Pengacara Pegi & Vina Komentari Sumpah Pocong Saka Tatal | Kabar Petang tvOne

Summary

Saka Tatal, a former convict in the murder case of Vina and Eki, performed a 'sumpah pocong' ritual to assert his innocence, claiming he was not involved in their deaths. Conducted in Cirebon, West Java, the ritual drew mixed reactions, with the Indonesian Ulema Council stating it is a cultural practice rather than an Islamic one. Tatal's legal team initiated this to strengthen public belief in his innocence, though some legal experts expressed skepticism about its impact on the judicial process. The event highlights the intersection of culture and justice in Indonesia.

Takeaways

• 😀 Saka Tatal, a former convict, performed a *sumpah pocong* ritual to assert his innocence in the Vina and Eki murder case.
• 🕊️ The ritual took place at the Agung Amparan Jati site in Cirebon, West Java.
• ⚖️ The Indonesian Ulema Council stated that the *sumpah pocong* is not part of Islamic teachings but a local cultural practice.
• 📜 Tatal claims that he was not involved in the murder, which occurred eight years ago.
• 👥 Legal representatives expressed mixed feelings about the ritual's impact on public perception and Tatal's case.
• 🤔 Concerns were raised about whether participating in the ritual could undermine Tatal's legal standing.
• 📣 Rudiana, who initiated discussions about the ritual, did not attend, raising doubts about the validity of testimonies.
• 💬 The council emphasized that oaths made in the name of Allah are acceptable as long as they promote good behavior.
• 🛑 The *sumpah pocong* is often used in Indonesia to prove innocence or guilt in serious legal matters.
• 🌍 The ritual reflects the intersection of local cultural traditions and contemporary legal issues in Indonesia.

Q & A

What was the purpose of Saka Tatal's 'sumpah pocong' ritual?

Saka Tatal performed the 'sumpah pocong' ritual to prove his innocence and assert that he was not involved in the murder case of Vina and Eki.

What is the 'sumpah pocong' ritual?

The 'sumpah pocong' is a traditional Indonesian oath that involves a person being wrapped in a burial shroud, symbolizing a commitment to tell the truth, often used to assert one's innocence.

How did the Majelis Ulama Indonesia respond to the 'sumpah pocong' ritual?

The Majelis Ulama Indonesia stated that the 'sumpah pocong' is not an Islamic teaching but rather a local cultural creativity, emphasizing that Islamic oaths should be taken in the name of Allah.

What was the context of Saka Tatal's case?

Saka Tatal was a former convict related to a murder case that occurred eight years prior involving Vina and Eki, for which he had been previously convicted.

Who witnessed the 'sumpah pocong' ritual?

The ritual was witnessed by members of the public, family, media representatives, and Tatal's legal team.

What was the reaction of Tatal's legal team to the ritual?

Tatal's legal team suggested that the ritual was a way to publicly assert his innocence, despite the conviction.

Did any legal representatives express doubts about the efficacy of the ritual?

Yes, some legal representatives, including Rudi and others, advised against participating in the ritual, questioning its influence on the legal proceedings.

What does the ritual signify in Indonesian culture?

In Indonesian culture, the 'sumpah pocong' is often performed as an effort to demonstrate someone's innocence or guilt, reflecting a belief in supernatural justice.

What did the Ulama state regarding the legal implications of the ritual?

The Ulama indicated that the 'sumpah pocong' is a cultural practice that does not affect the judicial decisions, as legal judgments are based on evidence and not on traditional oaths.

How is the 'sumpah pocong' viewed in relation to Islamic teachings?

The 'sumpah pocong' is viewed as a local cultural practice, and while oaths in Islam are taken in the name of Allah, this particular ritual does not align with core Islamic teachings.