Judge dismisses jury for the day after over 4 hours, with no verdict yet in Trump hush money trial

Summary

ニューヨークでの裁判の様子を伝えるニュースです。元アメリカ大統領ドナルド・トランプが選挙干渉と賄賂に関連する34件の重罪で起訴されています。陪審員たちはこの件について審議中で、証言の再読み上げや裁判官の指示の再確認を求めています。証人のデイビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コーエンの証言が特に重要視されています。裁判の進行や陪審員の質問に関する最新情報が報道されています。

Takeaways

• 🕔 ニューヨークの午後4時に、トランプ元大統領に対する歴史的な選挙干渉・秘密保持の刑事裁判の陪審が審議を開始。
• 📝 陪審員は現在、34件の重罪に対するトランプの運命を議論しており、裁判官の指示を再度聞くことを要求。
• 📜 陪審員はまた、デビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コーエンの証言を再度聞きたいと要求。
• 💼 ニューヨーク・タイムズは、陪審員がトランプが選挙陰謀に関与したかどうかを一致して決定する必要がないと報告。
• 📖 裁判官は各重罪カウントについて説明し、トランプがこれらの記録を偽造したかどうかを証明する必要があることを明示。
• 📱 トランプはTruth Socialに多くの投稿を行い、罪状を知らないと主張。
• 🔔 陪審員が1960年代の電話のような音でベルを鳴らし、裁判官に質問や要求を伝達。
• 📚 陪審員はコーエンとペッカーの証言、特にペッカーが投資家会議中にトランプと電話で話した部分を再度聞きたいと要求。
• ⏳ 裁判官は陪審員に翌朝9:30に戻るよう指示し、要求された証言と指示を再度読み上げる準備を整える。
• 📝 裁判官が陪審員に対して再度読み上げる指示は非常に重要であり、陪審員の理解を助けるためのものである。

Q & A

ニューヨークでの裁判は現在どのような時刻ですか？

ニューヨークでの裁判は4:00に開始されています。

裁判所で審議されているのは誰の事件ですか？

元アメリカ合衆国大統領ドナルド・トランプの事件が審議されています。

トランプ前大統領はどのような罪状で起訴されていますか？

トランプ前大統領は選挙介入と封口料の件で重罪の罪状で起訴されています。

陪審団はどのように構成されていますか？

陪審団は12人のニューヨーク市民から構成されており、その中に7人の男性と5人の女性がいます。

陪審団はどのような要求を裁判所にしましたか？

陪審団は裁判所に、裁判官の指示と特定の証言を再聴取するよう要求しました。

陪審団は裁判官のどの指示を再聴取を希望していますか？

陪審団は裁判官メルシャンからの指示全体を再聴取を希望しています。

トランプ前大統領は裁判に対してどのように対応していますか？

トランプ前大統領はTruth Socialというプラットフォーム上で多くの投稿を行い、裁判に関連するコメントをしています。

トランプ前大統領は自分に対して課せられた罪状についてどのように述べていますか？

トランプ前大統領は自分が何に起訴されているのかわからないと述べており、起訴内容が彼に読み上げられた際にも理解できていないと主張しています。

裁判所での証言を再聴取する予定がある人物は誰ですか？

デイビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コエンの証言が再聴取される予定です。

陪審団はなぜ裁判官の指示を再聴取を希望するのでしょうか？

裁判は複雑であり、陪審団は裁判官からの指示を再聴取することで判断基準を確認し、より正確な判断を下すためです。

トランプ前大統領が裁判に関連して何を主張していますか？

トランプ前大統領は裁判に関連して、もしMother Teresaがポルノスターとの不倫を隠すために封口料を支払ったとされるなら、彼女もこれらの起訴を打ち破ることはできないと主張しています。

陪審団はどのようにして裁判官からの指示を再聴取しますか？

陪審団は裁判所に戻り、裁判官メルシャンからの指示を再聴取しますが、具体的な指示の部分を希望するかどうかを裁判官に伝えています。

トランプ前大統領の裁判はどのような結果をもたらす可能性がありますか？

トランプ前大統領の裁判は彼の今後の政治的キャリアに影響を与える可能性があり、もし有罪判決が出る場合、アメリカ大統領選挙への影響も予想されます。

Outlines

00:00

🕒 ニューヨークでの元大統領の刑事裁判開始

ニューヨーク時間4時に、かつて多くの有名人や有力者を起訴した裁判所で、元アメリカ合衆国大統領が選挙介入と封口料事件に関する刑事裁判が始まりました。12人のニューヨーク市民と7人の男性と5人の女性の陪審員が、マンハッタン地裁の検察官による34の重罪指控を検討しています。陪審員からの2つ目のメモが届き、裁判官の指示を再聴取し、またデイビッド・ペルカーとマイケル・コエンの証言を再聴取するよう要求しています。裁判は昨日の7時間以上の結論弁論の後、陪審員が4時間を要して審議しています。

05:01

📚 陪審員の要求と証言の再聴取

陪審員は裁判官からの指示を再聴取するよう要求し、またデイビッド・ペルカーとマイケル・コエンの特定の証言を再聴取することを希望しています。裁判官は彼らに30ページに及ぶ証言を再読む必要があると知らせ、その準備に時間を要します。また、陪審員は裁判官からの指示を全て再聴取するかどうか尋ねられました。裁判は複雑で、陪審員は裁判所からの指示を理解するために時間を要する可能性があります。

10:02

🗣️ 証言の重要性と陪審員の要求

デイビッド・ペルカーの証言は、ドナルド・トランプと封口料事件に関する電話のやり取りを示しており、重要な証拠となっています。トランプは投資家会議中にペルカーと電話で話しており、彼はその話が真実であると信じ、トランプにその話を買収するよう促しました。この電話のやり取りは事件の陰謀の始まりであり、陪審員は裁判官からの指示を再聴取するよう要求しています。裁判所は陪審員の要求に応じて、証言の再聴取を準備しています。

Keywords

💡ニューヨーク

ニューヨークはアメリカ合衆国の州で、本動画の重要な舞台です。裁判所が存在し、かつては多くの有名な人物が裁判を受けたと記載されています。このキーワードは、事件の地理的背景を示しており、ニューヨークの裁判所での重要な裁判が本動画の中心となる出来事です。

💡裁判

裁判は、法律に基づいて争いを解決するプロセスを指します。本動画では、元大統領ドナルド・トランプが選挙介入と封口料の疑いで裁判にかけられているという裁判が中心です。裁判は、本動画の主題であり、トランプ氏の運命を決定する重要な手続きです。

💡陪審团

陪審团は、裁判において証拠を聴取し、被告の有罪または無罪を決定する一般市民による集団です。本動画では、12人のニューヨーク市民がトランプ氏の運命を決定する重要な役割を果たしています。彼らは、裁判所での証言を再聴取するよう要求し、裁判の進行に重要な影響を与えます。

💡選挙介入

選挙介入とは、外国が選挙プロセスに影響を与える行為を指します。本動画では、トランプ氏が選挙介入に関与したとされる疑いが審理されています。これは、トランプ氏が選挙に関連した不正行為を行ったかどうかを判断する裁判の核心です。

💡封口料

封口料とは、秘密を守ることの対価として支払われる金銭的な報酬を意味します。本動画では、トランプ氏がポルノスターとの不倫を隠すために封口料を支払った疑いが審理されています。これは、トランプ氏が犯罪を隠そうとしたとされる重要な要素です。

💡重罪

重罪とは、重大な犯罪を指し、通常は長期間の刑務または重い罰金が科されるものです。本動画では、トランプ氏が重罪の罪名で起訴されていることが示されており、これは裁判の重大性を強調しています。

💡証言

証言とは、裁判所などで証人の立場から話すことで、事実を述べることを指します。本動画では、ダビッド・ペッカーやミカエル・コエンの証言が重要な証拠として取り上げられており、トランプ氏との関係を証明する鍵となる証言とされています。

💡裁判所

裁判所は、裁判を行う場所であり、法律の裁きを下す機関です。本動画では、ニューヨークの裁判所がトランプ氏の裁判を行っている場所です。裁判所は、本動画の重要な場面であり、事件の決定的な瞬間が起こる場所です。

💡トランプ

ドナルド・トランプは、アメリカ合衆国の元大統領であり、本動画の中心となる人物です。トランプ氏は選挙介入と封口料の疑いで裁判にかけられており、その裁判の結果が彼の今後の政治的キャリアに影響を与える可能性があります。

💡裁判所の手続き

裁判所の手続きとは、裁判を進めるための法律上のステップを指します。本動画では、裁判所での手続きが複雑であることが示されており、陪審团は裁判所からの指示を再聴取する必要があると要求しています。これは、裁判の複雑さを示す重要な要素です。

Highlights

The jury in the historic Trump criminal election interference hush money trial is deliberating on the 34 felony counts Trump is charged with by the Manhattan District Attorney.

The jury requested to rehear Judge Merchan's instructions and earlier requested testimony from David Pecker and Michael Cohen.

The jury did not have to agree unanimously on the underlying crime that Trump might have used in the election conspiracy.

Judge Merchan explained what needed to be proven to show that Trump falsified records or caused the records to be falsified.

Trump is awaiting the jury's verdict, which could impact his potential run for the White House.

Trump posted controversial statements on the platform Truth Social, claiming ignorance of the charges against him.

Trump made a bizarre comment, stating that even Mother Teresa couldn't beat these charges if accused of concealing hush money payments.

The jury requested four specific parts of testimony, including from Michael Cohen and David Pecker, to be reread to them.

David Pecker's testimony included details of a phone conversation with Trump during an investor meeting, discussing the purchase of Karen McDougal's story.

Judge Merchan asked the jury if they wanted the whole set of instructions reread or just a specific part.

The jury has been dismissed for the day and will resume deliberations at 9:30 AM the following day.

New York law requires corroborating evidence or testimony, with Pecker's testimony providing circumstantial evidence linking Trump to the conspiracy.

Judge Merchan's reading of the jury instructions took an hour and 26 minutes, reflecting the complexity of the case.

Speculation about the jury's questions is common, with prosecutors and defense attorneys often interpreting them in different ways.

Andrew Weissmann and other legal experts discussed the standard practice of re-reading jury instructions and the potential impact on the trial's outcome.

Transcripts

>>> HI, EVERYONE.

>>> HI, EVERYONE.

HERE WE GO.

IT IS 4:00 IN NEW YORK.

OH TO BE A FLY ON THE WALL

BEHIND THESE CLOSED DOORS.

IN THE COURTHOUSE THAT HAS SEEN

NO SHORTAGE OF FAMOUS

INFLUENTIAL OR WEALTHY CRIMINAL

DEFENDANTS.

12 NEW YORKERS AND SEVEN MEN AND

FIVE WOMEN ARE RIGHT NOW

DEBATING THE FATE OF A FORMER

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

AND THEY HAVE QUESTIONS.

THE JURY IN THE HISTORIC TRUMP

CRIMINAL ELECTION INTERFERENCE

HUSH MONEY TRIAL IS AT THIS

MOMENT DELIBERATING ON THE 34

FELONY COUNTS TRUMP IS CHARGED

WITH BY THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT

ATTORNEY.

JUST IN, IN THE LAST FEW

MINUTES, A SECOND NOTE HAS BEEN SENT FROM THE JURY, THEY'RE

SENT FROM THE JURY, THEY'RE

ASKING TO RE-HEAR JUDGE

MERCHAN'S INSTRUCTIONS TO THEM

AND EARLIER THEY ARE REQUESTED

TESTIMONY FROM DAVID PERKCKER AN

MICHAEL COHEN.

OUR JOURNALISTS ARE STANDING

WATCH AND THEY ARE UPDATING US

AND WE'LL UPDATE YOU AS SOON AS

WE KNOW ANYTHING.

AS OF

AS OF 4:00 P.M., THE JURIES THAT

DELIBERATED FOR FOUR HOURS AFTER

YESTERDAY'S MARATHON DAY OF

CLOSING ARGUMENTS, MORE THAN 7

HOURS BETWEEN THE CLOSING

ARGUMENT DELIVERED BY THE

DEFENSE AND THE PROSECUTION.

THIS MORNING THE JUDGE DELIVERED

TOZ COMPLICATED BUT ALL

IMPORTANT JURY INSTRUCTIONS.

WHEN JUDGE MER SHAN EXPLAINED

HOW THE JURIES HAVE TO APPLY THE

LAWS TO THIS CASE.

SOMETHING THAT MATTERS IN THIS

CASE, BUT IN THIS ONE WHERE

DONALD TRUMP FACES FELONY

CHARGES, NOTS NOT MISDEMEANOR,

BECAUSE IT WAS TO CONCEAL

ANOTHER CRIME.

THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS TOOK ON A

NEW IMPORTANCE.

THEY DID NOT HAVE AGREE AMONGST

THEMSELVES WHAT THE UNDERLYING

CRIME WAS.

"NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTS THAT

THE JURY DID NOT HAVE TO AGREE

UNANIMOUSLY THAT THEY MIGHT

DETERMINE THAT TRUMP USE THE IN

THE ELECTION CONSPIRACY.

HAD THE JUDGE REQUIRED THEM TO

BE UNANIMOUS ON THE UNLAWFUL

MEANS IT MIGHT HAVE BECOME FAR

HARD TORE REACH A VERDICT.

THE JUDGE WENT THROUGH EACH AND

EVERY ONE OF THE SINGLE FELONY

COUNTS, EACH ONE POINTING TO 11

CHECKS AND 11 INVOICES AND 12

VOUCHERS.

THE JUDGE EXPLAINED WHAT NEEDED

TO BE PROVEN TO SHOW THAT TRUMP

FALSIFIED THESE RECORDS OR

CAUSED THE RECORDS TO BE

FALSIFIED.

NOW AS FOR DEFENDANT, DONALD

TRUMP, HE'S FORCED TO WAIT JUST

LIKE EVERY OTHER CRIMINAL

DEFENDANT IN THE COUNTRY.

ANY MOMENT NOW HE COULD FIND OUT

WHETHER HE'LL BE ASKING THE

AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEND HIM TO

THE WHITE HOUSE WITH A CRIMINAL

CONVICTION ON HIS RECORD.

HE HAS BEEN SPENDING HIS TIME

POSTING A LOT OF NUTTY THINGS ON

THE PLATFORM TRUTH SOCIAL.

EARLIER HE SAID, DOES NOT KNOW

WHAT HE'S BEEN CHARGED WITH.

INE THOUGH THEY WERE READ TO HIM

WHILE HE WAS THERE.

JUST BEFORE THAT, HE POSTED A

RANT FROM OUTSIDE OF THE

COURTHOUSE WHERE HE CLAIMED

MOTHER TERESA COULD NOT BEAT

THESE CHARGES.

IF MOTHER TERESA WOULD BE

CHARGED WITH CONCEALING HUSH

MONEY PAYMENTS TO HIDE AN AFFAIR

WITH A PORN STAR.

WE'RE SORRY WE SAID HER NAME IN

THAT SENTENCE.

WAIT-AND-SEE MODE IN THE

INTERFERENCE HUSH MONEY CRIMINAL

TRIAL IS WHERE WE BEGIN WITH OUR

MOST FAVORITE REPORTERS AND

FRIENDS.

WITH US AT THE TABLE, ANDREW

WISEMAN IS BACK AND SUSAN CRAIG,

AND ALSO BACK FORMER DEPUTY

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY HARRY LITMAN

IS HERE AND OUTSIDE OF THE

COURTHOUSE, VAUGHN HILLYARD.

VAUGHN, WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT

NOW?

I WANT TO LOOK DOWN TO SEE WHAT

IS HAPPENING IN THE COURTROOM

BUT I WON'T DO THAT.

I'LL LET YOU TELL US.

>> Reporter: WELL FIRST OF ALL,

I'M WONDERING HOW RINGS OF THE

BECAUSE IT IS NOT CLEAR WHEN THE

JURY, FROM THE JURY ROOM, RINGS

THE BELL INTO THE COURTROOM

WHETHER THEY HAVE A VERDICT OR

HAVE A NOTE WITH QUESTIONS.

AND NOW SO FAR THEY HAVE RUNG IN

TWICE WITH TWO DIFFERENT NOTES.

THE JURY JUST IN THE LAST TWO

MINUTES RE-ENTERED THE COURTROOM

AND THERE WERE TWO REQUESTS FROM

THE JURY TO JUDGE MERCHAN.

NUMBER ONE, THERE WERE FOUR

SPECIFIC PARTS OF TESTIMONY

INCLUDING FROM MICHAEL COHEN AND

DAVID PECKER THAT THEY WANT TO

HAVE REREAD TO THEM.

JUDGE MERCHAN INFORMING THEM IT

IS 30 PAGES OF TESTIMONY

REQUIRED TO BE READ BACK TO

THEM.

THAT COULD LAST UP TO 30

MINUTES.

THEY ARE STILL IN THE COURTROOM

TRYING TO GO AND GATHER THOSE

PAGES OF TRANSCRIPTS FROM ALL OF

THE WAY BACK IF APRIL TO MAY

13th WHEN KPIEKMICHAEL COHEN

TESTIFIED.

THE SECOND REQUEST IS TO REREAD

THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT JUDGE

MERCHAN DELIVERED THIS MORNING.

THIS IS THE PACKET OF JURY

INSTRUCTIONS.

HE READ IT ONCE AND IT TOOK HIM

AN HOUR AND A 26 MINUTES TO DO

SO.

IT IS COMPLICATE AND THE CASE IS

COMPLEX AND THE JURY

INSTRUCTIONS ARE COMPLEX BECAUSE

IT PERTAINED TO A LOT OF LEGAL

STATUES AND NOW THE QUESTION

THAT THE JUDGE JUST PUT TO THE

JURORS DO YOU WANT THE WHOLE

THING READ BACK OR A SPECIFIC

PART OF THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS.

THAT IS WHAT WE'RE WAITING TO

HEAR FROM THE JURY IN THIS

CLOSING HOURS OF DAY ONE EVER

DELIBERATION.

>> SO LET ME READ BACK TO YOU

THE FIRST PART OF THIS WHICH WAS

THE FIRST RINGING OF THE BELL.

IS IT AN ACTUAL BELL?

>> Reporter: WE'RE TOLD BY LISA

RUBIN THAT IT SOUNDS LIKE A

1960s TELEPHONE.

SO IF THAT TAKES YOU BACK,

SOMETIMES GOVERNMENT IS A LITTLE

SLOW TO UPDATE.

BUT THERE YOU GO.

>> OKAY.

THAT IS MY BURNING QUESTION.

SO THOSE WERE THE FOUR QUESTIONS

THAT THE FIRST RING OF THE BELL

WERE -- THAT THE JURY EXPRESSED

THEY WANTED TO SEE.

THESE ARE THE TRANSCRIPTS

THEY'RE RUNNING DOWN.

ONE, DAVID PECKER'S TESTIMONY

REGARDING THE PHONE CONVERSATION

WITH DONALD TRUMP WHILE PECKER

WAS IN THE INVESTOR MEETING.

THIS CAME UP CLOSER TO THE END

WHEN I THINK THE PROSECUTION

REMINDED -- IT CAME UP MAYBE IN

SOMEONE'S CROSS OR I DON'T

REMEMBER WHY IT CAME UP, BUT

THIS WAS TRUMP ON THE PHONE WITH

PECKER.

HE PULLED HIM OUT OF A MEETING

AND HE SAID, I DON'T PAY FOR

STUFF LIKE THIS.

THIS SEEMED LIKE AN IMPORTANT

PART OF TIEING TRUMP TO THE

WHOLE SCHEME, VAUGHN?

>> Reporter: RIGHT.

IT IS AROUND KAREN McDOUGAL

PURCHASING OF THE STORY.

HE WAS AT AN INVESTOR MEETING IN

NEW JERSEY WHEN HE GOT THIS

PHONE CALL.

HIS ASSISTANT CAME IN AND SAID

DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE LINE AND

HE STEPPED OUT AND THAT IS WHEN

THE PHONE CALL TOOK PLACE ABOUT

THE SPECIFICS OF KAREN McDOUGAL

STORY AND DAVID PECKER TESTIFIED

TO THIS JURY THAT HE, IN FACT,

THOUGHT THE STORY WAS REAL AND

CREDIBLE AND BASED ON THE FACT

THAT DONALD TRUMP TOLD HIM THAT

KAREN WAS A QUOTE, NICE GIRL.

AND THAT HE URGED DONALD TRUMP

ON THAT PHONE CALL THAT THE

STORY SHOULD BE PURCHASED.

AND TRRPDONALD TRUMP FOLLOWED UP

SAYING HE SHOULD TALK TO

MICHAEL, MICHAEL COHEN, ABOUT

EXECUTING THAT ARRANGEMENT.

THIS IS ALL AT THE BEGINNING OF

THE CONSPIRACY THAT THE JURY IS

HAVING TO DELIBERATE OVER.

AND WE HAVE FROM THE JURY

INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE JURY IS

NOW ASKING TO BE REREAD TO THEM,

THAT MICHAEL COHEN WAS AN

ACCOMPLICE IN THAT AND UNDER NEW

YORK STATE LAW, YOU HAVE TO HAVE

CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR

TESTIMONY AND THAT IS WHERE IT

IS INTERESTING TO SEE DAVID

PECKER, MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS

THAT DONALD TRUMP HAD WITH HIM

BEING ASKED TO BE REREAD BACK TO

THEM, THAT SPECIFIC TESTIMONY,

BECAUSE WHEN YOU MATCH IT UP,

YOU SEE CORROBORATING TESTIMONY,

NOT JUST DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE,

BUT THERE WAS CIRCUMSTANTIAL

EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY THAT

DAVID PECKER LINKED DONALD TRUMP

TO THE BEGINNING OF THE

CONSPIRACY.

>> YEAH, ANDREW, I'LL ASK YOU TO

PICK UP ON VAUGHN'S POINT.

LET ME TELL THE VIEWERS WHAT

HAPPENED IN THE LAST 60 SECONDS.

THE JURY HAS BEEN DISMISSED FOR

THE DAY AFTER JUDGE MERCHAN

BROUGHT THEM BACK IN AFTER THEY

RANG THEIR BELL A SECOND TIME.

TOLD THEM THEY WERE GOING TO RUN

DOWN THE TRANSCRIPTS OF THIS

TESTIMONY THAT VAUGHN JUST

DESCRIBED PERFECTLY.

WE'LL TELL WHAT YOU THE OTHER

THREE PIECES OF TESTIMONY ARE

THAT THEY WANT.

BUT THE JURY WANTED THE JURY

INSTRUCTION READ BACK TO THEM.

YOU WAVED AROUND YOUR PACKET.

THE WHOLE THING TOOK ABOUT AN

HOUR AND A HALF TO READ AND

JUDGE MERCHAN ASKED THEM TO

CLARIFY, WHETHER THEY WANTED THE

WHOLE INSTRUCTION OR JUST PART

OF IT.

SO THAT IS WHERE THEY PICK UP

TOMORROW MORNING AT 9:30.

>> THIS GIVES THE JUDGE AND THE

PARTIES TO HAVE THEIR DUCKS IN A

ROW SO WHEN THE JURY COMES BACK,

THEY COULD BE READY TO GO.

SO EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS, THIS

IS A NORMAL PART AS HARRY KNOWS,

OF WHAT YOU HAVE -- WHETHER A

JURY IS OUT.

THEY COULD ASK TO HAVE SOME KIND

OF INSTRUCTION REREAD OR SOME

QUESTION ABOUT THE INSTRUCTIONS.

AND REREADING IT IS SIMPLE ONCE

THE JURY RESPONDS IN SAYING THAT

THEY WANT THE WHOLE THING READ

BACK.

CO

HE COULD DO THAT.

HE JUST READS THAT.

>> I SAW THERE HIS INSTRUCTION,

HE SAID I WON'T GIVE THIS TO YOU

BUT I WILL READ IT TO YOU AGAIN.

WHY WOULDN'T HE GIVE THEM A

COPY.

>> A QUIRK OF NEW YORK FEDERAL

LAW.

I WAS A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, THIS

WOULD GO BACK TO -- MANY JUDGES

WOULD SEND IT BACK THERE.

SOME JUDGES DIDN'T.

BECAUSE THEY REALLY THOUGHT THAT

IT MIGHT HAVE THEM SORT OF PARS

IT TOO MUCH.

BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IN

OTHER COURTS, BUT NOT IN NEW

YORK.

IN NEW YORK THEY COULD ASK TO

HAVE IT READ.

MORE TYPICALLY, THEY ASK

QUESTIONS LIKE CAN YOU PLEASE

SPECIFY SOME MORE WHAT BEYOND A

REASONABLE DOUBT MEANS.

BECAUSE THAT IS THE LEVEL OF --

IN YOUR HEAD HOW TO DEAL WITH

THAT AND HOW CONVEY TO SOMEBODY

WHAT A LEVEL OF CERTITUDE IS.

THAT IS A COMMON QUESTION.

THE OTHER QUESTIONS.

THE MORE INTERESTING ONE WHICH

IS THE FIRST NOTE WHERE THERE IS

ENDLESS SPECULATION THAT GOES ON

AS TO WHAT DOES IT MEAN AND YOU

COULD ARGUE IT EACH WAY.

WHEN I WAS A PROSECUTOR, I

ARGUED IT AGAINST ME.

NO MATTER WHAT CAME IN, IT IS

AWFUL.

NO MATTER HOW GOOD IT WAS.

NO ONE EVER WANTED ME TO DO

TRIALS BECAUSE I WAS LIKE WE'RE

LOSING NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED.

SO I'M A TERRIBLE PERSON TO ASK.

>> I WAS LIKE THAT WITH

CAMPAIGNS.

>> I SAID THIS TO SOMEONE AND

THAT IS WHAT IS HE SAID.