Misteri Pagar Laut Tangerang, DPR Terus Desak KKP Ungkap Pemiliknya

Kompas.com
24 Jan 202503:58

Summary

TLDRThe ongoing controversy surrounding a 30-kilometer sea fence in Tangerang, Banten, has escalated, with mounting pressure on the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) to resolve the issue. Lawmakers in the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) are demanding accountability, with some accusing the Ministry of inaction. The sea fence's removal, linked to powerful corporations, is costly, and its impact on local fishermen is profound. Despite KKP's admission of challenges due to limited resources, there is a strong push for transparency and action against any oligarchic involvement, as the public eagerly awaits answers.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The mystery of the sea barrier, which stretches 30 km in the waters of Tangerang, Banten, is intensifying, with pressure mounting to uncover those responsible.
  • 😀 Members of the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) are urging the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) to resolve the case, which has been ongoing for months.
  • 😀 During a meeting between Commission 4 of the DPR and the KKP in Jakarta on January 23, 2025, there was a call for the KKP to address the sea barrier issue promptly.
  • 😀 Golkar Party representative Firman Subago from Commission 4 expressed embarrassment over the slow handling of the case and even removed his DPR pin in protest.
  • 😀 The Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries acknowledged that oversight and coordination between agencies would be improved to enhance monitoring of the sea barrier issue.
  • 😀 DPR members and the public are eager to know who is behind the sea barrier project, calling for transparency in identifying the responsible parties.
  • 😀 Minister Sakti acknowledged that dismantling the sea barrier in Tangerang would require substantial funds, even surpassing official costs, due to its scale.
  • 😀 Concerns were raised about the potential involvement of large companies in the sea barrier project, particularly those with interests in the coastal area of Pantai Indah Kapuk.
  • 😀 Commission 4's Chairperson emphasized the importance of investigating the sea barrier project thoroughly and ensuring that those behind it are held accountable.
  • 😀 Minister Sakti admitted that the KKP's failure to oversee maritime space utilization stemmed from limited resources, and improvements are needed, including budget enhancements.

Q & A

  • What is the central issue discussed in the transcript?

    -The central issue is the mystery surrounding a coastal barrier in Tangerang, Banten, which spans 30 km and has raised significant concern. The barrier’s dismantling and the responsible parties are being investigated.

  • Why are members of the Indonesian Parliament urging the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) to take action?

    -Members of the Indonesian Parliament are urging KKP to resolve the ongoing mystery of the coastal barrier, which has been unresolved for months, and to identify the parties responsible for its installation.

  • What did Firman Subago, a member of Commission 4 of DPR, do to express his frustration?

    -Firman Subago expressed his frustration over the slow response by removing his parliamentary pin as a protest against the slow handling of the issue.

  • What is the significance of the coastal barrier to the local communities?

    -The coastal barrier is significant to local communities, particularly fishermen, as it has made it difficult for thousands of fishermen to access productive fishing areas, thereby impacting their livelihoods.

  • What challenges does the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) face in resolving the issue?

    -KKP faces challenges such as limited resources, insufficient infrastructure, and a lack of budgetary support, all of which hinder their ability to effectively address the issue of the coastal barrier.

  • How does the DPR view the involvement of large corporations in the coastal barrier issue?

    -The DPR is critical of the involvement of large corporations, especially those linked to developments in the Pantai Indah Kapuk area, believing they may be influencing the situation and contributing to the controversy.

  • What are the financial implications of dismantling the coastal barrier?

    -The financial implications of dismantling the coastal barrier are significant, with costs reportedly exceeding the resources available to local authorities, making it a major financial burden.

  • What role does the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) play in the investigation?

    -KKP is responsible for investigating the coastal barrier issue, and although they acknowledge the delay in action, they are expected to lead the efforts in resolving the situation, especially in identifying the responsible parties.

  • What impact has the slow response of KKP had on the local community?

    -The slow response from KKP has left the local community frustrated, particularly the fishermen, who are struggling with the impacts of the barrier and are calling for faster action to address their concerns.

  • What was the reaction of the Ministry to the criticisms from the DPR?

    -The Ministry acknowledged the criticisms and admitted to the weaknesses in overseeing the use of marine space, attributing the delays to a lack of operational capacity, infrastructure, and financial support.

Outlines

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Mindmap

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Keywords

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Highlights

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Transcripts

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Coastal FenceTangerangDPRIndonesiaMarine PolicyAccountabilityMinisterial DebateCorruptionLegislative ActionEnvironmental Issues
英語で要約が必要ですか?