BREAKING NEWS: Trump Holds Surprise Press Briefing Following Supreme Court Ballot Eligibility Ruling

Summary

In a passionate address, the speaker celebrates a unanimous Supreme Court decision that he believes will foster national unity by affirming that candidates cannot be excluded from races due to opponents' preferences, regardless of their poll standings. He argues this principle protects democracy and the voter's right to choose, highlighting his own polling success against President Biden. Additionally, he discusses the importance of presidential immunity, citing personal decisions made during his tenure that he feels should not subject former presidents to prosecution. The speaker also criticizes current legal actions against him as politically motivated, undermining justice and democracy, and concludes by urging President Biden to address border security and halt the 'weaponization' of the legal system against political opponents.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Supreme Court made a unanimous decision that was praised for potentially unifying the country and ensuring candidates cannot be removed from a race unfairly.
• 👍 The decision was highlighted as important for democracy, emphasizing that only voters should have the power to remove a candidate from an election.
• 🔍 The speaker criticized certain states and political opponents for attempting to exclude him from races due to political reasons and poll numbers.
• 🗳️ Mentioned leading in polls against President Biden and viewed the Supreme Court's decision as a vindication against political manipulation.
• 🏛️ Discussed the concept of presidential immunity, arguing that it's essential for a president to make decisions without fear of future prosecution.
• 🤔 Expressed concern over the current state of prosecution and judicial bias, citing personal experiences with what he perceives as 'rogue' prosecutors and judges.
• 🌍 Highlighted major accomplishments, including economic success, tax and regulation cuts, and defeating ISIS without engaging in new wars.
• 🛑 Urged President Biden to close the borders, describing the situation as unsustainable and a security risk due to the influx of criminals and terrorists.
• 💡 Asserted that legal cases against him have, paradoxically, increased his popularity, suggesting that these actions are seen as unjust weaponization by some.
• 📈 Emphasized a desire to win elections based on policies and accomplishments, not through the adversities faced due to legal challenges.

Q & A

What was the Supreme Court's decision that the speaker thanked them for?

The Supreme Court made a unanimous decision that was seen as very important by the speaker, essentially ruling that a candidate cannot be removed from a race simply because an opponent wishes it. This decision was praised for potentially unifying the country.

How does the speaker view the impact of the Supreme Court's decision on the country?

The speaker believes the Supreme Court's decision will have a long-lasting impact, possibly being discussed 100 to 200 years from now, and sees it as a significant step towards unifying the country.

What is the speaker's stance on immunity for presidents?

The speaker argues for full immunity for presidents, stating that without it, presidents may lack the courage to make tough decisions. They believe that a president should be able to make decisions without the fear of being prosecuted after leaving office.

How does the speaker justify the need for presidential immunity?

The speaker justifies the need for presidential immunity by highlighting their own decisions, such as defeating ISIS and not starting new wars. They argue that these tough decisions were for the good of the country and the world, and a president should not be prosecuted for such actions.

What does the speaker say about their popularity in polls compared to President Biden?

The speaker claims to be beating President Biden in almost every poll, citing a New York Times poll as evidence of their strong popularity.

What legal challenges does the speaker mention facing?

The speaker mentions facing prosecution from 'rogue prosecutors' and 'rogue judges', indicating that they are under legal scrutiny at a level unprecedented for them.

How does the speaker describe their administration's achievements?

The speaker boasts about their administration's achievements, including providing the largest tax cuts in history, the largest regulation cuts, defeating ISIS, and avoiding new wars, portraying their tenure as a period of significant positive impact.

What criticism does the speaker have for President Biden's administration?

The speaker criticizes President Biden for the current state of the borders, arguing that the borders are unsafe and that the situation is not sustainable for the country. They urge Biden to close the borders and stop the alleged weaponization of legal processes against political opponents.

What does the speaker suggest President Biden should do regarding border policy?

The speaker suggests that President Biden should close the borders immediately, using the speaker's own policies as a model, which they claim resulted in the safest border in the history of the country.

How does the speaker view the legal cases against them?

The speaker views the legal cases against them as unfair and without merit, describing them as 'nonsense cases' and part of a weaponization process against them by political opponents, coordinated with the White House.

Outlines

00:00

🏛 Supreme Court Decision and Political Unity

The speaker begins by expressing gratitude towards the Supreme Court for a unanimous decision that he views as pivotal for the nation's unity. He emphasizes the importance of this ruling, arguing that courts should not disqualify candidates from races, as this is a decision that should be left to voters. He believes this principle applies regardless of a candidate's position in polls. The speaker then discusses his popularity and how certain states, due to political reasons, did not want him participating in races, highlighting his lead over President Biden in polls. He touches on the concept of presidential immunity, arguing that without it, presidents would be unable to make bold decisions for fear of future prosecution. He cites his actions against ISIS and other significant decisions during his presidency as examples where immunity was crucial. The narrative suggests that legal challenges he faces are politically motivated, aiming to underscore the need for a president to make decisions without fear of legal repercussions.

05:01

🔍 Allegations of Politicized Prosecutions

In this segment, the speaker claims he is being targeted by politically motivated prosecutors at both local and state levels, coordinated with the White House, to undermine him due to his high profile. He criticizes specific individuals involved in these prosecutions, suggesting their actions are biased and unprofessional. He asserts that these cases are conflicted and should be dismissed, accusing the prosecutors of focusing on him rather than addressing violent crime. The speaker further alleges that the Biden administration is weaponizing the legal system against him, a tactic he views as harmful to the democratic process and unprecedented in the U.S. He contrasts his administration's policies, particularly regarding border security and crime, with the current administration's, implying that his policies were more effective and beneficial for the country.

10:01

🇺🇸 Immigration Policy Critique and Call for Action

The speaker criticizes President Biden's immigration policies, describing them as unsustainable and harmful to the country. He claims that the current open borders policy has led to an influx of dangerous individuals, including criminals and terrorists, from around the world. He argues that this situation has made the U.S. a laughingstock internationally and has resulted in significant domestic issues, including crime. The speaker takes credit for having the safest border during his presidency, achieved without Congress's help, through the construction of a border wall and strict immigration policies. He urges President Biden to adopt his policies to secure the border and protect the nation.

15:02

🗳 Call for Political Unity and Policy Successes

The speaker concludes by reiterating his respect for the Supreme Court and its decision, hoping it serves as a unifying factor. He reflects on the significance of the decision, suggesting it sets a precedent for not removing candidates from races through legal challenges. He also addresses the impact of his legal troubles on his popularity, suggesting that, contrary to expectations, these issues have made him more popular. The speaker calls on President Biden to cease using the legal system against political opponents and to address national issues such as border security and crime. He lists his administration's achievements, including economic success, tax cuts, regulatory cuts, and no new wars, as a basis for his political appeal, emphasizing a desire to win elections based on policy rather than legal controversies.

Keywords

💡Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is mentioned as making a unanimous decision, described as important and potentially unifying. It illustrates the court's role in legal disputes of significant public interest, especially those involving political figures or electoral processes. The decision is framed as preventing the removal of a candidate from a race based on opponents' desires, emphasizing the judiciary's role in upholding democratic principles.

💡Unifying Factor

This concept refers to the belief that the Supreme Court's decision will bring people together, addressing divisions within the country. It suggests that certain legal outcomes can have broader social and political implications, fostering a sense of collective agreement or healing.

💡Voter Rights

The assertion that voters, not courts, should have the power to remove a candidate from contention underscores the importance of voter agency in democratic processes. It highlights the principle that electoral decisions should rest with the electorate, reflecting the core democratic value of self-governance.

💡Political Weaponization

The speaker criticizes the use of legal and judicial systems to target political opponents, suggesting that such actions undermine the integrity of those systems and the democratic process. The term points to a perceived misuse of legal mechanisms for partisan or political purposes.

💡Presidential Immunity

This refers to the idea that presidents should have immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office, to ensure they can make decisions without fear of future legal repercussions. The speaker argues this is essential for the president to perform their duties effectively, indicating a perspective on the balance between accountability and executive functionality.

💡Election Polls

Mention of poll numbers, particularly those favoring the speaker over President Biden, serves to highlight public support and the competitive dynamics of electoral politics. Polls are used as a barometer of political strength and public sentiment, influencing perceptions of electoral viability.

💡Border Security

The discussion on border security and immigration policies underlines the speaker's stance on national security and sovereignty. It reflects concerns over illegal immigration, portraying it as a threat to public safety and economic stability, and advocates for stringent border controls.

💡Weaponization

This term is used to describe the perceived abuse of legal and governmental power to target political adversaries, suggesting a corruption of these mechanisms for political gain. It implies a departure from the principle of impartial justice, pointing to a broader concern about the politicization of legal and regulatory institutions.

💡Economic Policy

References to tax cuts, regulation cuts, and no wars underscore the speaker's priorities and achievements in economic management. These policies are presented as contributing to a strong economy, indicating a belief in the link between economic policy, national security, and overall national well-being.

💡Judicial Bias

Accusations of 'rogue judges' and biased legal proceedings reflect concerns about the fairness and integrity of the judicial system. The speaker suggests that personal or political biases are influencing judicial decisions, challenging the principle of an impartial judiciary.

Highlights

Supreme Court's unanimous decision seen as unifying and significant for long-term impact on political races.

Emphasis on the principle that courts should not remove candidates from races, a decision for voters to make.

Mention of beating President Biden in polls and the influence of political motives on legal challenges.

Discussion on the necessity of presidential immunity for decision-making without fear of future prosecution.

Claim of defeating ISIS and making significant terrorist eliminations without wanting to be prosecuted for such actions.

Critique of current prosecutions and investigations as unprecedented and unfairly targeted.

Arguments against the politicization and weaponization of the legal system against a political figure.

Concerns about the impact of ongoing legal challenges on the ability of future presidents to govern effectively.

Call for President Biden to drop legal proceedings and for policies that focus on fighting violent crime.

Urgent appeal to President Biden to close the borders, claiming unsustainable levels of migration and security risks.

Criticism of the handling of the border situation and the comparison of current policies to those during his administration.

Claims of widespread support and increased popularity despite legal challenges, viewing them as unfair and without merit.

Highlighting the desire to win elections based on policy differences rather than through legal battles.

Emphasis on achievements during presidency, including economic success, tax cuts, and regulatory reductions.

Call for a presidential immunity doctrine to ensure presidents can make decisions without fear of future legal repercussions.

Transcripts

well thank you very much I want to start

by thanking the Supreme Court for its

unanimous decision today it was a very

important decision we're very well

crafted and I think it will go a long

way toward bringing our country together

which our country

needs and uh they worked long they

worked hard and frankly they worked very

quickly on on something that will be

spoken about a 100 years from now and

200 years from now extremely important

essentially you cannot take somebody out

of a race because an opponent would like

to have it that way and it has nothing

to do with the fact that it's the

leading candidate whether it was the

leading candidate or a candidate that

was well down on the totem pole you

cannot take somebody out of a race the

voters can take the person out of the

race very quickly but a Court shouldn't

be doing that and the Supreme Court saw

that very well and I really do believe

that will be a unifying Factor because

While most uh states were thrilled to

have me there were some that didn't and

they didn't want that for political

reasons they didn't want that because of

poll numbers because the poll numbers

are very good we're uh beating President

Biden in almost every poll New York

Times came out yesterday with a very big

Poll for us so they U they didn't like

that and you can't do that you can't do

what they tried to do and hopefully

Colorado as an example will unify I know

there's tremendous support they' they

brought our support up very strong in

Colorado because people thought people

in Colorado thought that was a terrible

thing that they did and while we're on

the subject and another thing that will

be coming up very soon will be immunity

for a president and not immunity for me

but for any president if a president

doesn't have full immunity you really

don't have a president because nobody

that is serving in that office will have

the courage to make in many cases what

would be the right decision or it could

be the wrong decision it could be in

some cases the wrong decision but they

have to make decisions and they have to

make them free of all Terror that can be

reigned upon them when they leave office

or even before they leave office and

some decisions are very tough I can tell

you that as a president that some

decisions to make are very tough tough I

took out Isis and I took out some very

big people from the standpoint of a

different part of the world two of the

leading terrorists probably the two

leading terrorists ever that we've ever

seen in this

world and uh those are big decisions I

don't want to be prosecuted for it uh

another president wouldn't want to be

prosecuted for it it had a tremendously

positive impact it stopped everything

called and sometimes you have to make

they were tough decisions sometimes you

have to make decisions like that when

you make a decision you don't want to

have your opposing party or opponent or

even somebody that just thinks you're

wrong bring a Criminal suit against you

or any kind of a suit when you leave

office I have that right now at a level

that nobody's ever seen before I have

Rogue prosecutors and I have Rogue

judges I have judges that are out of

control and it's a very unfair thing for

me but um serving perhaps as a uh sample

to others of what should not be

happening when you make good decisions

and in my case the economy was great we

didn't go into any wars we totally

defeated

Isis we provided the largest tax cuts in

history we provided the largest

regulation Cuts in history but think of

it no

Wars we beat Isis 100% of the caliphate

then there were no Wars we we did a job

that was was great but I maybe I

wouldn't have done that the caliphate

defeating them was very powerful it was

going to take four years it took me four

months but it was a very

strong dictum that I gave I said get

them defeat him ended we were fighting

for 20 years against Isis and we did it

very quickly I don't want to be

prosecuted in that case it worked out

very well there will be some things that

perhaps don't work out so well but I

don't want to be prose prosecuted

because I decided to do something that

is very much for the good of the country

and actually for the good of the world a

president shouldn't have that on his

mind and he has to have a free and clear

mind when he makes very big decisions or

it's going to be nothing more than a

ceremonial post you'll be president

it'll be wonderful thing and you won't

do anything because you don't want to be

hit by your opponent or hit by somebody

else because who wants to leave office

and and go through what I've gone

through I'm being prosecuted by Biden my

opponent because every one of these

things whether it's Fanny Willis or brag

these are local and state but they're in

total

coordination with the White House you

can't do that it shouldn't be done done

I mean a thing like that in the case of

the DA's office they put one of the top

people maybe the second person in the

Manhattan DA's office to get Trump they

had a Hillary Clinton lawyer leave the

law firm very prestigious big Law Firm

leave the law firm to go into the DA's

office to get Trump pomerance it's the

pomerance so he goes in to become a

prosecutor worked for the Democrat Party

and Hillary Clinton goes in to prosecute

Donald Trump at a local level in total

coordination with the Department of

Justice meaning

Biden and then you have the fanny Willis

or as she would say fonnie fonnie F A ni

I but

fonnie and she hired somebody knew the

person long

before this horrible prosecution took

place and she went out and she paid him

an unbelievable amount of money more

money than he ever had dreamt possible

much more money than other people that

are that do that for a living he never

did it at all had no experience in it at

all and they had obviously a conflict we

don't have to go into that but they were

able to get a lot of money because it

was a high-profile person me I'm a very

high-profile person so they were able to

pay him close to a million dollars when

he was not equipped to do the job and

she's not equipped to do the job and

that case should end immediately that

case is so conflicted nobody's ever seen

anything like it and then you have

deranged Jack Smith who's a trump hater

and represents all the Trump haters and

he's going wild he's just a wild and

he's been overturned unanimously by the

Supreme Court went after other people

over the years he's had great failure

but he's mean he's nasty he's unfair and

the judges on these cases the RO Trump

haers other than we have maybe one or

two that I think can be fair but you

look at New York what's happened I mean

these people have tremendous hatred you

can't do this to a president and again

I'm not talking about me I'm talking

about in the future a president has to

be free a president has to be if the

president does a good job I did some

people would say a great job but if the

president does a good job a president

should be free and clear and frankly

celebrated for having done a good job

not indicted four times and not gone

after on a civil basis and not uh

demanded to be to pay hundreds of

millions of dollars in fines on

something that was absolutely perfect

where there were no victims where the

financial statements were absolutely

Flawless where you have disclaimer

clauses I mean nobody's ever had a thing

like this I wasn't given a jury and I

had a clubhouse judge just come up with

this number on a perfect loan and very

conservative financial statements but

even at that if you look the disclaimer

says don't rely on the financial

statements in any way shape or form go

out and do your own work the bank in

question had the most sophisticated

lawyers in the world frankly very top

one of the top law firms anywhere in the

country and they can defend themselves

what guys like uh brag and uh Leticia

James and

fonnie and derange jacksmith what they

should be doing is fighting violent

crime and that would lead me to the end

I will say

that President Biden number one stop

weaponization

fight your fight yourself don't use

prosecutors and judges to go after your

opponent to try and damage your opponent

so you can win an election our country

is much bigger than that the other thing

I say to President

Biden close the borders now this is not

sustainable for our country it's not

sustainable for our

cities our country is under siege this

is a VI

ENT thing that you've done and many

people are dying many many people are

dying they die on the trip up they die

going through the border and they die in

our

country but many of the people coming up

are from prisons and

jails from mental institutions and

insane asylums many are terrorists you

see it many many are

terrorists and I believe the real number

that we have right now is probably

closer to 50 15 million people and by

the

time the term ends I believe the

president's term ends I believe you'll

be at close to 20 million

people that's almost larger than any

state in the Union our country it is not

sustainable many of these people are

tough many of these people are bad they

come from some of the roughest countries

in the world and some of the roughest

prisons we have prisons in the Congo in

Africa coming we have people coming from

all parts of the Middle East they're

coming from Yemen and yet you were

bombing Yemen you have to stop you have

to close the border you have absolute

authorization you don't need Congress I

had the safest Border in the history of

our

country and I didn't use Congress for it

and then I built hundreds of miles of

wall and the reason I built it and how I

built it was I considered it an invasion

of our country and I took the money from

the military and the Army Corp of engine

Engineers did it with me and we did a

great job and we had the safest border

we've ever had and now we have the most

unsafe border anywhere in the world at

any time there's never been a border

like this at any country anywhere in the

world they would have fought with sticks

and stones to stop the horrible

situation that's occurring our people

can't stand it and the people coming in

really can't stand it because they're

dying many are dying on the trip up and

they're dying in the country and also

many of the people are criminals and

they're doing tremendous harm I call it

migrant crime it's migrant crime it's a

new category of crime they're hurting

our country horribly and we've become a

laughing stock all over the world so I

say respectfully to President Biden you

have the authorization right now I did

it I didn't go to Congress and say do I

have the right to close I fought

Congress on it close the borders you can

do it right now now you have everything

use my policies my policies were great

everybody said it use my

policies so just to finish I have great

respect

for the Supreme Court and I want to just

thank them for working so quickly and uh

so diligently and so

brilliantly and again this is a unifying

Factor everybody now is together and

they can go after me as a politician

they can go after me with votes but

they're not going to go after me with

that kind of lawsuit that takes somebody

out of a race who's leading in this case

but even if the person wasn't leading

and I want to thank you all for being

here do we have any questions yes Mr

President uh the poll numbers are

massive for you going into Super Tuesday

we found that a lot of people that were

agnostic to politics in general see

these legal cases against you they see

what how life was back under a trump

administ ministration do you think

that's the key to pull some of these

independent voters into this next

election seeing that these legal cases

are unfair they have no married and also

your PO numbers in their life before

Trump it's such an interesting question

because historically a thing like what

I've been going through would have hurt

a political party or a political

candidate terrifically you wouldn't even

run you wouldn't be able to run you'd

get out and this has happened over many

years many times in this case the polls

show that uh I'm much more popular than

I

was before weaponization it's been

weaponized like it's never been this is

for third world countries this isn't for

us Biden order to drop all of these

things and frankly he may do better if

he does because people would say wow

that was very reasonable look they're

all the state the city and the federal

they're all coordinated Fanny Willis's

lover spent hours and hours at the White

House I guess with White House counsel

and with doj plotting out this plan

nobody talks about that they're all uh

they're all coordinated with the White

House it's weaponization never been done

in this country it's been done in third

world countries banana republics never

in this country

so I really believe what they should do

is really go all the way go out and stop

all of this nonsense they're nonsense

cases and everybody sees you just look

at Atlanta it's such an embarrassment to

Georgia what's happening there but Jack

Smith I don't think is any better

Leticia James is terrible she campaigned

on I will get Trump I will get Trump and

then it goes before a trumpeting judge I

mean the whole thing is a rig deal and

the public understands it I'm lucky that

I'm able to explain it to the public

because if you weren't able to explain

it the public wouldn't know they'd

believe what they see so I don't want to

win this way look I want to win based on

my policies are better we're going to

cut taxes we're going to get get

interest rates down you're going to be

able to buy homes again I mean you can't

buy a home today the interest rates are

so high I want to win on safe borders I

want to stop Wars I want to stop the war

in Ukraine with Russia I want to stop

what's happening in Israel Israel would

have never been attacked if I were

president Ukraine would have never ever

been attacked If I Was President um you

wouldn't have had inflation inflation

was caused by high energy prices I had

low energy prices I would have kept them

there very easily and a probably maybe

caused the war with Ukraine because

Putin became Rich all of a sudden it

went up so much and I I watched

President Biden talking about Putin

Putin became very rich because at $100 a

barrel he's got so much money to fight a

war at $40 a barrel he doesn't have the

money to fight a war but he wouldn't

have done it anyway because I told him

not to so I just uh want to thank all of

you for being here I think it's a very

big day for America I think it's a very

big day for Liberty and I think it's uh

just a great day for this country again

I hope it's unifying like I think but it

is it's a big step toward

unification I hope that the justices

because they'll be working on some other

cases but one in particular presidents

have to be given total immunity they

have to be allowed to do their job if

they're not allowed to do their job it's

not what the founders wanted but perhaps

even more importantly it will be ter

terrible for our country thank you all

very much I

app responsible access to idea are you

going to support a 15we federal abortion

ban