video04 luiz

Summary

The speaker addresses the issue of overburdened court dockets, which cause delays in legal proceedings, impacting lawyers and their clients. They propose discussing with the court to set limits on the number of cases per agenda, aiming to make trials more agile, efficient, and fair. This measure seeks to respect the time of lawyers, legal assistants, and the parties involved, ensuring a swifter and increasingly just judicial system.

Takeaways

• 📚 Advocates in both criminal and civil law are highlighted as being actively engaged in daily court hearings.
• 🕒 Lawyers may lose an entire day or morning waiting for their hearings due to overbooking by judges.
• 📈 There is a proposal to discuss with the court about setting limits on the number of cases on the agenda to avoid excessive waiting times.
• 🛑 The intention is to prevent unreasonable delays in the judicial process, which can affect all parties involved.
• 🔍 The speaker aims to make judgments more agile and efficient through these measures.
• 👥 The discussion is focused on respecting the time of lawyers, law clerks, and the clients they represent.
• 🚀 The goal is to achieve swifter and increasingly fair justice.
• 📝 There is an issue of judges overloading the court's agenda, which leads to inefficiencies in the legal system.
• 🤝 The speaker is advocating for a collaborative approach with the court to improve the judicial process.
• 🏛 The importance of a fair and timely justice system is emphasized for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript related to the legal profession?

The main issue discussed is the problem of overburdened judges leading to excessive caseloads, causing lawyers and their clients to wait for unreasonable amounts of time for court hearings.

What are 'advocates militantes' referred to in the transcript?

Advocates militantes are lawyers who actively engage in daily court hearings, often facing the issue of long waiting times due to court delays.

Why does the speaker propose discussing with the court about the limit of cases on the agenda?

The speaker aims to avoid unreasonable long waiting times for parties involved in legal proceedings by discussing a limit on the number of cases that can be on the court agenda at one time.

What is the intended outcome of implementing a limit on the number of processes per agenda?

The intended outcome is to make the judicial process more agile and efficient, and to respect the time of lawyers, their clients, and the judiciary.

How does the speaker describe the current situation of lawyers waiting for their hearings?

The speaker describes it as a situation where lawyers might lose an entire day or a morning waiting for their hearings to take place due to the excessive caseloads of judges.

What does the speaker suggest as a solution to make the judiciary more efficient?

The speaker suggests setting a limit on the number of cases that can be on the court agenda to streamline the judicial process and reduce waiting times.

What is the speaker's view on the current state of the justice system as it relates to lawyers and their clients?

The speaker believes that the current state of the justice system is inefficient and unfair to lawyers and their clients due to the long waiting times caused by overburdened judges.

What is the term 'jurisdicionados' referring to in the context of the transcript?

In the context of the transcript, 'jurisdicionados' refers to the clients of the lawyers, who are also affected by the delays in the judicial process.

How does the speaker plan to address the issue of long waiting times in court?

The speaker plans to address the issue by initiating a discussion with the court to establish a reasonable limit on the number of cases that can be scheduled for a hearing.

What is the ultimate goal of the measures proposed by the speaker?

The ultimate goal of the measures is to achieve a more prompt and just justice system by reducing delays and respecting the time of all parties involved.

What does the speaker imply about the current attitude of judges towards their caseloads?

The speaker implies that judges are either overburdening themselves or contributing to an excessive caseload, which in turn causes delays in the judicial process.