly ask me

play01:42

the same questions did you steal the

play01:44

money have you taken the money have you

play01:47

borrowed the money

play01:48

I've lent the money to some of the day

play01:52

the evidence against the postmasters

play01:54

came from the post offices computer

play01:56

system horizon in 2006 it showed 21,000

play02:05

pounds missing from Janet's till

play02:10

she panicked and hid the shortfall in

play02:12

her accounts while she tried to work out

play02:14

what has happened

play02:17

I knew that I hadn't done anything wrong

play02:19

and I just thought it's the problem

play02:23

it'll come back so what happened next

play02:26

week it just doubled and then it just

play02:29

got beyond the point where it was like

play02:33

had just buried my head in the sand and

play02:36

I didn't know what to do to be honest

play02:39

[Music]

play02:42

when auditors arrived at Janet's branch

play02:45

horizons showed fifty nine thousand

play02:48

pounds was missing the post office

play02:52

charged her with theft and false

play02:53

accounting then they offered her lawyer

play02:55

a deal he said if you will accept the

play03:03

guilty plea for frame false accounting

play03:05

they'll drop the theft charge - and then

play03:11

I said well what does that mean say I

play03:13

said well it means she probably were

play03:15

we're looking at a custodial sentence

play03:17

and so I said well I'll do that then

play03:22

Janee because I didn't want to go to

play03:24

jail

play03:25

[Music]

play03:28

but Janet did go to jail she got a

play03:32

nine-month sentence

play03:33

[Music]

play03:34

on her first night inside she was

play03:37

allowed to call home

play03:38

I remember fun tickets

play03:45

[Music]

play03:48

what were they saying to you and all of

play03:57

them me sir she's a lot command Co he

play04:04

well you're not going to see me so I

play04:08

don't miss growing up without memory of

play04:10

me post masters were told they had total

play04:17

control of their horizon accounts so

play04:20

when money went missing the post office

play04:23

said it was their fault but what if the

play04:27

computer made mistakes there's a very

play04:30

early one of me in 2000 even a lot

play04:33

younger in those days so I think that

play04:36

was the first time we ever had to

play04:37

anything in print which was December

play04:38

2003 2003 former postmaster Alan Bates

play04:46

has spent 20 years trying to prove

play04:48

horizon made money vanish from his post

play04:51

office

play04:52

there's a lovely quote from you here I'm

play04:55

going to fight this for as long as it

play04:57

takes because of the grave injustice I

play05:00

feel has been done to myself

play05:01

and the people have Craigie done in the

play05:04

way my contract was terminated great

play05:05

fight this for as long as it takes and

play05:07

yeah unfortunately I seem to be living

play05:10

up to my word team in two decades on

play05:16

Allen was sacked after refusing to pay

play05:19

back money horizon said was missing he

play05:24

was one of the first to argue that

play05:25

computer bugs were responsible but the

play05:29

post office wouldn't listen I've always

play05:32

felt that they've been trying to keep it

play05:34

covered up the whole thing covered up

play05:36

about the condition of the system how

play05:38

many people are sitting on the truth of

play05:41

what they knew at the time it has to

play05:44

come out now there are so many people

play05:46

who have suffered over the years with

play05:47

all of this and there are probably so

play05:50

many more out there that we haven't

play05:51

heard from yet more postmasters joined

play05:58

Allen's campaign I've met dozens of them

play06:03

over the years like Sue Knight who was a

play06:07

respected member of her church and local

play06:10

community she lost her home those

play06:15

Toffees had no idea what them or knoll

play06:22

thomas he was accused of stealing fifty

play06:25

thousand pounds they waited for a

play06:28

suspended sentence and he said take him

play06:30

down

play06:32

I spent my 60th birthday in Christian or

play06:38

Joe Hamilton whose customers raise

play06:40

thousands to pay off the money she was

play06:42

accused of stealing we're not gonna stop

play06:46

until they actually address what they've

play06:49

done and be helped to account for what

play06:51

they've done

play06:56

[Music]

play06:58

557 postmasters took the post office to

play07:01

court

play07:02

[Music]

play07:04

some had been jailed and some had been

play07:06

forced to pay back large sums of money

play07:08

the computer said was missing horizon

play07:12

was put on trial and the postmasters

play07:15

were proved right

play07:19

bugs in the computer system could make

play07:22

it look like money had disappeared the

play07:24

judge has found that on numerous

play07:26

occasions over the years

play07:28

bugs errors and defects in the horizon

play07:31

system caused discrepancies in

play07:34

postmasters branch accounts

play07:40

the judge criticized the post office for

play07:43

insisting horizon was robust when the

play07:45

evidence proved it wasn't this approach

play07:48

by the post office has amounted in

play07:51

reality to bear assertions and denials

play07:54

that ignore what has actually occurred

play07:56

it amounts to the twenty-first century

play07:59

equivalent of maintaining that the earth

play08:02

is flat the judge found that there was

play08:07

an excessive culture of secrecy within

play08:10

post office and that definitely

play08:12

reflected our experience of dealing with

play08:14

them it was very difficult to get things

play08:16

out they held all the cards and they

play08:19

weren't exactly putting them down on the

play08:22

table face up

play08:23

[Music]

play08:25

the post office has agreed to pay 58

play08:28

million pounds in compensation and legal

play08:31

fees but that may just be the start the

play08:35

Court of Appeal will now review the

play08:36

convictions of 47 post masters including

play08:39

all the convicted post masters featured

play08:41

in this program the post office is also

play08:44

assessing 900 prosecution's that may

play08:47

involve Verizon evidence this is

play08:50

potentially a huge miscarriage of

play08:52

justice and I support fully the demands

play08:56

of people who are affected by it get

play08:58

answers are now finally I hope we're on

play09:00

the verge of getting justice and closure

play09:03

for the people affected by this

play09:05

miscarriage of justice the post office

play09:11

says the court found the risk of bugs

play09:13

affecting balances in older versions of

play09:16

horizon was greater than post office

play09:18

believed it does not mean every

play09:21

shortfall was caused by a bug and each

play09:24

case would need to be determined on the

play09:25

full evidence the post office should

play09:28

have done more to investigate the risk

play09:30

and provide more help to postmasters

play09:33

that is something we deeply regret

play09:38

[Music]

play09:42

the High Court case has given me the

play09:45

chance to finally get to the truth I got

play09:49

access to dozens of internal documents

play09:54

they show problems with horizon coming

play09:56

up time and time again these documents

play10:02

show that post office knew there were

play10:04

serious problems with horizon so when

play10:06

they service system was very bust that

play10:08

wasn't true the people's lives have been

play10:10

destroyed because of that

play10:13

they show error after error logged by

play10:16

the IT firm running the system some bugs

play10:21

made it look as if money had gone

play10:23

missing

play10:24

these messages show the post office

play10:27

known as pole was told but they carried

play10:31

on prosecuting postmasters anyway

play10:37

there were bugs that affected horizon

play10:39

before Janet Skinner was accused of

play10:42

stealing we've uncovered farthest that

play10:45

demonstrates the post office knew about

play10:48

bugs in horizon well before they

play10:51

prosecuted you we should have been aware

play10:54

made aware of the system failings that

play10:57

was going on there just didn't tell

play11:00

anybody

play11:00

do you think the Department of

play11:01

prosecuting you were aware yes horizon

play11:05

had bugs and force yeah oh yeah and

play11:08

they're just obviously just ignored it

play11:12

[Music]

play11:17

the lawyer who advised Janet to plead

play11:20

guilty is now a Labour MP

play11:24

he says they should never have been put

play11:26

in that position by the post office

play11:29

that realization that Janet Skinner

play11:33

perhaps shouldn't have been in the

play11:34

situation that she was in how did you

play11:36

react personally was chilling I mean my

play11:38

blood ran cold we now know she should

play11:41

never have been prosecuted in the first

play11:44

place she went to prison a life was

play11:46

absolutely categorically ruined those

play11:49

problems that they knew about then there

play11:52

were not disclosing any of that at the

play11:54

time and we now know we certainly

play11:57

suspect strongly that those corporate

play11:59

cover-up this is the woman who ran the

play12:04

post office for almost a decade

play12:09

all of ennals always insisted she wanted

play12:12

to get to the truth about horizon we are

play12:17

a business that does genuinely care

play12:19

about the people that work for us and if

play12:21

there had been any miscarriages of

play12:23

justice it would have been really

play12:25

important to me in the post office slip

play12:27

that we actually surface those

play12:29

politicians have tried to hold her to

play12:31

account went along to the post office

play12:37

headquarters and met all of an owl's the

play12:41

chief executive of the post office and

play12:43

we said we can't go on like this this

play12:47

has got to be sorted out there's a real

play12:49

problem here the response we got was

play12:52

actually very encouraging they said

play12:54

we'll do this properly we'll get to the

play12:56

bottom of it

play12:59

in 2012 the post office appointed

play13:02

independent investigators called second

play13:05

sight to look at the postmasters

play13:07

complaints about horizon they were

play13:09

promised full cooperation

play13:12

I made it completely clear to the

play13:17

chairman and chief exec that this was

play13:21

not an investigation I was remotely

play13:23

interested in carrying out unless they

play13:26

were committed to the seat to the search

play13:28

for the truth that's the only way we

play13:30

operate well there was the famous feed

play13:32

phrase seek the truths at all costs but

play13:38

the post office is independent

play13:40

investigators soon suspected there was a

play13:42

problem with the convictions out of all

play13:45

of the cases that we looked at I don't

play13:47

think we ever came across a single

play13:49

example where the proceeds of crime so

play13:54

to speak had ever been identified in any

play13:58

form of satisfactory way I might have

play14:00

expected to hear about an expensive

play14:04

holiday or a flash car war or something

play14:06

like that we saw nothing to indicate

play14:09

that if money had been stolen that it

play14:12

had been used to benefit the sub

play14:14

postmaster although their immediate

play14:16

family

play14:19

Second Sight were initially given access

play14:22

to internal legal files but then the

play14:24

post office stopped handing them over

play14:27

the investigators told em piece we

play14:33

unsurprisingly asked for full access to

play14:36

those legal files well why don't you

play14:38

give this files over the point I want to

play14:43

pick up first answer my question but why

play14:46

won't you give Ian Henderson in those

play14:47

files well as far as I'm aware mr. Saar

play14:51

we we have shared whatever information

play14:52

was appropriate on everything most of

play14:58

the legal files were never released the

play15:01

investigators paid by the post office

play15:04

think there's been a cover-up if there

play15:07

was a decision taken to deliberately try

play15:11

and put obstacles in the way of your

play15:13

investigation why well I think that's

play15:17

pretty screamingly obvious it's the

play15:20

consequences of a loss of confidence in

play15:25

the underlying core system horizon so it

play15:29

is existential for the post office to -

play15:33

to maintain the position that the

play15:37

horizon is completely reliable and the

play15:40

people and the processes surrounding

play15:43

horizon are completely reliable

play15:47

the post office says it cooperated with

play15:50

Second Sight as appropriate second sites

play15:54

were not experts in criminal law and it

play15:57

was therefore not appropriate for them

play15:58

to have access to the privilege to

play16:00

prosecution files it says it seen no

play16:04

evidence of a cover-up

play16:11

those legal files are critical to the

play16:15

first case I ever encountered in this

play16:17

scandal it's the story of a postmaster

play16:20

called Seema mishra there's no evidence

play16:24

that I've taken any money and then the

play16:28

jury came back with the word guilty what

play16:34

I was had in front of me my husband my

play16:37

children and I'm pregnant that time

play16:44

Seema was jailed for stealing seventy

play16:46

four thousand pounds after she covered

play16:49

up the fact cash was missing key

play16:52

evidence came from the horizon computer

play16:54

system in the summing up the judge said

play16:57

there's no direct evidence of theft

play16:59

you have to infer it how can somebody

play17:03

doing listening who did properly come

play17:06

back with the word guilty so there was

play17:10

it was shocking and then you then had to

play17:13

go to prison yeah I asked one of the

play17:16

officers if I can borrow his jacket so

play17:18

they can cover my handcuff I didn't want

play17:22

anybody to see like that

play17:29

sima might not have been convicted of

play17:31

theft had her trial heard the truth

play17:33

about horizon

play17:35

we've found crucial evidence in her

play17:38

legal file that was never seen by the

play17:40

jury these documents are shocking they

play17:44

show post office prosecutors refusing to

play17:46

hand over information which could have

play17:48

helped SEMA prove her innocence this is

play17:52

just one example an email from the post

play17:55

office security team to the criminal law

play17:58

team it's about a bug in horizon that

play18:02

makes money simply disappear the

play18:06

security team are worried it may have

play18:08

repercussions in future prosecution

play18:10

cases the attachment says that any

play18:14

branch encountering the problem will

play18:16

have corrupted accounts

play18:18

in one case more than 30,000 pounds went

play18:22

missing in another almost 5,000 pounds

play18:25

the document was printed out by the post

play18:28

office legal department just three days

play18:30

before SEMA mistress trial but it was

play18:33

never disclosed to her defense we showed

play18:38

our evidence to a leading expert on

play18:40

criminal law what do you think of the

play18:44

behavior of the post office throughout

play18:46

the mr. Truong it seems to me and it

play18:48

goes to the heart of this that quite

play18:51

clearly the post office had material

play18:54

which they should have disclosed which

play18:57

they did not and in my view resulted in

play19:02

the wrongful conviction of missus mistre

play19:04

there should be a thorough examination

play19:07

of all the evidence in respect of any

play19:11

person who might have committed

play19:13

misconduct in the course of these

play19:15

prosecutions by the post office the post

play19:23

office says it has always accepted its

play19:26

legal obligations and has taken advice

play19:29

throughout

play19:30

it's conducting a further review about

play19:33

disclosure

play19:40

[Music]

play19:43

it wasn't just computer bugs that the

play19:45

post office was keeping to itself

play19:49

there was another way money could

play19:51

disappear from the horizons system in

play19:54

2015 we discovered postmasters accounts

play19:57

could be changed without them knowing

play20:01

we made a panorama which uncovered vital

play20:04

new evidence but it was bitterly

play20:05

contested by the post office

play20:09

the horizon computer system is run from

play20:12

this office in Bracknell by Fujitsu

play20:16

a whistleblower told us that financial

play20:18

records were sometimes changed remotely

play20:21

by Fujitsu staff he knew because he was

play20:25

one of them

play20:26

[Music]

play20:30

and went in through the back door and

play20:32

made changes sometimes you'd be putting

play20:36

several lines of code in at the time if

play20:39

we hadn't done that then the counters

play20:41

would have stopped working

play20:44

[Music]

play20:48

it was an explosive revelation if the

play20:54

accounts could be altered remotely then

play20:57

missing money could be down to human

play20:59

error or worse still theft by those with

play21:03

secret access to the system the post

play21:07

office said we were wrong senior

play21:10

managers flatly denied remote access was

play21:12

possible without the postmaster knowing

play21:15

one meeting was recorded it wasn't for

play21:21

broadcast so we've reversed their words

play21:25

can the system be accessed remotely and

play21:28

without anybody's knowledge in terms of

play21:30

it doesn't leave a footprint then no it

play21:33

would leave a footprint so in sum it is

play21:36

not now I never has been possible but

play21:38

anybody from post office or Fujitsu to

play21:42

interfere with transactions without the

play21:45

clear knowledge of the postmaster it is

play21:48

100% true to say we can't change alter

play21:51

and modify existing transaction data so

play21:53

the integrity is 100% preserved and

play21:55

that's true now has been okay

play22:00

[Music]

play22:05

[Music]

play22:07

despite these denials our evidence of

play22:10

remote access was crucial to the

play22:11

postmasters victory in their High Court

play22:14

case the BBC Panorama programme that you

play22:17

did in 2015 was very important in that

play22:20

in fact I'm not sure that this

play22:23

litigation would have happened as it did

play22:24

had panorama not made that programme the

play22:29

judge decided our whistleblower was

play22:32

right remote access was possible without

play22:35

the postmaster knowing

play22:38

why was that so important because it

play22:42

made a fundamental difference to the

play22:44

reliability of the accounts and a

play22:47

fundamental difference to the

play22:48

credibility of post office in what it

play22:50

had been saying to a number of people

play22:52

including in response to your program

play22:58

[Music]

play23:01

the post office told the court it had

play23:03

inadvertently misled panoramas

play23:06

[Music]

play23:09

the post offices barrister said it was a

play23:12

matter of enormous regret that the

play23:14

senior managers who dealt with panorama

play23:16

were not aware that remote access to

play23:18

horizon was possible the post office

play23:21

claimed that that was just an honest

play23:22

mistake but our documents suggest that

play23:28

isn't true

play23:32

this Ernst & Young report was sent to

play23:35

post office directors back in 2011 it

play23:39

says it has again identified weaknesses

play23:42

in the horizons system and it warned

play23:46

that Fujitsu staff have unrestricted

play23:48

access to post masters accounts that may

play23:51

lead to the processing of unauthorized

play23:53

or erroneous transactions so the post

play23:56

office knew all along that remote access

play23:59

was possible we showed our evidence to

play24:04

the then chair of the business Select

play24:06

Committee what does that say to you

play24:09

about their attitude towards the truth

play24:11

they right they're mistaken although of

play24:13

misleading the courts but this document

play24:16

just suggests that they couldn't be

play24:17

mistaken because the truth is here in

play24:21

black and white just spell out to us how

play24:23

serious that is but I think this is very

play24:25

serious it is very serious that the post

play24:27

office was sitting on information that

play24:29

told them and could have told the courts

play24:33

and their sub postmasters that other

play24:35

people could access their systems

play24:42

fujitsu was also sitting on information

play24:45

the judge was so worried about the

play24:48

evidence for Jitsu witnesses had given

play24:50

in other post office cases he referred

play24:52

the matter to the Director of Public

play24:54

Prosecutions Fujitsu says it takes the

play25:00

judgment very seriously and is

play25:02

conducting a thorough process to review

play25:04

the court statements the post office has

play25:10

launched a scheme it says offers redress

play25:12

for those who may have experienced

play25:13

shortfalls its new leadership is

play25:17

promising fundamental change and greater

play25:19

transparency

play25:22

[Music]

play25:24

so what about the woman who was in

play25:26

charge of the post office for so long

play25:29

Paul of enols left the organization last

play25:32

year and was given a CBE by the

play25:34

government and two new jobs but the

play25:37

government has now turned against her

play25:39

there's no question that the post office

play25:42

management at the time behaved

play25:44

disgracefully none of them are now in

play25:46

position

play25:48

officials were misled but by the post

play25:50

office of the information provided was

play25:51

was not correct Paul of enols declined

play25:56

to be interviewed but said it was and

play25:58

remains a source of great regret the

play26:01

colleagues and their families were

play26:02

affected over so many years she's truly

play26:05

sorry

play26:06

we were unable to find a solution or

play26:08

resolution and for the distress this

play26:11

caused

play26:13

but she hasn't answered any of our

play26:16

questions hello miss rennolds it's Nick

play26:23

Wallis from the panorama program this

play26:25

conversation is being filmed I'd like to

play26:27

ask you some questions about your tenure

play26:29

as chief executive of the post office no

play26:35

I would like to ask you why the post

play26:38

office knew about remote access to the

play26:40

horizon system this is one of the

play26:44

biggest frustrations about covering this

play26:46

story for so long the consistent refusal

play26:49

of the chief executive and the people at

play26:51

the top to answer serious questions

play26:53

about what's been happening I think the

play26:55

post masters deserve better than that

play26:58

[Music]

play27:05

MPs have demanded answers from Paula

play27:08

phenols and politicians on both sides of

play27:12

the house want a public inquiry people

play27:15

went to prison people's livelihoods were

play27:19

lost and some of the victims ended their

play27:25

lives that is enough for a judge led

play27:29

public inquiry I've never heard of

play27:33

anything like it at all

play27:34

we're a government-owned organization

play27:38

attacked on the basis of false evidence

play27:44

the integrity of so many pillars of the

play27:48

community it's it's a quite

play27:51

extraordinary story has there been a

play27:54

cover-up I believe that there has been

play27:56

and it's probably still going on the

play28:03

postmasters won't stop until they get to

play28:05

the truth they're being lying Noor just

play28:08

ELISA Postmaster to everybody they've

play28:11

been lying from day one

play28:14

I want to see somebody be held

play28:17

accountable for what's happened because

play28:20

you can't go you can't create its kind

play28:23

of injustice some people and then just

play28:27

walk away with it scot-free

play28:32

a much-loved national institution has

play28:35

become a national disgrace and hundreds

play28:38

of lives have been shattered by the

play28:41

scandal at the post office

play28:48

[Music]

play29:09

you

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Post OfficeScandalJusticeHorizon SystemFalse AccusationsIT BugsCourt CaseCompensationWhistleblowerAccounting FraudNational Disgrace
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?