話題のツール！CursorとGitHubCopilotの使い勝手を解説してみた

Summary

The video script discusses the functionalities and benefits of two AI-powered programming assistance tools, GitHub Copilot and Cursor. Both tools are praised for their convenience and utility in enhancing programming efficiency, with GitHub Copilot being an extension that integrates into editors like VS Code, while Cursor is a standalone editor that offers a similar experience. The speaker shares personal experiences with both tools, noting that they have transitioned to relying heavily on AI for programming support. The video also covers the recent update where GitHub Copilot has adopted GPT4, aligning it more closely with Cursor in terms of capabilities. The comparison touches on pricing, features, and the unique aspects of each tool, such as Cursor's powerful external reference functionality and GitHub Copilot's inline completion feature. The speaker concludes by expressing a slight preference for Cursor due to its flexibility and rapid development pace, but encourages viewers to explore both tools for their programming needs.

Takeaways

• 🛠️ GitHub Copilot and Cursor are both AI-powered tools designed to assist with coding, offering different features and integration capabilities within code editors like VS Code.
• 🔗 Cursor, financed by OpenAI, and GitHub Copilot, support integration with GPT-4, ensuring advanced AI capabilities in programming assistance.
• 💡 Both tools are useful for beginners and advanced programmers, offering real-time code suggestions and problem-solving assistance.
• 🤔 The choice between GitHub Copilot and Cursor may depend on specific needs such as pricing, features like inline completion, and external reference capabilities.
• 💳 Pricing varies between the two, with GitHub Copilot generally being less expensive than Cursor for individual use.
• 🚀 GitHub Copilot recently incorporated GPT-4, enhancing its functionality and making it more competitive with Cursor's offerings.
• 📊 Cursor excels with features like strong external reference capabilities, potentially outweighing its higher cost for those who value this feature.
• 📝 Both tools allow seamless coding experience but have distinct strengths: GitHub Copilot in inline code completions, and Cursor in managing external references.
• 🛠️ Some users might find GitHub Copilot's filtering system too restrictive, potentially limiting the range of topics it can assist with.
• 🧩 Cursor does not currently support Dev Containers, which can be a limitation for developers working in complex environments.

Q & A

What are the two AI programming assistance tools discussed in the script?

The two AI programming assistance tools discussed are GitHub Copilot and Cursor.

What is the main difference between GitHub Copilot and Cursor in terms of their functionality?

GitHub Copilot is an extension that can be integrated into various editors, including VS Code, while Cursor is a standalone editor with built-in AI support.

Which company is known for its investment in Cursor?

OpenAI, which is also known for developing the GPT models, has invested in Cursor.

What is the 'Inline Completion' feature mentioned in the script?

Inline Completion is a feature that predicts and displays the next lines of code as you type, allowing you to complete your code by pressing the tab key.

What is the main advantage of using Cursor for programming?

Cursor offers a seamless programming experience with efficient code writing support, and it has features like external reference functionality that allows it to provide answers by reading information from URLs pasted by the user.

What is the current pricing model for both GitHub Copilot and Cursor?

Both GitHub Copilot and Cursor offer monthly subscription plans for individual and business use, with Cursor being slightly more cost-effective with an annual plan.

What is the significance of the update where GitHub Copilot started using GPT-4?

The update allowed GitHub Copilot to provide responses generated by GPT-4, making the quality of the generated code and responses comparable to Cursor, which also uses GPT-4.

What is the limitation of GitHub Copilot when it comes to handling off-topic questions?

GitHub Copilot has a strict filter that may refuse to answer questions deemed off-topic, which can be limiting if the user is seeking information not directly related to programming.

Why might a developer find Cursor more appealing than GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, being a full-fledged editor, allows for a wider range of development activities and offers a more free and innovative experience. It also has rapid development updates and features like GPT-4 and code interpreters.

What is the main disadvantage of Cursor mentioned in the script?

Cursor's inability to work within container environments, which can be a significant drawback for developers who rely on containers for compatibility and streamlined development.

What does the speaker recommend for those interested in trying out Cursor?

The speaker recommends that those interested should definitely give Cursor a try, as it offers a different and potentially more liberating development experience compared to other tools.

What is the speaker's final recommendation between GitHub Copilot and Cursor?

The speaker leans towards recommending Cursor due to its standalone editor capabilities, rapid development pace, and innovative features.