Week 4.2: UTS Sociology Video

John Albert Quijano
8 Oct 202015:19

Summary

TLDRThis lecture covers different social perspectives that influence self-development, focusing on micro-level sociological theories. It explores how individual interactions shape the self, discussing key theories like Mead's symbolic interactionism, Cooley's looking-glass self, and Goffman's dramaturgy. Mead highlights how symbols and interactions contribute to the social self, while Cooley emphasizes the self as a reflection of others' judgments. Goffman likens social interaction to a theatrical performance, where individuals manage impressions in different social settings. These theories collectively show how the self is a social construct shaped by interaction.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Social perspectives, especially at the micro-level, play a crucial role in influencing self-development through small-scale interactions like conversations.
  • đŸ—Łïž Symbolic interactionism by George Herbert Mead explores how symbols and meanings in interactions shape the self, focusing on concepts like 'I' and 'Me'.
  • đŸ€ The 'Me' represents societal values and roles internalized by individuals, while the 'I' reflects creativity and freedom in response to societal norms.
  • 💬 Symbols, such as gestures and words, carry perceived meanings in interactions, influencing behaviors and shaping the social self.
  • đŸ‘šâ€đŸ‘©â€đŸ‘§â€đŸ‘Š Family and religion are seen as key social institutions that use shared activities and symbols to reinforce bonds and meanings within society.
  • 🔄 Charles Horton Cooley’s 'Looking Glass Self' emphasizes how individuals see themselves based on how they imagine others perceive them, shaping self-concept through social interactions.
  • 🎭 Irving Goffman’s dramaturgy theory likens social interactions to theater, where individuals manage impressions and perform roles in front and backstage settings.
  • 🙌 Impression management is the process where individuals consciously reveal or conceal aspects of themselves to maintain social norms or achieve personal goals.
  • đŸ‘ïž Goffman’s front stage refers to the behavior people exhibit when they know they are being observed, while backstage behavior is more relaxed and true to self.
  • 🎭 Goffman concludes that self-presentation must be carefully chosen, as initial masks worn in social interactions may eventually become one's true identity.

Q & A

  • What is the focus of the video lecture?

    -The video lecture focuses on discussing different social perspectives that influence self-development, particularly through micro-level theoretical perspectives.

  • What are micro-level theoretical perspectives?

    -Micro-level theoretical perspectives or sociological theories focus on small-scale interactions between individuals, such as conversations or group dynamics, and study how these interactions influence the self-concept.

  • How does symbolic interactionism by George Herbert Mead explain self-development?

    -Symbolic interactionism by George Herbert Mead explains that social interactions, involving symbols like words or gestures, shape the development of the self. Mead highlights the role of the 'I' and the 'Me' in the formation of the self-concept.

  • What is the 'I' and 'Me' in Mead's symbolic interactionism?

    -The 'Me' refers to the internalized roles, values, and expectations of others, shaping an individual's self-concept, while the 'I' represents the individual's spontaneous and creative response to others, offering freedom in actions.

  • What are significant symbols according to Mead?

    -Significant symbols are gestures or vocal expressions that elicit the same response in both the individual using them and those receiving them, facilitating mutual understanding and social interaction.

  • How does Charles Horton Cooley’s ‘Looking Glass Self’ contribute to the understanding of self-development?

    -Cooley’s ‘Looking Glass Self’ suggests that individuals develop their self-concept by imagining how others perceive them, imagining others' judgments, and experiencing feelings like pride or shame based on these imagined perceptions.

  • What are the three elements of the 'Looking Glass Self' theory?

    -The three elements are: (1) imagining how we appear to others, (2) imagining their judgment of that appearance, and (3) experiencing a corresponding feeling such as pride or mortification.

  • What is the central concept of Irving Goffman's dramaturgical theory?

    -Goffman's dramaturgical theory likens social interaction to a theatrical performance, where individuals present themselves as performers and manage impressions to influence how others perceive them.

  • What is the difference between the front stage and backstage in Goffman's theory?

    -In the front stage, individuals act according to social norms and expectations, aware that others are watching. In the backstage, they are free from these expectations and behave more authentically.

  • What warning does Goffman give about self-presentation?

    -Goffman warns that individuals should choose their self-presentations carefully, as what begins as a performance or mask can eventually become their true self.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 Self-Development and Micro-Level Theoretical Perspectives

This paragraph introduces the concept of self-development through the lens of micro-level theoretical perspectives, focusing on how societal processes influence the self. It discusses micro-level sociological theories that examine small-scale interactions like conversations and group dynamics. The paragraph delves into how these interactions shape our self-concept. It introduces three key theories: Symbolic Interactionism by George Herbert Mead, Looking Glass Self by Charles Horton Cooley, and Dramaturgy by Irving Goffman. The discussion on Mead's theory includes the concepts of 'I' and 'Me', significant symbols, and the nature of symbols. It explains how individuals internalize attitudes from others and how social interactions affect the development of the social self.

05:02

đŸ‘šâ€đŸ‘©â€đŸ‘§â€đŸ‘Š The Influence of Social Institutions on Self-Concept

The second paragraph explores the influence of social institutions such as family and religion on self-concept. It discusses how shared activities in families build emotional bonds and how symbolic rituals like family meals and holidays reinforce these bonds. The paragraph also examines the role of religion, using symbols like the cross, star of David, and crescent and star to illustrate how religious experiences are interpreted and given significance in people's lives. It introduces the concept of 'types of science' and differentiates between natural signs and conventional signs, using examples like smoke indicating fire and human language as a learned response. The Looking Glass Self theory by Cooley is further elaborated, emphasizing the three principal elements that define the self: the imagination of our appearance to others, their judgment of that appearance, and the resulting feelings of pride or shame.

10:04

🎭 Dramaturgy and the Performance of Self in Society

This paragraph discusses Irving Goffman's dramaturgical theory of self and society, which likens social interaction to theater. It introduces the concepts of performer and character, impression management, dramatic realization, and the distinction between the front stage and backstage. The paragraph explains how individuals present themselves to others, manage impressions, and the motives behind self-presentation, such as achieving personal goals, presenting a consistent and positive view of oneself, and conforming to social norms. The front stage represents the behavior individuals exhibit when they are aware of being observed, adhering to social norms, while the backstage is where individuals are free from these expectations, often revealing their 'true self'.

15:06

🔚 Conclusion: The Self as a Product of Social Construction

The final paragraph concludes the discussion by emphasizing the idea that the self is a product of social constructions. It reminds viewers to choose their presentations carefully, as what starts as a mask may become one's face. The paragraph summarizes the journey from George Herbert Mead's interactionist perspective to Cooley's Looking Glass Self and Goffman's dramaturgical view of society as a theater where people are performers. It encapsulates the overarching theme that our self-concept is significantly shaped by social interactions and the perceptions of others.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Micro-level sociological theories

Micro-level sociological theories focus on small-scale interactions between individuals, such as conversations and group dynamics. In the video, this concept is highlighted as a way to understand how social interactions shape an individual's self-concept. These theories emphasize the impact of everyday interactions on personal identity.

💡Symbolic interactionism

Symbolic interactionism, introduced by George Herbert Mead, explores how individuals create and interpret symbols in social interactions. In the video, it is explained as a key theory that affects self-development, highlighting how meanings are derived from symbols like gestures or language, which shape our social self.

💡Looking-glass self

The looking-glass self, coined by Charles Horton Cooley, is a concept where individuals form their self-concept based on how they believe others perceive them. The video emphasizes how self-identity is constructed through imagining others' judgment of our appearance, behavior, and characteristics.

💡Dramaturgy

Dramaturgy, developed by Erving Goffman, likens social interactions to theater performances, where individuals manage their presentations of self. The video discusses how people behave differently on the 'front stage' (public settings) versus the 'backstage' (private settings), affecting how they construct their social identity.

💡I and Me

In Mead's theory, 'I' refers to the individual's spontaneous, creative part, while 'Me' represents the socialized aspect influenced by societal expectations. The video explains how these two components interact within a person to form a balanced self-concept, shaped by both personal freedom and social roles.

💡Significant symbols

Significant symbols are gestures or vocal signs that hold shared meanings for both the individual using them and others. The video discusses how these symbols are crucial in social interactions, as they help individuals communicate and interpret behaviors, shaping one's identity within society.

💡Impression management

Impression management, a key concept in Goffman's dramaturgical theory, involves individuals consciously controlling how they present themselves to others. The video highlights this as an important part of self-presentation, where people reveal or conceal certain aspects of themselves based on the social context.

💡Front stage and backstage

In Goffman’s dramaturgical model, 'front stage' refers to the behavior individuals display when they know they are being watched, conforming to societal expectations, while 'backstage' refers to behavior when they are free from social norms. The video uses these terms to explain how individuals manage different aspects of their identity in public and private.

💡Social self

The social self, a concept emphasized by Mead, refers to the self that develops through social interactions. The video explains how a person’s identity is shaped by the roles and values they internalize from society, showing that our self-concept is deeply connected to our relationships and interactions with others.

💡Conventional signs

Conventional signs are symbols that are learned and controlled by individuals, such as language. The video contrasts these with natural signs and uses them to illustrate how communication and understanding between people are based on shared social constructs, further influencing self-perception.

Highlights

Discussion of micro-level theoretical perspectives that emphasize societal processes influencing self-development.

Introduction of symbolic interactionism by George Herbert Mead, focusing on the 'I' and 'Me' in self-concept.

Explanation of how symbols, like gestures or words, hold perceived meaning in interactions.

George Herbert Mead's premise that social interactions affect self-development, referred to as the 'social self.'

Mead’s three premises of symbolic interactionism: meaning, socialization, and learned behaviors within a cultural dimension.

Overview of Cooley’s looking glass self, where self-concept is shaped by how we imagine others perceive us.

Cooley's emphasis on harmonizing self-feeling and social feeling, and his observation on communication and social self.

Cooley’s three principles of the looking glass self: imagination of appearance, judgment, and feelings like pride or mortification.

Introduction of dramaturgy by Erving Goffman, viewing social interactions as performances, with performers and characters.

Goffman’s theory of impression management: individuals control what they reveal and conceal in their social performances.

Explanation of front stage and backstage behaviors in Goffman's theory, where front stage is performed for an audience, while backstage represents the true self.

Goffman’s concept of dramatic realization: individuals infuse their actions with signs to highlight certain facts during social interaction.

Theories of self as social constructions, highlighting Mead, Cooley, and Goffman’s contributions.

Goffman’s caution that self-presentation is important, as what starts as a mask can become one’s true identity.

Conclusion of the lecture, emphasizing that the self is influenced by both symbolic meanings and social interactions.

Transcripts

play00:01

hello everyone

play00:03

in this video lecture we will be

play00:05

discussing different

play00:07

social perspectives that influences the

play00:10

self-development

play00:12

this covers a micro-level theoretical

play00:14

perspectives

play00:16

which see societal processes as a

play00:18

fundamental aspect

play00:20

that influences the self

play00:23

micro level theoretical perspectives or

play00:26

micro level sociological theories

play00:29

looks at a small scale interactions

play00:32

between individuals such as conversation

play00:35

or group dynamics

play00:36

it is within these interactions the

play00:40

concepts were derived and studied

play00:42

on how thus it influences our

play00:44

self-concept

play00:47

first we ask ourselves on how

play00:50

do we perceive interactions an

play00:53

individual may see it

play00:54

as a conversation an exchange of

play00:57

thoughts

play00:58

listening talking influence

play01:02

belief and it may give signs or symbols

play01:06

we can say that everything we do in a

play01:08

society is involved with

play01:10

interaction next

play01:13

how do we see ourselves within these

play01:15

interactions

play01:16

this is where the positions of different

play01:19

theories arise

play01:22

first we have symbolic interactionism by

play01:25

george herbert mead

play01:27

next we have looking glass health by

play01:29

charles hurton cooley

play01:31

third we have dramaturgy by irving of

play01:33

man

play01:39

the topic under george herbert mead

play01:42

includes

play01:43

i and me symbolic interactionism

play01:47

significant symbols and the nature of

play01:50

symbols

play01:52

first we have the me or the generalized

play01:55

others

play01:56

this refers to the meanings roles and

play01:58

values of others

play02:00

that an individual organizes as part of

play02:02

their own self

play02:04

the way in which human internalized sets

play02:06

have attitudes from others

play02:08

i it is the immediate response of an

play02:11

individual to

play02:12

the others refers to the part of the

play02:15

self that is the identified

play02:17

as having freedom of creativity it

play02:20

decides whether to act the same or

play02:22

differently

play02:23

in the society

play02:26

next we have the symbolic interaction

play02:29

esem

play02:30

mead further highlighted that in

play02:32

interaction there

play02:33

are symbols symbols are the perceived

play02:37

meaning

play02:37

from interaction may be from words or

play02:40

gestures examples are rules

play02:44

authority rules care

play02:47

love functions affections impose

play02:51

implore angst and many others

play02:55

mead's discussion that social

play02:56

interactions

play02:58

affects the development of the self or

play03:00

what he calls

play03:01

the social self

play03:05

to further understand the symbolic

play03:07

interactionism

play03:08

we will discuss its three premises

play03:12

the significant symbols and the nature

play03:14

of symbols

play03:16

first is that meaning is an important

play03:19

element of human existence

play03:21

as we live our life in the symbolic

play03:24

domain

play03:25

where every symbols encountered has

play03:27

meaning within

play03:29

second is that people identify and shape

play03:33

their symbolic references

play03:35

through socialization the third

play03:38

is that behaviors are learned processes

play03:41

and therefore a cultural dimension

play03:43

exists

play03:44

that connects the symbolic educational

play03:47

development

play03:50

meads picture of a human being as an

play03:53

actor

play03:54

he saw a man escapable of having the

play03:57

idea of a self

play03:58

this possession of self means that it

play04:00

converts the human being

play04:02

into a special kind of actor

play04:05

this transforms his relationship to the

play04:08

world

play04:09

and gives his action a distinct

play04:11

character

play04:13

in asserting that human being has a self

play04:17

made emphasized that human being is an

play04:20

object to himself

play04:21

or herself this means that human being

play04:25

may perceive

play04:26

the concept of the self communicate with

play04:29

himself

play04:30

and act toward himself or himself

play04:35

as these types of behavior imply the

play04:38

human being may become the object to his

play04:41

or her own action now we'll proceed with

play04:45

a significant symbol

play04:47

significant symbol is a vocal or other

play04:50

kind of gesture

play04:51

that arouses in the one using it

play04:55

the same response as it arouses to those

play04:57

to whom

play04:58

it is directed as a result

play05:02

of the ability to employ significant

play05:04

symbols human beings interact with one

play05:07

another

play05:08

on the basis of meanings

play05:11

their responses to one another depend on

play05:14

the interpretation of

play05:15

symbols rather than merely on the

play05:18

enactment of responses they have

play05:20

been conditioned to make thus they

play05:23

engage in

play05:24

symbolic interactionism

play05:28

examples of how these interactions

play05:30

influences oneself

play05:31

is by looking on the social institutions

play05:35

first we have family symbolic

play05:37

interactionists argue that shared

play05:39

activities

play05:41

help to build emotional bonds and that

play05:44

marriage

play05:44

and family relationships are based on

play05:47

negotiated meanings

play05:49

the interaction is perspective

play05:51

emphasizes that families

play05:53

reinforce and rejuvenate bonds through

play05:56

symbolic rituals such as

play05:58

family meals and holidays

play06:02

second we have religion the cross

play06:05

star of david and the crescent and the

play06:07

star are symbols of islam

play06:10

christianity and judaism respectively

play06:13

focuses on the ways in which individuals

play06:16

interpret

play06:17

the religious experiences once they are

play06:20

regarded as sacred

play06:21

they take on special significance and

play06:24

give

play06:24

meaning to people's lives

play06:28

now we'll proceed with the types of

play06:30

science

play06:31

science is something that stands for

play06:34

something else

play06:35

that is an event or thing that takes

play06:37

place or

play06:38

signifies some or other event or a thing

play06:42

a sign would exist only if there is an

play06:44

organism

play06:45

capable of perceiving and responding to

play06:48

it

play06:49

the first type is the natural signs

play06:52

signs found only in natural connection

play06:55

with the things

play06:56

for which they stand for example

play06:59

a smoke is a sign of fire

play07:02

the next type is the conventional sign

play07:06

it's a thing or an event associated with

play07:08

some

play07:09

other thing or event but it is produced

play07:12

and controlled

play07:13

by the very organism that have learned

play07:15

to respond to it

play07:17

the most common example of this is the

play07:19

human language

play07:26

cooli's observation explains that people

play07:28

who dwell

play07:30

in the conformity can barely get rid of

play07:32

the impression

play07:33

that the way we live in which we are

play07:35

used to is the normal

play07:38

coolly suggests that the self-feeling

play07:40

and the social feeling must be abreast

play07:42

with each other

play07:44

and be put into harmony

play07:49

as we see our attributes such as our

play07:51

face

play07:52

body features and clothing in the glass

play07:55

and we are pleased and interested in

play07:58

them

play07:58

because they are ours and please or

play08:01

otherwise with them according as they do

play08:04

or do not answer to what we should like

play08:07

them to be

play08:09

so in imagination we perceive in

play08:12

another's mind some thought of our

play08:14

appearance

play08:16

manners aims deeds character

play08:20

friends and so on and are variously

play08:22

affected by it

play08:25

the idea of self-freedom is tied to its

play08:28

relations

play08:29

that comprise a society his comment

play08:32

about harmonizing self-feeling

play08:35

is not intended to assert that people

play08:37

should lose themselves

play08:39

and society but rather they should

play08:42

examine the responsibility of the

play08:44

effects

play08:45

of their actions on others

play08:49

cooley states that if there is no

play08:52

communication

play08:54

there can be no nomenclature and no

play08:57

developed thought

play09:00

according to cooley a social self of

play09:03

this kind might be called

play09:05

the reflected or looking glass

play09:08

self each to each a looking glass

play09:12

reflects that do pass

play09:15

thus the looking glass self of cooley

play09:18

emphasized

play09:19

that the self idea have three principal

play09:22

elements first the imagination of our

play09:26

appearance to other person

play09:28

second the imagination of his judgment

play09:32

to that appearance the third some sort

play09:35

of feeling

play09:36

such as pride or mortification

play09:41

these three principles have essential

play09:44

effects on defining the

play09:45

self these depend on the presentation of

play09:49

the self

play09:49

portrayed in another's mind

play09:54

the thing that dictates us to pride or

play09:56

shame is not the mere mechanical

play09:58

reflection of ourselves

play10:00

but an attributed sentiment the imagined

play10:04

effect of his reflection upon others

play10:07

mind the best examples are

play10:11

we are ashamed to seem evasive in the

play10:14

presence of a straightforward man

play10:17

cowardly in the presence of a brave one

play10:20

and gross in the eyes of a refined one

play10:24

and many others

play10:27

again we always imagine and imagining

play10:29

shares the judgments

play10:31

of other men according to cooley

play10:35

each to each a looking glass reflects

play10:38

that do

play10:38

pass now we're done with charles horton

play10:42

cooley

play10:43

and we will proceed with irving goffman

play10:49

the concepts under dramaturgy includes

play10:52

performer and character impression

play10:55

management

play10:56

dramatic realization and the front stage

play10:59

and the

play11:00

backstage the general concept that we

play11:04

make

play11:05

a presentation of ourselves to others is

play11:07

hardly

play11:08

a novel what ought to be emphasized in

play11:11

conclusion is that the very structure of

play11:13

the self

play11:14

can be seen in terms of how we arrange

play11:17

for such

play11:18

performances in a society

play11:21

performer and the character the

play11:24

individual

play11:26

was divided into two basic parts he can

play11:29

be viewed

play11:29

as a performer a harriet fabricator of

play11:32

impressions

play11:33

involved in all human tasks of

play11:36

staging performance he or she can also

play11:40

be viewed

play11:41

as a character a figure

play11:44

typically a fine one whose spirit

play11:47

strength and other sterling qualities

play11:50

the performers were designed

play11:52

to evolve

play11:55

in continuation irving goffman developed

play11:58

a dramaturgical theory of the self

play12:01

and society inspired by mead's basic

play12:04

conception

play12:05

of social interaction government

play12:08

presents a theory that likens

play12:10

social interaction to the theater

play12:13

individuals can be seen as performers

play12:16

audience members and outsiders that

play12:19

operate within a particular stages

play12:22

or social spaces

play12:26

impression management it is defined as a

play12:29

conscious decision on the part of the

play12:31

individual

play12:32

to reveal certain aspects of the self

play12:34

and to conceal others

play12:36

as actors do when performing on a stage

play12:39

and this is where dramatic realization

play12:42

comes in

play12:45

emphasizes that while in the presence of

play12:47

others the individual typically infuses

play12:50

his activity with signs which

play12:53

dramatically highlight and portray

play12:55

confirmatory facts that might otherwise

play12:58

remain

play12:59

unapparent or obscure

play13:02

again we have impression management and

play13:06

dramatic realization

play13:10

now we'll proceed with the motives or

play13:12

the reasons behind

play13:13

for our self-presentation first we have

play13:17

achieve personal goals second is to

play13:20

present a consistent and positive view

play13:22

of ourselves

play13:24

to the world third is to conform to

play13:28

social norms

play13:30

now we will be tackling the two

play13:31

remaining concepts under irving guffman

play13:34

we have the front stage and the

play13:36

backstage

play13:37

role playing can be applied at two

play13:39

settings it is either at the front stage

play13:42

or at the backstage individual plays

play13:46

different roles represented by acted

play13:49

behaviors on the front stage

play13:54

the behavior in the front stage is

play13:56

observed

play13:57

it is when individuals are aware that

play13:59

others are watching

play14:01

this behavior is reflected with the set

play14:03

norms in a given setting

play14:05

while the backstage individuals are free

play14:10

from the expectations and norms that

play14:13

influences behavior

play14:15

people at the backstage are more

play14:17

comfortable and often associated with

play14:19

the

play14:20

true self we started in the discussion

play14:23

of interaction and elaborated its

play14:25

components

play14:26

by george herbert mead this was

play14:29

succeeded by charles certain cooley's

play14:30

looking glass self

play14:32

that views oneself as a byproduct of

play14:35

other people's imagination

play14:36

based on your self-presentation lastly

play14:40

we have irving goffman

play14:42

that views society as a theater and

play14:44

people

play14:45

as a performers all decided theories

play14:48

highlight the idea

play14:50

of the self as a product of social

play14:53

constructions

play14:55

to conclude the discussion let's cite a

play14:58

reminder from

play14:59

irving goffman which states choose

play15:02

your presentations carefully for what

play15:05

starts out

play15:06

as a mask may become your face

play15:11

and that's it for this session thank you

play15:13

and see you

play15:14

next session

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Self-developmentSocial theoriesSymbolic interactionismDramaturgyLooking glass selfSociologySocial interactionsGeorge MeadCharles CooleyIrving Goffman
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?