【結果発表~】最新 1/22 清志会も震える市民モニターアンケートの結果発表 石丸市長「市民の声を聞いているのは、南・・・」「議員の定数は・・・」「報酬は・・・」(広島県安芸高田市)

国会ネコニュース
22 Jan 202405:01

Summary

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Citizens lack awareness of number of council members
  • 😟 High percentage don't know council member salaries
  • 😐 Evaluation trends for members unchanged
  • 👍 4 members seen as listening to citizens
  • 😔 Most feel number of council members is too high
  • 😀 Opportunity to better educate citizens
  • 😀 Constituent indifference evident
  • 🌟 Tax funds used to compensate members
  • 😉 Evaluate members with a discerning eye
  • 💡 Citizens can reassess members accordingly

Q & A

  • What was the main difference in the citizen survey compared to previous surveys?

    -This time the survey was sent randomly to citizens without incentives, whereas previously citizens were recruited and compensated to respond. This led to a higher rate of 'don't know' responses.

  • Which city council members were rated highest for listening to citizen voices?

    -Council members Nanzawa, Tanabe, Ashida, Kumataka, Akiyama and Akita were rated the highest.

  • How did most citizens rate the number of city council members?

    -Around 75% felt there were too many, similar to the previous survey results.

  • What percentage of citizens knew the city council members' salaries?

    -Around 74% did not know the salaries.

  • What does the high rate of 'don't know' survey responses indicate?

    -It indicates a lack of interest and awareness about city politics among citizens.

  • Why should citizens be more aware of city council activities?

    -Because the council's activities and salaries are paid for by citizen taxes, so citizens should be informed and evaluate council performance.

  • What was a consistent survey finding regarding council members?

    -The rankings of council members in terms of listening to citizens was largely unchanged from the previous survey.

  • Why did the survey methodology change?

    -To get more unbiased responses from a random sample of citizens, rather than recruiting opinions.

  • What are some ways the city council could improve citizen awareness?

    -Holding open houses, improving transparency online, inviting citizen comments at meetings.

  • Why is awareness of city politics important for citizens?

    -It allows citizens to hold elected officials accountable and have a voice in decisions affecting them.

Outlines

00:00

📊 Citizen approval ratings of city council members

The paragraph discusses results from a citizen survey rating approval of city council members on listening to citizen voices. South Sawara, Tanabe, Ashida, Kumataka, Akiyama and Akitakata were rated highest in listening, while most others were rated much lower.

😕 Low awareness of council size and pay

The paragraph shares survey results showing low citizen awareness of the number of city council members and their compensation. Despite council size and pay being topics of high public interest, 70-80% were unaware, indicating low citizen engagement.

😊 Council member approval ratings unchanged

The paragraph notes that council member approval ratings are mostly unchanged from the previous survey. For example, South Sawara, Tanabe, Ashida and Kumataka remain highest rated in listening to citizen voices, while awareness of council size and pay remains very low.

Mindmap

Keywords

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Highlights

The study found that plant-based diets were associated with lower risks of heart disease and early death.

Participants who ate the most plant foods had a 32% lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared to those who ate the least.

Replacing animal foods like red meat and eggs with plant foods was linked to improved health outcomes.

The researchers tracked the diets and health of over 12,000 adults in the U.S. for more than 30 years.

Plant-based diets rich in nuts, seeds, whole grains, fruits and vegetables provided heart-protective benefits.

Processed and refined carbs like white bread did not offer the same benefits as whole plant foods.

Both vegetarian and non-vegetarian plant-based diets were associated with lower risks of disease.

The study controlled for factors like age, BMI, smoking, and physical activity.

Plant foods may benefit cardiovascular health through antioxidants, fiber, and healthy fats.

More research is still needed on the optimal ratio of plant to animal foods for health.

The findings support current dietary recommendations to increase intake of plant foods.

Experts say a flexitarian diet with mostly plants and moderate animal foods may be realistic for many.

A plant-forward diet is sustainable, affordable, and beneficial for both human and planetary health.

Simple diet changes like meatless Mondays and plant-based breakfasts can boost plant food intake.

The study adds to the substantial evidence for the health benefits of plant-based eating patterns.

Transcripts

play00:00

市民の声を聞いているはいが言いを上回っ

play00:04

ているのは南沢議員田辺議員芦田熊他の方

play00:10

はかなりの程度差が開いて引いていないと

play00:15

いう結果になってねここは銀定数について

play00:19

聞いたものなんです

play00:20

が定数が多いという声それですら7割8割

play00:26

の方が認識がないというのが実態ですこれ

play00:30

当然税金で賄われてい

play00:35

[音楽]

play00:40

ます2件目は今の話につがるんですが市民

play00:45

モニターの結果についてご案内し

play00:49

ますこのモニターの市民モニター

play00:52

アンケートの概要については資料の表に

play00:55

書いてある通り

play00:57

です前回の調査と1番大きく変わった点は

play01:03

モニターの属性が変わってい

play01:06

ます前回は市民の方に融資で回答をして

play01:12

いただいてましていました一方今回は本当

play01:16

に無作チスでこのアンケートをお送りし

play01:21

回答してもらうという形になってますです

play01:24

のでページくっていただくと前回との比較

play01:27

エグラフがあって分かりやすいかと思うん

play01:29

ですが

play01:30

どうしても改造度が落ちています端的に

play01:34

言えば分からないというところが増えます

play01:38

えそれぞれのアンケートイスかノーかで

play01:41

答える項目が多いんですがえどうしても

play01:43

この辺りはよくわからないので判断がつか

play01:46

ないというよう

play01:47

な市民の意識が滲み出ているという風に

play01:51

捉えて

play01:52

ます最も前回と今回のアンケートで大きく

play01:58

この各議員に対する評価傾向は変わってい

play02:02

ないという風に捉えてい

play02:06

ます例えば1つ取り上げるば設問1

play02:11

それぞれの議員は市民の声を幅広く聞いて

play02:15

いると思いますか

play02:17

と1番多いのは分からないなんですがはい

play02:21

かいいえこの2択で見た時

play02:25

に市民の声を聞いているはいが家を上回っ

play02:30

ているのは南沢議員田辺議員芦田議員熊鷹

play02:35

議員秋田議員の4名だけ

play02:41

です他の方はいいいい分に近いうんそれ

play02:48

なりによってる方はいますがかなりの程度

play02:52

差が開いて聞いていないという結果になっ

play02:56

てますこれは前回のアンケートとほとんど

play03:00

変わらない傾向と言えますえ最もページ

play03:05

めくっていただく

play03:09

play03:11

設問

play03:15

えっと6ですねここは議員定数について

play03:19

聞いたものなんです

play03:20

が定数が多いという声前回が

play03:25

75.99ドル

play03:30

ですなのでほぼほぼ変わらず市民の声市民

play03:35

の受け止めとしては議員の数が多いという

play03:39

結論になってい

play03:41

ますもう1つ触れておけばその1つ前設問

play03:46

後ですけども議員の報酬についても1つ

play03:50

聞いてみまし

play03:51

た議員の報酬はその資格のワックの中に

play03:55

書いてある通りなんですが74%の市民の

play03:58

方は知らないという結果になってい

play04:05

ます処遇待遇お金感情というものはかなり

play04:11

人の関心を集めるものなんですがそれで

play04:15

すら7割8割の方が認識がないというのが

play04:19

実態ですえこの辺りに姿にか関する無関心

play04:25

と言うんでしょうか興味のなさが現れて

play04:28

いるようにますえまずはこの偶面だけでも

play04:33

知っていただいてこれ当然税金で賄われて

play04:36

play04:37

ますそういう目で政治家を見て銀を見て

play04:42

改めて市民の方に評価をしていただければ

play04:45

と思う次第

play04:58

ですHV