AF Archery Ming Bow 2012 vs. 2024 - Comparison and Review

Summary

In this archery review, Andrew from Australia compares the old AF Archery Tatar bow from 2012 with the new 2024 model. He discusses the differences in design, handle shape, arrow pass, weight, and draw length, highlighting the improvements in the new model. Andrew also tests the bows' performance and shares his thoughts on the shooting experience, emphasizing the refinement and elegance of the newer version.

Takeaways

• 🏹 The video is a review and comparison of an old AF Archery Tatar bow from 2012 and a new 2024 model.
• 📐 The new Tatar bow has a different handle design, with a straighter and more aggressive shape compared to the older model.
• 🔄 The new bow features a narrower arrow pass and a string bridge, while the old one has a wider pass and is more non-contact.
• 💲 The price of the new Tatar bow in Black is $126, while the Binga version is $226.
• 🎯 The new model is available in draw weights from 20 to 50 lbs and can be customized to the user's preference.
• 📏 The old Tatar has a draw length of 31 inches, while the new one is adjustable up to 34 inches.
• 📏 The old Tatar has a brace height of 7 3/4 inches, while the new one is slightly less.
• 📦 Andrew from AF Archery sent a variety of leather and fur thumb protectors for testing, including kangaroo fur options.
• 📈 The new Tatar bow is lighter, weighing 400g compared to the old model's 420g.
• 🏹 The new bow is described as more refined and beautiful, with less vibration and a smoother draw.
• 📝 The video concludes by recommending an upgrade for those with older AF bows, as the new models offer a significantly improved shooting experience.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?

The main topic of the video is a review and comparison of an old AF Archery Tatar bow from 2012 and a new 2024 model.

Who reached out to the reviewer with the old AF Archery Tatar bow?

Andrew, who is from Australia, reached out to the reviewer with the old AF Archery Tatar bow.

Why was the old AF Archery Tatar bow considered too strong for Andrew?

The old AF Archery Tatar bow was considered too strong for Andrew because it was a 50b bow, and he didn't shoot it often in recent years.

What did AF Archery provide for the comparison?

AF Archery provided the new 2024 model of the Tatar bow for the comparison.

What is the significance of the blue rubber band in the new bow?

The blue rubber band is part of the bow string, which is important for the bow's performance. It is a first string with 16 strands and a length of 131 cm.

What additional items did AF Archery send for testing?

AF Archery sent a bunch of leather thumb protectors for testing, including different types of leather and even kangaroo fur.

What is the difference in the brace height between the old and new Tatar bows?

The old Tatar bow has a brace height of 7 3/4 inches, while the new one has a brace height that the reviewer will figure out.

How do the arrow passes of the old and new Tatar bows compare?

The old Tatar bow has a wider arrow pass of 25 mm, while the new one has a narrower arrow pass of 17 mm.

What is the weight difference between the old and new Tatar bows?

The old Tatar bow weighs 420 grams, while the new one weighs 400 grams.

What customization options are available for the new Tatar bow?

The new Tatar bow can be customized with different options such as veneer, takedown version, carbon core, and different handle options.

What is the reviewer's final verdict on the new Tatar bow compared to the old one?

The reviewer loves the new Tatar bow, stating that it is a refined beauty with a smoother draw and less vibration compared to the old one.

What advice does the reviewer give about having multiple bows?

The reviewer advises having at least three bows: one for short draw (28 inches), one for medium draw (32-33 inches), and one for long draw (35-36 inches).

What is the reviewer's comment on the shipping costs associated with the bows?

The reviewer acknowledges that shipping costs can be high but emphasizes that it's not the company's fault, as they cannot control the costs imposed by carriers.