Haddadiyyah & Madakhilah benalu dalam dakwah salafiyyah

Summary

This video discussion explores the theological and practical differences between two Salafi movements: *Madakilah* and *Haddadiyah*. These groups follow the teachings of Sheikh Rabi al-Madkhali and Mahmud al-Haddad, respectively, with a focus on a rigid and textual interpretation of Islamic texts. Both groups strongly oppose innovation (bid'ah) and emphasize strict adherence to Salafi principles. The video also delves into their influence in Indonesia, where their confrontational approach has led to various controversies within the Salafi community. The speaker calls for open discussion about these movements and their impact on the broader Salafi dawah.

Takeaways

• 😀 The discussion focuses on the concepts of *madakilah* and *haddadiyah*, two groups within Salafi ideology, and their differing views on dealing with innovation (bid'ah).
• 😀 *Madakilah* refers to followers of Syekh Rabi al-Madkhali, who emphasize strict adherence to Salafi teachings and have a rigid stance towards bid'ah.
• 😀 *Haddadiyah* refers to the followers of Mahmud al-Haddad, characterized by an even more extreme stance against those considered innovators and differing from the mainstream Salafi views.
• 😀 Both *madakilah* and *haddadiyah* emphasize the rejection of bid'ah, often applying harsh measures like *hajr* (boycotting) and *tabdi'* (declaring someone an innovator).
• 😀 Syekh Rabi al-Madkhali and Mahmud al-Haddad initially had a close relationship, working together in the propagation of Salafi ideology, but later diverged in their approaches to handling those they considered deviants.
• 😀 The script highlights the contrast between the two factions, with *madakilah* being strict but more moderate compared to the harsher approach of *haddadiyah*.
• 😀 In Indonesia, the influence of these factions has led to divisions within the Salafi community, with some groups criticizing others for not adhering strictly to their interpretations of Salafi teachings.
• 😀 The harsh approach of *madakilah* and *haddadiyah* towards others, including scholars, is criticized for being excessive and divisive, particularly in their treatment of those with differing views on Salafi practices.
• 😀 The impact of these Salafi groups extends beyond the Middle East, with the spread of their methods and ideas into regions like Indonesia, causing rifts among local Islamic scholars and communities.
• 😀 The main ideological similarity between *madakilah* and *haddadiyah* is their shared stance against those they view as deviating from the 'true' Salafi path, including their harsh stance on practices like *bid'ah* and disagreements over matters of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence).

Q & A

What is the significance of 'madakilah' and 'haddadiyah' in the context of Salafi dawah?

In the context of Salafi dawah, 'madakilah' refers to the followers of Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali, while 'haddadiyah' refers to the followers of Mahmud al-Haddad. Both groups share a strict approach to understanding Salafi principles, particularly in terms of their rigid stance on bid'ah (innovation) and the need to avoid it. They often display an extreme textualist approach and have controversial views on dealing with people they consider to be deviants.

Who are the key figures associated with the madakilah and haddadiyah groups?

The key figures associated with the madakilah group are Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali, while Mahmud al-Haddad is central to the haddadiyah group. Both figures are recognized for their strict interpretations of Salafi dawah, particularly in opposing bid'ah (innovation) and their interactions with other Islamic groups.

What was the relationship between Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali and Mahmud al-Haddad?

Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali and Mahmud al-Haddad had a collaborative relationship in the early stages of their dawah work. They were allies in spreading Salafi teachings and had similar views on dealing with bid'ah. However, tensions arose later due to differing views and actions, with Mahmud al-Haddad being criticized for his extreme actions, such as burning books written by prominent Islamic scholars.

What is the primary ideological difference between madakilah and haddadiyah?

The primary difference between madakilah and haddadiyah lies in their approach to Salafi dawah and their treatment of people they consider to be innovators. While both groups share a strict stance on bid'ah, haddadiyah is seen as more extreme in its textualism and actions, often engaging in harsh condemnation and exclusion of those with differing views. Madakilah, on the other hand, is somewhat less extreme but still upholds a rigid approach to Salafi principles.

What role does the concept of 'hajr' play in the madakilah and haddadiyah movements?

'Hajr' refers to the act of avoiding or cutting off relations with people considered to be deviants or innovators. Both the madakilah and haddadiyah groups practice hajr towards those they view as not adhering strictly to Salafi principles, often targeting individuals who engage in practices deemed as bid'ah or heretical, even in matters of personal choice like shaving beards or following certain schools of thought.

What controversial actions did Mahmud al-Haddad take that impacted his reputation?

Mahmud al-Haddad took controversial actions such as burning books by renowned Islamic scholars, including works by Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar, because he deemed them to contain heretical content. This action greatly tarnished his reputation, even among some of his early supporters. He also criticized major Islamic texts and scholars, further alienating him from other Salafi groups.

How do the madakilah and haddadiyah groups interact with other Islamic movements?

The madakilah and haddadiyah groups often interact with other Islamic movements through a lens of caution and criticism, particularly towards those they consider to be deviating from Salafi teachings. Their interactions can be marked by harsh criticism, or 'tahdir,' of other groups, especially when it comes to issues related to bid'ah or differences in the interpretation of Islamic texts. These groups often view themselves as defenders of true Salafi doctrine.

What is the significance of Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali’s role in Salafi dawah in Indonesia?

Sheikh Rabi' al-Madkhali’s influence in Indonesia is significant because his teachings have shaped the Salafi movement there, particularly through his followers who practice a rigid interpretation of Salafi principles. These followers, often labeled as 'madakilah,' have been involved in various controversies, including harsh criticisms of other Islamic scholars and movements, leading to division and the practice of tahdir within Indonesia’s Islamic communities.

Why do the madakilah and haddadiyah groups often engage in 'tahdir' (excommunication or denouncement) of other Islamic scholars?

The madakilah and haddadiyah groups engage in 'tahdir' because they believe that other Islamic scholars and movements are deviating from true Salafi principles, particularly in matters of bid'ah and misinterpretation of Islamic texts. They see this practice as a necessary step in preserving the purity of Salafi dawah and protecting the community from what they perceive as harmful innovations in the religion.

What are the shared theological views between the madakilah and haddadiyah groups?

Both the madakilah and haddadiyah groups share a strong commitment to the doctrine of tawhid (the oneness of God) and a strict interpretation of Salafi teachings. They are united in their opposition to bid'ah (innovation), rejecting any practices they see as not being in line with the Quran and Sunnah. They also share a focus on rejecting any form of intercession or innovation in religious practices, emphasizing a return to the practices of the early generations of Muslims.