Egyptian Mummies: From Sacred Vessels to Scary Undead | Monstrum
Summary
TLDRThe video explores the transformation of the Egyptian mummy from a sacred figure into a popular culture monster. It delves into how the commodification of mummies in early Europe led to their role in medicine, public spectacle, and eventually horror fiction. The video highlights the rise of 'Egyptomania' in the 19th century, with mummy unwrappings becoming entertainment. Literature, cinema, and real-world events like the discovery of King Tut's tomb contributed to the mummy's enduring presence as a cursed, silent, and terrifying figure in Western horror media.
Takeaways
- 🌍 Mummies are broadly defined as well-preserved cadavers found on almost every continent, but the Egyptian mummy is the most iconic.
- 🧟♂️ The Egyptian mummy became the poster child for mummification due to its connection with ancient rituals and later, its portrayal in popular culture as a horror figure.
- 🏺 Mummification in ancient Egypt was a sacred practice linked to the gods Isis and Osiris, meant to prepare the body and soul for the afterlife.
- 💊 The early modern trade of mummified remains for pharmaceuticals contributed to the commodification of Egyptian mummies, mistaking them for medicinal bitumen.
- 📜 European fascination with Egypt grew after Napoleon's invasion, leading to Egyptomania and a surge in mummy autopsies as both academic and public spectacles.
- 📚 Fictional portrayals of mummies, starting with Jane Loudon's 1827 novel, began turning them into monsters, reflecting cultural anxieties and imperialistic views.
- 🎥 The 1932 film 'The Mummy' popularized the image of the bandaged, undead Egyptian mummy, cementing its place in horror cinema.
- 🧲 The rise of mummy curses, notably after the discovery of King Tutankhamun's tomb, fed into the mystical and ominous perception of Egyptian mummies.
- 🔬 Advancements in science and archaeology in the 20th century led to new ways of studying mummies, influencing how they were portrayed in media.
- 😱 The mummy's image evolved into a horror icon in the 1940s, depicted as a decaying, revenge-driven monster, a trend that continues in modern media.
Q & A
What is the significance of mummification in ancient Egypt?
-Mummification in ancient Egypt was a sacred, transformative process linked to the gods Isis and Osiris. It was believed to make one's body and soul fit for the afterlife.
How did mummies become associated with monsters in popular culture?
-Mummies became associated with monsters due to early trade in mummified remains for medicinal purposes, European fascination with Egyptian artifacts, and fictional tales that dramatized mummies as reanimated undead beings.
What role did early modern trade in mummies play in their horror transformation?
-The early trade in mummified remains, driven by the mistaken belief that they had medicinal properties, contributed to the commodification of human corpses, which in turn led to their portrayal as horror figures in popular culture.
How did Napoleon's invasion of Egypt influence the Western perception of mummies?
-Napoleon's invasion of Egypt from 1798-1801 brought back Egyptian artifacts and sparked a field of study, Egyptology, which fueled Western intrigue and fascination with mummies, contributing to their portrayal in fiction.
Who wrote the first science fiction novel about mummies, and what was it called?
-The first science fiction novel about mummies was 'The Mummy! Or A Tale of the Twenty-Second Century' written by Jane Loudon in 1827.
What is 'Egyptomania' and how did it impact mummy depictions?
-'Egyptomania' refers to the intense European fascination with ancient Egyptian culture in the 19th century. It led to the commercialization of Egyptian artifacts and influenced the popular representation of mummies as exotic, mysterious figures.
What role did public mummy autopsies play in mummy horror stories?
-Public mummy autopsies, which were both academic pursuits and entertainment, contributed to the dehumanization of mummies, turning them into spectacles and objects, which helped cement their role as horror figures in Western fiction.
How did the discovery of King Tutankhamun's tomb fuel the mummy curse myth?
-The discovery of King Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1922 and the subsequent deaths of people involved, like Lord Carnarvon, led to rumors of a curse, fueling the popular notion of a mummy's curse, which became a significant part of mummy horror fiction.
How did Boris Karloff's portrayal in the 1932 film 'The Mummy' shape the mummy's image in popular culture?
-Boris Karloff's portrayal of the mummy in the 1932 film 'The Mummy,' particularly his bandaged appearance, solidified the image of the mummy as a frightening, undead figure in pop culture, even though he spent little time onscreen wrapped in bandages.
What was the influence of 1940s mummy films on the monster's portrayal?
-1940s mummy films transformed the mummy into a true horror monster, emphasizing decay, emotionless rage, and revenge, which solidified its role as a feared figure in horror cinema.
Outlines
🧟♂️ Origins of the Mummy Monster
The Egyptian mummy became synonymous with the concept of a mummy monster, evolving from an ancient funerary rite to a shambling, linen-wrapped undead being in popular culture. This transformation was influenced by historical and etymological confusion, notably when early modern Europe mistook mummified remains for having medicinal properties, leading to a thriving trade in mummies. Public dissections and unwrapping ceremonies of these mummies helped build the image of the mummy as a horrifying figure.
🎭 The Mummy as a Cultural Fetish
The commodification of Egyptian mummies for entertainment and science became a spectacle in 19th-century Britain, where public autopsies and unwrapping parties were popular. This fascination was reflected in early mummy fiction, where the mummy was portrayed as both monstrous and instructive. Stories like Jane Loudon's 'The Mummy!' and Gautier's 'The Mummy's Foot' explored the reanimation of mummies, which also mirrored the fetishization and exoticization of Egypt's cultural heritage during imperialism.
🎥 Cinema and the Curse of the Mummy
The popularity of the mummy in cinema took hold in the early 20th century, starting with films like 'Robbing Cleopatra's Tomb' and continuing with Universal Pictures' iconic 1932 film 'The Mummy.' These films built on the myth of the mummy's curse, popularized by the real-life discovery of King Tutankhamun's tomb. Mummies in these narratives were depicted as both tragic and terrifying, representing a cautionary tale about the dangers of disturbing the dead.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Mummification
💡Egyptomania
💡Mummy Curse
💡Unwrapping Parties
💡Napoleon's Invasion
💡King Tutankhamun
💡Mummy's Curse Fiction
💡Egyptology
💡Boris Karloff
💡Colonialism and Mummies
Highlights
Mummies are broadly defined as well-preserved cadavers found globally, but the Egyptian mummy has become the iconic image of mummification.
Mummification in ancient Egypt was linked to the gods Isis and Osiris and was a sacred, transformative process preparing the body for the afterlife.
The early commodification of Egyptian remains, due to mistaken beliefs in their medical properties, helped turn mummies into commercial objects.
In early modern Europe, the word 'mummy' came from the Persian 'mumiya,' which referred to bitumen, leading to the misconception that human remains had healing properties.
In the 19th century, Egyptomania, fueled by Napoleon's invasion of Egypt, led to a fascination with ancient Egyptian culture and artifacts, including mummies.
Public mummy unwrapping events became popular in Britain, blending scientific study with entertainment.
Fiction began portraying mummies as monsters in the early 19th century, with Jane Loudon’s 1827 novel 'The Mummy!' being an early example of a reanimated mummy.
The fascination with Egyptian mummies led to mummy autopsies and unwrapping events, with items from the body often kept as souvenirs.
Edgar Allan Poe and Louisa May Alcott helped shape the mummy curse narrative in their fiction, reinforcing the image of the mummy as a vengeful figure.
The discovery of King Tutankhamun's tomb in 1922 and the rumored curse surrounding it significantly contributed to the popularity of the mummy curse in popular culture.
Universal Pictures' 1932 film 'The Mummy,' starring Boris Karloff, solidified the image of the bandaged, undead mummy in horror cinema.
Post-1940s mummy horror films depicted mummies as slow, emotionless, and decayed figures, emphasizing their monstrous nature.
The shambling walk associated with mummies in later films was influenced by actor Tom Tyler’s arthritis during the filming of 'The Mummy’s Hand' in 1940.
Scientific advancements in the 1950s, like x-rays, added new layers to the mummy mythos, with films exploring the revival of mummies through radiation.
The mummy has evolved into a staple figure in horror, fantasy, and pop culture, often portrayed as a symbol of revenge against those who disturb its rest.
Transcripts
A mummy is defined broadly as any well-preserved cadaver,
and has a history that extends
to almost every continent on the globe.
But when we're talking monsters,
it's hard not to picture anything
that's not your gauzy, wrapped, upright human.
Why did the Egyptian mummy
become the poster child for mummification?
And how did an ancient common funerary rite
turn into the shambling, silent, linen-wrapped,
undead corpse monster of popular culture?
[adventurous music]
I'm Dr. Emily Zarka, and this is "Monstrum."
Mummification was a sacred,
transformative practice in ancient Egypt.
Directly linked to the gods Isis and Osiris,
the ritual process made one's body and soul
fit for existence in the afterlife.
Part of the mummy's journey into the stuff of horrors
began with the early commodification
of Egyptian human remains,
and a little etymological confusion.
In early modern Asia and Greece,
bitumen was a common medical remedy.
The Persian word for Bitumen,
became the Latin mumiya,
and later mummie in medieval Europe.
And with the word mummy came the mistaken belief
that mummified human corpses
had the same medical properties as bitumen,
thus creating a corpse trade where human mummies
were harvested for use in pharmaceuticals.
By the 16th century,
the controversial trade became increasingly popular
as people used dead human remains as medicine.
One English merchant's account
of his handling of an Egyptian mummy
illustrates the kind of treatment
the remains were subject to
in this bizarre trade industry.
John Sanderson writes that he
"broke off all parts of the bodies
to see how the flesh was turned to drugge,"
bringing home more than 600 pounds of remains
for trade in London apothecaries.
Some of these specimens were wholly intact
and pharmacies would unwrap the bodies for scientific study.
In 1763, John Hadley unrolled a mummy in his home
at the behest of the British Royal Society.
His documentation helped lead to the first systematic study
of Egyptian mummy necropsies
by German physician Johann Friedrich Blumenbach
in the late 1700s.
For centuries, ancient Egypt was a subject
of intrigued to Europeans,
and Napoleon's 1798 to 1801 invasion of Egypt
brought back an influx of pillaged artifacts
and firsthand accounts,
fueling intrigue and sparking a field of study, Egyptology.
This marked the first grips
of Egyptomania in the 19th century,
a term used to summarize the robust popular interest
in ancient Egyptian culture.
Ancient Egypt continued as a fashionable pursuit
in the first decade of the 19th century,
mostly in Britain.
The British government built its own Egyptian Hall,
which housed artifacts transferred to Britain
as part of Napoleon's surrender.
The public even started to collect
cheap replicas of Egyptian furniture,
china patterns inspired by Egyptian designs,
and other commercial items.
The 1820s brought significant contributions
to the mummy monster as well.
Former circus strongman Giovanni Belzoni's
recreation of an Egyptian tomb
in Piccadilly's Egyptian Hall In 1821 drew crowds,
as did his inventive marketing techniques,
which included public mummy autopsies.
He was occasionally assisted
by the surgeon and antiquarian Thomas Pettigrew,
who would become a famous Egyptologist
and celebrity mummy autopsist
the following decade after his 1834 publication,
"History of Egyptian Mummies,"
considered the foundational text in modern mummy studies.
In 1822, John-Francois Champollion
translated hieroglyphics for the first time
using the Rosetta Stone.
Desire to better understand
all aspects of ancient Egyptian culture,
including its dead, grew.
Attempts to identify the name and social status of mummies
became increasingly important.
In 1825, Augustus Bozzi Granville
performed the first modern medical autopsy of a mummy.
The mummy continued to turn up in hospitals,
artist studios, dissection theaters, universities,
and on the drawing room tables of the upper class.
Unrolling or unwrapping mummies was both an academic pursuit
and a form of titillating entertainment.
Members of the public who could not attend
such a spectacle in person
had their appetites whet with detailed reports
of the experience in newspapers.
When you consider how the removal of the corpse
from its intended resting place
turns it more object than person,
the treatment of the mummified corpse as entertainment
is significant in understanding the mummy.
They are made uneasy representations of culture,
history, and personhood,
something fiction responds to by making them monsters.
Jane Loudon is the first author
to write these tensions into a fictional text.
Her 1827 science fiction novel, "The Mummy!
Or A Tale of the Twenty-Second Century,"
is the story of a reanimated Egyptian mummy.
In the long, bizarre tale,
the Mummy Cheops serves as a terrifying
yet instructive undead character.
The book was incredibly commercially popular
and reprinted multiple times.
The influence of imperialism
contributed to the commodification
and fetishization of the mummy in Britain.
Colonial territories in other distant countries
provided museums and private collections
with a steady stream of exotic items, including bodies.
By mid-century, the unwrapping of a mummy
had become both formulaic and highly performative.
The body would be laid surrounded
by other Egyptian artifacts and funerary images.
A lecture about the practice of mummification
and Egyptian history would serve
as a prelude to the real show,
the removal of the textiles and other items on the body.
Some of these items, an amulet,
a fragment of bandage, a piece of bone,
might be passed around for the audience
to touch, smell, even taste.
In some cases, particularly at private unrolling parties,
the guests may keep the objects as souvenirs.
We see this trend dramatized in mummy fiction of the time.
In French author Theophile Gautier's story,
"The Mummy's Foot,"
a man buys a mummified foot
and later a woman hopping on one foot arrives at his door.
She's an ancient Egyptian princess
searching for her lost appendage,
apparently unable to rest until her full body is restored.
Edgar Allen Poe's 1845 short story,
"Some Words with a Mummy,"
sets the reanimated Egyptian corpse
in an all too familiar place,
the white man's unwrapping party.
The mummy at the center of the story
is brought back to life with an electrical charge
to the outright terror of the guests.
Louisa May Alcott is responsible
for what many consider to be the first
mummy's curse narrative,
"Lost in a Pyramid; or, The Mummy's Curse."
Penned in 1868, a mummified Egyptian sorceress
curses anyone who dares to disturb her grave,
which, of course, two British men do.
Famous mummy fiction at the turn of the century,
like Arthur Conan Doyle's "The Ring of Thoth"
and "Lot No. 249,"
or Bram Stoker's "The Jewel of Seven Stars"
helped bolster the already mysterious
and mystical popular perception of the Egyptian dead.
The rise of the film industry
continues to reinforce the mummy as foreign antagonist.
In the 1899 silent film "Robbing Cleopatra's Tomb,"
the mummy makes its first appearance on screen.
A man chops a female mummy into pieces
in order to resurrect her.
In 1911's "The Mummy,"
a female mummy comes to life
after exposure to an electrical current.
The Egyptian princess
is infatuated with the male protagonist
and aggressively pursues him,
reinforcing the whole Egyptian mummy
as fetish commodity thing.
The 1920s popularized the idea of the mummy's curse.
Although 19th century writers had already used this trope,
now the idea was supported by rumors of a real curse.
The rumor of King Tutankhamun's curse is notorious,
in part because some people associated with the excavation
did die in mysterious ways.
When archeologist Howard Carter
and his patron the 5th Earl of Carnarvon
unburied the immense tomb of King Tut in November 1922,
it was an immediate global sensation,
sparking a new period of Egyptomania
that would grow into a fever pitch in 1923
when Lord Carnarvon fell ill from an infected mosquito bite,
after rumors circulated that he had stolen
a hoard of valuable items from the dig.
Even before the lord's eventual death
from complications of the infection,
stories circulated that he was suffering a dire punishment
for opening and robbing the Egyptian king.
While not the first rumored mummy's curse,
King Tut's was the curse
with the most bodies attributed to it,
at least 12 if you include some unfortunate pets.
Real warnings do adorn the walls of Egyptian tombs.
Meant to deter thieves
and keep the resting place of the dead sacred,
these hieroglyphics never translate
to vengeful undead corpses.
In fact, in ancient funerary tradition,
the bones of the deceased would be broken
to prevent them from rising and walking among the living.
Life after death was one thing for the Egyptians,
disturbing the living in this realm, however,
was not encouraged.
Besides the fact that rumors of mummy curses
make for profitable tabloid fodder
and easy inspiration for gothic tales,
it's important to note that during this period,
Egypt was actively seeking independence
from British colonial rule.
Painting the physical and bodily remains
of the ancient Egyptians in a negative way
attempted to discredit and demonize
the living Egyptian population.
While the film can be read in several ways,
it's hard to deny the cultural impact
of Universal Pictures' 1932 "The Mummy."
Inspired in part by the preceding decades' events
as well as 19th century gothic and horror tales,
the film tells the story of an undead Egyptian priest
desperate to secure the woman he believes
to be the reincarnation of his one-time lover.
"The Mummy" is an interesting commentary
on the curse controversy
around the opening of King Tut's tomb,
one that places science as a dangerous pastime,
at least when it comes to disturbing corpses.
Included with the remains of Imhotep,
the mummy at the center of the film,
is a box emblazoned with a curse.
Archeologist Whemple ignores
occult scientist Professor Muller's call for caution,
declaring, "In the interest of science,
even if I believe in the curse,
I'd go on with my work for the museum."
Although it's the archeologist's assistant
who inadvertently brings the mummy back to life,
the commentary on the selfish pursuit
of scientific advancement and the folly of youth
cannot be missed.
And in the end it is magic,
or rather, the movie's warped interpretation
of ancient Egyptian spiritual practices
that defeats the mummy.
But what really made the movie iconic,
Boris Karloff's bandaged form.
Even though the titular mummy in the movie
only spends a few minutes on screen
wrapped in linen bandages,
appearing in the rest of the film
as a modern Egyptian historian,
the compelling image animated the mummy's public form
in a way unseen since those early 19th century necropsies.
Yet it wasn't until the 1940s
that the mummy became a true horror monster.
Where the Egyptian undead had before
been more moralistic, romantic, or profound,
even if they were placed
in tension with Western protagonists,
this decade of horror films made them something to fear.
Their decay was made more profound,
often with wrappings still in place,
and they ambled about seemingly void of all emotions
other than anger and revenge.
We see this trend take hold
in Universal's second foray into mummy horror,
"The Mummy's Hand."
Unable to secure Karloff
for an official sequel to their 1932 film,
Universal gets creative with the story...and the costuming.
With an aim to capitalize on audience recognition,
they put the new actor in a rubber mask,
made the mummy mute,
and kept him wrapped in bandages for most of the movie.
The odd shambling walk that the Egyptian mummy
would become known for?
The replacement actor Tom Tyler had arthritis.
They gave the mummy a new backstory
to partially explain these physical changes,
getting rid of the articulate mummy
and replacing him with a silent thief,
cursed to be an uncontrollable monster.
The movie's sequel, "The Mummy's Tomb" in 1942,
reinforced the silent shambling version of the mummy,
and Universal will double down on the image in the 1950s,
but for the first time, throw in some humor as well
with "Abbott and Costello Meet the Mummy."
Just like the advent of Egyptology
and the medical autopsy provided inspiration
for tales some hundred years before,
scientific advancements in the 1950s
also found their way into mummy myths.
The greater prevalence of x-rays in archeology
and the use of chemical testing
meant that the Egyptian mummy could be examined
in a way previously unheard of.
Gone are the spells or galvanic batteries
that bring the mummy to life.
Science's ability to solve the mysteries
of life and death become paramount,
not that such scientific advances
weren't again met with trepidation.
"Curse of the Faceless Man"
claims radiation from x-ray exposure
is what revives the mummy.
Another trend that arises,
conflating the mummy with other undead monsters,
In the "Pharaoh's Curse,"
the disturbance of the remains of an Egyptian priest
leads to a character being possessed
by the soul of the mummy.
The character, aided by a shapeshifting cat woman,
begins rapidly aging and starts sucking people's blood
before becoming the mummy himself.
Since then, the mummy has been a familiar horror figure
in the pages of fiction, children's cartoons,
movies across genres, and on the front of cereal boxes.
They've been made frequent characters in comic books,
ravenous zombie-esque flesh eaters,
and Brendan Fraser's sinewy nemesis.
The Egyptian mummies that stalk the pages
and screens of horror, science fiction, and fantasy
are in a way justified for their behavior.
Rarely does a mummy animate without outside provocation,
and many of those bodies are exposed to modernity
by the mistakes or greed of the living.
They threaten to literally consume or kill
those who see them as objects
ready for commercial consumption
or scientific investigation.
Part of what makes the Egyptian mummy horrifying
or monstrous outside of its intended context
is a lack of understanding
associated with a death practice
few people are familiar with,
and mistreatment of those bodies by outsiders.
Before you go, we want to invite you
to participate in PBS Digital Studios'
annual audience survey.
It's your chance to tell PBS what you like
and even vote on new show ideas.
If you'd like to continue shaping the future of PBS
There's a link in the description below.
We can't wait to hear from you.
Dramaticized.
(speaker) Dramatized.
Dramatized, okay!
Oh, is it Thoth?
I did it right! [groaning]
Carna, Carnarvon.
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
The Cthulhu Mythos Explained #2:Hastur,Carcosa and the King in Yellow Explained (with Pappara Prod.)
Why Are Nursery Rhymes So F***ing Creepy?
The Evolution Of Cinema: From Silent Films To Blockbusters
a modern look at minstrelsy
Why the Curse of Tutankhamun Might Be Real
Lessons from a terrified horror researcher | Mathias Clasen | TEDxAarhus
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)