Istana : Isu Kemiskinan Dihembuskan untuk Memprovokasi

Summary

In this transcript, the government responds to the rising issue of poverty, which they claim is being used to provoke political tension ahead of the 2019 presidential election. The government dismisses these claims as populist and misleading, pointing to data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) showing a significant decline in poverty rates. From 2017 to 2018, the number of people living in poverty dropped substantially, with a reduction of 1.8 to 2 million. The government emphasizes that the BPS data is accurate, thoroughly tested, and reflects the real conditions of society.

Takeaways

• 😀 The government believes that the issue of poverty being raised during the political year is intentionally used to provoke the public.
• 😀 The issue of poverty being discussed ahead of the 2019 presidential election is seen as a strategy to influence the public.
• 😀 The Presidential Palace responded to claims about rising poverty by emphasizing a decrease in poverty figures, as reported by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS).
• 😀 BPS data showed a significant reduction in the poverty rate, with the number dropping to 26.58 million in 2017.
• 😀 In March 2018, BPS reported the number of people living in poverty dropped to 25.95 million, continuing the downward trend.
• 😀 The government claims to have reduced poverty by 1.82 million people in one year, highlighting the success of poverty alleviation efforts.
• 😀 The validity of BPS data is strongly defended by the government, asserting that the figures are based on real social conditions and not manipulated for political purposes.
• 😀 BPS's head emphasized that the data is not arbitrary and is derived from factual reality, not political agendas.
• 😀 Critics are accused of spreading populist messages that provoke the public without addressing the actual progress made in poverty reduction.
• 😀 The government stresses the importance of using validated data to demonstrate genuine progress in fighting poverty, dismissing claims of fabricated figures.

Q & A

Why did the government respond to the issue of poverty during the 2019 presidential election?

The government responded because they believed the issue of poverty was being raised deliberately to provoke or manipulate public sentiment ahead of the election.

What was the government's position on the poverty rate in Indonesia?

The government claimed that the poverty rate had been decreasing, referencing data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) that showed a decline in poverty numbers from 26.58 million in 2017 to 25.95 million in 2018.

How did the government support the accuracy of the poverty data?

The government emphasized that the data provided by BPS had undergone rigorous testing, ensuring its validity and dismissing any doubts about its accuracy.

What was the stance of the Presidential Palace on the use of poverty figures in political discourse?

The Presidential Palace believed that the use of poverty figures in political discourse was often exaggerated and used for populist purposes, aiming to provoke or manipulate the public.

What was the government's response to the claim that poverty data was being manipulated for political gain?

The government dismissed the claim, asserting that the BPS data was based on factual socio-economic realities and not manipulated for political purposes.

How significant was the reduction in poverty according to the data presented?

The reduction in poverty was described as significant, with the number of people living in poverty dropping by 1.8 to 2 million over the course of a year.

What is the role of the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) in this context?

The BPS is responsible for collecting and analyzing data related to poverty and other socio-economic issues, and its reports were central to the government's argument about the reduction in poverty.

How did the government justify the accuracy of the poverty figures despite criticisms?

The government justified the accuracy of the poverty figures by citing the rigorous testing and validation processes conducted by BPS, ensuring the numbers reflected real-world socio-economic conditions.

What was the argument of those who criticized the government's poverty data?

Critics argued that the government's focus on the reduction of poverty was a populist tactic meant to sway public opinion during the election, and that the issue was being downplayed.

How did the government respond to accusations of using the poverty issue as a political tool?

The government responded by asserting that the data was based on real, verifiable social conditions, and dismissed the idea that the issue of poverty was being exploited for political purposes.