ローカット絶対にしない方が良い？しても良い？【何が起きるのか検証】

Summary

In this video, the composer discusses the ongoing debate about low-cut filters in music production. He shares his personal view that while low-cut can be useful in certain scenes, it's often better to avoid it if possible. He conducts an experiment using his own music track 'Beagle Kick's Sherry' to demonstrate the effects of different low-cut frequencies on the sound quality. The composer emphasizes the importance of considering the context and making informed decisions rather than blindly following tips or advice.

Takeaways

• 🎵 The script discusses the ongoing debate about the use of low-cut filters in music production, suggesting that it's a topic frequently discussed on social media.
• 🔍 The composer expresses a personal opinion that while low-cut filters have their place, it might be better to avoid them if possible, without having a strong conviction about the specific drawbacks.
• 📉 It is mentioned that cutting frequencies below 50Hz can make the sound clearer and cleaner, but it may also remove the sense of movement and liveliness from the music.
• 🎛️ Alternative methods to using low-cuts are suggested, such as adjusting the bass or creating a wide sound spectrum to cover the areas where low frequencies would normally contribute.
• 🚫 The composer warns against blindly following tips or rules about cutting low frequencies, emphasizing the importance of understanding the implications before applying them.
• 👂 The importance of hearing the low frequencies on different speakers and headphones is highlighted, as some may not reproduce them accurately.
• 🎶 The script includes an experiment using a multitrack of the composer's song 'Beagle Kick's Shelly' to demonstrate the effects of different low-cut settings.
• 📈 The experiment compares the original track with versions that have 100Hz, 50Hz, and 20Hz low-cut filters applied, to illustrate the differences in sound.
• 🎸 The acoustic guitar example in the script shows how low frequencies can be important for the arrangement and should be considered when deciding on the use of low-cuts.
• 👨‍🎤 The composer suggests that the decision to use low-cuts should be based on the context of the arrangement and the desired expression, rather than following a one-size-fits-all rule.
• 🌐 The script concludes by encouraging listeners to have a constructive dialogue about music production techniques rather than engaging in arguments, and to enjoy their digital music-making experience.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the video script?

The main topic discussed in the video script is the issue of low-cut filtering, particularly its use and effects in music production.

What is the speaker's personal stance on the use of low-cut filters?

The speaker's personal stance is that while there are scenes where low-cut filters might be useful, it might be better not to use them if it's possible, without having a strong conviction about the specific drawbacks.

What does the speaker suggest about the common advice given on low-cut filtering?

The speaker suggests that the common advice to cut off frequencies below 50Hz might make the sound clearer but could also remove the dynamic and live feel of the music.

What is the purpose of the experiment the speaker is conducting in the video?

The purpose of the experiment is to demonstrate the effects of applying different low-cut filter settings to a piece of music and to encourage listeners to consider whether or not to use them based on their musical goals.

What is the speaker's opinion on the widespread advice to cut off frequencies below 50Hz?

The speaker believes that the widespread advice might be too simplistic and not universally applicable, suggesting that it's important to consider the context and make informed decisions rather than blindly following tips.

What is the song 'Beagle Kick's Sherry' mentioned in the script?

'Beagle Kick's Sherry' is a song composed by the speaker, and its multi-track data is used in the video for demonstrating the effects of low-cut filtering.

How does the speaker approach the issue of low-end frequencies in music production?

The speaker suggests that instead of relying solely on low-cut filters, one could adjust the bass or create a wide-range sound in a different way to address the issue.

What is the significance of the speaker's mention of acoustic guitars in the context of low-cut filtering?

The mention of acoustic guitars highlights how low-cut filtering can affect the perception of certain frequencies, and the speaker implies that decisions on filtering should be made considering the specific characteristics of the instrument.

What does the speaker mean by 'arrangement issues' in relation to low-end frequencies?

The speaker refers to the need to consider the role of low-end frequencies in the overall arrangement of a song, suggesting that decisions on filtering should be part of a broader arrangement strategy.

What is the speaker's final advice regarding the use of low-cut filters in music production?

The speaker advises that one should understand the effects of low-cut filters on the sound and then make informed decisions based on their creative goals, rather than blindly applying filters.

What is the speaker's view on the repeated discussions about low-cut filtering on social media?

The speaker believes that repeated discussions can be beneficial, as they provide opportunities for new learners to understand the topic and for experienced individuals to engage in constructive communication.