Dune: Part Two (2024) Review

Summary

In this review of a highly praised movie, the reviewer shares their mixed opinion. While they acknowledge the film's impressive visuals, solid acting, and intriguing story, they point out several character shortcomings. Despite the positive feedback, especially about the protagonist's journey, they criticize the underdeveloped supporting characters and the underwhelming villains. The review also humorously highlights the choice of Christopher Walken as the emperor, drawing a comparison to Star Wars. Overall, the movie is recommended, but the reviewer doesn't quite consider it a masterpiece, offering a nuanced take on its strengths and weaknesses.

Takeaways

• 😀 The reviewer starts by admitting they haven't seen the first part of the movie and have no prior knowledge of the franchise.
• 😀 The movie is highly praised online, receiving perfect ratings, but the reviewer remains cautious about whether it truly deserves such acclaim.
• 😀 The story centers around a war, with Timothy Chalamet's character playing a potential savior who wants peace, not violence.
• 😀 Zendaya plays the love interest and is initially skeptical of Timothy Chalamet's character, but gains respect for him once he proves himself.
• 😀 A major twist occurs when Timothy Chalamet's character chooses to join the dark side and lead a war, leaving Zendaya upset and unwilling to follow him.
• 😀 The reviewer praises the story, particularly the smart ending, where the 'good guy' wins, but it leaves a sense that it's actually a bad thing.
• 😀 The acting in the movie is described as solid, and the action scenes are noted as exciting.
• 😀 The visuals of the movie are highlighted as outstanding and beautiful.
• 😀 The reviewer suggests that, while the movie is great, it isn't a perfect 10 out of 10 and doesn't blow them away.
• 😀 One major criticism the reviewer has is the lack of depth in supporting characters, who are often treated as background figures.
• 😀 Characters like Rebecca Ferguson, Josh Brolin, and Dave Bautista are mentioned as underdeveloped, with some lacking meaningful backstories or motivations.
• 😀 Christopher Walken's portrayal as the emperor is criticized, with the reviewer likening it to a parody of Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars, diminishing its effectiveness.

Q & A

What is the main plot of the movie discussed in the script?

The movie is about a war where a character, played by Timothy Shalamet, has the potential to save everyone and lead them to a better life. He initially seeks peace, but later joins the Dark Side and declares war, leading to a complicated ending.

How does the protagonist, played by Timothy Shalamet, evolve throughout the movie?

Initially, the protagonist seeks peace and avoids violence, but in a twist near the end, he chooses to join the Dark Side and becomes a feared leader, which conflicts with his earlier beliefs.

What role does Zendaya's character play in the story?

Zendaya plays the love interest of the protagonist. At first, she is skeptical of his intentions, but after he proves himself, she gains respect for him. However, she later refuses to bow down to him after he joins the Dark Side.

What is the reviewer's overall opinion of the movie?

The reviewer thinks the movie is great but not a masterpiece. They enjoyed the story, acting, action scenes, and visuals but noted that it didn't blow them away.

What criticism does the reviewer have about the movie?

The main criticism is that the supporting characters feel underdeveloped and are treated like background characters. The reviewer highlights the lack of depth in characters like Rebecca Ferguson's, Josh Brolin's, and Dave Batista's characters.

Who are some of the underwhelming characters mentioned in the review?

The reviewer mentions Rebecca Ferguson, Josh Brolin, Dave Batista, Austin Butler, and even the villains as underwhelming, lacking significant backstory or development.

What are some of the positive aspects of the movie the reviewer mentions?

The reviewer praises the acting, action scenes, and visuals, describing them as solid and outstanding. The story is also considered good, with a smart ending.

How does the reviewer feel about Christopher Walken's performance as the emperor?

The reviewer finds Christopher Walken's portrayal of the emperor underwhelming, with a comedic comparison to Emperor Palpatine from *Star Wars*.

Does the reviewer think the movie is a 10/10 as some people claim?

No, the reviewer believes the movie does not deserve a perfect score, as it had some flaws, particularly in the treatment of supporting characters, but they still recommend it.

What makes the ending of the movie stand out according to the reviewer?

The ending is described as smart because it shows the good guy winning, but there is an underlying feeling that this victory might not be a positive outcome, creating a sense of complexity.