Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism In Less Than 15 Minutes (BRILLIANT!)
Summary
TLDRIn this compelling discourse, John Lennox, a scientist, mathematician, and Christian apologist, presents a robust defense of the Christian faith. He argues that the rationality and intelligibility of the universe are evidence of a divine creator, challenging atheism's stance. Lennox emphasizes the historical significance of Christianity in the development of science and ethics, asserting that human cognitive faculties and moral values are rooted in a belief in God. He further discusses the problem of evil and the hope offered by Christianity through the person of Jesus Christ, whose resurrection provides a foundation for faith and a promise of ultimate justice.
Takeaways
- đ John Lennox, a scientist, mathematician, and Christian apologist, defends the Christian faith logically and exposes atheism's unreasonable tenets.
- đ Richard Dawkins, a notable atheist, was present during Lennox's defense of Christianity, highlighting the significance of the debate.
- đ Lennox believes in a supernatural God who created the universe and holds it in existence, aligning with the beliefs of Oxford University's founders.
- đŹ The rise of science is attributed to the expectation of law in nature due to belief in a lawgiver, challenging the notion that science and faith are at odds.
- đ The comparison of God to Henry Ford and the motorcar illustrates that God and scientific explanations are not mutually exclusive.
- đ€ The question of why there is something rather than nothing is addressed, with the suggestion that God is the answer, contrary to the idea of the universe creating itself.
- đ The fine-tuning of the universe's fundamental forces is presented as evidence that demands an explanation beyond atheism's scope.
- đ§ The universe's intelligibility and the effectiveness of mathematics in describing it are highlighted as points that challenge atheism and support theism.
- đ§ The reliability of human cognitive faculties is questioned if they evolved solely for survival, casting doubt on atheism's validity.
- đĄïž Biblical theism asserts that the universe and human minds are products of the same divine intelligence, providing a coherent foundation for science.
- đšâđ©âđ§âđŠ Ethical behavior and human dignity are rooted in the Judeo-Christian ethic, suggesting that morality cannot be explained without God.
- đ The historical resurrection of Jesus Christ is presented as central evidence for God's existence and the validity of Christianity.
Q & A
Who is John Lennox and what is his stance on the existence of God?
-John Lennox is a scientist, mathematician, and Christian apologist. He believes in God and has strong reasons for his belief, which he has defended at institutions like Oxford University.
What is the significance of the motto 'Domino illumino' in the context of the script?
-The motto 'Domino illumino', which can be translated as 'The Lord illuminates', signifies the belief held by the founders of the University that there is no contradiction between faith in God and the pursuit of rational inquiry.
What does John Lennox suggest about the relationship between Christianity and the rise of science?
-John Lennox suggests that the rise of science in the 16th and 17th centuries was influenced by the belief in a lawgiver, God, who instilled order and law in nature, which in turn inspired people to study and understand these laws.
What is the argument Lennox presents against the idea that the universe created itself from nothing?
-Lennox argues that the idea of the universe creating itself from nothing is an oxymoron. He points out that if 'x' created 'y', it assumes the existence of 'x' to explain 'y', and thus saying the universe created itself assumes its own existence to explain itself.
What does Lennox say about the rationality of the universe and its implications for belief in God?
-Lennox argues that the universe being rationally intelligible is a phenomenon that demands an explanation. He suggests that the universe's intelligibility points to a rational Creator, which aligns with the belief in God.
What is the conflict Lennox identifies between atheism and the reliability of human cognitive faculties?
-Lennox points out that if atheism is correct and humans are a product of unguided natural processes, then it casts doubt on the reliability of human cognitive faculties, including the reasoning used by atheists to reject the belief in God.
How does Lennox connect the concept of human equality and ethics to religious belief?
-Lennox suggests that the concept of human equality and ethics, including human rights and democracy, have their roots in the Judeo-Christian ethic of justice and love, which are consistent with the belief in a God who values all humans equally.
What does Lennox say about the role of Jesus Christ in providing evidence for the existence and nature of God?
-Lennox believes that Jesus Christ, as the Son of God, provides central evidence for the existence and nature of God. He points to Jesus' life, teachings, and especially his resurrection as historical evidence supporting the Christian faith.
How does Lennox address the problem of evil and suffering in the world?
-Lennox acknowledges the difficulty of reconciling the existence of evil and suffering with the belief in a good God. However, he suggests that the crucifixion of Jesus shows that God does not remain distant from human suffering but becomes part of it, offering hope and a promise of ultimate justice.
What is Lennox's personal experience with faith and its impact on his life?
-Lennox shares that he not only believes in God but has come to know and trust Him through the sacrifice and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This faith has given him a sense of forgiveness, acceptance, and peace, enabling him to face his own shortcomings and the problem of evil in the world.
Outlines
đ Faith and Reason in Science and Christianity
In this paragraph, John Lennox, a scientist, mathematician, and Christian apologist, discusses his belief in God based on rational evidence. He reflects on his time at Oxford University, where he defended the Christian faith against atheism, particularly noting the presence of Richard Dawkins. Lennox argues that Christianity is not in conflict with scientific inquiry and that the founders of Oxford University saw no contradiction between faith and reason. He emphasizes the historical expectation of law in nature due to belief in a lawgiver, and he criticizes the notion of the universe creating itself from nothing, citing GK Chesterton. Lennox also highlights the importance of the universe's rational intelligibility and the role of God as the ultimate explanation for it.
đ§ The Reliability of Human Reason and the Origins of Ethics
This paragraph delves into the reliability of human cognitive faculties, especially reason, in the context of evolution and survival rather than truth. Lennox points out the paradox of atheists doubting the reliability of human cognitive faculties while still trusting in their own reason. He contrasts this with biblical theism, which views the universe and the human mind as products of the same divine intelligence. The paragraph also touches on the origins of ethics, suggesting that the concept of human equality and the ideals of freedom, solidarity, and democracy have their roots in the Judeo-Christian ethic of justice and love. Lennox cites Jurgen Habermas to support this view, arguing that these values are the direct legacy of these religious ethics.
đ The Transformative Power of Jesus Christ and the Problem of Evil
In this paragraph, Lennox discusses the transformative power of Jesus Christ as evidence for the existence and nature of God. He describes Christ's life and teachings as embodying the Golden Rule, healing the sick, and extending compassion to the marginalized. Lennox argues that Christ's resurrection is central evidence for God's existence and the truth of Christianity. He also addresses the problem of evil and suffering, suggesting that atheism offers no ultimate hope or justice, while Christianity provides a promise of both through the resurrection of Jesus. Lennox acknowledges the difficulty of reconciling human suffering with the existence of a good God but suggests that God's identification with human suffering through Christ offers a unique perspective on this issue.
đ The Ultimate Hope and the Judgement of Jesus
The final paragraph focuses on the ultimate hope provided by Christianity, contrasting it with atheism's view of death as the end. Lennox emphasizes that the resurrection of Jesus guarantees the promise of ultimate justice, which is absent in atheism. He discusses the irony that while atheists have no hope for justice, Christianity offers it through the judgment by Jesus, who is both the Son of God and the ultimate judge due to his resurrection. Lennox concludes by reiterating his belief in God's reality and trustworthiness, grounded not only in faith but also in the logical evidence found in creation and the person of Jesus Christ.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄChristian apologist
đĄAtheism
đĄSupernatural
đĄRational evidence
đĄEvolution
đĄReliability of human cognitive faculties
đĄBiblical theism
đĄEthics
đĄHuman dignity
đĄResurrection
đĄProblem of evil
Highlights
John Lennox, a scientist, mathematician, and Christian apologist, defended the Christian faith at Oxford University and exposed the unreasonableness of atheism.
Lennox argued that belief in God is not just a blind faith but is supported by rational evidence and logical arguments.
Richard Dawkins, a prominent atheist, was present in the audience, adding significance to Lennox's defense of theism.
The founders of Oxford University believed in God and saw no contradiction between faith and rational inquiry.
The rise of science was influenced by the belief in a lawgiver, which is the belief in God as the source of natural laws.
Lennox stated that being a scientist and a Christian is not contradictory, as Christianity arguably gave rise to the field of science.
Newton's discovery of gravity did not lead him to reject the need for God; instead, he authored 'Principia Mathematica', a seminal work in science.
Atheists often ask to choose between God and science, which Lennox finds absurd, as God and scientific explanations are not mutually exclusive.
Alan Sandage, a cosmologist, believed that God is the answer to why there is something rather than nothing.
The idea that the universe created itself from nothing is considered an oxymoron by Lennox.
G.K. Chesterton's quote was used to illustrate the absurdity of expecting nothing to turn into everything.
Lennox emphasized the fine-tuning of the universe and the need for an explanation beyond mere physical laws.
Arno Penzias, a Nobel Prize winner, suggested that the universe was created with a delicate balance that allows for life, hinting at a supernatural plan.
The universe's rational intelligibility is a point that demands an explanation, according to Lennox.
Einstein's view that the comprehensibility of the universe is itself incomprehensible was highlighted.
Lennox discussed the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics and its relation to the physical universe.
Atheists face a paradox in trusting human cognitive faculties, which are products of evolution, to discern truth.
Biblical theism asserts that the universe and the human mind are products of the same divine intelligence.
Ethical behavior and the concept of human equality have roots in Judeo-Christian ethics, as noted by Jurgen Habermas.
The value of a human being is based on being made in God's image, which underpins egalitarianism and human rights.
Lennox shared personal experiences and the transformative impact of Christ's teachings on his life and understanding of God.
The problem of evil and pain is acknowledged, and Lennox discussed how Christianity offers hope and a response to this issue.
The resurrection of Jesus Christ is presented as central evidence for the claim that God became human and offers a solution to humanity's problems.
Lennox concluded by emphasizing the personal nature of knowing God through a relationship with Christ.
Transcripts
and so I don't simply believe there is a
God I've come to know him and trust him
and I have strong reasons for doing so
John Lennox is a scientist mathematician
and Christian apologist in 2012 he was
at Oxford University where he logically
defended the Christian faith and exposed
the many unreasonable tenants of atheism
this was one of the most brilliant
displays of logic and Arguments for God
in Christianity what people are missing
is that Richard Dawkins one of the most
notable atheists and opponents of
Christianity was sitting in the audience
I believe in
God I believe in the Supernatural God
who created the heavens and the
earth I believe in a God who holds the
heavens and the Earth in
existence I believe that on the basis of
rational
evidence similar to the beliefs held by
the founders of this house who gave this
University The Motto Domino
illumino may they saw no contradiction
between faith in God and the utmost
excellent irrational
inquiry and if I dare mention my alma
mat of Cambridge in this holy
place I would remind you that on the
door of the Cavendish laboratory in
Cambridge are written the words great
are the works of the Lord studied by all
who Delight in them and as we look at at
the rise of Science in the 16th and 17th
centuries Alfred North Whitehead and
many others commented that men became
scientific because they expected law in
nature and they expected law in nature
because they believed in the lawgiver so
ladies and gentlemen I'm not ashamed of
being both a scientist and a Christian
because arguably Christianity gave me my
subject what I am amazed at is that
serious thinkers today continue to ask
us to choose between God and science
that's like asking people to choose
between Henry Ford in engineering as an
explanation of the motorc
car when Newton discovered his law of
gravity he didn't say I've got a law I
don't need God no he wrote the principia
Mathematica arguably the greatest work
in the whole history of
science because he saw that God is not
the same kind of explanation as a
scientific EXP ration God doesn't
compete agency does not compete with
mechanism and
law why is there something rather than
nothing Alan Sandage the brilliant
cosmologist who became a Christian in
his 50s said God is the answer to that
question but people are now so desperate
to show that the universe created itself
from nothing which seems to me to be an
immediate oxymoron if I say x created y
I'm assuming the existence of x to
explain the existence of Y if I say x
created X I'm assuming the existence of
x to explain the existence of X which
simply shows that nonsense remains
nonsense even if high-powered scientists
utter it it reminds me a little bit of
GK Chester who said it is absurd to
complain that it is Unthinkable for an
unthinkable God to make everything out
of nothing and then to pretend that it
is more thinkable that nothing should
turn itself into
everything the heavens declare that
glory of God says the ancient
Psalm and we've unraveled a bit of that
seeing the fine choing of the
fundamental forces of nature it's
something that's so striking to
scientists that it demands
explanation and it seems to me that Arno
penus hit it right he is the Nobel Prize
winner who discovered the microwave
background on which a lot of the
evidence for the Big Bang is based he
said astronomy leads us to a unique
event a universe which was created out
of nothing one with the very delicate
balance needed to provide exactly the
right conditions required to permit life
and one which has an underlying one
might say Supernatural plan but I want
to come to what I think is one of the
fundamental Arguments for
theism I take it this house believes in
reason that's why we're all here and as
a scient
I believe that the universe is
rationally
intelligible that is something that has
struck some of the Geniuses of science
as demanding an
explanation Einstein said the only
incomprehensible thing about the
universe is that it's comprehensible and
vigner talked about the unreasonable
effectiveness of mathematics how is it
that a mathematician thinking in her
head in here can come up with equations
that seem to fit the universe out there
well how is it indeed because the irony
of the atheist position here is evident
my atheist friends and I have many of
them tell me that the driving force of
evolution which eventually produced our
human cognitive faculties reason
included was not primarily concerned
with truth at all but with survival and
we all know ladies and gentlemen what
has often happened and still happens to
truth when individuals or commercial
Enterprises or nations feel themselves
threatened and struggle for
Revival a leading philosopher Alvin
planting of notame says if atheists are
right that we are the product of
mindless unguided natural processes then
they have given us strong reason to
doubt the reliability of human cognitive
faculties and therefore inevitably to
doubt the validity of any belief that
they produce including their atheism
their biology and their belief in
naturalism would therefore appear to be
at war with each other in a conflict
that is nothing at all to do with God
God yet my atheist friends still insist
that it is rational for them to believe
that the evolution of human reason was
not directed for the purpose of
discovering truth and yet it is
irrational for me to believe that human
reason was designed and created by God
to enable us to understand and believe
the truth curious
logic by contrast with that biblical
theism asserts that Ultimate Reality is
personal and intelligent and the reason
science works and this was the
motivating force that drove the great
pioneers of science is that the Universe
out there and the human mind in here
that does the science are ultimately the
product of the same intelligent Divine
mind human beings are made we are told
in God's image and that means that
science can be done that makes
infinitely more sense to me as a
scientist than atheism
does now let me come briefly to ethics
ethical Behavior like rational behavior
of course does not itself require
religious belief this is consistent with
the fact that humans are created in
God's image as rational moral persons
but just as I suggest that rationality
cannot be explained without the
existence of God so I dare to suggest
that the existence of morality cannot be
explained either as modern science
sprang from judeo-christian sources so
did the concept of humanid equality
listen to atheist Jurgen habous arguably
one of Germany's leading intellectuals
he said that universalistic
egalitarianism from which sprang the
ideals of freedom and a collective life
and solidarity the individual morality
of conscience human rights and democracy
is the direct Legacy of the judaic ethic
of justice and the Christian ethic of
love
this Legacy substantially
unchanged has been the object of
continual critical appropriation and
reinterpretation to this day there's no
alternative to it everything else is
just idle postmodern talk and it seems
to me he's hitting the core of something
important because the value of a human
being on which such egalitarian is a is
based not on what the human being can do
but what she's made of what or how she's
made in God's
image I never forget speaking when on
one of my many visits to Russia at to a
colleague in the Academy of Sciences and
he said you know John we thought we
could abolish God and retain a value for
human beings we found we couldn't and we
murdered millions of them and Alexander
saniton has said if I'm ask why is it
that 60 million of my fellow countrymen
were sacrificed he said the answer is we
have forgotten
God science of course marvelous that it
is is limited even a Nobel Prize winner
by analyzing a cake cannot tell why it
was made but aunt Matilda who made it
can tell you she can reveal it to you
but if she doesn't reveal it to you
you'll never know and that brings me to
be my next evidence it's the same with
the universe we can analyze it
magnificently But ultimately if it has a
maker and I believe it has only he can
tell us what it's all about and he's
done so in the powerful Narrative of the
Bible in particular in its analysis of
the problem with Humanity not simply in
terms of Behavioral breakdown between
people but a vertical breakdown of trust
between us and the
Creator the unique solution to that
problem is not simply in terms of human
ethical development although that's very
important but in terms of something far
deeper altogether the restoration of the
fractured relationship with God through
the Salvation he has brought through
Jesus Christ a radical relationship that
empowers us to live ethically from God
and here we reach what for me is a chief
evidence not only for the Existence but
the nature of God it is Jesus Christ he
it was who not only taught the Golden
Rule but embodied it fed the hungry
healed the sick and suffering and
welcomed society's Outcast brought honor
and respect to the marginalized and
ashamed and he's brought forgiveness and
peace to
multi-millions uh around the world he's
able to do this of course because though
he was a man he uniquely never was only
a man but God become
human the central evidence for this
startling
claim is of course his historical
Resurrection from the dead that launched
Christianity in the world this is of
course ladies and gentlemen a crunch
issue if Jesus rose from the dead death
is not the end and Atheism is false if
Jesus did rise did did not rise from the
dead Christianity is false and I
remember at Cambridge as a student
listening to the brilliant sir Norman
Anderson a legal expert go going through
forensically the evidence from his legal
perspective as a a brilliant lawyer and
he said at the end of it the empty tomb
then of Jesus forms a veritable rock on
which all rationalistic theories of the
Resurrection Dash themselves in vain
just finally now as I read the Bible I
do not only find intellectual
satisfaction but I find a great deal of
that I sense the voice of God speaking
to me you see that's intensely personal
but ladies and gentlemen we've been
asked tonight about belief in God and I
want to strongly emphasize that God is
not a theory he's a person and if the
origination of meqa person is a personal
God then the most exciting thing really
is is there a possibility of getting to
know
God and so I don't simply believe there
is a God I've come to know him and trust
him and I have Str wrong reasons for
doing so because of Christ dying and
Rising again for me and that has
generated in me a sense of utterly unmar
forgiveness acceptance and peace that
has enabled me to face the ugly side of
my own nature and with God's help to do
something about it but it's enabled me
to face something else the hardest
problem I face as a Christian is the
problem of evil and pain
my niece getting a tumor at 22 that
kills her what do I say to my sister and
this is the hardest problem we face but
it seems to me that atheism here has no
answer because by definition atheism
believes that human death is the end so
there is no ultimate
hope but you see ladies and gentlemen we
could stay here till midnight and Beyond
arguing as has been done in this
University for centuries what a good god
should might would could if not possibly
might just could he not have done and
we'll get nowhere so it seems to me
there's another question we can ask and
it's this granted that life is presents
us with a double picture we see some
beautiful things we see some ragged ages
we see hurt and pain and we see Joy how
can we come to terms with that and it
seems to me here is no simplistic answer
but a window into an answer and it's
this if it is actually true that Jesus
is as I believe him to be the Son of God
then we can ask the question what is God
doing on a
cross and the answer comes back at the
very least God do not remain distant
from our human suffering but has become
part of it and the other side of that is
this because Jesus rose from the the
dead he is going to be the ultimate
judge now here's an irony because
atheism has no ultimate hope of Justice
by definition the vast majority of
people in the history of the world have
died without Justice and will die
without Justice and if death is the end
then of course they have no hope of
ultimate justice but the promise in the
New Testament guaranteed by the
resurrection of Jesus is that he is to
be the judge in the coming day so ladies
and
gentlemen those are some of the reasons
why I believe that God is real and
worthy to be trusted thank
[Applause]
you what I love about Christianity is
that it is not just rooted in faith
which is trusting in the promises of God
but also in the logic that God revealed
to us in his creation and in the person
of Jesus Christ
[Music]
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism (15 Minute Brilliancy!)
A histĂłria do cristianismo sĂł faz sentido se for verdadeira
Next time they say "God is evil", say THIS | John Lennox
The Decline Of Christianity In America
Apologetics: What it Can and Can't Do
Existem evidĂȘncias de que Jesus existiu? - AlĂ©m da BĂblia #3
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)