How to Never Pay Taxes Again (In Ten Minutes)! v2.0

Summary

In this video, Brandon Joe Williams, a trustee at Williams and Williams Law Group, explores the legal distinctions between U.S. citizenship and state citizenship. He examines key Supreme Court cases like Dred Scott v. Sanford and the Slaughterhouse Cases, revealing how these rulings defined citizenship for former slaves. Williams also addresses how these legal distinctions impact practical matters like taxation and driver's licenses. His main argument is that U.S. citizenship is linked to specific historical and racial contexts, and challenges the system that requires individuals to declare U.S. citizenship for legal and financial purposes.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video explains the concept of U.S. citizenship and how it differs from state citizenship, specifically referencing the Dred Scott v. Sanford case.
• 😀 The Dred Scott case established a distinction between citizenship of the U.S. and citizenship of individual states, where some groups were excluded from certain privileges.
• 😀 Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s opinion in Dred Scott is highlighted to demonstrate the historical legal understanding of citizenship.
• 😀 The 14th Amendment is discussed, with emphasis on how it defined U.S. citizenship and the jurisdiction of the U.S. government after the Civil War.
• 😀 The Slaughterhouse Cases are cited as a pivotal moment in clarifying citizenship issues, especially the distinction between U.S. citizenship and state citizenship.
• 😀 The video argues that the 14th Amendment was primarily designed to provide citizenship to emancipated slaves, shifting the understanding of what it means to be a U.S. citizen.
• 😀 The script claims that the legal interpretation of 'U.S. citizen' has racial undertones, particularly in how it applied to freed slaves post-Civil War.
• 😀 It discusses the W9 tax form and the legal definition of a 'U.S. person,' which includes citizens, resident aliens, and various business entities.
• 😀 The video suggests that identifying as a U.S. citizen or resident alien on legal forms could lead to serious legal consequences, such as imprisonment.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that, as a 'white California citizen,' one might face legal repercussions if they claim U.S. citizenship and engage with certain state legal systems, such as taxes or driver's licenses.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video?

The video aims to explain the concept of different types of citizenship, specifically distinguishing between U.S. citizen and state citizen, and how this relates to issues like driver's licenses and taxes. The presenter discusses cases such as Dred Scott v. Sanford and the Slaughterhouse Cases to support his points.

How does the presenter define 'citizenship' in the video?

Citizenship is described as two distinct categories: U.S. citizenship and state citizenship. U.S. citizenship refers to individuals who are recognized by the federal government, while state citizenship applies to individuals who belong to a specific state, typically referring to white people in historical contexts.

What is the significance of the Dred Scott v. Sanford case?

The Dred Scott case is pivotal in understanding the historical context of citizenship in the United States. It ruled that African Americans, even if emancipated, were not U.S. citizens and could not claim rights under the Constitution. This decision is used to highlight the historical racial distinctions in citizenship.

What role did Roger B. Taney play in the Dred Scott case?

Roger B. Taney was the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court during the Dred Scott case. He delivered the majority opinion, arguing that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be citizens of the U.S. according to the Constitution.

What change did the Slaughterhouse Cases bring to the concept of citizenship?

The Slaughterhouse Cases, particularly through the opinion of Justice Samuel Freeman Miller, helped define U.S. citizenship after the Civil War. The 14th Amendment clarified that all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. were citizens of the U.S., regardless of their state citizenship.

How does the 14th Amendment define citizenship?

The 14th Amendment defines U.S. citizenship as anyone born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction. This was a key development after the Civil War, ensuring that former slaves were granted U.S. citizenship.

What is the distinction between U.S. citizenship and state citizenship?

U.S. citizenship refers to individuals recognized by the federal government, while state citizenship is tied to a specific state's jurisdiction. The video implies that the concept of state citizenship historically favored white individuals, while U.S. citizenship applied to former slaves.

What does the presenter say about filing a W9 form and paying taxes?

The presenter argues that filing a W9 form and paying taxes requires declaring oneself as a U.S. citizen or a resident alien. If one is not a U.S. citizen, such as a state citizen, they would be committing perjury by signing the W9, and could face penalties including prison time.

Why is the discussion of a driver's license included in the video?

The video connects the concept of citizenship to the ability to obtain a driver's license. According to the presenter, only U.S. citizens or residents can legally hold a driver's license, and if one is classified as a state citizen, they would be in violation of the law if they had a license.

What is the presenter's perspective on the historical context of the 14th Amendment?

The presenter suggests that the 14th Amendment was primarily designed to grant citizenship to freed slaves and that its purpose was to address the racial disparities in citizenship at the time. He believes the amendment was not meant to confer the same rights to white individuals.