Setelah Baca Buku Tulisan Presiden Prabowo, Baleg DPR Tanyakan RUU Perampasan Aset ke Kemenkum

Summary

In this conversation, a member of parliament questions the government on the status of the proposed Asset Forfeiture Bill, citing concerns over the lack of clarity in the legislative agenda for 2025. The speaker emphasizes the president's concern over corruption in his book 'Paradoks Indonesia' and seeks clarity on why such critical legislation has not been introduced. Government officials respond, explaining that the bill remains in the long-term legislative plan but has faced delays due to complex debates within the parliament. Despite this, the government remains committed to addressing corruption through legislative action.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expressed concern about the absence of the Asset Forfeiture Bill in the legislative agenda for 2025, questioning why it was not included despite its importance.
• 😀 The speaker referred to President Prabowo's book, which highlights his strong stance against corruption and his vision for a clean government in Indonesia.
• 😀 The speaker emphasized that Indonesia cannot progress without a clean government and reiterated the urgency of addressing corruption, which is a central issue for the president.
• 😀 The speaker raised concerns about the legislative agenda, specifically regarding the lack of clarity on the inclusion of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, urging the government for clarification.
• 😀 The speaker suggested that the government take the initiative to propose a revision of the KPK Law (Corruption Eradication Commission), as well as the Anti-Corruption Law, to further address corruption issues.
• 😀 The government responded by affirming that the Asset Forfeiture Bill is part of the national legislative agenda for 2025-2029, but it has not been formally proposed yet due to ongoing debates in parliament.
• 😀 The government explained that there were significant debates regarding the bill in parliament, including differing opinions on whether the focus should be on asset forfeiture or asset recovery.
• 😀 The government clarified that it remains committed to passing the Asset Forfeiture Bill and that discussions are ongoing with parliament, especially regarding the bill's content and title.
• 😀 The speaker criticized the government for not yet submitting the bill for discussion in parliament and questioned the government's role in the delay of the proposal.
• 😀 The government confirmed that the Asset Forfeiture Bill is included in a list of 40 proposed bills and that it remains a priority, urging transparency and clarity on the government's stance.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the transcript?

The main topic discussed is the government's proposal regarding the asset confiscation bill and its absence in the legislative agenda for 2025, as well as the challenges and deliberations surrounding its potential inclusion.

Why did the speaker express concern about the asset confiscation bill?

The speaker expressed concern because the asset confiscation bill was not included in the legislative agenda for 2025, despite it being an important issue for combating corruption, which was a key concern in the president's book.

How does the speaker view the president's stance on corruption in Indonesia?

The speaker views the president's stance on corruption as a serious issue, as reflected in his book. The president is portrayed as deeply concerned about the pervasive corruption in Indonesia and advocates for a clean government to achieve national progress.

What is the relationship between the speaker and the president's concerns about corruption?

The speaker aligns with the president's concerns about corruption, as they both emphasize the need for clean governance. The speaker suggests that the president's vision for a better Indonesia cannot be achieved without addressing corruption.

What does the speaker request from the government regarding the asset confiscation bill?

The speaker requests clarification from the government about the status of the asset confiscation bill, asking why it has not been proposed or included in the legislative agenda, and urging the government to take initiative in submitting it.

How does the government respond to the concerns raised about the asset confiscation bill?

The government acknowledges the concerns and explains that the asset confiscation bill is included in the medium-term legislative program (prolegnas) for 2025-2029. However, the bill has not been introduced yet due to ongoing debates within the parliament and the need for further discussions.

What reason does the government give for not yet submitting the asset confiscation bill?

The government states that while the asset confiscation bill was initially proposed in the previous period, there were significant debates in parliament about its details. Therefore, the government intends to conduct more dialogues and discussions before formally submitting the bill.

What is the proposed approach to the asset confiscation bill as discussed by the government?

The government suggests a collaborative approach with the parliament, acknowledging that both the government and the parliament (DPR) have a shared responsibility in shaping the bill. They plan to discuss the bill further with the parliamentary leadership to ensure it addresses all relevant concerns.

What did the speaker mean by the term 'cilukbah' in the context of this discussion?

The term 'cilukbah' is used by the speaker to criticize the government's lack of transparency regarding the status of the asset confiscation bill. It implies a game of hide and seek, where the government is being vague about whether the bill has been submitted or not.

How does the government plan to move forward with the bill on asset confiscation?

The government plans to engage in further discussions with the parliamentary leadership and other stakeholders to resolve the issues related to the bill's title, substance, and other technicalities. They aim to reach a consensus before submitting the bill officially.