Judge dismisses jury for the day after over 4 hours, with no verdict yet in Trump hush money trial
Summary
TLDRニューヨークでの裁判の様子を伝えるニュースです。元アメリカ大統領ドナルド・トランプが選挙干渉と賄賂に関連する34件の重罪で起訴されています。陪審員たちはこの件について審議中で、証言の再読み上げや裁判官の指示の再確認を求めています。証人のデイビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コーエンの証言が特に重要視されています。裁判の進行や陪審員の質問に関する最新情報が報道されています。
Takeaways
- 🕔 ニューヨークの午後4時に、トランプ元大統領に対する歴史的な選挙干渉・秘密保持の刑事裁判の陪審が審議を開始。
- 📝 陪審員は現在、34件の重罪に対するトランプの運命を議論しており、裁判官の指示を再度聞くことを要求。
- 📜 陪審員はまた、デビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コーエンの証言を再度聞きたいと要求。
- 💼 ニューヨーク・タイムズは、陪審員がトランプが選挙陰謀に関与したかどうかを一致して決定する必要がないと報告。
- 📖 裁判官は各重罪カウントについて説明し、トランプがこれらの記録を偽造したかどうかを証明する必要があることを明示。
- 📱 トランプはTruth Socialに多くの投稿を行い、罪状を知らないと主張。
- 🔔 陪審員が1960年代の電話のような音でベルを鳴らし、裁判官に質問や要求を伝達。
- 📚 陪審員はコーエンとペッカーの証言、特にペッカーが投資家会議中にトランプと電話で話した部分を再度聞きたいと要求。
- ⏳ 裁判官は陪審員に翌朝9:30に戻るよう指示し、要求された証言と指示を再度読み上げる準備を整える。
- 📝 裁判官が陪審員に対して再度読み上げる指示は非常に重要であり、陪審員の理解を助けるためのものである。
Q & A
ニューヨークでの裁判は現在どのような時刻ですか?
-ニューヨークでの裁判は4:00に開始されています。
裁判所で審議されているのは誰の事件ですか?
-元アメリカ合衆国大統領ドナルド・トランプの事件が審議されています。
トランプ前大統領はどのような罪状で起訴されていますか?
-トランプ前大統領は選挙介入と封口料の件で重罪の罪状で起訴されています。
陪審団はどのように構成されていますか?
-陪審団は12人のニューヨーク市民から構成されており、その中に7人の男性と5人の女性がいます。
陪審団はどのような要求を裁判所にしましたか?
-陪審団は裁判所に、裁判官の指示と特定の証言を再聴取するよう要求しました。
陪審団は裁判官のどの指示を再聴取を希望していますか?
-陪審団は裁判官メルシャンからの指示全体を再聴取を希望しています。
トランプ前大統領は裁判に対してどのように対応していますか?
-トランプ前大統領はTruth Socialというプラットフォーム上で多くの投稿を行い、裁判に関連するコメントをしています。
トランプ前大統領は自分に対して課せられた罪状についてどのように述べていますか?
-トランプ前大統領は自分が何に起訴されているのかわからないと述べており、起訴内容が彼に読み上げられた際にも理解できていないと主張しています。
裁判所での証言を再聴取する予定がある人物は誰ですか?
-デイビッド・ペッカーとマイケル・コエンの証言が再聴取される予定です。
陪審団はなぜ裁判官の指示を再聴取を希望するのでしょうか?
-裁判は複雑であり、陪審団は裁判官からの指示を再聴取することで判断基準を確認し、より正確な判断を下すためです。
トランプ前大統領が裁判に関連して何を主張していますか?
-トランプ前大統領は裁判に関連して、もしMother Teresaがポルノスターとの不倫を隠すために封口料を支払ったとされるなら、彼女もこれらの起訴を打ち破ることはできないと主張しています。
陪審団はどのようにして裁判官からの指示を再聴取しますか?
-陪審団は裁判所に戻り、裁判官メルシャンからの指示を再聴取しますが、具体的な指示の部分を希望するかどうかを裁判官に伝えています。
トランプ前大統領の裁判はどのような結果をもたらす可能性がありますか?
-トランプ前大統領の裁判は彼の今後の政治的キャリアに影響を与える可能性があり、もし有罪判決が出る場合、アメリカ大統領選挙への影響も予想されます。
Outlines
🕒 ニューヨークでの元大統領の刑事裁判開始
ニューヨーク時間4時に、かつて多くの有名人や有力者を起訴した裁判所で、元アメリカ合衆国大統領が選挙介入と封口料事件に関する刑事裁判が始まりました。12人のニューヨーク市民と7人の男性と5人の女性の陪審員が、マンハッタン地裁の検察官による34の重罪指控を検討しています。陪審員からの2つ目のメモが届き、裁判官の指示を再聴取し、またデイビッド・ペルカーとマイケル・コエンの証言を再聴取するよう要求しています。裁判は昨日の7時間以上の結論弁論の後、陪審員が4時間を要して審議しています。
📚 陪審員の要求と証言の再聴取
陪審員は裁判官からの指示を再聴取するよう要求し、またデイビッド・ペルカーとマイケル・コエンの特定の証言を再聴取することを希望しています。裁判官は彼らに30ページに及ぶ証言を再読む必要があると知らせ、その準備に時間を要します。また、陪審員は裁判官からの指示を全て再聴取するかどうか尋ねられました。裁判は複雑で、陪審員は裁判所からの指示を理解するために時間を要する可能性があります。
🗣️ 証言の重要性と陪審員の要求
デイビッド・ペルカーの証言は、ドナルド・トランプと封口料事件に関する電話のやり取りを示しており、重要な証拠となっています。トランプは投資家会議中にペルカーと電話で話しており、彼はその話が真実であると信じ、トランプにその話を買収するよう促しました。この電話のやり取りは事件の陰謀の始まりであり、陪審員は裁判官からの指示を再聴取するよう要求しています。裁判所は陪審員の要求に応じて、証言の再聴取を準備しています。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡ニューヨーク
💡裁判
💡陪審团
💡選挙介入
💡封口料
💡重罪
💡証言
💡裁判所
💡トランプ
💡裁判所の手続き
Highlights
The jury in the historic Trump criminal election interference hush money trial is deliberating on the 34 felony counts Trump is charged with by the Manhattan District Attorney.
The jury requested to rehear Judge Merchan's instructions and earlier requested testimony from David Pecker and Michael Cohen.
The jury did not have to agree unanimously on the underlying crime that Trump might have used in the election conspiracy.
Judge Merchan explained what needed to be proven to show that Trump falsified records or caused the records to be falsified.
Trump is awaiting the jury's verdict, which could impact his potential run for the White House.
Trump posted controversial statements on the platform Truth Social, claiming ignorance of the charges against him.
Trump made a bizarre comment, stating that even Mother Teresa couldn't beat these charges if accused of concealing hush money payments.
The jury requested four specific parts of testimony, including from Michael Cohen and David Pecker, to be reread to them.
David Pecker's testimony included details of a phone conversation with Trump during an investor meeting, discussing the purchase of Karen McDougal's story.
Judge Merchan asked the jury if they wanted the whole set of instructions reread or just a specific part.
The jury has been dismissed for the day and will resume deliberations at 9:30 AM the following day.
New York law requires corroborating evidence or testimony, with Pecker's testimony providing circumstantial evidence linking Trump to the conspiracy.
Judge Merchan's reading of the jury instructions took an hour and 26 minutes, reflecting the complexity of the case.
Speculation about the jury's questions is common, with prosecutors and defense attorneys often interpreting them in different ways.
Andrew Weissmann and other legal experts discussed the standard practice of re-reading jury instructions and the potential impact on the trial's outcome.
Transcripts
>>> HI, EVERYONE.
>>> HI, EVERYONE.
HERE WE GO.
IT IS 4:00 IN NEW YORK.
OH TO BE A FLY ON THE WALL
BEHIND THESE CLOSED DOORS.
IN THE COURTHOUSE THAT HAS SEEN
NO SHORTAGE OF FAMOUS
INFLUENTIAL OR WEALTHY CRIMINAL
DEFENDANTS.
12 NEW YORKERS AND SEVEN MEN AND
FIVE WOMEN ARE RIGHT NOW
DEBATING THE FATE OF A FORMER
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
AND THEY HAVE QUESTIONS.
THE JURY IN THE HISTORIC TRUMP
CRIMINAL ELECTION INTERFERENCE
HUSH MONEY TRIAL IS AT THIS
MOMENT DELIBERATING ON THE 34
FELONY COUNTS TRUMP IS CHARGED
WITH BY THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT
ATTORNEY.
JUST IN, IN THE LAST FEW
MINUTES, A SECOND NOTE HAS BEEN SENT FROM THE JURY, THEY'RE
SENT FROM THE JURY, THEY'RE
ASKING TO RE-HEAR JUDGE
MERCHAN'S INSTRUCTIONS TO THEM
AND EARLIER THEY ARE REQUESTED
TESTIMONY FROM DAVID PERKCKER AN
MICHAEL COHEN.
OUR JOURNALISTS ARE STANDING
WATCH AND THEY ARE UPDATING US
AND WE'LL UPDATE YOU AS SOON AS
WE KNOW ANYTHING.
AS OF
AS OF 4:00 P.M., THE JURIES THAT
DELIBERATED FOR FOUR HOURS AFTER
YESTERDAY'S MARATHON DAY OF
CLOSING ARGUMENTS, MORE THAN 7
HOURS BETWEEN THE CLOSING
ARGUMENT DELIVERED BY THE
DEFENSE AND THE PROSECUTION.
THIS MORNING THE JUDGE DELIVERED
TOZ COMPLICATED BUT ALL
IMPORTANT JURY INSTRUCTIONS.
WHEN JUDGE MER SHAN EXPLAINED
HOW THE JURIES HAVE TO APPLY THE
LAWS TO THIS CASE.
SOMETHING THAT MATTERS IN THIS
CASE, BUT IN THIS ONE WHERE
DONALD TRUMP FACES FELONY
CHARGES, NOTS NOT MISDEMEANOR,
BECAUSE IT WAS TO CONCEAL
ANOTHER CRIME.
THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS TOOK ON A
NEW IMPORTANCE.
THEY DID NOT HAVE AGREE AMONGST
THEMSELVES WHAT THE UNDERLYING
CRIME WAS.
"NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTS THAT
THE JURY DID NOT HAVE TO AGREE
UNANIMOUSLY THAT THEY MIGHT
DETERMINE THAT TRUMP USE THE IN
THE ELECTION CONSPIRACY.
HAD THE JUDGE REQUIRED THEM TO
BE UNANIMOUS ON THE UNLAWFUL
MEANS IT MIGHT HAVE BECOME FAR
HARD TORE REACH A VERDICT.
THE JUDGE WENT THROUGH EACH AND
EVERY ONE OF THE SINGLE FELONY
COUNTS, EACH ONE POINTING TO 11
CHECKS AND 11 INVOICES AND 12
VOUCHERS.
THE JUDGE EXPLAINED WHAT NEEDED
TO BE PROVEN TO SHOW THAT TRUMP
FALSIFIED THESE RECORDS OR
CAUSED THE RECORDS TO BE
FALSIFIED.
NOW AS FOR DEFENDANT, DONALD
TRUMP, HE'S FORCED TO WAIT JUST
LIKE EVERY OTHER CRIMINAL
DEFENDANT IN THE COUNTRY.
ANY MOMENT NOW HE COULD FIND OUT
WHETHER HE'LL BE ASKING THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEND HIM TO
THE WHITE HOUSE WITH A CRIMINAL
CONVICTION ON HIS RECORD.
HE HAS BEEN SPENDING HIS TIME
POSTING A LOT OF NUTTY THINGS ON
THE PLATFORM TRUTH SOCIAL.
EARLIER HE SAID, DOES NOT KNOW
WHAT HE'S BEEN CHARGED WITH.
INE THOUGH THEY WERE READ TO HIM
WHILE HE WAS THERE.
JUST BEFORE THAT, HE POSTED A
RANT FROM OUTSIDE OF THE
COURTHOUSE WHERE HE CLAIMED
MOTHER TERESA COULD NOT BEAT
THESE CHARGES.
IF MOTHER TERESA WOULD BE
CHARGED WITH CONCEALING HUSH
MONEY PAYMENTS TO HIDE AN AFFAIR
WITH A PORN STAR.
WE'RE SORRY WE SAID HER NAME IN
THAT SENTENCE.
WAIT-AND-SEE MODE IN THE
INTERFERENCE HUSH MONEY CRIMINAL
TRIAL IS WHERE WE BEGIN WITH OUR
MOST FAVORITE REPORTERS AND
FRIENDS.
WITH US AT THE TABLE, ANDREW
WISEMAN IS BACK AND SUSAN CRAIG,
AND ALSO BACK FORMER DEPUTY
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY HARRY LITMAN
IS HERE AND OUTSIDE OF THE
COURTHOUSE, VAUGHN HILLYARD.
VAUGHN, WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT
NOW?
I WANT TO LOOK DOWN TO SEE WHAT
IS HAPPENING IN THE COURTROOM
BUT I WON'T DO THAT.
I'LL LET YOU TELL US.
>> Reporter: WELL FIRST OF ALL,
I'M WONDERING HOW RINGS OF THE
BECAUSE IT IS NOT CLEAR WHEN THE
JURY, FROM THE JURY ROOM, RINGS
THE BELL INTO THE COURTROOM
WHETHER THEY HAVE A VERDICT OR
HAVE A NOTE WITH QUESTIONS.
AND NOW SO FAR THEY HAVE RUNG IN
TWICE WITH TWO DIFFERENT NOTES.
THE JURY JUST IN THE LAST TWO
MINUTES RE-ENTERED THE COURTROOM
AND THERE WERE TWO REQUESTS FROM
THE JURY TO JUDGE MERCHAN.
NUMBER ONE, THERE WERE FOUR
SPECIFIC PARTS OF TESTIMONY
INCLUDING FROM MICHAEL COHEN AND
DAVID PECKER THAT THEY WANT TO
HAVE REREAD TO THEM.
JUDGE MERCHAN INFORMING THEM IT
IS 30 PAGES OF TESTIMONY
REQUIRED TO BE READ BACK TO
THEM.
THAT COULD LAST UP TO 30
MINUTES.
THEY ARE STILL IN THE COURTROOM
TRYING TO GO AND GATHER THOSE
PAGES OF TRANSCRIPTS FROM ALL OF
THE WAY BACK IF APRIL TO MAY
13th WHEN KPIEKMICHAEL COHEN
TESTIFIED.
THE SECOND REQUEST IS TO REREAD
THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT JUDGE
MERCHAN DELIVERED THIS MORNING.
THIS IS THE PACKET OF JURY
INSTRUCTIONS.
HE READ IT ONCE AND IT TOOK HIM
AN HOUR AND A 26 MINUTES TO DO
SO.
IT IS COMPLICATE AND THE CASE IS
COMPLEX AND THE JURY
INSTRUCTIONS ARE COMPLEX BECAUSE
IT PERTAINED TO A LOT OF LEGAL
STATUES AND NOW THE QUESTION
THAT THE JUDGE JUST PUT TO THE
JURORS DO YOU WANT THE WHOLE
THING READ BACK OR A SPECIFIC
PART OF THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS.
THAT IS WHAT WE'RE WAITING TO
HEAR FROM THE JURY IN THIS
CLOSING HOURS OF DAY ONE EVER
DELIBERATION.
>> SO LET ME READ BACK TO YOU
THE FIRST PART OF THIS WHICH WAS
THE FIRST RINGING OF THE BELL.
IS IT AN ACTUAL BELL?
>> Reporter: WE'RE TOLD BY LISA
RUBIN THAT IT SOUNDS LIKE A
1960s TELEPHONE.
SO IF THAT TAKES YOU BACK,
SOMETIMES GOVERNMENT IS A LITTLE
SLOW TO UPDATE.
BUT THERE YOU GO.
>> OKAY.
THAT IS MY BURNING QUESTION.
SO THOSE WERE THE FOUR QUESTIONS
THAT THE FIRST RING OF THE BELL
WERE -- THAT THE JURY EXPRESSED
THEY WANTED TO SEE.
THESE ARE THE TRANSCRIPTS
THEY'RE RUNNING DOWN.
ONE, DAVID PECKER'S TESTIMONY
REGARDING THE PHONE CONVERSATION
WITH DONALD TRUMP WHILE PECKER
WAS IN THE INVESTOR MEETING.
THIS CAME UP CLOSER TO THE END
WHEN I THINK THE PROSECUTION
REMINDED -- IT CAME UP MAYBE IN
SOMEONE'S CROSS OR I DON'T
REMEMBER WHY IT CAME UP, BUT
THIS WAS TRUMP ON THE PHONE WITH
PECKER.
HE PULLED HIM OUT OF A MEETING
AND HE SAID, I DON'T PAY FOR
STUFF LIKE THIS.
THIS SEEMED LIKE AN IMPORTANT
PART OF TIEING TRUMP TO THE
WHOLE SCHEME, VAUGHN?
>> Reporter: RIGHT.
IT IS AROUND KAREN McDOUGAL
PURCHASING OF THE STORY.
HE WAS AT AN INVESTOR MEETING IN
NEW JERSEY WHEN HE GOT THIS
PHONE CALL.
HIS ASSISTANT CAME IN AND SAID
DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE LINE AND
HE STEPPED OUT AND THAT IS WHEN
THE PHONE CALL TOOK PLACE ABOUT
THE SPECIFICS OF KAREN McDOUGAL
STORY AND DAVID PECKER TESTIFIED
TO THIS JURY THAT HE, IN FACT,
THOUGHT THE STORY WAS REAL AND
CREDIBLE AND BASED ON THE FACT
THAT DONALD TRUMP TOLD HIM THAT
KAREN WAS A QUOTE, NICE GIRL.
AND THAT HE URGED DONALD TRUMP
ON THAT PHONE CALL THAT THE
STORY SHOULD BE PURCHASED.
AND TRRPDONALD TRUMP FOLLOWED UP
SAYING HE SHOULD TALK TO
MICHAEL, MICHAEL COHEN, ABOUT
EXECUTING THAT ARRANGEMENT.
THIS IS ALL AT THE BEGINNING OF
THE CONSPIRACY THAT THE JURY IS
HAVING TO DELIBERATE OVER.
AND WE HAVE FROM THE JURY
INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE JURY IS
NOW ASKING TO BE REREAD TO THEM,
THAT MICHAEL COHEN WAS AN
ACCOMPLICE IN THAT AND UNDER NEW
YORK STATE LAW, YOU HAVE TO HAVE
CORROBORATING EVIDENCE OR
TESTIMONY AND THAT IS WHERE IT
IS INTERESTING TO SEE DAVID
PECKER, MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS
THAT DONALD TRUMP HAD WITH HIM
BEING ASKED TO BE REREAD BACK TO
THEM, THAT SPECIFIC TESTIMONY,
BECAUSE WHEN YOU MATCH IT UP,
YOU SEE CORROBORATING TESTIMONY,
NOT JUST DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE,
BUT THERE WAS CIRCUMSTANTIAL
EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY THAT
DAVID PECKER LINKED DONALD TRUMP
TO THE BEGINNING OF THE
CONSPIRACY.
>> YEAH, ANDREW, I'LL ASK YOU TO
PICK UP ON VAUGHN'S POINT.
LET ME TELL THE VIEWERS WHAT
HAPPENED IN THE LAST 60 SECONDS.
THE JURY HAS BEEN DISMISSED FOR
THE DAY AFTER JUDGE MERCHAN
BROUGHT THEM BACK IN AFTER THEY
RANG THEIR BELL A SECOND TIME.
TOLD THEM THEY WERE GOING TO RUN
DOWN THE TRANSCRIPTS OF THIS
TESTIMONY THAT VAUGHN JUST
DESCRIBED PERFECTLY.
WE'LL TELL WHAT YOU THE OTHER
THREE PIECES OF TESTIMONY ARE
THAT THEY WANT.
BUT THE JURY WANTED THE JURY
INSTRUCTION READ BACK TO THEM.
YOU WAVED AROUND YOUR PACKET.
THE WHOLE THING TOOK ABOUT AN
HOUR AND A HALF TO READ AND
JUDGE MERCHAN ASKED THEM TO
CLARIFY, WHETHER THEY WANTED THE
WHOLE INSTRUCTION OR JUST PART
OF IT.
SO THAT IS WHERE THEY PICK UP
TOMORROW MORNING AT 9:30.
>> THIS GIVES THE JUDGE AND THE
PARTIES TO HAVE THEIR DUCKS IN A
ROW SO WHEN THE JURY COMES BACK,
THEY COULD BE READY TO GO.
SO EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS, THIS
IS A NORMAL PART AS HARRY KNOWS,
OF WHAT YOU HAVE -- WHETHER A
JURY IS OUT.
THEY COULD ASK TO HAVE SOME KIND
OF INSTRUCTION REREAD OR SOME
QUESTION ABOUT THE INSTRUCTIONS.
AND REREADING IT IS SIMPLE ONCE
THE JURY RESPONDS IN SAYING THAT
THEY WANT THE WHOLE THING READ
BACK.
CO
HE COULD DO THAT.
HE JUST READS THAT.
>> I SAW THERE HIS INSTRUCTION,
HE SAID I WON'T GIVE THIS TO YOU
BUT I WILL READ IT TO YOU AGAIN.
WHY WOULDN'T HE GIVE THEM A
COPY.
>> A QUIRK OF NEW YORK FEDERAL
LAW.
I WAS A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, THIS
WOULD GO BACK TO -- MANY JUDGES
WOULD SEND IT BACK THERE.
SOME JUDGES DIDN'T.
BECAUSE THEY REALLY THOUGHT THAT
IT MIGHT HAVE THEM SORT OF PARS
IT TOO MUCH.
BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IN
OTHER COURTS, BUT NOT IN NEW
YORK.
IN NEW YORK THEY COULD ASK TO
HAVE IT READ.
MORE TYPICALLY, THEY ASK
QUESTIONS LIKE CAN YOU PLEASE
SPECIFY SOME MORE WHAT BEYOND A
REASONABLE DOUBT MEANS.
BECAUSE THAT IS THE LEVEL OF --
IN YOUR HEAD HOW TO DEAL WITH
THAT AND HOW CONVEY TO SOMEBODY
WHAT A LEVEL OF CERTITUDE IS.
THAT IS A COMMON QUESTION.
THE OTHER QUESTIONS.
THE MORE INTERESTING ONE WHICH
IS THE FIRST NOTE WHERE THERE IS
ENDLESS SPECULATION THAT GOES ON
AS TO WHAT DOES IT MEAN AND YOU
COULD ARGUE IT EACH WAY.
WHEN I WAS A PROSECUTOR, I
ARGUED IT AGAINST ME.
NO MATTER WHAT CAME IN, IT IS
AWFUL.
NO MATTER HOW GOOD IT WAS.
NO ONE EVER WANTED ME TO DO
TRIALS BECAUSE I WAS LIKE WE'RE
LOSING NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED.
SO I'M A TERRIBLE PERSON TO ASK.
>> I WAS LIKE THAT WITH
CAMPAIGNS.
>> I SAID THIS TO SOMEONE AND
THAT IS WHAT IS HE SAID.
Weitere verwandte Videos ansehen
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eZ2cX8kqOgg/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGE4gMyh_MA8=&rs=AOn4CLDOzbfxxn4nTilgNXuDGHkRfMFo6Q)
Can't Read Too Much Into Note: Zeldin on Trump Jury
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ANuwppJt7Ds/hq720.jpg)
Supreme Court allows NRA free speech lawsuit to move forward
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QtDWhaTMMUc/hq720.jpg)
Jessica Roth on Trump Trial Closing Statements
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hMetdS5gjko/hq720.jpg)
Trump called his guilty verdict 'rigged.' Hear Biden's reaction
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/949-G6dGvic/hq720.jpg)
'I did my job': Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg on Trump verdict
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8H01qQ1IODE/hq720.jpg)
Trump Found Guilty: Key Trial Moments That Led to Hush-Money Conviction | WSJ
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)