Sidang Lanjutan Kasus Suap dalam Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Jalur Mandiri Universitas Lampung
Summary
TLDRThe court session focuses on the testimony of Karomani, the former Rector of the University of Lampung, regarding allegations of university entrance manipulation. Karomani reveals that he received a bribe of 500 million IDR from a person claiming to be the nephew of the Lampung Governor, Arinal Junaedi. This individual allegedly helped two students gain admission to the university's Medical Faculty. Despite the claim of the person being the Governor’s nephew, Karomani denies knowing any direct connection between the students and the Governor. The case sheds light on corruption within university admissions.
Takeaways
- 😀 The court session is about the admission process for new students at the University of Lampung (Unila), specifically the independent admission route.
- 😀 The former rector of Unila, Karomani, is a witness in the trial, and is questioned about the actions of Weheriandi and Embasri.
- 😀 Karomani disclosed that a person named Parera, who claims to be the nephew of the Governor of Lampung, Arinal Junaedi, asked him to help two students get accepted into Unila's Faculty of Medicine.
- 😀 Karomani admitted that he received a sum of 500 million IDR in relation to the acceptance of these students.
- 😀 The music played in the background indicates pauses or transitions in the trial, but doesn't impact the core content of the dialogue.
- 😀 Karomani stated that he had prior conversations about the students' admission before accepting them, and was not immediately persuaded by Parera's claims.
- 😀 The witness, Karomani, emphasized that the students accepted were not the Governor's children, despite the claims made by Parera about being a relative.
- 😀 There was a question about Karomani's prior knowledge of Parera and whether he recognized the relationship with the Governor’s family.
- 😀 Karomani failed to mention Parera’s name during the initial investigation, even though Parera claimed to be the Governor’s nephew.
- 😀 Despite Parera’s claim of being the nephew of Governor Arinal Junaedi, Karomani did not acknowledge any direct connection between the Governor and the students admitted to the university.
Q & A
Who is the defendant in this case?
-The defendant is the former rector of Universitas Lampung, Karomani.
What role does Karomani play in the trial?
-Karomani is acting as a witness in the trial, where he is testifying about the involvement of Weheriandi and Embasri.
What did Karomani reveal about a person named Parera?
-Karomani revealed that Parera, who claimed to be the nephew of Lampung Governor Arinal Junaedi, helped get two students admitted to the Faculty of Medicine at Unila.
How much money did Karomani claim to have received?
-Karomani claimed to have received 500 million IDR.
What was the nature of the two students' admission to the university?
-The two students were admitted to the Faculty of Medicine at Unila through a process where their names were 'sponsored' or 'entrusted' by Parera.
Was Parera directly related to Governor Arinal Junaedi?
-No, Karomani clarified that although Parera claimed to be the nephew of Governor Arinal Junaedi, he did not know the exact relationship between Parera and the governor.
Did Karomani initially recognize Parera?
-No, Karomani stated that he did not initially recognize Parera, even though Parera identified himself as the governor's nephew.
How did the conversation between Karomani and Parera unfold?
-The conversation between Karomani and Parera was not immediate; it involved discussions and was not directly accepted without prior communication.
What did Karomani disclose about the two students' connection to the governor?
-Karomani disclosed that he did not know the actual relationship between the two students and Governor Arinal Junaedi, despite Parera claiming to be the governor's nephew.
Why was there confusion regarding Parera's identity and his connection to the governor?
-The confusion stemmed from Parera introducing himself as the governor's nephew, but Karomani did not confirm or recognize this claim during his testimony.
Outlines

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video

Kasus Dugaan Pelecehan Seksual Di Universitas Pancasila

FSMEIX_PA_NURIFAHDA,Y.M_PEMBAWA ACARA (PENYAMBUTAN MAHASISWA BARU UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG)

Janaina Paschoal, USP e a linguagem cifrada da esquerda

Mismong si VP Sara Duterte ang PASIMUNO ng "OPLAN TOKHANG" — Lascañas | 24 Oras

SELAIN IJAZAH UGM-NYA DISOAL & DIGUGAT SOAL ESEMKA, KINI IJAZAH SMA MILIKNYA JUGA DIGUGAT

Universidad MALA vs BUENA: ¿cuál es la diferencia?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)