Dibilang Pandai Merangkai Kata, Ini Tanggapan Anies Baswedan #kickandy

Summary

The transcript discusses a political figure's response to accusations and misunderstandings regarding their statements and actions during their campaign. They address concerns about divisive remarks, their stance on social justice and nationalism, and the controversial use of religion in politics. The individual explains their commitment to social harmony, defending their past decisions and clarifying misunderstandings about their role in promoting unity. Additionally, they provide explanations for their policies, such as the introduction of a water absorption solution in Jakarta, and confront criticisms of their actions during their tenure.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker defends his past statements, emphasizing that his remarks about 'pribumi' (indigenous people) were not about current events but about historical colonialism in Jakarta.
• 😀 He clarifies that his statement about 'pribumi' was meant to reflect the past colonial struggles and not to promote division between different groups in modern Jakarta.
• 😀 He argues that accusations of discrimination or favoritism are misplaced, asserting that his leadership has embraced inclusivity and fairness, not bias or division.
• 😀 The speaker highlights that polarizing rhetoric and ethnic divides existed before he entered the political arena, particularly during the gubernatorial race against Ahok, who is of Chinese descent.
• 😀 He defends his actions during the campaign, claiming that when controversial issues like mosque-based discrimination against non-Muslim candidates arose, he took immediate action to address them with official letters and public clarification.
• 😀 Despite criticisms, the speaker maintains that his record as a leader has been focused on bridging divides, not deepening them, even when faced with inflammatory social media narratives.
• 😀 The speaker points to the successful implementation of the 'sumur resapan' (infiltration wells) as a solution for Jakarta's flood issues, despite criticisms and some failures in the execution of the program.
• 😀 He emphasizes that the 'sumur resapan' program, although not without its flaws, is still seen as a key solution for the city's drainage and flood management, offering long-term benefits for Jakarta's urban planning.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on the legacy of his tenure, noting that many of the controversies that have followed him began before he became a candidate for governor, with social divides already entrenched in the city.
• 😀 The speaker presents his policies as forward-thinking, with a focus on environmental sustainability (such as infiltration wells), alongside his commitment to social justice and unity in a diverse city like Jakarta.

Q & A

Why did the speaker mention the issue of 'pribumi' in the context of Jakarta's past?

The speaker referred to the term 'pribumi' to highlight the colonial history of Jakarta and how indigenous people were oppressed during the colonial era. This was meant to explain the historical context, not to promote division, as some critics interpreted it.

What was the controversy around the statement made by the speaker after being appointed as Governor?

The controversy arose when the speaker mentioned that the victory was a win for 'pribumi' who had been oppressed during colonial times. Critics misinterpreted this as a divisive statement, especially since the speaker's political competitor was of Chinese descent, which led to accusations of racial divisiveness.

How does the speaker defend his actions regarding the perception of discrimination during his governance?

The speaker argues that his leadership was inclusive and did not involve discrimination. He emphasizes that his policies were aimed at embracing all citizens, regardless of background, and refutes claims of discriminatory practices during his time in office.

What is the speaker's response to accusations that he allowed the use of religious issues for political gain during the campaign?

The speaker clarifies that when issues regarding religious exclusion, like the refusal to pray for non-Muslim leaders, arose, he intervened by sending letters condemning such actions and ensuring that no religious discrimination occurred in the public sphere.

What does the speaker say about the social media criticism of his actions, particularly concerning the sumur resapan (infiltration wells) project?

The speaker acknowledges the criticism, stating that while some infiltration wells were poorly executed, the overall program was successful. He insists that the project, aimed at reducing flooding in Jakarta, was a forward-thinking solution, adopted globally, and showed improvements in flood management.

Why did the speaker mention the 'sumur resapan' project as a future solution?

The speaker presents the 'sumur resapan' project as a crucial measure for flood control in Jakarta, emphasizing its global relevance and success. The concept, which involves creating infiltration wells, is used in many major cities worldwide to manage water runoff and prevent flooding.

How did the speaker respond to the argument that his actions contributed to increasing polarization in Indonesia?

The speaker points out that the growing polarization and division in Indonesian society began before he became a gubernatorial candidate. He stresses that divisive narratives existed during the 2012 and 2015 periods, long before his involvement, and his aim was to heal those divisions once in office.

What was the role of media and social media in shaping the public's view of the speaker's actions?

The media, especially social media, played a significant role in shaping public perception by amplifying negative aspects of the speaker's record. The speaker acknowledges that his opponents used social media to portray his actions in a damaging light, particularly focusing on failures like the infiltration wells.

What is the speaker's stance on the allegations that his supporters engaged in divisive political rhetoric?

The speaker rejects the idea that he encouraged divisive political rhetoric, specifically regarding ethnicity and religion. He highlights that his campaign was about inclusivity and national unity, and he took steps to prevent such divisiveness, including publicly addressing religious exclusion.

How did the speaker address the criticisms surrounding his leadership during the early stages of his tenure?

The speaker emphasizes that while criticisms arose, his leadership was focused on addressing Jakarta's challenges and striving for social justice, rather than indulging in divisive politics. He argues that the real issue was the historical context of division, which he sought to address.