I Tried EVERY Full Body Tracker! [Tundra, SlimeVR, HaritoraX, Axis, Vive 3.0 & Ultimate]

Summary

In this video, Chris dives deep into the world of VR full-body tracking, reviewing various trackers including the Lighthouse-based V3.0 & Tundra, IMU-based Heritor X and Slime VR, and camera-based Five Ultimate trackers. Each tracker is put to the test in terms of setup, performance, comfort, and usability. Chris provides detailed insights into their pros and cons, highlighting the best options for both casual users and hardcore VR enthusiasts. With his experience, he offers a clear guide on which trackers are worth the investment and which ones still have room to grow.

Takeaways

• 😀 Lighthouse-based trackers (V3.0 & Tundra) provide highly reliable tracking with minimal drift, making them a gold standard for VR full-body tracking.
• 😀 Tundra trackers are smaller and more portable than V3.0, offering additional flexibility and some unique use cases like juggling objects in VR.
• 😀 Lighthouse trackers require line-of-sight to base stations, so positioning is crucial to avoid tracking loss, especially around the hips.
• 😀 IMU-based trackers like Heritor X are extremely user-friendly, with pre-labeled trackers, lightweight design, and a fast setup process.
• 😀 Heritor X trackers prioritize convenience over absolute tracking precision, making them ideal for casual or frequent use without setup headaches.
• 😀 Slime VR trackers provide excellent IMU tracking and open-source customization but have a more complex setup, require stickers/straps, and are suited for enthusiasts who enjoy tinkering.
• 😀 Five Ultimate trackers use camera-based tracking with high potential but are still in beta, featuring heavy hardware, complicated setup, and sensitivity to lighting and occlusion.
• 😀 Axis trackers have sleek design and charging convenience but suffer from jittery tracking, uncomfortable chest/waist placement, and poor value at their high price point.
• 😀 Quality-of-life features such as clasps, pre-labeled trackers, and well-designed straps can outweigh minor tracking imperfections by making systems more enjoyable to use.
• 😀 Chris emphasizes the importance of setup simplicity, software usability, and reliability alongside tracking quality, as these factors greatly impact whether a system is practical for regular use.
• 😀 Lighting, environment, and hardware quality significantly affect the performance of camera-based and IMU trackers, requiring controlled conditions for optimal results.
• 😀 While newer tracker technologies show promise, established Lighthouse systems remain the most dependable for consistent, high-quality full-body tracking in VR.

Q & A

Who is the presenter in the video, and what is he known for?

The presenter is Chris, known for being a full body tracking enthusiast and reviewer, often testing and comparing various VR trackers.

Why does Chris tend to stick with the same VR equipment over time?

Chris is a creature of habit and prefers not to change what works, which is why he has continued using Lighthouse tracking and the Valve Index for years.

What is EO VR, and why does Chris recommend it?

EO VR is a brand of track straps for VR trackers. Chris recommends it for its durability, comfort, and secure fit, especially for frequent full body tracking users.

What are the main Lighthouse-based trackers Chris tested?

Chris tested the V 3.0 and Tundra trackers, noting that both offer solid tracking quality, minimal drift, and are easy to set up, although they can lose line of sight in certain scenarios.

How do IMU-based trackers differ in user experience according to Chris?

IMU-based trackers, such as Heritor X and Slime VR, offer portability and versatility but vary in setup complexity and tracking quality. Heritor X is consumer-friendly, while Slime VR is more suitable for users who like to tinker and optimize settings.

What are some standout features of the Heritor X trackers?

Heritor X trackers are lightweight, pre-labeled, have convenient clasps for fast setup, and include a pseudo foot tracker for ankle movement, making them easy to use despite slightly mid-level tracking performance.

What issues did Chris face with the Slime VR trackers?

Chris found Slime VR trackers to have excellent IMU tracking quality but less convenience due to the need for stickers, tangled straps, and some dangling cables. The setup requires more user tinkering and community resources.

How do the Five Ultimate trackers work, and what challenges did Chris encounter?

Five Ultimate trackers are inside-out camera-based trackers similar to Quest Pro controllers. Chris faced a complicated setup, sensitivity to lighting, and occasional tracking loss when cameras were obstructed, though their tracking quality shows strong potential.

What is the significance of track strap design, according to Chris?

Track strap design affects comfort, stability, and ease of use. Chris emphasizes that straps that sit flush, have quick release mechanisms, and prevent sliding greatly enhance the user experience, especially during active movements.

Which trackers did Chris ultimately find most convenient to use?

Chris found the Heritor X trackers the most convenient due to their lightweight design, pre-labeled nodes, and fast, secure clasps, even though their tracking was not as precise as Slime VR.

What factors should be considered when choosing a full body tracker setup?

Considerations include tracking accuracy, setup complexity, compatibility with VR systems, durability of straps, battery life, weight, comfort, and personal preference for convenience versus fine-tuned performance.

What general advice does Chris give for viewers exploring full body tracking?

Chris advises viewers to use his review as a starting point, explore additional tutorials and reviews, and recognize that tracking experience can vary based on equipment, room setup, and personal usage habits.