Brain Criticality - Optimizing Neural Computations

Artem Kirsanov
5 Mar 202337:05

Summary

TLDRThe video script delves into the critical brain hypothesis, which likens the brain's neural networks to a system at the brink of phase transition, akin to Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism. It explains phase transitions, critical points, and their relevance to neuroscience, suggesting that the brain operates near a critical point to optimize information processing. The script explores concepts like neuronal avalanches, power laws, and the balance between excitation and inhibition, highlighting the brain's computational efficiency at the critical state.

Takeaways

  • 🧠 Understanding the brain's complexity is a major challenge in neuroscience, with a goal to develop a comprehensive theory similar to Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism.
  • 🌟 The critical brain hypothesis has gained attention; it suggests that neural networks operate near a phase transition point, akin to the critical state of water molecules coexisting in liquid and gas phases.
  • πŸ” The concept of phase transitions is introduced with the example of water boiling, illustrating how energy can lead to a change in the macroscopic properties of a system.
  • πŸ“Š Phase transitions are characterized by an order parameter and driven by a control parameter, with first-order transitions showing a discontinuity and second-order transitions being continuous.
  • 🌑 The Ising model, used to explain magnet properties, is highlighted as an example of a system undergoing a second-order phase transition, leading to a critical point with unique properties.
  • 🌐 At the critical point, systems exhibit long-range communication and scale-free behavior, with self-similar patterns observable at all scales, a characteristic of fractals.
  • πŸ“‰ Neuronal avalanches, observed in neural cultures, are bursts of activity that spread across networks and are indicative of the brain operating near a critical point.
  • πŸ“ˆ The distribution of features of neuronal avalanches follows a power law, suggesting a lack of characteristic scale in brain activity and supporting the idea of criticality in neural systems.
  • πŸ”„ The balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain is crucial and can be adjusted to demonstrate phase transitions, with compounds that block these processes causing shifts from critical dynamics.
  • πŸ’‘ Operating near a critical point is beneficial for the brain as it optimizes information processing and computational power, allowing for efficient transmission and reduction of uncertainty about inputs.
  • πŸ“š The study of criticality in neuroscience is an exciting and growing field, with potential applications in understanding brain function and developing treatments for neurological disorders.

Q & A

  • What is one of the Holy Grails of Neuroscience?

    -One of the Holy Grails of Neuroscience is to build an elegant yet comprehensive theory that describes the general roles of the nervous system, similar to the impact of Maxwell's equations on electromagnetism.

  • What does the critical brain hypothesis propose about the operation of networks of neurons?

    -The critical brain hypothesis proposes that networks of neurons operate near a point of phase transition, in a special critical state similar to when water molecules coexist in liquid and gaseous phases.

  • How does the phase transition concept relate to the boiling of water?

    -The phase transition concept relates to the boiling of water as an example of a first-order transition, where water changes from a liquid to a gaseous state, absorbing latent heat and undergoing a qualitative change in properties.

  • What is an order parameter in the context of phase transitions?

    -An order parameter is a macroscopic property that quantifies the organization of a system, such as entropy, volume, fluidity, or surface tension in the case of water.

  • How does the control parameter influence the phase transition?

    -The control parameter, such as temperature or pressure, drives the phase transition by altering the system's state. It is an independent variable that can be freely varied in an experiment.

  • What is a continuous or second-order phase transition?

    -A continuous or second-order phase transition is a type of phase transition where the change in the order parameter is continuous, allowing the system to smoothly transition from one phase to another.

  • What is the significance of the critical point in a phase transition?

    -The critical point is a unique intermediate state at the interface of two different phases where the boundaries are blurred, and new properties emerge. It is a point of balance between order and disorder.

  • How does the Ising model relate to the concept of criticality in the brain?

    -The Ising model, originally developed to explain the properties of magnets, demonstrates how a system can undergo a second-order phase transition, exhibiting properties of criticality such as long-range communication and scale-free behavior, which are relevant to understanding neural networks.

  • What is the role of the correlation length in the Ising model?

    -The correlation length in the Ising model is the distance at which the dynamic correlation between spins drops to zero. It indicates the extent of long-range communication in the system, peaking at the critical point.

  • What is the significance of scale-free behavior in the context of the brain?

    -Scale-free behavior signifies that the system, such as the brain, has no characteristic scale and resembles itself at any scale. This property is indicative of criticality and is associated with optimal information processing and computational power.

  • How does the branching ratio (Sigma) act as a control parameter in neural networks?

    -The branching ratio (Sigma) is a control parameter that governs the transition from subcritical to supercritical dynamics in neural networks. When Sigma equals 1, the network is at a critical point where activity is neither decaying nor amplifying, and information transfer is optimized.

  • What experimental evidence supports the idea that the brain operates near a critical point?

    -Experimental observations such as neuronal avalanches, which are power-law distributed patterns of activity in neural networks, support the idea that the brain operates near a critical point. These have been observed in various species and scales, from single neurons to EEG recordings.

  • Why is operating near a critical point considered beneficial for the brain?

    -Operating near a critical point is considered beneficial for the brain because it maximizes capabilities such as information processing and computational power. At the critical point, the brain can efficiently transmit information and maintain a balance between activity and quiescence.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 The Quest for a Neural Theory and Critical Brain Hypothesis

This paragraph introduces the complexity of understanding the brain and the pursuit of a comprehensive theory in neuroscience, akin to Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism. It presents the critical brain hypothesis, which suggests that neural networks operate near a phase transition point, drawing an analogy to the coexistence of water in liquid and gaseous states. The paragraph sets the stage for exploring the concept of criticality and phase transitions in the context of neural information processing.

05:00

🌑 Understanding Phase Transitions and Critical Points

The paragraph delves into the concept of phase transitions, using the example of water boiling to illustrate the qualitative change from liquid to gas. It explains order parameters and control parameters in phase transitions and introduces first and second order transitions. The critical point, where the system can exist in an intermediate state with unique properties, is highlighted as a point of interest for understanding the brain's operation.

10:03

🧲 The Ising Model and Its Relevance to Neuroscience

This section introduces the Ising model, originally developed for magnets, as a tool for understanding neural networks. It describes the model's lattice structure, where each site can be in one of two states, and how the alignment of these states can lead to macroscopic properties like magnetization. The paragraph explains how temperature acts as a control parameter, inducing fluctuations that can prevent the system from settling into the most energetically favorable configuration, and discusses the model's continuous second-order phase transition.

15:05

πŸ”— Long-Range Communication and Correlation Length

The paragraph explores how long-range communication can emerge from local interactions in the Ising model, introducing the concept of correlation length to measure the coordinated behavior of distant sites. It discusses how dynamic correlation changes with temperature and how the system becomes scale-free at the critical point, with self-similar patterns observable at different scales.

20:06

πŸ“Š Power Laws and Scale Invariance in Critical Phenomena

This section discusses the power law distribution observed in the Ising model at the critical point, which indicates scale invariance. It uses a thought experiment to illustrate how the probability distribution of cluster sizes follows a power law, leading to the mathematical definition of scale invariance. The importance of power laws in understanding critical phenomena and phase transitions is emphasized.

25:07

🌐 Neuronal Avalanches and the Brain's Critical State

The paragraph presents experimental evidence suggesting that the brain operates near a critical point, with neuronal avalanches observed in neural cultures. It describes how these avalanches resemble activity cascades in other systems and how they are characterized by power law distributions. The paragraph also discusses the potential implications of criticality for neural information processing across species and scales.

30:07

πŸ”„ The Branching Model and Neural Information Transmission

This section introduces the branching model to represent neural activity, where each neuron is connected to others with a transmission probability. It explains how the branching ratio, a control parameter, governs the system's behavior, leading to a phase transition at a critical value. The paragraph discusses how this model can be used to understand the balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain and the emergence of scale-invariant spike avalanches.

35:08

🎯 Optimizing Information Processing at the Critical Point

The paragraph explores why operating near a critical point is beneficial for the brain, maximizing its information processing capabilities. It uses a guessing game analogy to illustrate how the critical point optimizes information transfer, with the output layer of the branching model resembling the input layer's activity. The importance of this balance for neural computation and the potential applications of criticality research in neuroscience are highlighted.

πŸš€ Conclusion and the Future of Criticality Research in Neuroscience

In conclusion, the video summarizes the key properties of systems undergoing second-order phase transitions, such as scale-free behavior and long-distance communication. It emphasizes the role of the critical point in optimizing the brain's information processing and the potential of criticality research for understanding brain function and developing treatments for neurological disorders. The video also promotes further exploration and discovery in this exciting field.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Neuroscience

Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system, which includes the brain, spinal cord, and nerves. It is central to understanding how neurons and neural networks process information. In the video, neuroscience is the overarching field of study that seeks to build comprehensive theories, like the critical brain hypothesis, to describe the general roles and operations of the nervous system.

πŸ’‘Critical Brain Hypothesis

The critical brain hypothesis is a theory suggesting that networks of neurons operate near a point of phase transition, akin to a critical state in physical systems. It has gained attention due to accumulating experimental evidence. The hypothesis is integral to the video's exploration of how the brain may function optimally at the edge of a phase transition, balancing between order and disorder.

πŸ’‘Phase Transition

A phase transition refers to a change in the state of matter, such as from liquid to gas, driven by changes in control parameters like temperature or pressure. In the context of the video, the brain's phase transition is metaphorical, suggesting a shift in the state of neural activity. The script discusses how the brain might undergo a phase transition in terms of neural activity rather than physical state changes.

πŸ’‘Order Parameter

An order parameter is a macroscopic property that quantifies the organization of a system. In the video, it is used to characterize the phase of a system, such as entropy in the case of water. The concept is applied to the brain's neural networks, where the order parameter might represent the level of neural activity or connectivity.

πŸ’‘Control Parameter

A control parameter is an independent variable that can be adjusted to induce phase transitions in a system. Examples include temperature or pressure. In the context of the brain, the script suggests that the balance between excitation and inhibition acts as a control parameter, influencing whether neural networks are subcritical, critical, or supercritical.

πŸ’‘Second-Order Transition

A second-order transition is a type of phase transition where the order parameter changes continuously. The video highlights second-order transitions as they relate to the brain's critical state, where the system can exhibit scale-free behavior and long-range communication without a characteristic scale.

πŸ’‘Icing Model

The Ising model is a mathematical model of ferromagnetism in statistical mechanics, which the video uses as an analogy to explain critical phenomena in neural networks. The model demonstrates how local interactions can lead to long-range correlations and scale-free behavior at critical points.

πŸ’‘Correlation Length

Correlation length is a measure of the distance over which correlations in a system decay. In the video, it is used to describe how far information can propagate in a system at criticality. The script mentions that at the critical point, correlation length extends to a larger distance, indicating effective communication across the network.

πŸ’‘Scale Invariance

Scale invariance refers to the property of a system where its statistical properties remain invariant under changes in scale. The video explains that at the critical point, neural networks become scale-free, with no characteristic scale, and exhibit self-similar patterns at all levels of magnification.

πŸ’‘Power Law

A power law is a functional relationship between two quantities, where a relative change in one quantity results in a proportional relative change in the other quantity, independent of the initial size. In the video, power law distributions are observed in the sizes and durations of neuronal avalanches, suggesting the brain operates near a critical point.

πŸ’‘Neuronal Avalanches

Neuronal avalanches refer to the cascades of neural activity that propagate through a network, resembling avalanches in physical systems. The video discusses how these avalanches, characterized by power-law distributions, indicate that the brain may be operating at a critical state, optimizing information processing.

πŸ’‘Branching Ratio

The branching ratio, denoted as Sigma in the video, is a parameter that represents the average number of neurons activated by a single neuron. It acts as a control parameter for neural networks, with a value of 1 indicating a critical state where activity is neither amplified nor diminished, optimizing information transfer.

Highlights

Understanding the brain's complexity is a major challenge in neuroscience, with the goal of developing a comprehensive theory similar to Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism.

The critical brain hypothesis has gained attention, suggesting that neural networks operate near a phase transition point, akin to water's liquid and gaseous states coexistence.

The concept of phase transitions, such as water turning into gas, is used to explain the critical state in neural networks without actual melting or boiling.

Criticality in the brain is related to the efficient processing of neural information, with the phase transition being a significant point of interest.

Order parameters and control parameters are key in characterizing phase transitions, with the brain's critical point being driven by the balance of excitation and inhibition.

Second-order phase transitions, unlike first-order, involve continuous changes in the order parameter, allowing for the existence of a critical point with unique properties.

The Ising model, used to explain magnet properties, is also applied to understand critical points in neural networks, demonstrating long-range communication from local interactions.

Correlation length and dynamic correlation are measures used to understand how information is transmitted across neural networks at criticality.

Scale-free systems, like those at critical points, exhibit self-similarity at all scales and are characterized by power law distributions.

Neuronal avalanches, observed in neural cultures, are activity patterns that spread across networks and are indicative of critical brain dynamics.

Power law distributions of neuronal avalanches suggest the brain operates near a second-order phase transition, with no characteristic scale.

The branching model simplifies the complexity of neural networks, illustrating how activity can propagate and lead to critical phenomena.

The branching ratio, Sigma, is identified as a control parameter for neural networks, with a value of 1 indicating criticality and optimal information transfer.

Operating near a critical point maximizes the brain's information processing capabilities and computational power.

Criticality in neuroscience has potential applications in understanding brain function and developing treatments for neurological disorders.

The book 'The Cortex and the Critical Point' by John Max provides an in-depth look at criticality in neuroscience.

Brilliant.org is highlighted as an educational platform for learning computational methods and analysis of complex data sets like those in neuroscience.

Transcripts

play00:00

understanding the brain in all of its

play00:02

complexity is a difficult challenge one

play00:05

of the Holy Grails of Neuroscience is to

play00:07

build an elegant yet comprehensive

play00:10

Theory describing the general roles of

play00:13

the nervous system

play00:14

similar to what a set of Maxwell

play00:16

equations was to electromagnetism

play00:20

in this video we are going to talk about

play00:22

the critical brain hypothesis

play00:25

a theory which has been getting a lot of

play00:27

attention and experimental evidence in

play00:30

recent years

play00:31

it states that networks of neurons

play00:33

operate near a point of phase transition

play00:37

it is special critical State similar to

play00:40

when water molecules coexist in liquid

play00:43

and gaseous phases but what does it even

play00:46

mean for the brain to undergo a phase

play00:49

transition

play00:50

there are surely no melting and boiling

play00:52

right and in what way is this critical

play00:55

point whatever it is important to neural

play00:59

information processing all of that and

play01:02

more coming right up

play01:11

to understand the concept of criticality

play01:14

let's begin with the notion of phase

play01:16

Transitions and one such transition that

play01:19

is probably very intuitive to you is

play01:21

when liquid turns into gas consider a

play01:25

pot of water on a hot stove at first

play01:27

when the water is below 100 degrees the

play01:31

energy provided by the burning stove

play01:33

Heats it up accelerating individual

play01:36

molecules at 100 degrees however

play01:38

something interesting happens

play01:40

even though the heat is still being

play01:43

pumped into the water

play01:45

temperature stays constant instead of

play01:47

accelerating individual water molecules

play01:49

the energy is now being spent on

play01:52

Breaking the bonds between them

play01:55

which allows the molecules to break free

play01:57

from the lattice and fly away as a gas

play02:01

notice that at the boiling point we have

play02:04

seen a qualitative switch from liquid

play02:07

which is incompressible has surface

play02:09

tension and can dissolve substances to

play02:13

gas which is compressible and doesn't

play02:15

really dissolve anything even though the

play02:18

individual water molecules stayed the

play02:20

same the macroscopic properties of the

play02:23

system as a whole changed drastically

play02:25

what we have just witnessed is known as

play02:28

the phase transition

play02:29

more generally a phase transition is

play02:32

observed when a system moves from

play02:35

existing in one well-defined state of

play02:38

organization or phase to another

play02:41

phase is usually characterized by an

play02:44

order parameter a macroscopic property

play02:47

that somehow quantifies the organization

play02:49

of the system for example in the case of

play02:52

water order parameter can be entropy the

play02:56

degree of disorder volume fluidity or

play02:58

surface tension the phase transition is

play03:01

driven by changes in control parameter

play03:04

for example temperature or pressure

play03:06

essentially you can think of the control

play03:08

parameter as an independent variable

play03:11

something that we can freely vary in an

play03:14

experiment and the order parameter is a

play03:17

dependent variable which changes in

play03:20

response to altering the control

play03:21

parameter and quantifies the state of

play03:24

our system

play03:25

notice that if you plot the order

play03:28

parameter as a function of control

play03:30

parameter then in the case of water

play03:32

boiling you'll see a discontinuity a

play03:35

sudden jump as we go from liquid to gas

play03:38

accompanied by the absorbance of latent

play03:40

energy such phase transitions are called

play03:43

discontinuous or first order transitions

play03:46

these are what you normally see in

play03:48

everyday life however we will be more

play03:51

interested in another type so called

play03:54

continuous or second order transitions

play03:56

as you might have guessed from the name

play03:58

in this type of transitions the change

play04:01

in the order parameter is continuous

play04:04

which means that you can smoothly go

play04:06

from one phase to another

play04:08

now the slope of this curve can be very

play04:11

steep sure but it's always continuous

play04:13

this allows the system to exist in a

play04:17

unique intermediate State called the

play04:19

critical point right at the interface

play04:22

when the boundaries between the two

play04:24

different phases are blurred and new

play04:26

properties emerge this is what makes the

play04:29

critical point so special as we'll see

play04:31

further

play04:33

water can actually undergo a second

play04:36

order transition at specific values of

play04:38

temperature and pressure this is where

play04:41

latent heat disappears and water can be

play04:44

continuously transformed into gas

play04:46

existing in a special state known as

play04:49

supercritical fluid but to develop

play04:51

intuition about the properties of

play04:53

critical point let's focus on a

play04:55

different much simpler system where the

play04:58

second order transition feels more

play05:00

natural and which actually has a lot of

play05:02

applications in neuroscience

play05:05

meet the icing model which was first

play05:07

developed to explain the properties of

play05:09

magnets the model consists of a large

play05:12

lattice where each site can be in one of

play05:15

two states plus one or -1 these sites

play05:19

represent individual particles that the

play05:21

system is made of characterized by their

play05:24

spins which you can think about as this

play05:26

sign of magnetic field generated by each

play05:29

particle

play05:31

when all spins are aligned tiny magnetic

play05:34

fields of individual particles add up

play05:37

resulting in the magnetic properties on

play05:40

a macro scale

play05:41

however when these pins are pointing in

play05:44

different directions individual magnetic

play05:46

fields essentially cancel each other out

play05:49

and the system has no macro scale

play05:51

magnetization

play05:54

physicists have known for a long time

play05:56

that if you heat up a magnet past a

play05:58

certain point called Curie temperature

play06:00

it will suddenly lose its magnetic

play06:03

properties so there must be some sort of

play06:05

phase transition at play now there are

play06:08

two types of interactions that govern

play06:10

the Dynamics of the system

play06:13

first of all neighboring spins will tend

play06:15

to line up because it is more

play06:17

energetically favorable

play06:19

we can write the energy of a single

play06:21

pairwise interaction between the two

play06:23

sides has been proportional to the

play06:26

negative product of their spins where

play06:28

the coefficient of proportionality J is

play06:31

called the coupling constant and it

play06:33

tells us how strongly the sides are

play06:35

coupled as you can see when the spins

play06:38

are of the same signs the energy of an

play06:41

interaction is negative while for a pair

play06:43

of opposite spins the value of energy is

play06:46

positive

play06:47

to find the energy of one site all we

play06:50

need to do is to sum the energies of the

play06:52

interactions between its four neighbors

play06:55

and summing together the energies for

play06:57

all these Heights will give us the

play07:00

energy of the entire system

play07:04

because it will try to minimize its

play07:06

energy we can expect all these pins to

play07:09

perfectly line up

play07:11

so what can prevent this from happening

play07:13

notice that so far we haven't included

play07:17

our control parameter temperature in any

play07:20

of the equations in reality however

play07:22

flipping of spins is a stochastic

play07:25

process which is subject to random

play07:28

thermal movement

play07:29

more formally the distribution of energy

play07:32

values subject to random fluctuations

play07:34

obeys the boltzmann distribution which

play07:37

gets more broad at higher temperatures

play07:39

but it's not that important to

play07:42

understand phase transitions so don't

play07:43

worry about it

play07:45

essentially you can think of temperature

play07:46

as this stochastic destabilizing force

play07:50

that will induce fluctuations Jocelyn

play07:53

spins around and preventing them from

play07:56

settling down into their most

play07:58

energetically favorable configuration

play08:00

the higher the temperature the more

play08:02

disordered the system would be

play08:04

to quantify this let's introduce an

play08:07

order parameter for example the

play08:09

macroscopic magnetization which is

play08:12

defined as the average value of spins

play08:15

when the absolute value of magnetization

play08:18

is big

play08:19

it means that a large number of spins

play08:21

are aligned and our system will display

play08:24

magnetic properties let's play with the

play08:27

temperature and see how macroscopic

play08:29

properties of the system change at low

play08:31

temperatures local interactions Dominate

play08:34

and the system exists in this state when

play08:37

a large portion of spins are lined up in

play08:40

contrast if you heat it up the

play08:43

temperature related fluctuations take

play08:44

over all the spins are oriented randomly

play08:47

and no macroscopic magnetic properties

play08:50

are observed notice that as we turn the

play08:53

temperature knob there is something that

play08:56

looks like a very abrupt change in the

play08:58

organization of spins from Euler to

play09:01

disorder

play09:04

indeed it turns out that icing model

play09:07

undergoes a continuous second order

play09:09

phase transition

play09:11

in other words it is possible to catch

play09:14

the system in an intermediate state

play09:17

right at the point of critical

play09:18

temperature where order and disorder are

play09:21

perfectly matched and a number of

play09:23

interesting properties emerge

play09:26

before we move to the brain let's spend

play09:29

a little more time exploring the icing

play09:31

model

play09:35

similarly to how neurons communicate

play09:37

with each other across the entire brain

play09:39

there is a crosstalk between spins in

play09:42

our lattice

play09:43

notice that if you flip once pin this

play09:46

can make some of the neighboring spins

play09:48

to flip which in turn affects pins two

play09:51

sides away and so forth So eventually

play09:54

even though only nearest neighbor

play09:56

interactions are explicitly defined the

play09:59

information about flipping one spin has

play10:02

the potential to be transmitted across

play10:05

the entire ladders

play10:07

in other words long-range communication

play10:09

emerges from purely local interactions

play10:14

a good way to measure this is through a

play10:16

quantity called correlation length for

play10:19

example let's take two lattice sites

play10:21

some distance apart and look at their

play10:24

Dynamic correlation which is a measure

play10:27

of how coordinated in time their

play10:29

behavior is

play10:31

more formally for sites I and J we can

play10:35

express the dynamic correlation as

play10:37

follows where angular brackets indicate

play10:40

averaging over time the first term in

play10:42

the parenthesis represents the amount by

play10:45

which the spin I fluctuates from its

play10:48

average value and likewise for

play10:50

fluctuations of the spin J

play10:53

notice that in order to maximize the

play10:56

value of dynamic correlation the spins

play10:59

should fluctuate in a coordinated

play11:01

fashion for the product of the

play11:03

parenthesis to remain positive let's see

play11:06

what happens to the value of dynamic

play11:08

correlation for a given pair as we

play11:11

change the control parameter

play11:13

at low temperatures the spins don't

play11:15

fluctuate much so they are stuck at

play11:18

their average values yielding a low

play11:21

value of dynamic correlation

play11:23

at high temperatures the spins fluctuate

play11:26

wildly but they do so in a random

play11:29

uncoordinated fashion at one point in

play11:32

time the terms in the parenthesis might

play11:34

be of the same sign while on another

play11:36

occasion they might be of different

play11:38

signs so on average the value of dynamic

play11:42

correlation is low as well

play11:44

at the critical temperature however

play11:46

nearest neighbor interactions are

play11:49

balanced by the thermal stochasticity

play11:51

there is a coexistence of coordination

play11:54

and fluctuation resulting in the large

play11:57

value of dynamic correlation as spins

play12:00

flip up and down in a coordinated way

play12:03

so far we've only looked at the dynamic

play12:06

correlation for a single pair of pins

play12:08

and that of course will depend on the

play12:10

distance between them let's now plot the

play12:13

value of c as a function of distance

play12:15

between the spins for different

play12:17

temperatures

play12:19

unsurprisingly it decreases with

play12:21

distance because we've only Incorporated

play12:24

local interactions into the model

play12:26

and what's prominent is that the curve

play12:29

corresponding to the critical

play12:30

temperature decays much more slowly than

play12:34

the two other ones for example we might

play12:36

find that it extends up to 20 sites

play12:39

before it falls to near zero let's turn

play12:42

this distance at which the dynamic

play12:45

correlation drops to zero as correlation

play12:48

length

play12:49

drawing correlation length as a function

play12:52

of temperature reveals a sharp Peak at

play12:56

the critical point right there at the

play12:58

intersection of odor and disorder is

play13:01

where a large distance communication

play13:02

emerges if we were to make an analogy

play13:05

this is the state in which neurons in

play13:07

networks communicate most effectively

play13:10

through the largest number of synapses

play13:12

between them

play13:15

another important property that emerges

play13:17

at the critical point is that our system

play13:20

becomes scale free to illustrate what

play13:23

this means take a look at these three

play13:25

magnified snapshots of the isig model at

play13:28

three different temperatures exactly

play13:30

critical slightly below and slightly

play13:33

above the critical temperature can you

play13:35

guess which is which well this is not so

play13:38

obvious because they all look kind of

play13:40

similar but let's zoom out to see the

play13:43

whole lattice as we move further and

play13:45

further away it becomes apparent that

play13:48

the leftmost snapshot corresponds to a

play13:51

sub-critical temperature because

play13:53

everything is ordered

play13:55

zooming out on the rightmost snapshot

play13:58

reveals a great deal of disorder so this

play14:02

must be this super critical State now

play14:04

watch what happens as we zoom out when

play14:06

the system is at the edge of the phase

play14:08

transition no matter how close or how

play14:10

far away we are things look very similar

play14:14

in the ideal case right at the critical

play14:16

point this pattern will continue to

play14:19

Infinity in other words there is no

play14:22

characteristic scale this

play14:25

self-similarity when the system as a

play14:27

whole resembles some of its parts at any

play14:30

scale is a typical property of fractals

play14:35

such zooming animations are surely

play14:37

satisfying to look at but is there any

play14:40

way we can objectively prove that this

play14:43

is scale free while this is not

play14:46

to mathematically describe the scaling

play14:49

properties let's consider the

play14:51

probability distribution of this size of

play14:53

clusters that is connected domains of

play14:56

the same spin

play14:58

here are the examples of a few

play15:00

relatively small clusters and a couple

play15:02

of larger ones let's focus on the

play15:04

critical case and build the intuition

play15:07

for what this function f should look

play15:09

like

play15:10

suppose a dark wizard has shrunken you

play15:13

to a random size so that you have no

play15:16

idea how tall you are and trapped you in

play15:19

the icing model at the critical

play15:20

temperature the only way for you to get

play15:23

out is to correctly guess the

play15:25

probability distribution of cluster

play15:27

sizes

play15:28

so you grab a ruler and start walking

play15:31

around measuring the size of every

play15:33

cluster you see

play15:35

let's say on average you find out that

play15:38

every hundredths cluster you encounter

play15:40

has the size of four square inches so

play15:43

you can write down F of 4 equals 1 over

play15:45

100 because the ruler has been shrunken

play15:48

with you the exact units are irrelevant

play15:51

what would matter in this case are

play15:53

ratios so you begin looking for clusters

play15:56

that are two times as large and discover

play15:59

that the probability of observing an 8

play16:02

square inches cluster is about 1 over

play16:04

500 which is 5 times as large compared

play16:08

to the probability of seeing a four

play16:09

square inches one after repeating the

play16:12

measurements for a few other cluster

play16:14

sizes you discover an interesting

play16:16

pattern every time you double the size

play16:19

of a cluster its probability decreases

play16:22

by a factor of five

play16:25

now here is the crucial Point Let's

play16:27

imagine that you were shrunken to a

play16:30

completely different size for example

play16:32

what if you were actually 10 times

play16:34

taller what would you see in this case

play16:36

well remember because the system is

play16:39

right at the critical point it is scale

play16:42

invariant

play16:43

in other words no matter how small or

play16:46

big you were you would see similar

play16:49

pictures everywhere and hence similar

play16:52

cluster distributions at any scale so

play16:55

this ratio of the probability for

play16:58

observing the cluster of size 2x versus

play17:01

the cluster of size X would equal to

play17:03

one-fifth at every scale

play17:06

which means it doesn't depend on x

play17:09

of course there is nothing special about

play17:11

the factor of 2. we could have just as

play17:14

well looked at any other ratio of

play17:16

cluster sizes so let's substitute the

play17:19

number 2 with a factor k

play17:21

the value of this ratio will be also

play17:24

different for different factors because

play17:26

for instance the probability of

play17:28

observing a cluster with a size 3x will

play17:32

be different than the probability of

play17:34

seeing a cluster of size 2x in general

play17:37

we can write down the right hand side to

play17:40

be some function J of K since as we have

play17:43

already established it surely doesn't

play17:46

depend on x

play17:48

this right there is the mathematical

play17:50

definition of scale invariance so

play17:53

whatever the distribution of cluster

play17:56

sizes is it should satisfy this

play17:58

constraint it turns out that the only

play18:01

function for which this equation holds

play18:04

is of the form a times x to the power of

play18:07

minus gamma where the number gamma is

play18:10

called the exponent in that case J of K

play18:13

is equal to K to the power of minus

play18:16

gamma plugging in our values for cluster

play18:19

sizes reveals that gamma equals 2.32

play18:23

this behavior is called a power law and

play18:27

it is central for the study of critical

play18:29

phenomena you can easily see for

play18:32

yourself that x to the power of minus

play18:34

gamma is indeed scale free proving it

play18:37

the other way around that any scale free

play18:40

function should have this form is a bit

play18:43

more tricky and requires taking a few

play18:45

derivatives I won't go through the

play18:47

derivation in this video but if you are

play18:48

interested check out the references in

play18:50

the description

play18:52

another way to see why power laws are

play18:54

scale free is to plot a power law

play18:57

function for example x to the power of

play18:59

minus 2.3 next to something similar but

play19:02

which is not power law for example an

play19:05

exponential function notice that if we

play19:07

look at the graphs at different scales

play19:09

the shape of the parallel curve stays

play19:13

the same the only thing that changes are

play19:16

the exact units if axis labels were

play19:19

erased we couldn't distinguish them from

play19:21

each other however the exponential curve

play19:23

looks different at different scales and

play19:26

hence is not scale free

play19:29

usually such relations are plotted in

play19:32

double logarithmic coordinates known as

play19:34

log lock plots

play19:36

where you take the logarithm of both

play19:38

sides in log lock coordinates power laws

play19:42

look like straight lines and the slope

play19:44

of that line is related to the exponent

play19:47

value gamma

play19:49

importantly many other characteristics

play19:52

of this system for example the value of

play19:55

dynamic correlation we discussed earlier

play19:57

all follow a power law distribution near

play20:00

a critical point in fact when you see

play20:03

that a lot of things are power law

play20:05

distributed it often suggests that the

play20:08

system is near a point of a second order

play20:11

phase transition

play20:12

now after we've developed an intuition

play20:14

for many important Concepts in

play20:16

criticality let's finally move to the

play20:19

brain

play20:21

[Music]

play20:22

one of the first pieces of experimental

play20:25

observations suggesting that the brain

play20:27

might be operating near a critical point

play20:29

came in 2003 when John Banks ended our

play20:33

plans published their seminal paper

play20:35

titled vironal avalanches in neocortical

play20:38

circuits they grew cultures of neurons

play20:40

taken from Red somatosensory cortex and

play20:43

put them on an 8x8 grid of electrodes to

play20:47

record spontaneous activity that arises

play20:49

in this network and what they found was

play20:52

a characteristic pattern of activity

play20:54

spreading across the network in space

play20:56

and time let's take a closer look at the

play20:59

data collected by a single electrode it

play21:02

records how extracellular voltage known

play21:05

as local field potential changes with

play21:07

time

play21:09

if you have seen my video on theater

play21:10

rhythms it is essentially the same thing

play21:12

what is usually observed in these

play21:14

cultures of neurons in a dish however is

play21:17

that Baseline lfp occasionally shows

play21:20

large deflections following a

play21:22

characteristic shape of a negative Spike

play21:25

superimposed on a positive envelope this

play21:28

arises when a number of neurons in the

play21:31

vicinity of electrode activate

play21:32

simultaneously

play21:35

we are going to treat such waveforms as

play21:37

discrete events that are either present

play21:40

or absent simply by finding when the

play21:42

voltage Trace dips below a certain

play21:44

threshold and also keep track of the

play21:47

amplitude of every such event

play21:49

thus our data will contain both a Time

play21:53

point and an amplitude value for every

play21:55

lfp event that caused the threshold

play21:58

repeating this procedure for all the

play22:01

electrodes gives us the pattern of

play22:03

spontaneous electrical activity

play22:05

spreading in the network

play22:07

notice how periods of quiescence are

play22:10

interspersed by what looks like chains

play22:13

of activity arising reverberating in the

play22:16

network and finally dying out

play22:18

such bouts of activity were termed

play22:21

neuronal Avalanches because they

play22:24

resemble Cascades of activity

play22:26

propagating in systems like pile of sand

play22:29

or earthquakes

play22:31

to Define an avalanche more formally

play22:33

let's break up the entire time course

play22:36

into short means and for each bin count

play22:39

the number of electrodes that recorded

play22:42

the lfp event for example it might go

play22:45

like this

play22:46

first there is no activity then one

play22:49

electrode detects the Supra threshold

play22:51

event

play22:52

in the next time being another electrode

play22:55

then two simultaneously then another one

play22:58

then three others at the same time and

play23:00

then activity dies out

play23:02

this sequence of time bins with some

play23:05

non-zero activity flanked by at least

play23:08

one time being of quiescence at either

play23:11

side is what we are going to call an

play23:13

avalanche

play23:15

and we can describe each Avalanche by

play23:18

its duration as well as its size defined

play23:21

as the number of electrodes that were

play23:23

activated during the Cascade

play23:26

note that in the alternative definition

play23:28

size can also take into account the

play23:31

amplitude values

play23:33

surprisingly the authors found that all

play23:36

these features of neuronal avalanches

play23:38

were distributed according to a power

play23:41

law revealing a prominent straight line

play23:44

in log lock plots

play23:47

this suggested that the network activity

play23:50

had no characteristic scale and that the

play23:53

brain might be operating near a point of

play23:56

a second order phase transition

play23:59

now all of this happened in 2003 and

play24:03

since then Pablo described Avalanches of

play24:06

activity were demonstrated in awake

play24:09

behaving animals of many species

play24:11

including worms zebrafish monkeys and

play24:14

humans and on a variety of scales from

play24:18

single neuron recordings to

play24:20

electroencephalography

play24:21

suggesting that criticality can indeed

play24:24

be a universal phenomenon which

play24:27

describes many aspects in neural systems

play24:30

at this point in the video I think a

play24:33

couple of pieces are still missing first

play24:35

of all I've said that the critical point

play24:37

is the intermediate stage of phase

play24:39

transition but what are the distinct

play24:42

phases for the case of the brain what

play24:44

would be neural analogues to temperature

play24:46

as the control parameter and

play24:48

magnetization as the order parameter and

play24:51

secondly why operating near a critical

play24:54

point would be useful to the brain at

play24:56

all

play24:57

[Music]

play25:00

to make the following discussion more

play25:01

intuitive let's switch from thinking

play25:04

about avalanches in terms of lfp events

play25:06

on the electrode grid and view the data

play25:09

as activity of individual neurons that

play25:11

either fire an action potential or not

play25:14

such switch is Justified because of

play25:17

scale invariants remember we are going

play25:19

to see similar Behavior at any scale

play25:22

plus it has been established

play25:24

experimentally that there are indeed

play25:26

such Spike Avalanches whose features are

play25:29

power law distributed

play25:31

in this representation each circle is an

play25:34

individual neuron rather than a single

play25:36

electrode now it becomes easier to

play25:39

interpret the activity propagation in

play25:41

the network

play25:42

whenever any run reaches its threshold

play25:45

voltage it sends a signal to its

play25:48

Downstream Partners increasing or

play25:50

decreasing their probability of

play25:52

subsequent firing

play25:54

but because neurons connect to each

play25:56

other in very intricate ways unlike the

play25:58

icing model for example it is hard to

play26:01

see who is connected to whom

play26:04

let's make a slight simplification to

play26:06

this network and rearrange the neurons

play26:09

into a layered structure so that

play26:12

information will always flow from left

play26:15

to right

play26:16

even though we don't allow any feedback

play26:19

connections or Loops to a first

play26:21

approximation it is a reasonable

play26:23

assumption and importantly this

play26:25

description known as branching model

play26:28

still allows for avalanches and other

play26:31

critical phenomena to emerge in the

play26:34

branching model each neuron is randomly

play26:36

connected to some neurons in the

play26:38

downstream layer and each connection has

play26:41

a transmission probability associated

play26:43

with it

play26:45

upon this Spike of a sender neuron the

play26:48

connection will transmit a spike with a

play26:50

certain probability and if this happens

play26:52

on the next time point the receiver

play26:55

neuron will activate and send the

play26:58

information further

play27:00

additionally each neuron has a very

play27:03

small probability of spontaneously

play27:05

activating even when it doesn't receive

play27:08

any input this stochasticity provides

play27:10

the network with some input drive to

play27:13

work with

play27:14

as you may have guessed how activities

play27:16

spreads in the network will be mostly

play27:19

controlled by the distribution of

play27:21

transmission probabilities to tune this

play27:24

with a single parameter let's introduce

play27:27

a number Sigma called a branching ratio

play27:30

and set the sum of our going

play27:33

transmission probabilities for each

play27:35

neuron to be equal to Sigma

play27:37

for example if the branch in ratio is 1

play27:40

this configuration of our going

play27:43

connections is valid because the sum of

play27:45

probabilities is equal to 1 and this is

play27:48

not

play27:49

by the way the branching ratio doesn't

play27:52

really tell us the exact number of

play27:54

connections for Sigma equal to 1 a

play27:57

neuron can have a hundred connections

play27:59

each with a probability of 100 or one

play28:03

connection with the probability of one

play28:04

the only thing that is constrained is

play28:08

the overall sum of transmission

play28:09

probabilities

play28:11

it turns out that this branching ratio

play28:13

is a control parameter for our system

play28:16

and that a phase transition occurs when

play28:19

Sigma is equal to 1.

play28:21

to understand why this is the case

play28:23

notice from the very definition of Sigma

play28:26

it follows that it is actually equal to

play28:29

the average number of descendants that

play28:32

are activated per single active ancestor

play28:34

neuron

play28:36

let's run the simulation for different

play28:39

values of branching ratio and see what

play28:41

happens

play28:43

as you can see when Sigma is equal to

play28:45

0.5 any activity that rises quickly dies

play28:48

out this is because on average it takes

play28:51

two Upstream neurons to fire in order to

play28:54

activate a single Downstream neuron

play28:57

in a real brain that would correspond to

play29:00

deep comatose state with very little

play29:02

activity

play29:04

increasing the value of Sigma 2 causes

play29:07

the network to blow up with activity

play29:09

similar to what you would see during

play29:11

epilepsy this is because on average

play29:14

single neuron activates two others which

play29:17

makes the activity amplify with time

play29:21

something interesting happens when Sigma

play29:24

is equal to 1 however

play29:25

in this configuration one neuron on

play29:28

average activates one Downstream

play29:30

descendant allowing the network activity

play29:33

to be maintained on a relatively

play29:36

constant level without decaying or

play29:39

amplifying

play29:40

now because this is a stochastic process

play29:43

Avalanches will eventually die out but

play29:46

their sizes and durations will be power

play29:49

law distributed

play29:51

this is why the branch in ratio is a

play29:54

control parameter governing the

play29:56

transition from decaying to amplifying

play29:59

activity and we can use the average

play30:02

density of active neurons as the order

play30:04

parameter which is really low for

play30:07

subcritical values of branches ratio but

play30:10

quickly grows as soon as we hit the

play30:12

critical point by the way in real

play30:14

neurons this control parameter which is

play30:17

equal to the average number of neurons

play30:19

activated by a single Upstream neuron is

play30:23

shaped by the balance between excitation

play30:25

and inhibition which are the two

play30:28

counteracting forces in the brain

play30:30

Dynamics importantly because this

play30:32

balance of excitation and inhibition is

play30:35

something that we can control

play30:36

experimentally it can further illustrate

play30:39

that there is indeed a phase transition

play30:41

at play namely adding compounds that

play30:44

block inhibitory transmission

play30:46

disrupted the power law distribution of

play30:49

avalanches seen in the normal condition

play30:52

leading to supercritical behavior

play30:54

likewise adding compounds that block

play30:57

excitatory synaptic transmission leads

play31:00

to subcritical Dynamics again with the

play31:03

disruption of power laws

play31:08

okay by now the only left is why would

play31:11

brain even evolve to operate near a

play31:14

critical point is it actually useful it

play31:17

turns out that at the critical point a

play31:20

lot of brain's capabilities such as

play31:22

information processing and computational

play31:24

power are maximized to begin

play31:27

understanding why this is the case let's

play31:29

think of information transmission as a

play31:31

guessing game

play31:32

suppose someone provides an input to the

play31:36

first layer of our branching model by

play31:38

activating a random set of neurons and

play31:41

our job is to correctly guess the number

play31:43

of neurons that were activated by

play31:45

observing only the output the activity

play31:48

of the rightmost layer

play31:52

for low values of branching ratio no

play31:55

matter how many neurons were activated

play31:57

in the beginning the activity quickly

play31:59

vanishes before reaching the output

play32:02

layer we are completely ignorant about

play32:05

the input because there is no activity

play32:07

Trace left

play32:09

for high values of Sigma activity will

play32:11

be Amplified causing the output layer to

play32:14

be fully activated even for the weakest

play32:17

input which makes the guessing again

play32:19

very difficult

play32:20

at the critical case when Sigma is equal

play32:23

to 1 the connection strengths are tuned

play32:25

to the optimal intermediate value

play32:27

because one neuron on average activates

play32:30

only one descendant activity of the

play32:32

output layer has a high probability of

play32:35

resembling the activity of the input

play32:37

layer in terms of the number of active

play32:40

units

play32:41

in other words observing the output

play32:44

successfully reduces our uncertainty

play32:47

about the input

play32:49

if we introduce some measure of

play32:52

information transmission that will tell

play32:54

us how accurately we can make this gas

play32:57

this quantity will have a sharp Peak

play33:01

when the branch in ratio is 1.

play33:03

similar to how Dynamic correlation Peaks

play33:07

at the critical temperature in the icing

play33:09

model this on a very simplified level is

play33:12

what it means to optimize information

play33:15

transfer

play33:16

of course we have really just scratched

play33:19

the surface of the topic of critical

play33:21

point and its relevance to Neuroscience

play33:23

I didn't really talk about the concept

play33:25

of universality and the Beautiful

play33:27

relationship between the exponents the

play33:30

idea of course a criticality and how the

play33:32

brain actually maintains this right

play33:34

balance in the first place but if you

play33:37

are interested to know more about

play33:38

criticality and face transitions in the

play33:41

Neuroscience context I really encourage

play33:43

you to check out a wonderful book

play33:45

published in 2022 titled the cortex and

play33:49

the critical point by John Max who is

play33:52

one of the pioneers of this field the

play33:54

book is written in a really accessible

play33:56

language and introduces all the concepts

play33:59

from the ground up

play34:01

before we move to the summary I have one

play34:04

important message

play34:06

in this video we have seen a few

play34:08

examples of how analyzing neural data

play34:10

can help us better understand the brain

play34:12

but have you ever wondered how computers

play34:14

can be programmed to process and analyze

play34:17

such complex data sets if you're

play34:19

interested in the fascinating world of

play34:21

computer science you are definitely

play34:23

going to love our today's sponsor

play34:26

brilliant.org brilliant is an Innovative

play34:29

educational platform that takes a

play34:31

Hands-On approach to learning whether

play34:33

you are a student or a professional it

play34:35

is the best way to learn and Excel in

play34:37

stem Fields Brilliance courses are

play34:40

designed to be engaged in an interactive

play34:42

packed with stunning demonstrations and

play34:44

exercises to help you gain intuition and

play34:47

develop problem-solving skills in the

play34:49

context of real world applications

play34:52

brilliant has thousands of lessons for

play34:55

everyone from foundational math and

play34:57

logic to Ai and quantum mechanics with

play35:00

new ones being added monthly if you are

play35:02

interested in getting started with

play35:04

computational Neuroscience take a look

play35:05

at the course on algorithm fundamentals

play35:08

introducing essential array algorithms

play35:10

such as sorting and binary search that

play35:13

underlie the majority of modern

play35:14

Computing and from there you can move on

play35:17

to programming with python which is what

play35:19

I've actually used to run simulations

play35:21

you've seen in this video don't hesitate

play35:23

to start your Learning Journey today go

play35:26

to brilliant.org artem carsonov to get a

play35:30

30-day free trial of everything

play35:31

brilliant has to offer additionally the

play35:34

first 200 people to use this link will

play35:36

get 20 off the premium subscription

play35:40

alright let's recap in this video we

play35:43

have explore

play35:44

X properties that arise when the system

play35:46

undergoes a second order phase

play35:48

transition namely it becomes scale free

play35:52

and there is an emergence of long

play35:54

distance communication between the

play35:56

components

play35:57

in the brain such phase transition is

play36:00

governed by the fine balance between

play36:02

excitation and inhibition and by

play36:04

hovering near a critical point our

play36:07

brains optimize information processing

play36:09

of course this area is still very new so

play36:12

there is a lot of things we don't know

play36:14

but it is now apparent that the

play36:16

applications of criticality research are

play36:19

far-reaching and exciting from

play36:21

understanding the general principles of

play36:23

brain function to developing new

play36:25

treatments and therapies for

play36:26

neurological disorders as our

play36:29

understanding of criticality in neural

play36:31

networks continues to grow it is sure to

play36:34

be an exciting field of exploration and

play36:36

discovering in the years to come

play36:38

if you like the video share it with your

play36:40

friends and colleagues subscribe to the

play36:42

channel if you haven't already press

play36:44

like button and consider supporting me

play36:46

on patreon stay tuned for more

play36:48

interesting topics coming up

play36:50

goodbye and thank you for the interest

play36:52

in the brain foreign

play36:55

[Music]

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
NeuroscienceCriticalityBrain FunctionInformation ProcessingNeural NetworksPhase TransitionCognitive ScienceNeuronal AvalanchesTheoretical ModelsComputational Neuroscience