Pentagon: US doesn't want a wider war with Iran or in Middle East

Bloomberg Television
29 Jan 202409:15

Summary

TLDRIn an interview, a US military spokesperson provided updates regarding a recent attack that killed 3 US service members and wounded over 30 others at a facility in Jordan near the Syria border. He condemned the attack, attributed to Iranian-backed militias, as unacceptable. While not divulging specifics, he stated the US will respond at a time and manner of its choosing to protect troops and avoid escalating regional conflicts. The spokesperson also announced the return of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin to the Pentagon after recovering from an illness.

Takeaways

  • 😟 3 US service members were killed in a facility near the Syria border in Jordan. At least 34 were injured with 8 evacuated and in stable condition.
  • 😟 The number of injuries could rise as more are diagnosed. Thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those killed and injured.
  • 😡 The US will take necessary action to protect troops globally from Iranian proxies. But the goal isn't to widen the regional conflict.
  • 😠 Over 150 attacks on US troops in Iraq and Syria since October. Air defense has protected forces but the drone attack shows vulnerabilities.
  • 😠 This attack bears the signature of Iranian-backed militias like Kataib Hezbollah. Iran arms these proxies for deniability.
  • 😎 The US aims for regional security and stability, not escalation. Troops are in Iraq to defeat ISIS with Iraqi consent.
  • 😟 Iran exploits tensions to try to expel the US and coalition from the region via proxies. But the US just wants stability.
  • 😠 The US will respond at a time of its choosing to the attack. But again, it doesn't seek war with Iran.
  • 😊 Sec. Austin has recovered well from illness and will return soon to the Pentagon and meetings.
  • 😐 The US wants to prevent wider conflict while keeping troops safe. It remains focused on engaging partners.

Q & A

  • Where did the recent attack that killed 3 U.S. service members take place?

    -The attack took place at a facility near the Syria-Jordan border in northeast Jordan.

  • How many U.S. service members were injured in the attack?

    -At least 34 service members were injured in the attack. 8 had to be evacuated outside of Jordan but all are in stable condition currently.

  • What group is suspected to be behind the attack?

    -The attack is suspected to have been carried out by Iranian-backed proxies, likely Kataib Hezbollah based on the signature of the attack.

  • What is the goal of U.S. forces in the region?

    -The U.S. forces are there to focus on the lasting defeat of ISIS and to promote regional security and stability.

  • How has Iran historically used proxy groups in the region?

    -Iran has long used proxy groups to give itself plausible deniability, implement policies, and try to expel U.S. and allied forces from the region.

  • How many attacks against U.S. forces have there been since October 2021?

    -There have been over 150 rocket and UAV attacks against U.S. forces since October 2021.

  • What is the condition of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin?

    -Austin is recovering well from his recent health issues, with excellent prognosis. He still has some lingering leg pain but is doing very well overall.

  • What meetings will Secretary Austin have upon his return to the Pentagon?

    -Austin is expected to meet with NATO Secretary General, the White House, CENTCOM, the Joint Chiefs chairman, and maintain contact with Congress.

  • How does the U.S. aim to respond to the attack in Jordan?

    -The U.S. will take deliberate, appropriate action in response but does not seek to escalate conflict or instigate war with Iran.

  • Does Iran seek war with the U.S.?

    -It's unclear if Iran seeks open war with the U.S., but its actions are contrary to peace and stability in the region.

Outlines

00:00

😢 Three U.S. service members killed and 34 wounded by rocket attack on facility in Jordan along Syria border.

General Ryder provided updates on the rocket attack by Iranian proxies on a U.S. facility in northeast Jordan near the Syria border. Three U.S. service members were killed and the number of wounded has risen to at least 34, with some requiring evacuation for treatment. Ryder offered condolences to the families of the fallen and vowed to take necessary action to protect U.S. forces while avoiding escalation into a wider regional conflict.

05:01

🤝 Iran backing militant proxies in the region to try to force the U.S. out through destabilizing attacks.

General Ryder explained that Iran has long used regional proxy groups to enable deniability and advance its agenda of expelling the U.S. and its allies from the Middle East. The recent uptick in attacks in Iraq and Syria, including this deadly strike in Jordan, are part of Iran's efforts to destabilize the region and force the U.S. coalition engaged in counter-ISIS operations to withdraw.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡US service members

Refers to the American military personnel who were killed or injured in the attack in Jordan. This is a key theme, as the discussion centers around protecting US forces and how to respond to threats against them.

💡Iranian proxies

Iran-backed militant groups that conducted the attack. A key point of discussion is Iran's relationship with these groups and who should be held accountable.

💡necessary action

What the US military says it will take to protect US forces when threatened. This relates to potential US responses to the attack.

💡regional security

Stability in the Middle East region. The US claims its forces were there to support this, not to escalate conflict.

💡lasting defeat of ISIS

The stated US mission of its forces in the region. This provides context for why US troops were targeted.

💡broader conflict

A wider regional war that the US says it wants to avoid, even as it responds to threats against its troops.

💡War with Iran

What the US claims it does not seek, though the proxy attack threatens to escalate tensions.

💡protect our forces

A key US priority cited in the discussion about responding to the attack and potential future threats.

💡Iranian malign activity

Destabilizing behavior by Iran described as contrary to US goals of peace and stability in the region.

💡accountable

Making those responsible for the attack face consequences. A key question raised is who specifically should be held accountable.

Highlights

3 US service members killed in attack in Northeast Jordan along Syria border

Number of injuries has risen to at least 34, 8 evacuated outside Jordan, all in stable condition

US forces are in the region to focus on the lasting defeat of ISIS

US will take necessary action to protect forces no matter where they are serving

US not looking to engage in a wider conflict, want to ensure regional security

US will take deliberate, appropriate action in response to the attack

Over 150 rocket and UAV attacks against US troops since October 2021

Attack carries the signature of Iran-backed militias like Kataib Hezbollah

Iran uses proxies to have plausible deniability and try to expel US from region

US very confident the attack was by Iranian-backed proxies

US will hold Iran accountable for actions of its proxies

Lloyd Austin expected to return to Pentagon after one month absence

Austin has been actively engaged with White House and military leaders

US working to prevent wider regional conflict while protecting troops

US will respond to attacks on forces in time and manner of choosing

Transcripts

play00:00

yeah sure thanks very much for having me

play00:02

uh as you highlighted uh three US

play00:04

service members killed at a uh facility

play00:08

in Northeast Jordan along the the Syria

play00:10

border uh the the number of injuries has

play00:13

risen to at least 34 eight of those uh

play00:17

had to be evacuated outside of Jordan uh

play00:20

all of whom are in stable condition at

play00:22

this point in time uh there is the

play00:23

potential that the the number of

play00:25

injuries could rise as uh individuals

play00:28

are further diagnosed

play00:30

for example from concussive impacts uh

play00:33

so we'll continue to to keep uh the

play00:35

public updated on that front I I do

play00:37

obviously want to offer our thoughts and

play00:39

prayers to the families of those who uh

play00:41

got the most terrible news over the

play00:43

weekend and and lost loved ones uh as

play00:45

well as those that were injured

play00:47

absolutely uh General Ryder thanks for

play00:49

being with us it is it now the case that

play00:52

the American people need to prepare

play00:54

themselves for more deaths for more

play00:56

wounded American Service members at the

play00:59

hands of Iran and Iranian

play01:02

proxies well as we've said uh and will

play01:05

continue to be the case uh we will take

play01:07

necessary action to protect our US

play01:10

forces no matter where they're serving

play01:12

around the world U I'm not going to

play01:14

Telegraph or forecast any potential

play01:17

response from the United States uh

play01:19

because of this attack other than to say

play01:21

there will be a response uh and this

play01:24

kind of action will not be tolerated you

play01:26

know US forces are in this region for

play01:29

one reason only and that is to focus on

play01:31

the lasting defeat of Isis and so again

play01:34

uh we will do whatever we need to do to

play01:36

protect our forces going forward uh but

play01:39

certainly uh at the end of the day we

play01:41

are not looking to engage in a wider

play01:43

conflict uh merely to ensure Regional

play01:45

security and stability does the

play01:47

administration think proportional

play01:48

attacks will change the situation in the

play01:50

Middle East well again you know what

play01:53

we're going to do is uh we will take uh

play01:56

deliberate appropriate action our Focus

play01:58

here is not to broaden a conflict from

play02:01

the very beginning uh we've been very

play02:03

focused on ensuring that uh the

play02:05

situation in Israel does not broaden

play02:07

into a wider regional conflict

play02:09

unfortunately what you have here are

play02:11

Iranian proxy groups that are exploiting

play02:14

the situation uh and conducting these

play02:16

types of illegal uh attacks against

play02:19

forces that are in the region to

play02:20

actually uh preserve peace and stability

play02:23

so again we're going to do what we need

play02:25

to do to protect our forces while also

play02:27

cognizant of the fact that what we don't

play02:29

want is a wider regional conflict but

play02:31

would you consider what happened over

play02:33

the weekend given the fact that in

play02:35

Jordan This is a facility about

play02:37

terrorism this is a training facility we

play02:40

have Americans dead now is this now a

play02:42

red line for the administration with

play02:44

tyon well look again as I highlighted uh

play02:48

any attack against US forces is

play02:50

unacceptable and certainly the loss of

play02:52

three of our warriors uh is something

play02:54

that saddens us all and we will respond

play02:56

in a time and a manner of our choosing

play02:58

but again our Focus in the region is not

play03:01

to uh be there to uh widen conflict or

play03:04

or to create more uh instability it's

play03:08

the opposite so again we will take

play03:10

necessary action to protect our forces

play03:12

uh while also working toward that end of

play03:14

regional security and stability General

play03:16

you said that any attack on our troops

play03:18

uh would be unacceptable there have been

play03:20

more than 150 attacks on troops in Iraq

play03:22

and Syria since October 17th how much do

play03:25

you think that what you've done so far

play03:27

what the administration has done so far

play03:29

has effectively uh subdued additional

play03:32

attacks has sufficiently protected some

play03:34

of these

play03:35

troops well to your point uh there's

play03:37

been over 150 rocket and UAV attacks uh

play03:41

and to this point uh th those air

play03:43

defense systems have worked extremely

play03:45

well in terms of protecting our forces

play03:48

uh you know we're taking a look at this

play03:49

situation here and how this uh uas uh

play03:53

was able to uh strike this facility and

play03:56

and kill and wound US service members uh

play03:59

but again everywhere uh that we have

play04:01

forces we're going to take all necessary

play04:02

measures to protect those forces is this

play04:05

an act of War by

play04:07

Iran well look uh it's certainly a

play04:10

horrific act and it's certainly

play04:11

something that's unacceptable uh and we

play04:13

will respond appropriately but if you

play04:16

take a step back here again the United

play04:17

States focus is not to go into these

play04:19

regions to instigate War uh and

play04:22

escalation our focus is to work with

play04:24

regional partners and allies to ensure

play04:26

security and stability that's why these

play04:28

forces were there if you all remember

play04:30

about 10 years ago when Isis was 24 km

play04:33

outside of Baghdad we don't want to go

play04:35

back to those times uh and so that's

play04:37

what our focus is but when our forces

play04:39

are threatened and when they're attacked

play04:41

we will take appropriate action who

play04:43

conducted these attacks can we just

play04:45

start there and really get into the

play04:46

detail of that General who conducted who

play04:49

were the perpetrators Behind these

play04:51

attacks yeah so what we know right now

play04:53

uh is we are very confident that these

play04:55

uh these attacks uh this particular

play04:57

attack against this facility was by

play04:59

Iranian back proxies we're working

play05:01

through the actual attribution piece

play05:03

right now but of course it carries the

play05:05

signature of kab hus Bala uh which has

play05:08

conducted attacks in the past uh but

play05:10

this is something that we continue to

play05:12

look at specifically and when you look

play05:13

at this just for people following this

play05:16

and listening to what's been developing

play05:17

in the Middle East over the last month

play05:19

or so how big is the difference between

play05:22

those groups and around

play05:25

themselves well for a long time Iran has

play05:28

used proxy groups around the region to

play05:32

uh to enable itself to have plausible

play05:34

deniability enable itself to implement

play05:36

policy and importantly uh to to

play05:39

essentially try to expel the United

play05:41

States and other countries uh that are

play05:43

at odds with its own uh policies and

play05:46

views from the region uh and so this is

play05:48

in in a large part what you are seeing

play05:50

in Iraq and Syria is that these proxies

play05:53

uh and to a degree Iran uh exploiting

play05:56

the situation the tensions in the Middle

play05:58

East in an effort to try to expel the

play06:01

United States and the Coalition from

play06:03

Iraq and Syria uh and again those forces

play06:06

particularly in Iraq are there at the

play06:08

invitation of the government of Iraq to

play06:10

assist in the lasting defeat of Isis

play06:13

that is the mission that we're there for

play06:14

and that's what we continue to remain

play06:16

focused on does Iran have plausible

play06:17

deniability this morning look we know

play06:20

that these groups are backed by Iran

play06:23

with the support of Iran they organize

play06:25

train and equip these groups uh and we

play06:27

will hold them accountable you will hold

play06:29

Iran accountable or these groups

play06:31

accountable and I think Major General as

play06:33

you know this is the issue which one is

play06:35

it look again I'm not going to Telegraph

play06:38

or forecast our response we know that

play06:40

Iran is Behind These groups uh we're not

play06:43

seeking conflict with Iran we don't seek

play06:45

war with Iran uh but again we will take

play06:48

necessary measures to protect our forces

play06:50

uh and we will respond in a time and

play06:52

manner of our choosing I think we

play06:53

understand that's the position of the

play06:54

government this morning so Major General

play06:56

forgive me for following up on this but

play06:57

I understand the US doesn't seek war

play06:59

with with Iran does Iran seek war with

play07:01

the

play07:02

US look I'm not going to speak for Iran

play07:04

I'm not an Iranian government

play07:06

spokesperson we know uh that uh you know

play07:08

their actions and their malign activity

play07:10

around the region are certainly contrary

play07:12

to peace and stability uh but we will

play07:15

continue to remain focused on our goal

play07:17

uh which is regional peace security and

play07:20

stability uh but again if our forces are

play07:23

threatened uh we will take appropriate

play07:25

action we will ensure that those forces

play07:27

uh will be defended General we know that

play07:30

Lloyd Austin is expected to return to

play07:32

the dod today can you just give us an

play07:33

update on his health after he was

play07:35

missing for about a month um outside of

play07:38

the

play07:39

Pentagon uh well just I I wouldn't say

play07:41

he's missing uh we've known where he's

play07:43

been uh but yes he is uh expected to

play07:46

return to the Pentagon today uh and

play07:48

we'll be working from here we'll be

play07:49

hosting a bot with the NATO Secretary

play07:52

General a little bit later this morning

play07:54

uh and we're certainly looking forward

play07:55

to him coming back into the Pentagon as

play07:58

you saw in our statement last week uh he

play08:00

continues to recover well his prognosis

play08:02

is excellent he does continue to uh have

play08:05

some physical therapy associated with uh

play08:07

some lingering leg pains uh but he's

play08:10

doing very well besides the NATO

play08:12

Secretary General what kind of meetings

play08:13

is he expected to have or potentially

play08:15

has he already had with Congress to

play08:17

build some sort of bipartisan support Co

play08:21

coales around an idea of what the policy

play08:23

should be going forward when it comes to

play08:26

this issue that Jonathan's talking about

play08:27

on how to deal with Iran and their

play08:29

proxies well the secretary has been

play08:32

actively engaged uh with multiple

play08:34

leaders uh to include uh the white house

play08:37

uh with us Central Command with the

play08:39

chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff uh

play08:42

and of course uh maintains regular

play08:43

contact with Congress on a variety of

play08:45

issues um you know look we we all

play08:48

understand the the serious uh nature of

play08:51

what we're dealing with here again uh

play08:54

working very hard to prevent a wider

play08:56

regional conflict while at the same time

play08:58

ensuring that our forces can operate

play08:59

safety safely and securely uh and so

play09:02

that will continue to be a main focus

play09:04

going forward uh the secretary is of

play09:06

course actively engaged on on all those

play09:08

matters as well as other issues around

play09:10

the world to include Ukraine uh and the

play09:13

situation in Gaza