The Two Envelopes Paradox : Math And Probability
Summary
TLDRThe Two Envelope Problem explores a probability paradox involving two envelopes with unknown amounts of money, one containing twice the other. The script challenges the common misconception that one should always switch envelopes based on expected value calculations. It clarifies the paradox by distinguishing the dual meanings of 'x' in the equation, revealing that the expected value remains constant at three-quarters of the total sum, thus eliminating the incentive to switch and resolving the paradox.
Takeaways
- 💼 The Two Envelope Problem is a probability paradox involving two envelopes with unknown amounts of money.
- 🔄 One envelope contains twice the amount of money as the other, and you initially choose one envelope to keep its contents.
- 🔄 You are given an opportunity to switch to the other envelope before opening the first one.
- 🤔 The dilemma arises from whether to stick with the initial choice or switch, based on the perceived probabilities of the amounts.
- 🧮 A common initial calculation suggests that switching would yield a higher expected value, which leads to a paradox.
- 🔄 The paradox is that if you switch once, you would have the same reason to switch again, leading to an infinite loop of switching.
- 🔑 The key to resolving the paradox lies in understanding the true meaning of 'x' in the equation, which represents the unknown amount of money.
- 🔄 The flaw in the initial reasoning is the misuse of 'x' to represent two different scenarios: one where 'x' is less than the other amount, and one where 'x' is more.
- 📝 The correct equation accounts for both scenarios, where if 'a' is greater than 'b', the expected value in 'b' is 'x', and vice versa, it is 2'x'.
- 💡 The final expected value for the current envelope, considering both scenarios, is (1/2)x + 2x, which simplifies to (3/2)x.
- 🚫 There is no incentive to switch envelopes, as the expected value remains the same, thus resolving the paradox.
Q & A
What is the Two Envelope Problem?
-The Two Envelope Problem is a probability paradox where you have two envelopes, each containing an unknown amount of money, with the only information being that one envelope contains twice the amount of the other. You must decide whether to keep the envelope you picked or switch to the other one.
Why does the initial calculation suggest that one should always switch envelopes?
-The initial calculation suggests switching because it assumes that if you pick an envelope with x amount of money, the other envelope has either x/2 or 2x, with equal probability. The expected value of switching, 1.5x, is greater than x, leading to the conclusion that switching is always better.
What is the paradoxical situation that arises from the initial calculation?
-The paradox is that if you are given another chance to switch, the same reasoning applies, and you would switch again. This leads to an infinite loop of switching, which seems irrational.
What is the flaw in the initial reasoning about the Two Envelope Problem?
-The flaw is using the same symbol 'x' with two different meanings: one for the case where x is less than the other envelope's amount, and another for when x is greater. This creates confusion and leads to an incorrect conclusion.
How should the equation be modified to correctly represent the Two Envelope Problem?
-The equation should be modified to account for two scenarios: if a is greater than b, the expected value in b is x; if a is less than b, the expected value in b is 2x. This avoids the misuse of 'x' and leads to a different conclusion.
What is the correct expected value for the money in the envelope you initially picked?
-The correct expected value for the current envelope is 3x/2, which is derived from the sum of the two possible scenarios: half the time you have x and half the time you have 2x.
Why is there no incentive to switch envelopes according to the corrected reasoning?
-There is no incentive to switch because the expected value of the current envelope (3x/2) is the same as the expected value of the other envelope after switching (also 3x/2), thus eliminating the paradox.
What is the sum of the money in both envelopes according to the script?
-The sum of the money in both envelopes is 3x, which is the basis for calculating the expected value of each envelope.
How does the script demystify the Two Envelope Problem?
-The script demystifies the problem by pointing out the misuse of 'x' and providing a corrected equation that shows there is no advantage to switching envelopes, thus resolving the paradox.
What is the conclusion of the video script regarding the Two Envelope Problem?
-The conclusion is that after correcting the misuse of 'x' and recalculating the expected values, there is no incentive to switch envelopes, and the paradox is resolved.
Outlines
💰 The Two Envelope Paradox
The video introduces the Two Envelope Problem, a probability paradox where one is faced with a choice between two envelopes, each containing an unknown amount of money. The only known fact is that one envelope contains twice the amount of the other. The dilemma arises when given the option to switch envelopes after an initial choice, leading to an infinite loop of decision-making. The video explains that the common mistake in reasoning involves using the same variable 'x' to represent two different amounts, leading to a flawed conclusion. The correct approach is to consider the expected values based on whether the chosen envelope has more or less money than the other, resulting in no advantage in switching envelopes, thus resolving the paradox.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Two Envelope Problem
💡Probabilities
💡Expected Value
💡Paradox
💡Switching
💡Infinite Loop
💡Flawed Reasoning
💡Variable 'x'
💡Equation
💡Demystify
💡Subscription
Highlights
The two envelope problem is introduced as a paradox about probabilities.
Two envelopes contain unknown amounts of money, one with twice the amount of the other.
The dilemma is whether to stick with the initial choice or switch envelopes.
A common calculation suggests switching for a higher expected value.
The paradox arises when given multiple chances to switch, leading to an infinite loop.
The flaw in reasoning is identified as the misuse of the variable x with two different meanings.
The correct approach is to consider the different scenarios for x representing less or more than the other envelope.
The modified equation calculates the expected value based on the relationship between the amounts in the envelopes.
The sum of the two envelopes' amounts is represented as 3x.
The expected value for the current envelope is determined to be 3x/2.
There is no incentive to switch envelopes, resolving the paradox.
The video concludes by explaining the importance of understanding the true meaning of variables in probability problems.
The video encourages viewers to like or subscribe for more interesting topics.
The transcript provides a detailed analysis of a famous probability paradox.
The explanation demystifies the paradox by correcting a common mathematical mistake.
The video is educational, aiming to clarify misunderstandings in probability theory.
The resolution of the paradox is presented through a logical and mathematical breakdown.
The transcript emphasizes the importance of accurate variable representation in equations.
The video's conclusion offers a clear and concise resolution to the two envelope problem.
Transcripts
[Music]
the two envelope problem is a famous
paradox about probabilities
imagine you have two envelopes and each
of them has some money inside
you don't know the exact amount of money
in each envelope
the only information you have is that
the one envelope contains twice as much
money as the other
you're allowed to pick one envelope and
keep the money for yourself
before you open the envelope to check
the money you will be given another
chance to switch your envelope to
another one
the question is should you stick to your
current selection or switch to another
envelope
most people may have the following
calculation
let's assume that you randomly pick up
an envelope called a and the amount of
money in it is x
so the amount of money in another
envelope is either double or half of x
since the chance for each case is 50 to
50.
so if you choose to switch to another
envelope the expected amount you will
get is 5x 4.
since that amount is bigger than x from
the probability perspective you should
swap the envelope now we have the
paradox
if you are given another chance to swap
envelopes again you will have the same
reason to switch back
then you will swap it the third time and
so on
you will end up in an infinite loop of
swapping
what's wrong with this calculation
the key to demystify this paradox is to
understand the real meaning of x
the first x in the equation indicates
that the amount x in envelope a is less
than envelope b
however the second x in the equation
indicates that the amount x in envelope
a is greater than b
so the flaw in our reasoning is that the
same symbol x is used with two different
meanings in different situations
however they have been used together in
one equation and are assumed to have the
same value
the modified equation should be like
this
if a is larger than b the expected value
in b will be x
if a is less than b the expected value
in b will be two x
so the final result for this modified
equation will be one half x plus two x
equals three x slash two
due to the fact that the sum of two
envelopes is x plus two x equals three x
so the expected value for the current
envelope is also three x slash two
so there is no incentive to switch
envelopes and hence no paradox
thanks for watching
if you like the video please hit the
like button or subscribe button for more
interesting topics
[Music]
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
PS1 - Le problème des anniversaires
Solving Systems of Equations in Two Variables
Lab Exp07:: Prevention of Race condition using mutex in C programming in multithreaded process
Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem
The Monty Hall Problem - Explained
Time value of money | Interest and debt | Finance & Capital Markets | Khan Academy
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)