Kode Etik Psikologi : Kerahasiaan Rekam dan Hasil Psikologi

Summary

The script discusses Indonesian psychology records, emphasizing confidentiality and ethical guidelines. It covers complete and limited psychological records, detailing how they should be collected, stored, and destroyed. The script also presents case studies where psychologists violated ethical codes by disclosing patient records without consent. It highlights the importance of maintaining client privacy and the consequences of breaching confidentiality, such as reporting to the Indonesian Psychology Council.

Takeaways

• 📜 The script discusses Article 23, which pertains to the psychology record, distinguishing between full and limited psychology records.
• 🔒 For full psychology records, psychologists and scientists must collect and store psychological examination results according to the law and ethical codes, ensuring confidentiality.
• 🗂 The purpose of documenting psychological examination results includes facilitating service users, serving as proof of service delivery, and meeting legal or institutional demands.
• 📝 Psychologists and scientists must maintain client confidentiality in recording, storage, transfer, and destruction of records or data under supervision.
• 🚫 Transfer of data and results is allowed if psychological services cannot be continued, but confidentiality must still be safeguarded.
• 📑 For limited psychology records, reports are only given to those who need them for specific purposes and are oriented towards the welfare of the person undergoing psychological examination.
• 📖 A case example is provided where a psychologist, Sherly, and her clinic, IC Professional Services, were sued for violating ethical codes by disclosing confidential medical records without client permission.
• 🤝 Article 24 discusses maintaining the confidentiality of records, emphasizing that records should only be given to authorized parties and should contain only information directly related to the service provided.
• 📢 Another case example involves a psychologist, DW, who leaked client information to students, violating confidentiality and ethical codes.
• 🏥 Article 25A addresses the limitations on data usage, stating that discussions should be for scientific purposes without disrupting the client's personal life and that reports should be made according to initial agreements.
• 🗣️ A case example in Article 25 involves a psychologist sharing client information with colleagues without permission, violating the code of ethics by disclosing client identity.

Q & A

What are the two types of psychological records mentioned in the script?

The script mentions two types of psychological records: 'rekam psikologi lengkap' (complete psychological record) and 'rekam psikologi terbatas' (limited psychological record).

What are the purposes of documenting psychological examination results?

The purposes of documenting psychological examination results are to facilitate the use of psychological services by clients, serve as evidence that psychological services have been provided, and to meet requests from institutions or legal requirements.

What is the responsibility of psychologists and psychological scientists regarding the confidentiality of client records?

Psychologists and psychological scientists are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of client records in terms of recording, storage, transfer, and destruction of notes or data under their supervision.

What are the considerations for transferring data and results in limited psychological records?

When transferring data and results in limited psychological records, confidentiality must still be maintained. The transfer of data should be done under supervision, and the report should be given only to those who need it for specific purposes, oriented towards the benefit or welfare of the person undergoing psychological examination.

What is the case example involving Sherly and IC Professional Service mentioned in the script?

Sherly and IC Professional Service were sued in the South Jakarta District Court for violating the psychologist's ethics code by releasing medical records from a divorce counseling process without the client's consent, which is supposed to be confidential.

What are the responsibilities of psychologists and psychological scientists in maintaining the confidentiality of psychological service records according to article 24?

According to article 24, psychologists and psychological scientists are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of psychological service records. They should only provide information to those authorized to know it and discuss it only with people or parties directly authorized over the client.

What was the violation committed by the psychologist DW in the script?

Psychologist DW violated the ethics code by disclosing personal issues of a client, including details about an abortion, to students without concealing the client's identity.

What are the two important considerations when discussing the use of psychological service data with clients?

The two important considerations are the content of the discussion and the scope of the people involved. The content should be used for scientific purposes without disrupting the client's private life, and reports should be made according to initial agreements. The scope of people involved should ensure that information is only shared with those concerned and with the client's permission.

What is the scenario described in the case example related to article 25?

The scenario involves a psychologist who consulted with colleagues about a client's case without the client's consent and shared identifiable information, which violates the rule that psychologists should not share confidential information about clients without their permission.

What are the conditions under which psychologists and psychological scientists can disclose confidential data without client consent?

Psychologists and psychological scientists can disclose confidential data without client consent only when required by law or for other purposes, such as helping individuals or organizations in need of professional services, or to protect clients from problems or difficulties.

What is the violation committed by the psychologist in the case example related to article 27?

The psychologist violated article 27 by using client data for educational purposes without anonymizing the identities of the clients, thus failing to protect the confidentiality of the psychological service data.