Brendan Schaub REACTS To Dricus Du Plessis vs. Sean Strickland

Extra Thiccc

20 Jan 202406:52

Summary

TLDRTwo commentators enthusiastically discuss a close UFC fight between Sean Strickland and Dricus Du Plessis. They score the technical back-and-forth match round-by-round, agreeing it's very close. When the split decision is announced for Du Plessis, they're shocked, feeling Strickland landed more shots and won more rounds. They speculate on how judges scored it and the implications for each fighter's career going forward. Online reaction from fans and analysts is divided on who deserved the win.

Takeaways

😀 Sean O'Malley and Marlon Vera fought to a split decision, with the judges scoring it controversially for Vera
😮 The author and Joe Rogan seemed to score the fight for O'Malley 3-2
👍 O'Malley looked impressive, especially given it was his first real test in the UFC
😕 The judges' scorecards were questionable, with many fans online thinking O'Malley won
🤔 The fight was very close and competitive throughout all 5 rounds
🥊 It featured high level striking exchanges between two talented fighters
💪 O'Malley showed tremendous toughness and heart continuing to battle despite a badly injured leg
😡 Fans online, including the author, felt O'Malley was 'cheated' out of the victory by the judges
🤼‍♂️ There was discussion of potential future matchups like O'Malley vs Chimaev or Vera vs Cannonier
😎 Overall it was an exciting back and forth fight that left fans wanting to see more of O'Malley against elite competition

Q & A

Who is Sean O'Malley fighting in this match?
-Sean O'Malley is fighting Marlon Vera in this UFC match.
What round does the person commenting think Sean O'Malley won?
-The person commenting thinks Sean O'Malley won rounds 1, 2, and 4.
What is the potential next matchup discussed for Bo Nickal?
-The potential next matchup discussed for Bo Nickal is against Hamzat Chimaev.
Why does the commentator think Israel Adesanya would want to fight Sean O'Malley?
-The commentator thinks Israel Adesanya would want to fight Sean O'Malley to prove that O'Malley is not as good as Adesanya originally thought.
What issue is discussed regarding Hamzat Chimaev fighting during Ramadan?
-The commentators discuss that Hamzat Chimaev likely would not want to fight during Ramadan since he would be fasting during the day.
What did the online audience think about the judges' decision?
-Many in the online audience felt Sean Strickland was robbed and should have won the decision.
How did the total strikes compare between Sean O'Malley and Marlon Vera?
-Sean O'Malley landed 154 total strikes while Marlon Vera landed 116 total strikes.
Why might the total strike numbers be misleading?
-The total strike numbers may be misleading because they don't show the distribution across rounds - many of O'Malley's strikes could have come in the early rounds.
What did Luke Thomas predict the result would be beforehand?
-Beforehand, Luke Thomas predicted the fight would be close and could see either fighter winning 48-47.
Who does the commentator think would win in a rematch between Israel Adesanya and Sean O'Malley?
-The commentator thinks Israel Adesanya would beat Sean O'Malley in a rematch now that he realizes O'Malley is better than he originally thought.

Outlines

00:00

🤼‍♂️ Discussing the close matchup and decision for Strickland vs Du Plessis

Paragraph 1 is a discussion between speakers about the recent MMA fight between Sean Strickland and Dricus Du Plessis. They analyze the match round-by-round, scoring it in favor of Strickland. They express surprise at the split decision result for Du Plessis and speculate on how judges scored the bout. The speakers wonder how fans and analysts like Luke Thomas scored the fight and discuss a potential next matchup between Du Plessis and Israel Adesanya.

05:00

📊 Examining stats and reactions to the Strickland vs Du Plessis decision

Paragraph 2 continues the analysis of judges' decision. Speakers examine striking statistics seeming to favor Strickland and read social media reactions of outrage from South African fans over Du Plessis' disputed win. They acknowledge the fight's closeness and subjectivity of scoring, noting judges may weigh early rounds more heavily. The speakers remain open to a rematch between Strickland and Du Plessis.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Round Scoring

Round scoring refers to the method used in combat sports to determine the winner of a fight based on the performance in each round. In the video script, round scoring is discussed in the context of a fight where one participant, Sean, is mentioned to have won a round with a score of 3-2. This illustrates the panel's analysis of the fight's competitiveness and skill display by the fighters, emphasizing the close nature of the contest.

💡Octagon

The Octagon is the eight-sided cage used in the UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) as the arena for fights. The term is used in the script to describe where the fight took place, indicating the context of a professional mixed martial arts (MMA) bout. The mention of a fighter being tested for the first time inside the Octagon signifies a significant milestone in the fighter's career, marking a tough challenge against a formidable opponent.

💡Bo Nickel

Bo Nickel is mentioned in the script as a fighter who is expected to perform exceptionally well against his opponents, despite not being ranked and appearing on the main card. This indicates the high expectations and potential seen in him by commentators and possibly the UFC, suggesting he is a fighter to watch in future events.

💡Ranked Fighter

A ranked fighter in MMA is someone who is officially listed among the top competitors in their weight class according to the organization's rankings. The script questions when Bo Nickel will face a ranked fighter, indicating a curiosity about Nickel's progression in the sport and when he will be tested against higher-level competition.

💡Podcast

The mention of a podcast in the script signifies the medium through which the speakers are sharing their insights and analysis of the fight. It highlights the growing trend of using podcasts as platforms for in-depth discussions on sports, including behind-the-scenes perspectives and personal experiences from hosts and guests.

💡Striking

Striking refers to the stand-up fighting aspect of MMA, involving punches, kicks, elbows, and knees. In the script, a fighter's striking ability, particularly noting that he has been training in striking for only two years, underscores the rapid development and potential of the fighter. This highlights the importance of striking skills in MMA and the fighter's dedication to improving in this area.

💡Split Decision

A split decision in combat sports is a result where two of the three judges score the fight in favor of one fighter, and the third judge scores it for the other fighter. In the script, a fight outcome is described as a split decision, illustrating the close and controversial nature of the bout, where opinion on the winner is not unanimous among the judges.

💡Judges

Judges in MMA are responsible for scoring each round of a fight and ultimately determining the winner in the absence of a knockout or submission. The script discusses the judges' decision-making, hinting at the subjectivity and potential controversy in scoring fights, especially in closely contested matches.

💡Significant Strikes

Significant strikes refer to strikes that have a potential impact on the outcome of the fight, including all strikes at distance and power strikes in the clinch or on the ground. The script references significant strikes as a key metric in assessing fighters' performance, demonstrating the importance of effective striking in winning rounds and influencing judges' scores.

💡Ramadan

Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, observed by Muslims worldwide as a month of fasting, prayer, reflection, and community. The script mentions fighters' considerations around competing during Ramadan, highlighting the challenges and adjustments athletes might face due to fasting and its impact on training and performance.

Highlights

The study found a strong correlation between A and B, suggesting A may directly influence B.

Participants who engaged in activity C showed a 25% increase in D compared to the control group.

Researchers identified a potential new biomarker E which could be used to predict F with 75% accuracy.

The novel compound G was shown to inhibit tumor growth in mice by 60% without observable side effects.

According to the results, combining therapies H and I led to far greater outcomes than either therapy alone.

The study provides strong evidence that mechanism J drives process K, overturning the previous theory.

Further research into phenomenon L may lead to vital new insights into disease M.

The authors propose an innovative model N that successfully explains contradictions in previous findings.

These discoveries represent a promising step towards developing effective therapies for condition O.

By analyzing data in a new way, the researchers challenged long-held assumptions about P.

The study highlights the importance of factor Q and its potential clinical applications.

The results open up exciting possibilities for early diagnosis and prevention of disease R.

Further investigation of mechanism S may enable more targeted and personalized interventions.

The findings fill a critical gap in our understanding of the complex interactions between T, U, and V.

By integrating diverse data sets, the study delivers novel insights into the dynamics of system W.