How To Coach Yourself For Powerlifting Part 2

Summary

In this video, Johnny Candido from Candido Training HQ delves into self-coaching for powerlifters, focusing on progressions within a training cycle. He critiques static RPE training, advocating for a more dynamic approach to accommodate individual responses to intensity. Candido emphasizes the importance of balancing similarity of stimulus with the direction of training cycles and provides specific recommendations for static RPE use on isolation movements, lighter slots, and primary days. He also addresses the limitations of static RPE, suggesting it may not be suitable for all lifters, especially those coaching themselves.

Takeaways

• 🔗 Johnny Candido introduces the video as a follow-up to part one on self-coaching, emphasizing its depth and applicability to powerlifting.
• 💡 He encourages viewers to share the video with those who might benefit and mentions his paid programming service for those seeking more personalized guidance.
• 📈 The video focuses on progressions within a training cycle, contrasting with the previous video which discussed progressions across cycles.
• 🏋️‍♂️ Johnny discusses different progression styles including static RPE, accumulating and rising RPE, and changing reps in sets, advocating for the latter as 'linear periodization with seasoning'.
• 🤔 He stresses the importance of balancing similarity of stimulus and direction of the training cycle, suggesting that too much of one can detract from the other.
• 📊 Candido critiques linear periodization programs that don't peak effectively, suggesting that they can be too simplistic and not tailored to individual needs.
• 📉 He advocates for static RPE progressions on single-joint movements and lighter slots within a program, arguing they provide a consistent stimulus and allow for precise adjustments.
• 🚫 Johnny warns against the overuse of static RPE on primary lifts, suggesting it can be mentally challenging and may not provide enough variation for optimal progress.
• 🔝 He discusses the potential downsides of static RPE, including the risk of overcomplicating training with too many minor changes and the lack of a clear top-down approach.
• 🌟 Candido highlights the value of static RPE for identifying individual responses to different intensities, suggesting it can reveal optimal training zones.

Q & A

What is the main focus of Johnny Candido's video?

The main focus of Johnny Candido's video is on how to coach yourself for powerlifting, specifically discussing progressions within a given training cycle or block.

What is the significance of part two in the series?

Part two extends and goes deeper into the topic introduced in part one, which was an in-depth discussion on self-coaching for powerlifting.

Why does Johnny Candido recommend sharing the video?

Johnny Candido recommends sharing the video because it can benefit anyone looking to coach themselves for powerlifting, especially those who cannot afford a personal coach.

What are the three styles of progression discussed in the video?

The three styles of progression discussed are static RPE, accumulating and rising RPE within a training block, and changing reps in sets with a focus on linear periodization.

What is the advantage of static RPE progressions according to Johnny Candido?

Static RPE progressions allow for reacting to when one is the strongest and adjusting the training cycle duration accordingly, rather than predetermining it.

What are the downsides of static RPE progressions mentioned in the video?

Downsides of static RPE progressions include the difficulty in having the maturity and reflection to make the right decisions when coaching oneself, and the potential for the training to become boring.

In what situations does Johnny Candido recommend using static RPE?

Johnny Candido recommends using static RPE for single joint movements, lighter slots within a training week, and as a unique case on primary days for some individuals.

What is the main criticism of static RPE progressions within a block?

One of the main criticisms is that it can lead to a lack of a top-down vision, resulting in constant minor adjustments rather than significant, strategic changes to the training program.

Why does Johnny Candido suggest that some people might not respond well to static RPE?

Some people might not respond well to static RPE because they may need exposure to higher intensity training for limited periods to peak effectively, which static RPE does not provide.

What alternative to static RPE does Johnny Candido discuss?

Johnny Candido discusses the alternative of accumulating and rising RPE throughout the training block as a way to manage training intensity and potentially peak more effectively.