Karim Suryadi - Ketika Demokrasi Tanpa Demos

Karim Suryadi Channel

6 Nov 202104:47

Summary

TLDRThe script addresses the concerns over the nomination of presidential candidates in 2024, questioning the transparency and public participation in the process. It critiques the dominance of party leaders in selecting candidates and the lack of open nomination. The speaker calls for a more democratic approach, emphasizing the importance of ethical decision-making and accountability to both God and the people. The script also urges the media to provide comprehensive coverage of potential leaders, advocating for a democracy that truly represents the people's will.

Takeaways

🗳️ The script discusses the nomination of presidential candidates in 2024, suggesting that the process is influenced by party leaders rather than public participation.
🤔 It questions whether there will be any change in the nomination process, given past experiences where party leaders decide the candidates.
👥 The script highlights the importance of public participation in the nomination process, emphasizing that democracy should involve the people.
📜 It points out that while there are no laws requiring open nomination of candidates, the spirit of democracy and Pancasila principles suggest that decisions should be accountable to the people.
🤝 The script calls for party leaders and activists to act wisely and honor the voice and will of the people in the nomination process.
📢 It urges the media to provide more coverage of potential leaders, offering a broader perspective beyond surveys and polls.
🚫 The script warns against using party politics as a tool to manipulate public opinion or to rubber-stamp decisions made by a few within the party.
🙅‍♂️ It criticizes the notion of party politics overshadowing the will of the people, suggesting that parties should not become a 'stomach' for the desires of a few.
🌟 The script ends with a call for integrity and the elevation of the voice of the people in the political process, aiming for a democracy that truly represents the people.

Q & A

What is the main concern expressed in the script about the nomination of presidential candidates?
-The main concern is the lack of transparency and public participation in the nomination process, which is often controlled by party leaders rather than reflecting the will of the people.
What historical event from 2019 is mentioned in the script that illustrates the issue with the nomination process?
-The script refers to a fragmentation incident in 2019 where a potential vice-presidential candidate had to wait until the end of the process, only to be proven wrong, illustrating the unpredictability and control by party leaders.
What is the speaker's fear regarding the future of the nomination process?
-The speaker fears that there will be no change in the nomination process and that party politics will continue to overshadow the democratic will of the people.
How does the script use the story of Jalaluddin Rumi to convey a message about the nomination process?
-The story of Jalaluddin Rumi is used as a metaphor to criticize the self-righteousness and lack of self-awareness in the nomination process, where people might not realize the true reasons behind their decisions.
What does the script suggest about the role of party politics in the nomination process?
-The script suggests that party politics should not be a tool to manipulate the will of the people but should instead serve to amplify the voices and aspirations of the public.
What is the importance of the media's role as highlighted in the script?
-The script emphasizes the media's role in providing extensive coverage of potential leaders, offering a strength map and alternative views beyond surveys, to ensure a more democratic and informed nomination process.
What is the script's stance on the ethical principles that should guide the nomination process?
-The script advocates for the nomination process to be guided by ethical principles that ensure decisions are accountable to both God and the people, reflecting the true spirit of democracy.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Public Nomination for Presidential Candidates

The paragraph discusses the nomination of a presidential candidate for the 2024 election, suggesting that the public is being encouraged to nominate a candidate. It questions whether this is a sign of improved public participation in the nomination process. The speaker reflects on past experiences where the choice of candidates was entirely up to the party leaders, even leading to a fragmentation incident in 2019. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of considering the public's voice in the selection process and not just relying on party politics. It also mentions the ethical teachings of Pancasila, which call for decisions to be accountable to God and the people, suggesting that party politics should not overshadow the will of the people.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Partai

In the context of the video, 'Partai' refers to political parties that play a significant role in nominating presidential candidates. The script discusses how the decision-making process within these parties can be opaque and not always reflective of public participation. It is used to highlight the importance of transparency and democratic principles within party politics.

💡Pencalonan Presiden

This term translates to 'presidential candidacy' and is central to the video's theme. It is discussed in relation to the nomination process and the concerns about the influence of party leaders in selecting candidates for the presidency, as opposed to a more inclusive approach that involves the wider public.

💡Relawan

The term 'Relawan' means 'volunteers' in Indonesian. In the script, it is used to describe individuals who are advocating for a more participatory approach to nominating presidential candidates. It underscores the desire for a more grassroots involvement in the political process.

💡Pimpinan Partai

This phrase translates to 'party leadership' and is used in the script to denote the individuals who traditionally hold the power to nominate candidates within their parties. The video questions the concentration of power in the hands of a few and calls for a more democratic approach.

💡Demokrasi

The concept of 'Demokrasi' or 'democracy' is a recurring theme in the script. It is used to emphasize the need for a political system that is truly representative of the people's will, where decisions are made transparently and with public participation.

💡Pancasila

Pancasila is the philosophical foundation of the Indonesian state, emphasizing five core principles. In the script, it is mentioned to highlight the ethical guidelines that should guide decision-making, including the selection of political candidates, to ensure they are accountable to both God and the people.

💡Kedaulatan Partai

This term translates to 'party sovereignty' and is used to critique the notion that political parties should have absolute control over their decision-making processes, including candidate selection. The video suggests that this approach can lead to the exclusion of public voices.

💡Media

The script calls upon 'Media' or 'media' to play a more active role in covering potential leaders who are not necessarily backed by established political parties. It suggests that media coverage can provide a platform for alternative voices and perspectives, thus enriching the democratic discourse.

💡Kehendak Masyarakat

This term translates to 'will of the people' and is central to the video's message. It is used to argue for a political process that respects and reflects the aspirations and desires of the public, rather than being dominated by party politics.

💡Etika

Ethics or 'Etika' is mentioned in the context of the moral and ethical considerations that should guide the actions of political party leaders. The script suggests that decisions, including the nomination of presidential candidates, should be made with integrity and a sense of responsibility towards the public.

💡Permusyawaratan

This term translates to 'consultation' and is used to suggest a more inclusive approach to decision-making within political parties. It implies that decisions should be made through a process of dialogue and consensus-building, rather than being dictated by a few.

Highlights

The discussion suggests that the selection of a presidential candidate for 2024 is being influenced by party leaders rather than public participation.

There is a historical pattern where party leaders decide the presidential candidate without full public involvement.

The speaker expresses concern that the current process may not change and could continue to be dominated by party politics.

The narrative includes a historical reference to the 2019 political fragmentation and its impact on the selection of presidential running mates.

The speaker warns against prematurely judging the decision-making process based on outcomes, as there are many factors at play.

An anecdote is shared about Jalaluddin Rumi to illustrate the consequences of not considering the full context of decisions.

The speaker questions the necessity of open nominations for presidential candidates, suggesting that current laws may not require them.

The importance of democratic principles is emphasized, with a call for government truly 'of the people, by the people, and for the people'.

The speaker argues that party politics should not overshadow the will of the people or the democratic process.

The ethical principles of Pancasila are invoked, emphasizing accountability to God and the community in decision-making.

The role of party politics in channeling the voice and aspirations of the people is discussed, with a call for ethical conduct.

The speaker warns against using party politics as a tool to enforce the will of a few and against treating the people as mere rubber stamps.

A call to action is made for party leaders and activists to make wise decisions that honor the voice and will of the people.

The hope is expressed for a democracy that is not devoid of the people or the 'demos', emphasizing the need for a true democratic process.

The media is encouraged to provide more coverage on potential leaders who are worthy of leading the republic, offering a broader perspective beyond surveys.

The conclusion is a call for honor and integrity in the decision-making process, ensuring that democracy is served by the people and for the people.