Rekayasa Perampokan, Suami Bun*h Istri di Serang - [Newsline]

Summary

The mystery surrounding the death of Patri Hombing, allegedly caused by a robbery, takes a shocking turn as her husband, Wadison Pasaribu, confesses to strangling her. Initially thought to be a theft with violence, investigations revealed the true motive was romantic—Wadison wanted to marry his mistress while keeping custody of his child. With the victim’s two young children now in the care of her family, the perpetrator faces serious charges, including premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Criminal Code, carrying the possibility of the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Takeaways

• 😀 The alleged robbery case involving the murder of Patri Hombing in Serang City has been solved.
• 😀 The victim's husband, Wadison Pasaribu, initially misled the authorities but later confessed to strangling his wife.
• 😀 The initial report suggested a robbery with violence, but the investigation revealed that no such robbery took place.
• 😀 Witnesses initially thought there was a robbery, as the victim was found wrapped in a sack with tied hands and feet.
• 😀 The motive for the murder was found to be related to a romantic affair and a desire to obtain custody of his child.
• 😀 The perpetrator, Wadison Pasaribu, wanted to marry his girlfriend but feared losing custody of his minor child, so he killed his wife.
• 😀 The case was originally believed to be a robbery, but further investigation uncovered that the murder was premeditated.
• 😀 The victim had two young children, aged 7 and 5, who are now being cared for by the victim’s family.
• 😀 The suspect, Wadison Pasaribu, faces criminal charges under Article 340 of the Criminal Code, with the potential for a death sentence, life imprisonment, or at least 20 years in prison.
• 😀 The investigation revealed that the suspect's actions were premeditated, further solidifying the seriousness of the crime.

Q & A

What was initially suspected in the case of Patri Hombing's death?

Initially, the case was suspected to be a robbery with violence, based on the condition of the victim's body and the scene being in disarray.

What shocking revelation did Patri Hombing's husband make during the investigation?

Patri Hombing's husband, Wadison Pasarbu, admitted to being the perpetrator of his wife's murder, deviating from his previous statements.

How did the victim's child get involved in the case?

The victim's child found the parents wrapped in sacks and asked neighbors for help, which led to the discovery of the crime.

What was the actual cause of Patri Hombing's death according to the investigation?

The cause of death was determined to be strangulation by the perpetrator, who was Patri's husband, Wadison Pasarbu.

What was the motive behind the murder of Patri Hombing?

The motive was largely romantic. The perpetrator, Wadison Pasarbu, wanted to end his relationship with his wife in order to marry another woman, but he also wanted to retain custody of his child.

Why did the perpetrator create a robbery scenario in the murder?

The perpetrator tried to cover up the murder by making it look like a robbery, in order to divert suspicion and justify the violence to others.

How many children did the victim and the suspect have, and who is taking care of them now?

The victim and the suspect had two children, aged 7 and 5. The victim's family is currently taking care of the children.

What are the possible criminal charges faced by Wadison Pasarbu?

Wadison Pasarbu faces charges under Article 340 of the Criminal Code for premeditated murder, which could result in the death penalty, life imprisonment, or a prison sentence of at least 20 years.

How did the initial witness contribute to the investigation?

The witness, who was a neighbor, saw the victim's child seeking help and provided an account that led to the understanding that the incident involved a murder rather than a robbery.

What led the police to change their theory from robbery to murder?

After conducting a thorough investigation and interviewing witnesses, the police determined that there was no evidence of theft, and the true cause of the death was revealed to be a premeditated murder by the victim's husband.