Lifting ban on govt officials joining RSS absolutely wrong: AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi

Summary

The script discusses the historical context of the RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) in India, its ban post-Gandhi's assassination, and subsequent lifting under certain conditions. It critiques the current BJP government's decision to permit government servants to participate in RSS activities, arguing this goes against the organization's original oath, which rejected Indian diversity and pledged to a Hindu nation. The speaker also mentions cultural organizations supporting communist ideologies and questions the NDA's stance on such groups, implying a need for consistency in government policy.

Takeaways

• 📜 The script discusses the banning of the RSS after Mahatma Gandhi's assassination and the subsequent lifting of the ban under Sardar Patel and Nehru's government, with conditions for the RSS to accept India's constitution and national flag.
• 🤝 The government under BJP's NDA is permitting government servants to participate in RSS activities, which the speaker believes is incorrect.
• 🤔 The speaker questions the validity of the RSS's oath, originally in Marathi, later in Sanskrit, which pledges not to accept India's diversity and to uphold a Hindu nation.
• 🚫 The speaker argues that cultural organizations that do not accept the concept of a pluralistic India should not be permitted.
• 🔄 The script mentions amendments to the original oath of the RSS, indicating a change in its stance over time.
• 🏛 The speaker implies a contradiction in the NDA government's stance by permitting participation in RSS activities while the organization's oath opposes Indian nationalism.
• 🌐 The script touches on the issue of cultural organizations that adhere to ideologies such as communism and Islamism, suggesting a broader context of political and ideological diversity.
• 🤷‍♂️ The speaker suggests that the NDA's alliance partners, presumably those with differing ideologies, may not agree with or accept the decision to permit government servants' participation in RSS activities.
• 📢 The final point made is the need for the government to communicate and justify its decision to its alliance partners and the public.
• 🔍 The script raises questions about the compatibility of the RSS's historical and ideological positions with the principles of the Indian constitution and the idea of a secular state.
• 📝 The speaker's perspective is critical of the government's decision, indicating a need for further discussion and clarification on the matter.

Q & A

What significant event occurred after Mahatma Gandhi's assassination that led to the ban on RSS?

After Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, Sardar Patel and Nehru's government banned the RSS because they believed the organization would not respect the Indian Constitution and the National Flag.

Why was the ban on RSS lifted?

The ban was lifted because the RSS had to give a return constitution, which included several conditions that they would not participate in politics.

What is the current government's stance on allowing government servants to participate in RSS activities?

The current BJP government is permitting government servants to participate in RSS activities, which is seen as controversial.

What is the RSS oath and how has it evolved over time?

The RSS oath was initially in Marathi, then translated to Sanskrit, and has undergone some amendments. It emphasizes not respecting India's diversity and pledges allegiance to a Hindu nation.

What is the speaker's view on cultural organizations and their participation in politics?

The speaker believes that cultural organizations should not be permitted to participate in politics.

What is the speaker's opinion on organizations that adhere to communist ideologies?

The speaker mentions that there are many cultural organizations that adhere to communist ideologies, implying a concern about their influence.

What is the speaker's concern about organizations that follow Islamic ideologies?

The speaker mentions that there are cultural organizations that follow Islamic ideologies, suggesting a need for scrutiny of their activities.

What is the speaker's view on the NDA's alliance and their acceptance of the decision?

The speaker questions what the NDA's alliance thinks and whether they accept the decision, indicating a need for clarity on their stance.

What does the speaker suggest about the need for these organizations to clarify their stance?

The speaker suggests that these organizations need to be clear about their stance and whether they accept the decision, indicating a need for transparency.

What is the broader implication of the speaker's concerns about cultural organizations in politics?

The speaker's concerns highlight the potential conflict between cultural ideologies and the secular nature of the Indian state, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach.