Algebra 5.5 - Logarithms

Summary

In this algebra series video, Matthew Sorbo explores the concept of logarithms through the lens of Warren Buffett's philanthropy. He explains how logarithms are the inverse of exponentiation, using examples to demonstrate their function. The video then connects logarithms to the idea that happiness increases logarithmically with income, showing diminishing returns as income rises. It discusses Buffett's decision to give away most of his wealth, suggesting that beyond a certain point, money doesn't buy happiness but giving can. The video concludes with a discussion on the U.S. tax system and Buffett's push for the wealthy to pay a fairer share of taxes.

Takeaways

• 📈 Warren Buffett, known as the 'Oracle of Omaha', has pledged to give away more than 99% of his wealth to philanthropy, emphasizing that additional wealth does not proportionally increase happiness or well-being.
• 🧮 Logarithms are mathematical functions that can model the relationship between wealth and happiness, showing that happiness increases logarithmically rather than linearly with income.
• 💰 The concept of diminishing returns in happiness is illustrated by the logarithmic model, where a significant increase in income results in a smaller increase in happiness compared to lower income brackets.
• 📊 A logarithmic graph of income versus happiness shows a curve that levels off at higher incomes, indicating that additional wealth beyond a certain point has less impact on happiness.
• 🏆 The initial increase in income from poverty to middle class provides a larger boost in happiness due to meeting basic needs, whereas moving from middle to high income has a smaller impact on happiness.
• 🌐 Maslow's hierarchy of needs is referenced to explain why money's ability to buy happiness is limited once basic physiological and safety needs are met.
• 💵 The United States has a marginal tax system where different income brackets are taxed at different rates, which aligns with the idea that money earned beyond a certain point contributes less to personal happiness.
• 💼 Warren Buffett has advocated for the 'Buffett Rule', which aims to ensure that the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes to address the issue of tax loopholes and different taxation of investment income.
• 🤔 The video script prompts a discussion on whether the wealthy should pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes, using the logarithmic relationship between income and happiness as a basis for the argument.
• 🔍 The script encourages viewers to consider the impact of wealth on happiness and societal contributions, suggesting that giving away wealth can enhance one's sense of belonging and esteem more than personal consumption.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the video script?

The main topic discussed in the video script is the relationship between wealth and happiness, specifically using logarithms to model this relationship and exploring Warren Buffett's views on philanthropy.

Who is Warren Buffett and why is he mentioned in the script?

Warren Buffett is often referred to as the 'Oracle of Omaha' and is one of the most successful investors in the United States. He is mentioned in the script to illustrate the concept of logarithms and to discuss his philanthropic approach to wealth.

What is the significance of logarithms in the context of this video script?

Logarithms are used in the script to model the relationship between income and happiness. They help to demonstrate the concept of diminishing returns, where increases in income lead to smaller increases in happiness.

How does the video script use Warren Buffett's wealth to explain logarithms?

The script uses Buffett's wealth to show that even a significant increase in wealth, such as a 100,000 dollar raise, would only result in a minor increase in happiness, illustrating the logarithmic nature of the happiness-income relationship.

What is the concept of diminishing returns as it relates to happiness and income?

Diminishing returns in the context of happiness and income refers to the idea that as income increases, the additional happiness gained from each subsequent increase in income becomes smaller.

How does the video script use Maslow's hierarchy of needs to explain the relationship between money and happiness?

The script uses Maslow's hierarchy of needs to show that money is more effective in increasing happiness when it is used to fulfill basic needs (lower rungs of the pyramid) rather than for luxuries or self-actualization (higher rungs).

What is the 'Buffett Rule' mentioned in the script, and what does it propose?

The 'Buffett Rule' is a proposal by Warren Buffett to change tax codes to ensure that the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes, not just a higher dollar amount, by eliminating loopholes and raising taxes on investments.

Why does the video script suggest that the wealthy should pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes?

The script suggests that the wealthy should pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes because higher incomes do not increase happiness as much as lower incomes do, and the tax revenue can be used to address societal needs more effectively.

What is the marginal tax system, and how is it discussed in the script?

The marginal tax system is a progressive tax structure where different portions of income are taxed at different rates. The script discusses it in the context of how it benefits individuals with lower incomes and generates more tax revenue from higher incomes.

How does the video script use the concept of logarithms to explain Warren Buffett's decision to give away most of his wealth?

The script explains that because of the logarithmic relationship between income and happiness, Buffett's happiness would not significantly increase with additional wealth. Therefore, he chooses to give away most of his wealth to increase his sense of belonging and esteem by helping others.

Outlines

00:00

📈 Introduction to Logarithms and Warren Buffett's Wealth

The video script introduces the concept of logarithms through the lens of financial success, exemplified by Warren Buffett, known as the 'Oracle of Omaha.' It discusses how investing with Buffett in 1964 could have led to significant returns by 2018. The script then poses the question of what Buffett plans to do with his wealth, hinting that he intends to give away most of it to philanthropy. The lesson transitions into explaining logarithms as the inverse operation of exponentiation, using examples to demonstrate how logarithms can isolate variables in equations. The video encourages viewers to follow along with downloadable notes and introduces the logarithmic model for happiness based on income, suggesting that beyond a certain point, additional wealth does not proportionally increase happiness.

05:02

📊 Happiness and Income: The Diminishing Returns of Wealth

This section of the script delves into the relationship between income and happiness, using logarithmic models to illustrate the concept of diminishing returns. It explains how a small income can lead to minimal happiness, but as income increases, the rate of increase in happiness slows down significantly. The script uses a table and a graph to visualize this relationship, showing that while a jump from $10 to $50,000 annually results in a substantial increase in happiness, moving from $50,000 to $100,000 only marginally boosts happiness. The discussion references Maslow's hierarchy of needs to explain why basic necessities have a more significant impact on happiness than luxuries. The video also explores the idea that higher incomes provide less additional happiness, aligning with the concept of logarithmic compression of large numbers into a more manageable scale.

10:06

💼 Warren Buffett's Philanthropy and Tax System Discussion

The final paragraph of the script returns to Warren Buffett's decision to give away most of his wealth, emphasizing how this aligns with the idea that additional income does not increase happiness for those already wealthy. It discusses Buffett's stance on the tax system, particularly the marginal tax rates in the United States, and how they affect individuals at different income levels. The script highlights Buffett's proposal for the 'Buffett Rule,' which aims to ensure that the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes. The video concludes by posing a question to the viewers about whether they agree with Buffett's views on taxation and encourages them to consider the material presented in the lesson to form their opinions.

Keywords

💡Logarithms

Logarithms are the inverse operation of exponentiation, used to solve equations involving powers. In the video, logarithms are introduced as a way to 'undo' the operation of exponentiation, such as finding the exponent x in the equation 4^x = 64. The script uses the example of log base 4 of 64 to illustrate how logarithms help isolate the variable x, which is essential for understanding the mathematical concept of undoing operations.

💡Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett, known as the 'Oracle of Omaha', is a central figure in the video, illustrating the concept of wealth and philanthropy. His net worth and investment strategies are used to discuss the relationship between money and happiness. The video mentions Buffett's pledge to give away more than 99% of his wealth, highlighting his philosophy that additional wealth does not proportionally increase happiness or well-being.

💡Philanthropy

Philanthropy refers to the act of donating to or supporting good causes. In the context of the video, Warren Buffett's commitment to philanthropy is highlighted as a means of enhancing the well-being of others, rather than personal happiness. This is used to discuss how giving away wealth can have a significant impact on society, aligning with the video's theme of the diminishing returns of wealth on personal happiness.

💡Diminishing Returns

Diminishing returns is an economic concept where each additional unit of input yields a progressively smaller increase in output. The video uses this concept to explain how additional income beyond a certain point has less impact on happiness. It is illustrated through the logarithmic model of happiness versus income, where increases in income lead to smaller increments in happiness.

💡Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is a psychological theory that arranges human needs in a hierarchy. The video uses this theory to explain the different levels of needs that must be met for a person to achieve happiness. It is used to argue that money is more effective in fulfilling basic needs (like food and shelter) than in achieving higher-level needs (like self-actualization and belonging).

💡Income

Income is the money received on a regular basis, especially salary or wages. In the video, income is used as a variable to model happiness through logarithmic functions. The script explores how different levels of income impact happiness, with lower incomes being more critical for happiness due to their ability to meet basic needs.

💡Happiness

Happiness, in the video, is the subjective state of well-being and contentment. It is measured on a scale from 0 to 10, with the video suggesting that happiness increases logarithmically with income. The concept is central to the discussion on whether money can buy happiness, with the video concluding that there are limits to how much additional income can increase happiness.

💡Marginal Tax System

The marginal tax system is a progressive taxation method where the tax rate increases as the amount of income increases. The video discusses the U.S. marginal tax system as an example, explaining how different income levels are taxed at different rates. It is used to argue for a fairer tax system where the wealthy, who might not experience increased happiness from additional income, contribute more to society through taxes.

💡Buffett Rule

The Buffett Rule is a proposal by Warren Buffett to ensure that the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes. The video mentions Buffett's op-ed advocating for this rule, which aims to close tax loopholes and increase taxes on investments. This is discussed in the context of the video's theme of wealth distribution and the role of the wealthy in society.

💡Loopholes

Loopholes refer to legal ambiguities or inadequacies that can be exploited, often to reduce tax liability. In the video, loopholes are mentioned as a way wealthy individuals, like Buffett, can reduce their tax burden. The discussion around loopholes ties into the broader conversation about tax fairness and the responsibilities of the wealthy in society.

Highlights

Introduction to logarithms and their application in analyzing Warren Buffett's wealth and philanthropy.

Warren Buffett's net worth exceeded 100 billion dollars as of 2021, and his investment returns are exemplified.

Buffett's plan to give away most of his wealth to philanthropy, leaving little to his family.

Explanation of logarithms as the inverse operation to exponentiation.

Practical demonstration of solving for x using logarithms in the context of Buffett's wealth.

The concept of wealth and happiness being modeled by a logarithmic function.

Analysis of how happiness increases with income, but at a diminishing rate, illustrated with a logarithmic model.

The significance of the first income increase from poverty to middle income on happiness.

Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a framework to understand the relationship between wealth and happiness.

Graphing the logarithmic relationship between income and happiness to show diminishing returns at higher incomes.

Discussion on the impact of a large income raise on happiness for someone already earning a high salary.

Warren Buffett's perspective on how earning more money does not increase his happiness, but giving away wealth does.

Introduction to the United States' marginal tax system and its implications on income and happiness.

Buffett's proposal for the 'Buffett Rule' to ensure the wealthy pay a fairer share of taxes.

Engagement with the audience to discuss whether the wealthy should pay a higher percent of their income in taxes.

Conclusion and invitation for viewers to reflect on the content and its implications on personal finance and societal structures.

Transcripts

hello mathematicians my name is matthew

sorbo covering the algebra series on sku

the script

today we'll be discussing logarithms

specifically

can money by happiness without further

ado

let's skew it

[Music]

welcome in to lesson 5.5 of the skew the

script algebra series today we'll be

discussing

logarithms specifically you may have

heard of warren buffett often dubbed the

oracle of omaha

he's one of the most successful

investors ever in the united states

his net worth as of 2021 was in excess

of 100

billion dollars if you invested 19

with warren buffett in 1964 it will be

worth almost

300 000 in 2018 and even more

today so given that warren has

101.3 billion dollars at his disposal

what does he plan to do with his fortune

he could

do he could buy 5 000 luxury yachts

1600 tropical islands he could buy 10

000 private jets all those sound pretty

tempting

but what does he actually plan to do

give most of it

away warren has said that his pledge

is that more than 99 of his wealth goes

to philanthropy during his lifetime

or at his death his family won't get

any of that money so this might be a

little surprising to hear

but that's exactly today's key analysis

why would warren buffett give away

most of his wealth if you'd like to

follow along with today's lesson check

out the link below feel free to download

or print out the guided notes

and work along with the video to start

we're going to be reviewing logarithms

uh logs for short you can see our handy

dandy little

image there essentially uh we can think

of inverse operations to start these

help us

undo other operations in math for

example

if we have x plus 10 equals 25 how do we

undo this operation and solve for x

well we have the addition operation so

the inverse is the subtraction operation

we subtract 10 from both sides

cancels out on the left side we get x

equals 15.

how do we undo this operation 2x equals

28 to solve for x

well we have 2 times x which is

multiplication

the inverse is division we divide by

divide by 2 sorry to get

2's cancelling on the left side and x

equals 14.

how about this operation 4 to the power

of x

equals 64. the operation here is an

exponent

and the inverse is not immediately clear

however as makes sense because we're

talking about it this this section

the true inverse is the logarithm and in

this example

we see that log base 4 of 64 equals x

which is a little confusing and we will

get into it logs essentially undo the

exponent and isolate

x so a good way to remember this is the

loop

we start with a base which in this case

is four and you can see it's in the base

of the log it's it's colored green here

we go to the argument which in this case

is 64. it's the argument in our log

function so log base 4 of 64 and it

loops all the way back to the exponent x

which is what we end up isolating in the

end so

you can always evaluate a log in your

calculator this is log base 4 of 64.

in this case it comes out to 3. 3 equals

x

and again you can use it with any

standard calculator we can always check

by plugging 3 back into our original

equation

we get 4 to the power of 3 does indeed

equal 64.

4 to the power of 2 is 16 times 4 again

is 64.

um and you can see it here 4 times 4

times 4 is 64.

that is 16 times 4 again is 64.

so now we've kind of reviewed what

logarithms are let's look at logs of big

and small numbers returning to warren

buffett's previous quote

he said were we to use more than one

percent of my wealth on ourselves

in him and his family neither our

happiness nor our well-being

would be enhanced in contrast that

remaining 99

can have a huge effect on the health of

welfare and

others so a key part of this quote is

that neither

his happiness or his well-being without

his families would be enhanced

it would have a huge effect on the

health and welfare of others

mathematically we can express this as

wealth and happiness

is modeled or can be modeled with a

logarithm

so let's look at our handy-dandy table

where we have yearly income

happiness on a 0 to 10 scale and we have

a model y equals log base 10

of x x here equals yearly income that's

kind of our

explanatory variable y happiness on a

scale of 0 to 10

10 being the happiest in this case we're

going to use base 10 logs

and because it's a very standard format

base 10 logs are often written without

the 10

just written as log so here we have y

our happiness equals log of x

our yearly income let's try plugging in

some values so we plug in our yearly

income of just

ten dollars um we're going to get y

equals log 10

which comes out to one so not very happy

uh

one on a scale of zero to ten not very

happy but that makes sense because

yearly income is quite small how about

if we plug in a way bigger number than

ten dollars

fifty thousand dollars a year as your

yearly income we get y equals log

fifty thousand that comes out to four

point seven so

much much happier than with 10 dollars

4.7 far higher than than one on the

scale of happiness

if we plug in a hundred thousand dollars

for our yearly income we get

a happiness of five and uh we can

continue in this way because we have log

y equals log of x but first we can look

and see that

when we go from ten dollars to fifty

thousand dollars in our income

we get a huge increase fifty thousand

dollar increase um and when we go from

fifty thousand dollars to a hundred

thousand dollars we also get a fifty

thousand dollar increase in income

um however when we go from ten dollars

to fifty thousand dollars

we get a big jump in happiness three

point seven points but from fifty

thousand to a hundred thousand

get a much smaller jump just point three

jump in happiness from those two points

so what's going on we had a fifty

thousand dollar increase in both but a

much bigger jump in happiness

we went from ten dollars to fifty

thousand dollars um

what's important to know is jumping from

ten dollars to fifty thousand dollars

this is jumping from

the poverty line to middle income what

does middle income give you

guaranteed shelter likely you have

health insurance from your job

your next meal is not an issue and you

have money for personal interest beyond

your uh disposable income you have

disposable income for your

personal interest beyond your basic

costs and necessities

um you can see there's a huge jump in

predictive happiness because

it's a big jump in quality of life as we

kind of detailed on the previous slide

when you jump from middle income to

fairly high income so fifty thousand to

a hundred thousand

you do get some benefits you have a

better house a nicer car

spending on luxuries but luxuries don't

increase happiness as much as

the guaranteed necessities of jumping

from poverty to middle

income um one way to encapsulate this is

with maslow's hierarchy of needs but you

can see here and this kind of outlines

the question of if money can buy

happiness

the higher you move up on this pyramid

the happier you

are the lower rungs of safety needs so

personal security employment resources

and physiological needs so the very

simple

air water food shelter you can't move up

on the rung until you've achieved the

lower

lower levels so you need to be safe you

need to have your physiological needs

cared for you cannot reach esteem

self-actualization level belonging if

you're st the higher rungs no ladder if

you're still worried about

food water and shelter on the lower

rungs money can help a lot with the

lower runs you can buy houses you can

buy food all that stuff

but not so much with the higher realms

it doesn't help as much with esteem

self-actualization love and belonging

so if we return to our table and we

continue plugging in higher values of

income

we see the trend continues another 50

000 increase

to 150 000 income per year just

increases happiness by 0.2

and if we add go up to 200 000 a year

happiness just increases by 0.1 to

5.3 um so again looking at this uh

from the top logarithms compress the

numbers right so we have these really

big numbers

logarithms compress it down to a smaller

scale they take big numbers which is the

early income

and they compress them more than the

small numbers so yearly income of 10

gets compressed to one

the yearly income of 200 000 gets

compressed all the way

to 5.3 that's a good property of

logarithms

this is good for diminishing returns

which in this case we'll talk about it

more

means big money a large salary earns

little extra happiness as compared to

early gains on on happiness so let's

actually look at graphing logs to drive

home

this intuition we take our table and

we'll work to visualize it

we plot yearly income on the x-axis and

happiness on the 0-10 scale on the y

axis

and we can just put in our dots from the

table here and

sort of think about what shape you see

we can draw this line here this

kind of curved line which represents y

equals log x

and remember our maslow's hierarchy of

needs pyramid

that first fifty thousand dollars in

income makes happiness increase

rapidly you get a big increase in

happiness because you can use it for

basic needs

air water food shelter security

all that sort of stuff but at higher

incomes we get diminishing returns

your happiness increases less rapidly

from the money you make because the

higher incomes don't help as much with

self-actualization

esteem and love and belonging so let's

think about a specific question

you work a very high income job you make

four hundred thousand dollars per year

let's imagine that you work super super

hard and you get a massive

one hundred thousand dollar raise that's

a big rate it's 25 of the money

that you make how much is your happiness

predicted to increase

so you go from 400 000 to 500 000

at la at y equals log of 400 000 your

happiness is 5.6

how about at uh log of 500 000 what does

your happiness go to

5.7 so you go from 5.6 to 5.7

just a 0.1 difference in happiness from

that

huge bonus and again this confirms the

fact that at higher incomes we see

diminishing returns

happiness increases much less rapidly at

higher incomes this kind of nails on the

point

money can't buy love and belonging can't

buy self-actualization

or necessarily esteem warren buffett

course

of course is way way way to the right on

this chart it extends a long way until

we see warren buffett

and now we can return to his quote where

he said that neither happiness or his

well-being

would be enhanced by this extra money

so if we think about how warren's way

over there on the scale of dimension

returns

if he can't get happier by earning more

money how can he

increase his happiness well he notes

that giving away 99

of his wealth has a huge effect on the

health and welfare of others

and as you can see by warren giving to

his community giving wealth to charity

and still saving enough to meet the

needs of himself

it increases his belonging and esteem

because he's helping

others and serving others in the

community so it helps him with

his top of the pyramid now that we've

kind of explored

warren buffett's decision making in his

uh personal finances let's turn to the

discussion

um specifically we'll be talking about

the united states which has a marginal

tax system

for example in 2021 if you earn your

first ten thousand dollars earned is

taxed at ten percent

your next thirty thousand dollars is

taxed at twelve percent

next forty five thousand dollars is

taxed at twenty two percent

etc and then earnings after five hundred

thousand dollars is taxed at thirty

seven percent

there are a couple of benefits of this

marginal system for example

for individuals that are not making as

much money their first

ten thousand dollars is has a lower tax

that's necessity money it's required for

safety needs

physiological needs that sort of thing

um whereas more tax revenue is actually

from luxury money so money earned past

250 000

which doesn't increase happiness as much

as we've seen um

or may not increase happiness as much as

we've seen uh we get

more tax revenue from that there's also

no back penalty for earning more so if

you earn

more than ten thousand dollars it

doesn't affect the taxes on the first

ten thousand dollars

that means it is never better off to be

working less which is

an important point to note there is one

catch

wealthy individuals hire very good

accountants who then find loopholes in

the system to lower their taxes

you also have income from investments

like warren buffett's stocks and bonds

those are taxed differently than normal

income so buffett

uh tried to establish the buffett rule

he wrote new york times op-ed

which was titled stop coddling the super

rich and it's linked here

um he essentially proposed this rule to

change tax codes to guarantee that the

wealthy pay a higher dollar amount and a

higher

percent of their income in taxes not

just a higher amount but a higher

percent

to do this you have to eliminate

loopholes and raise taxes on

investments which many of them have so

to turn to the discussion

do you agree with buffett that the

wealthy should pay not only a higher

dollar amount in taxes

but also a higher percent of their

overall income why or why not

and be sure to to use the material from

this lesson to support your answer

that's all for today thanks for joining

and we'll see you next time on skew the

[Music]

script

[Music]