“When I saw Julian Assange I was SHOCKED by his appearance” Glenn Greenwald | Redacted News

Summary

このビデオでは、ジャーナリストのグレン・グリーンウォルドがジュリアン・アサンジのケースとそれがプレスの自由の未来に与える影響について深く議論しています。アサンジの弁護側は、ウィキリークスの公開が誰かを害した証拠はないと主張し、これが米国への引き渡しに反対する重要な論点の一つとなりました。グリーンウォルドは、アサンジが政治的な理由で起訴されていること、英国が米国の影響下にあること、そしてこの裁判がジャーナリズムに与える潜在的な影響について語ります。彼はまた、オーストラリア政府がアサンジの解放に向けてどのように影響力を行使できるかについても触れています。この深い分析は、プレスの自由、国際政治、そして個人の権利に関心のある視聴者を引き付けます。

Takeaways

• 🔍 グレン・グリーンウォルドは、ジュリアン・アサンジの事件と報道の自由の未来について深い洞察を提供しています。
• 📢 防衛側は、ウィキリークスの公開によって実際に被害を受けた人がいないと主張しています。
• 🇺🇸 アメリカの安全保障国家は、情報の漏洩が常に人々を危険にさらすという認識を広めているが、具体的な例を示すことはできない。
• 🔓 ウィキリークスの漏洩が人々に害を及ぼしたというアメリカ政府の主張は大げさであったり、作り話である可能性が高い。
• ⚖️ 引き渡し条約によれば、政治的理由での引き渡しは禁止されていますが、アサンジのケースではこの原則が無視されている可能性があります。
• 🇬🇧 イギリスはアメリカの影響下にあり、アサンジの引き渡しに関してはその法的議論よりも政治的現実が重要になるかもしれません。
• 🇦🇺 オーストラリア政府はアサンジの釈放を求めているが、アメリカとの関係の中でどれだけ影響力を行使できるかは不透明です。
• 📰 アサンジの起訴は、報道の自由に対する脅威と見なされ、他の国々にも同様の行動をとる余地を与えるかもしれません。
• 🔒 ジュリアン・アサンジがすでに身体的、精神的に深刻な影響を受けていることが、彼を完全に「中立化」する米国政府の目的にかなっている可能性があります。
• 🤔 アサンジ事件が報道に与えた影響は深刻で、将来的にジャーナリズムがどのように行われるかに重大な影響を及ぼす可能性があります。

Q & A

ジュリアン・アサンジの事件が報道の自由の未来にとってどれほど重要かを説明してくれるジャーナリストは誰ですか？

グレン・グリーンウォルドです。彼は賞を受賞したジャーナリストであり、「System Update」のホストでもあります。

ウィキリークスの公開が実際に誰かに害を与えた証拠があるか？

防衛側の弁護士マーク・サマーズは、ウィキリークスの公開が誰かに害を与えた証拠はないと主張しています。

ウィキリークスの報道が米国の国家安全保障にどのような影響を与えたか？

米国政府は過去に、機密情報の漏洩が現場の人々を危険にさらすと主張してきましたが、これらの主張に対する具体的な例を提供することはできませんでした。

アサンジの弁護側は政治的迫害についてどのように主張していますか？

弁護側は、政治的目的での引き渡しが引き渡し条約に違反すると主張しています。

イギリスの裁判所がこれまでアサンジに関するどのような判断を下してきたか？

イギリスの裁判所は、アサンジの弁護側のほぼ全ての主張を却下してきましたが、初期の判断で彼がアメリカへの引き渡しを生き延びられない可能性があるとして引き渡しに反対したことがあります。

オーストラリア政府はアサンジの状況にどのように関与していますか？

オーストラリアの政府は、アサンジがオーストラリアの市民であることから、彼の解放を求めて米国に圧力をかけています。

アサンジがアメリカに引き渡される可能性はどのくらいありますか？

アサンジの弁護側の主張が却下され、引き渡しの要求が承認された場合、彼は即座にアメリカへの引き渡しに直面する可能性があります。

アサンジの事件が他の政府にとってどのような先例を設定するか？

アサンジへの訴追が支持されれば、他の政府も同様にジャーナリズムを犯罪化する根拠を持つことになり、これは全世界の調査ジャーナリズムに対する脅威となります。

アサンジのケースがジャーナリズムに既に与えた損害は何ですか？

アサンジのケースは、米国政府がジャーナリストを追及することが可能であるという先例を設定し、他の国々が同様の行動をとる可能性があることを示しています。

グレン・グリーンウォルドは、アサンジの事件に関して楽観的ですか、それとも悲観的ですか？

グリーンウォルドは、アサンジのケースに関して悲観的であり、イギリスがアメリカの要求に従う可能性が高いと考えていますが、バイデン政権がこの件を扱いたくない可能性があるという点で、若干の希望を示しています。

Outlines

00:00

🗣 ジュリアン・アサンジ事件と報道の自由

グレン・グリーンウォルドは、ジュリアン・アサンジのケースが報道の自由の未来にとって何を意味するのかについて語ります。アサンジの弁護団は、ウィキリークスの公開が実際に誰かを害した証拠はないと主張し、これがアメリカへの引き渡しに反対する主要な論点の一つであると述べています。グリーンウォルドは、アメリカのセキュリティステートが過去数十年にわたって同様の主張を繰り返してきたこと、そしてそのような漏洩が国家の安全を守るためではなく、主に自身の評判を守るために行われたことを指摘します。彼は、政府が分類情報の漏洩が必ずしも人々を危険にさらすわけではないという事実にもかかわらず、そのような漏洩が人々を危険にさらすという誤った信念を人々に植え付けたと批判しています。

05:00

🇬🇧 イギリスの司法制度とアサンジの将来

グリーンウォルドは、イギリスの司法制度がアサンジのケースにおいてどのような役割を果たしているかについて論評し、イギリスがかつてはその司法の独立性で知られていたが、現在はその多くを失っていると指摘します。彼は、イギリスがアメリカの意向に従う傾向があり、アサンジに対する政治的迫害が引き渡し条約に違反しているにもかかわらず、イギリスの裁判所がアサンジを守る可能性は非常に低いと述べています。また、彼はアサンジが「チェスの駒」としてどのように利用され得るかについても考察し、アサンジの身体的および精神的な状態が既に大きく損なわれていることを悲観的に見ています。

10:02

🔍 アサンジ事件がジャーナリズムに与える影響

グリーンウォルドは、アサンジの起訴が報道界全体、特に調査報道にどのような影響を与えるかを検討します。彼は自身の体験を引き合いに出し、ブラジルでの報道がアサンジの起訴とどのように類似しているかを詳述します。さらに、彼はアサンジ事件が他の国々によるジャーナリストへの迫害の正当化にどのように使われ得るかを指摘し、ジャーナリズムへの広範なダメージについて議論します。また、アメリカ政府がジャーナリストを対象としたこの種の起訴を支持することで、他の政府に同様の行動をとるための道を開いていると批判しています。

15:03

🚨 アサンジの引き渡しの可能性とその影響

グリーンウォルドは、アサンジがアメリカに引き渡される可能性とそれが持つ潜在的な影響について論じます。彼は、アサンジが即座にアメリカに送還されるリスクがあり、その場合アサンジがアメリカの土壌に立つことは二度とないと予測します。また、彼は、バイデン政権がこのケースを扱いたくない可能性があると指摘し、引き渡しを回避するための外交的解決策が存在するかもしれないとの希望を示唆しています。さらに、グリーンウォルドは、アサンジの支持者が持つ唯一の希望は、この起訴がバイデン政権にとって大きな頭痛の種であるという事実にあると結論づけています。

Keywords

💡ジュリアン・アサンジ

ジュリアン・アサンジは、WikiLeaksの創設者であり、政府の機密情報を公開したことで知られています。ビデオの文脈では、アサンジの米国への引き渡しに関する裁判と、これが報道の自由にどのような影響を与えるかが主なテーマです。アサンジのケースは、政府に不都合な情報を公開した報道機関への圧力を示す例として使用されています。

💡報道の自由

報道の自由は、情報を収集、発表するメディアの権利を指し、民主主義の基本的な柱の一つです。このビデオでは、アサンジのケースが報道の自由にどう影響するかが議論され、特に政府の情報を公開する報道の自由がどの程度保護されるべきかが問われています。

💡引き渡し

引き渡しは、ある国が犯罪容疑者を別の国に引き渡す法的プロセスを指します。このビデオでは、ジュリアン・アサンジを米国に引き渡すことの正当性とその法的、政治的な含意に焦点が当てられています。

💡グレン・グリーンウォルド

グレン・グリーンウォルドは著名なジャーナリストであり、特にエドワード・スノーデンからの情報を基にした報道で知られています。このビデオでは、グリーンウォルドがアサンジのケースとそれが報道の自由に与える影響について解説しています。

💡WikiLeaks

WikiLeaksは機密情報を公開するウェブサイトであり、特に政府や企業の機密文書を公開することで知られています。アサンジの引き渡し問題は、WikiLeaksが公開した情報がどのように扱われるか、その公開がどのような法的な結果を招くかについての議論と直結しています。

💡政治的迫害

政治的迫害は、個人がその政治的見解または活動のために不当に追及されることを指します。ビデオの中で、アサンジが政治的理由で迫害されているか、そしてその引き渡しが政治的動機に基づいているかどうかが議論されています。

💡機密情報

機密情報とは、公開されると国家の安全や個人のプライバシー、企業の利益に害を及ぼす可能性のある情報です。このビデオでは、WikiLeaksによる機密情報の公開がどのような影響を持ち、それが報道の自由とどう関連しているかが議論されています。

💡エクストラディション

エクストラディションは、引き渡しの法的用語であり、特定の犯罪容疑者を要請に応じて他国に引き渡すプロセスを指します。アサンジのケースで使用されているこの用語は、彼がどの法的基準に基づいて米国に引き渡される可能性があるのか、その法的な根拠と影響についての議論を含んでいます。

💡法的論争

法的論争は、法律の解釈や適用に関する争いを意味します。ビデオでは、アサンジの引き渡しを巡る法的論争が中心テーマの一つであり、これが国際法や報道の自由にどのような影響を与えるかが検討されています。

💡国家安全保障

国家安全保障は、国家が直面する脅威から国を守るための方策や活動を指します。このビデオでは、アサンジとWikiLeaksが公開した情報が国家安全保障にどのような影響を与えたか、またその情報の公開が国家安全保障を守るための措置にどう反映されるべきかが議論されています。

Highlights

Glenn Greenwald, an award-winning journalist, discusses the Julian Assange case's implications for press freedom.

Defense lawyer Mark Summers argues there's no evidence WikiLeaks' publications harmed anyone, challenging the narrative against Assange.

Greenwald criticizes the US Security State's tactic of claiming leaks endanger national security without providing evidence.

Assange's case raises questions about political prosecution and the violation of extradition treaties for political purposes.

UK courts' repeated rejection of Assange's appeals illustrates the political challenges and biases in the legal battle.

The Assange case demonstrates the UK's diminished judicial independence and its role as a 'puppet country' of the US.

Potential diplomatic resolutions for Assange's situation are discussed, including Australia's increasing pressure on the US.

The Australian government's role and influence in Assange's case highlight the complex international dynamics at play.

Assange's physical and psychological deterioration in prison underscores the personal toll of his legal ordeal.

Greenwald shares his personal experience with legal threats in Brazil, drawing parallels to Assange's legal theories.

The discussion touches on how Assange's case has already impacted journalism and the precedent it sets for criminalizing investigative reporting.

Concerns over safe countries for journalism and the broader implications of the US asserting jurisdiction over foreign nationals are voiced.

The role of the Australian government and international diplomacy in potentially securing Assange's freedom is examined.

The importance of preventing Assange from becoming a martyr or symbol for press freedom and whistleblowing is emphasized by US security agencies.

Speculation about the future of Assange's extradition and the potential immediate actions following court decisions.

The potential impact of Assange's case on the Biden Administration's legacy and the political calculus of proceeding with extradition.

The significance of broad editorial opposition from major media outlets to Assange's prosecution and its potential influence on the case's outcome.

Transcripts

well there is perhaps no better

journalist in the world to help us make

sense of the importance of the Julian

Assange case and what that is to the

future of press freedom than pet Sur

prizewinning journalist Glenn Greenwald

and host of system update right here on

Rumble streaming live uh on Rumble just

as we do here and we want to welcome

Glenn to the show tonight to talk all

about this Glenn welcome to redacted

great to have you

here thank you for having me I always

happy to be on fellow Rumble programs

it's good to be with you great to have

you Glenn as always uh it's great to get

your insights on topics like this the

defense of course made a number of

compelling um arguments today against

extradition to the United States two

points though really stood out to me and

and I want to get your take on this now

according to Taylor who you just heard

there who was just on our show defense

lawyer Mark Summers argued that there's

no evidence that anyone has been harmed

as a result of WikiLeaks Publications

that's 0 one and I just I found that I

just had to sit there and sit back for a

second after I heard that argument and

and say wait a second that that's true

like at the at the heart of this who

really has been hurt by the Wikileaks

Publications I mean if you think about

the size and scope of the

military-industrial complex it's grown

by Leaps and Bounds the intelligence

Community the intelligence state has

grown by Leaps and Bounds so maybe

they've even flourished under this what

do you think about that at least that

one part of the argument from the

defense this is a completely standard

tactic propagandistic speaking on the

part of the US Security State going back

decades every single time there's a leak

of information that they want to hide

not to protect the security the National

Security of the United States but to

protect their own reputation because

these leaks are V lies and deceit and

crimes that they've committed that's was

true of the Pentagon papers it was true

of our reporting in the Edward Snowden

archives it's been true of all the

Wikileaks reporting and what they have

convinced people to believe almost like

reflexively without having to present

any evidence is that every time there's

a leak of classified information it

necessarily means that people in the

field have been put into danger that the

names of undercover operatives have been

revealed to our enemies that it has

endangered all sorts of people all over

the world every single time you ask

someone who makes that claim about any

of these Leakes to give you a single

example of a single name of an operative

or an undercover agent or an informant

that has been disclosed by these

materials they will be completely

incapable of providing it to you right

when the Wikileaks leak happened in 2010

the government constantly came out and

made claims it was the Obama

Administration saying Wikileaks and

Julian Assange have blood on their hands

and when reporters finally started

asking well what blood do they have on

their hands they started realizing that

they had been misled that there was

nobody who had been harmed exactly as

your question suggested and then good

reporters like the ones who worked in

mcache one of the very few to question

the Iraqi wmd Li started publishing

articles that you can find online which

essentially said that the US government

completely exaggerated if not fabricated

all of these wild claims and even us

generals came out and said the idea that

these materials have harmed Americans or

put people in danger is probably a

fabrication but it's one of the things

that they have instilled in our

bloodstream to get people to almost

automatically oppose anybody who exposes

things that they have decided should be

secret one of the other questions and

that's such a great point and one of the

other questions that came up was the

idea about the the political prosecution

and of course under the extradition

treaty this is a violation of the

extradition treaty right you can't be

extradited for political purposes I mean

that's literally written right in the

statute so how are they going to how is

the prosecution tomorrow you think going

to make the case that yeah we just need

to violate this extradition treaty and

we need to send them to the United

States I mean we can go over the legal

arguments if you want I'm happy to do so

the legal AR arguments are extremely

compelling but there's a broader

political reality here namely that these

arguments have been made these same

arguments and every step along the way

this is the final appeal that Julian has

within the British Judiciary and every

single level of the British courts have

rejected every single argument the one

exception being that the very first

judge to look at this ruled against him

and all instances except said that he

was unlikely to survive an extradition

to the United States and therefore r

against the extradition request that was

reversed on appeal when the US

government made a bunch of assurances

about protecting his health none of

which are reliable since they're all

conditional so we can definitely analyze

the validity of the legal arguments and

they're extremely potent in favor of

Assange the problem is is that the UK is

a basically a puppet country of the

United States they do what the United

States government tells them to do

they're a tiny little former Empire who

has no Prestige and no power in the

world they're constantly kind of

trailing along Ong with whatever the

United States government tells them to

do their Judiciary has very little

Independence left it once the British

Judiciary once was renowned for its

independence and now it has very little

left and I wish more than anything that

I was more optimistic about the outcome

of this case I hope more than anything

that I'm wrong but just for political

reasons the fact that there's so much

hysteria about Russia that they have

convinced the West that Assange is an

agent of the Russian government even

though that has no basis the chances

that any Court in the K will intervene

and tell the United States that they

will not get this extradition unless

behind the scenes the Biden

Administration doesn't really want to

bring him to American soil to stand

trial which I actually think is possible

for reasons we could discuss if you want

the notion that the British judges on

their own will protect Julian Assange no

matter how compelling the legal

arguments seems very very remote to me I

want to ask a question because I think

that brings up a good point about

Assange as a chess piece and how he

could be useful to say Rishi sunak or

the Biden Administration so that they

can hold him up as a just position for

oh Alexi naly right he wasn't let out

even though we know he was not a

journalist uh and so what are the

implications what are the possible ways

that he could be used you bring up a

good point let's let's play that out a

little if you don't

mind so by all accounts if you listen to

assange's doctors and psychiatrists and

psychologist and family members he's

already basically destroyed as a person

physically

psychologically emotionally I visited

him back in

2017 when he was still at the Ecuadorian

Embassy just a few months before he was

taken out by the London Police and

brought to prison and I was shocked by

what I saw when I visited him I mean he

was still mentally acute but you know he

had been inside of a of a Embassy like a

one-bedroom apartment basically in the

middle of London with no outdoor space

for many years by that point which

completely corrodes your physical health

now he's in a high security prison this

is not a joke of a prison the BBC has

called this uh the British Guantanamo

this is where terrorist suspects go and

organized criminal uh suspects this is a

high security prison he's been there now

for four or five years this is hard jail

time he's done and so I think that the

goal of the US government was just to

destroy Julian Assange and on some level

they've already achieved that in a way

that will serve their interest I think

even more so than letting him out

imagine if they do actually succeed in

this extradition and then Julian Assange

comes and stands trial in a Northern

Virginia Courthouse as the first ever

publisher of information to be charged

with Espionage crimes and face life uh

imprison for having published documents

that he did not help acquire setting a

standard that every press freedom and

civil liberties group in the west is set

as a grave threat to press freedom I

don't think that the Biden

Administration wants that on their

legacy nor do I think they want this

incredible Sideshow this drama that's

going to happen outside that Courthouse

with protesters with Julian Assange

taking the stand saying who knows what

with his ability to demand classified

information that they won't want to give

him one of the things that has changed

in this case politically is that the

Australian government pressured by the

Australian citizen or remember Julian

Assange as a citizen of Australia that's

the only country of which he's ever been

a citizen has finally started telling

Australia why aren't you protecting our

Citizen and the Prime Minister has now

come out publicly and privately and told

the United States enough is enough it's

time to release him and that diplomatic

solution is one exit that everybody has

to both get Assange totally neutralized

and destroyed out of this court system

feeling like they've neutralized him in

Wikileaks and no longer need to worry

about him but at the same time don't

need to bring him to the United States

in order to create this Nani comparison

do you think that does the Australian

government have that power to be able to

bring him to Australia do you

think Australia is a very important

Junior Ally of the United States

especially with this kind of shift to

the focus on Asia and the Pacific and

China the United States has just closed

this very important new alliance with

the UK and with Australia where nuclear

submarines are going to be placed in

Australia as a deterrence against China

so the importance of Australia has

actually increased pretty significantly

in the last few years but it's still a

subservient relationship just like with

the UK and the us but if the Australians

really wanted badly enough to get their

citizen back I think they could do it

the problem is is that there are a lot

of factions inside Washington that

consider Julina Sange and Edward Snowden

to be the devil there is nobody they

want to destroy more and I think one of

the things they fear in Langley and in

the other three-letter agencies is that

Assange gets free isn't quite as

physically or psychologically distinct

and then gets to live life freely as a

hero who stood up to the US

and kind of becomes a symbol that might

Inspire others to do the same thing I

think that's the thing they fear most so

Australia might have a lot of Leverage

but the CIA and the Pentagon and the

documents from which these agencies came

that the state department that Assange

published also have a lot of Leverage

and it all depends on how badly they

want him fully destroyed can I ask you

sort of a I guess I don't know esot

question really but I guess it's how

much damage has already been done to

journalism as a result of this

regardless of the outcome of what

happens

next so I'll just tell you a little

anecdote that involved myself which was

in May of

2019 I wrote an upet in the Washington

Post when this indictment was released

warning that the theories on which this

indictment were base would be a threat

to all investigative journalism

everywhere that it was essentially a

theory that would enable States

throughout the West to criminalize

investigative journalism of all kind

because the argument that they made

about why Assange did something the

guardian of the the New York Times

didn't do namely receive they this

information they say he became a

conspirator with his Source Chelsea

Manning by doing things like encouraging

her to get more documents or uh helping

her evade

detection that is something that

investigative journalist do all the time

and I argument in the Washington post.

bed was if that becomes criminal every

investigative journalist is going to be

easily criminalized and unbeknownst to

me at the time about two weeks later at

had a major source in Brazil hand me a

huge Archive of secret material that I

ended up reporting on that changed the

course of Brazil it it basically freed

Lula D Silva from prison it changed the

course of Brazilian political history in

so many ways and I ended up indicted by

allies of the Justice minister in Brazil

based on exactly this theory that by

encouraging my source to get more

information by helping them avoid

detection even though I wasn't part of

the acquisition of the documents I had

become a conspirator in the crimes

committed by my source based on exact

actly the blueprint used to prosecute

Julian Assange and I ended up being

exonerated because the Brazilian court

intervened and said my press freedom is

guaranteed by the Brazilian Constitution

prohibit my prosecution but I was lucky

I mean I could have easily been in julan

ass San's position and so can every

investigative journalist if this

indictment ends up being upheld but as

you said the mere fact that the US

government has already stood behind it

is a signal to other governments that

well if the United States can do this to

journalist then certainly we can too

right and so you're an expat living a

broad we are too and so you have to

wonder where is it safe to do journalism

do I need to look into the country that

I'm living in and their relationship

with the United States as the world

Central bully that's something that we

think about all the time but I have to

wonder because most of his alleged

crimes happened almost a decade ago or

over that much time and now when the

government sees something they don't

like they can censor they can label it

misinformation or they defame the person

and that's been fairly successful so do

they have what they need in the

cautionary tale of Assange because

they're otherwise they've got these

other nefarious tools now I mean that

doesn't make me feel any better but it's

a little bit less personal now do you

know what I

mean yeah absolutely you know first of

all one of the amazing things about this

case is that not only is Doan Assange

not a citizen of the United States I

can't tell you how often I hear people

accusing him of treason do Americans

think that every citizen in the world of

every other country namely 95% of the

planet who are not Americans have some

overarching duty of loyalty to the

United States government but he's only

been to the United States one time for

about three days and so the fact that

the government the US government asserts

the power to reach across the world and

grab him and take him back to the United

States for the reporting of course if

you're a US citizen living abroad or

anywhere you're going to be pretty

alarmed by that I think at least you

should be and I think the point that you

asked is the the most important one you

know when I uh was advocating for Edward

snowden's part in the last days of the

Trump Administration and Trump got

pretty close but really felt like there

was a lot of opposition arrayed against

him and I think that final impeachment

was a sort of Stam sword hanging over

his head to make sure he didn't do

things on the way out like declassify

JFK files and Parton Edward sodin and

Julian Assange it was kind of odd to me

how important it was to the US Security

State that Edward snow did not be

pardoned and allowed to come home after

all he's no threat to anybody has no

more access to classified material and

yet what they're so interested in is the

deterrent of fact that everyone has to

know that if you defy or report on the

US Security State the way that they

dislike they want you to know that you

will end up being destroyed and they

can't allow somebody like Edward Snowden

like Julina Sange to be able to go free

have a Heroes welcome that's the reason

why they pursue these cases long past

the point where the person continued to

put posed a threat to them I'll get you

out of here on this Glenn which is what

where do you think this goes from here

do you think he is extradited back to

the United

States well I think one of the uh scary

part here is that if this court rejects

the arguments of his lawyers and

approves the extradition request as the

lower courts have done he might be

subject to immediate deportation he

wants to appeal to a European court and

argue that the UK though still not

though not part of the EU after brexit

is still subject to European law on

human rights and they may not want him

to do that they might want to exray him

immediately and so the minute that this

decision is issued before he has a

chance to appeal they could put him on a

plane to Washington and he will be on us

soil now again I don't trust the US the

UK Judiciary I think the only hope is

that there's some diplomatic solution

that we're not privy to that in some way

result in his release but but it could

very well be the case that you know he's

a matter of a couple of weeks away from

getting on a plane and coming to

American soil where I'm convinced he

will never

leave unbelievable well I was right

there's perhaps no one better in the

world to talk about this from a

journalistic perspective than Glenn

Greenwald sorry I didn't have better

news for you and I left it with kind of

a gloomy impression but that's the one

no but but so my brain is thinking in

terms of something you said earlier

which is you know maybe the Biden

Administration doesn't want to deal with

this in this way right they don't want

this to be their legacy and perhaps

maybe that is the Silver Lining so in my

brain I always go to the glass half full

so I'm thinking of the Silver Lining

here that the bite Administration has a

whole other heaping ton of problems

right now on their plate they do not

want to have tens of thousands of people

descending on Washington DC CU I would

take my show there I would I we would

broadcast live from that event and we

would make it as loud as possible if

that happened in the United States so I

don't think they want that headache so

that's the Silver Lining that I see

Glenn I couldn't agree with you Martin

remember every media outlet from The New

York Times to the guardian to The

Washington Post is editorialized against

this prosecution they won't have many

allies in this prosecution if they go

forward with it so I think it's a huge

headache for them when they already have

so many others as you suggested seven

months away from an election and that is

the one hope that I think Assange and

his supporters have yeah absolutely yeah

I'm hoping for a miracle too uh thank

you for coming on redacted for the first

time we're longtime Watchers of your

show and we really are so excited to

have had you on you gotta watch you

gotta watch system update on Rumble

absolutely system update on Rumble thank

you so much Glenn and don't be a

stranger hopefully we'll have you back

soon happy to do it good night I really

hope you enjoyed watching this video You

Know YouTube thinks that you'll actually

like this next video right here it's

personalized based on your own viewing

habits so if you watch the video please

leave a comment let us know what you

think about it and we will see you next

time everyone