Rugikan Negara Rp 193,7 T, Bagaimana Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Pertamina Terungkap?

Summary

In a corruption case involving PT Pertamina's oil and refinery product management, the Attorney General's Office has detained seven suspects. The scandal, dating from 2018 to 2023, involves a manipulation of oil supply regulations, leading to unlawful imports instead of prioritizing domestic sources. The suspects, including high-ranking Pertamina officials, allegedly colluded with brokers to manipulate oil imports for illegal profits. The total loss to the country is estimated at 193.7 trillion IDR. Pertamina has expressed its support for the legal process, ensuring cooperation with authorities for a transparent investigation.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Attorney General's Office (Kejaksaan Agung) detained 7 suspects on February 24, 2025, in a corruption case involving crude oil and refinery products management.
• 😀 The corruption case is estimated to have caused a financial loss to the state amounting to IDR 193.7 trillion between 2018 and 2023.
• 😀 The case originated from the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 42 of 2018, which required Pertamina to prioritize domestic crude oil supplies.
• 😀 Investigations revealed that key figures in Pertamina subsidiaries, including RS, SDS, and AP, manipulated meetings to import oil products instead of using domestic resources.
• 😀 The suspects are accused of colluding with brokers to unlawfully import crude oil and refinery products, bypassing regulations.
• 😀 Pertamina, despite being required to source oil domestically, allegedly reduced local refinery production, thus necessitating imports.
• 😀 The corruption included inflated shipping contract fees (13-15%) on the importation of crude oil and refinery products, benefiting the suspects.
• 😀 The suspects are believed to have gained illegal profits from the imports, causing significant financial damage to the country.
• 😀 Some of the suspects held positions such as executives at Pertamina, including RS, the Director of PT Pertamina Patra Niaga, and YF, a shipping official.
• 😀 Pertamina has expressed its cooperation with authorities and will assist in ensuring the legal process proceeds smoothly.

Q & A

What was the main issue in the corruption case involving PT Pertamina?

The main issue involved alleged corruption in the management of crude oil and refinery products, which included bypassing regulations requiring domestic oil supply in favor of imports, leading to significant state financial losses.

How much financial loss is the alleged corruption estimated to have caused?

The alleged corruption is estimated to have caused a loss of 193.7 trillion IDR to the state.

What regulation initiated the investigation into PT Pertamina's oil management?

The investigation was initiated following Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 42 of 2018, which mandated Pertamina to prioritize domestic crude oil supply.

Who were the key individuals implicated in the corruption case?

Key individuals implicated in the case include RS, SDS, AP, YF, DW, and GRJ, who were involved in manipulating meetings and engaging in illegal contracts.

How did the suspects manipulate the system to import oil instead of sourcing it domestically?

The suspects manipulated meetings within Pertamina, specifically those related to optimizing downstream operations, to justify reduced refinery production and thus, the need to import crude oil and refined products despite the regulatory requirement to source domestically.

What was the role of YF in the corruption scheme?

YF, a Pertamina official, was involved in inflating shipping contracts for the importation of oil, which resulted in the state paying an additional 13-15% fee, benefiting the suspects.

What illegal activities were carried out by the brokers involved in the case?

The brokers were involved in winning contracts for the importation of crude oil and refinery products through unlawful means, possibly receiving bribes or commissions for their role in manipulating the process.

How did DW and GRJ contribute to the corruption?

DW and GRJ communicated with AP to secure high prices for oil imports, despite not meeting the required conditions, and also obtained approval from SDS and RS for importing the oil.

What is PT Pertamina's stance on the ongoing legal investigation?

PT Pertamina has expressed respect for the legal process and is committed to fully cooperating with the authorities to ensure the smooth continuation of the investigation and that justice is served.

What is the significance of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 42 of 2018 in the case?

Regulation No. 42 of 2018 is significant because it required Pertamina to prioritize domestic crude oil sourcing, but the suspects bypassed this regulation by importing oil, leading to the alleged corruption.