Why KEF R5 Meta Speaker Is a Must-Have for Audiophiles with a Budget

Summary

このビデオスクリプトでは、オーディオレビューアーが自ら購入したハイエンドスピーカーのレビューを行っています。スピーカーは約44,000ドルペアで、中立的な音質で自然なサウンドを提供すると評価されています。スピーカーは背壁に近い場所に置くことができ、小部屋でも使用に適しており、拡散範囲が広く、垂直および水平方向で均一なサウンドフィールドを提供します。ただし、低域の出力は限られており、サブウーファーとの組み合わせが推奨されています。スクリプトでは、スピーカーの性能、測定データ、およびKEF R5メタとオリジナルR5の比較も行われています。

Takeaways

• 🎶 このスピーカーは、地元のBest Buyで購入でき、作者自身がレビューのために購入しました。
• 💰 スピーカー1対の価格は約44,000ドルで、オーディオ性能は非常に優れています。
• 🔊 スピーカーは大きなフロアスタンドタイプではなく、スペックはオンラインで確認できますが、広角で音質が安定します。
• 👂 作者はスピーカーのハイエンド近くで聴いて、スピーカーの設計から15°以上離れた場合の音質の変化について心配しています。
• 📏 コアクシアルタイプのスピーカーは、通常、ツイーターの耳レベルに配置するように設計されていません。
• 📉 スピーカーのミッドレンジには、ls50 metaと比較してはっきりとした1dB程度の後退があります。
• 🎵 スピーカーはニュートラルで、再生された音源に忠実で、特にハイエンドはクリーントでもなく、鈍くもなく自然な感じを与えます。
• 🔍 ベースの出力能力は限られており、非常に低い周波数では表現力に欠けるかもしれません。
• 🏠 スピーカーは小間使いに適しており、後ろの壁に近い場所に置くことができますが、低音のブーミングを避けるためにはサブウーファーが推奨されます。
• 📊 スピーカーの測定データは、CLIPPLE近場スキャナーを使用して取得され、平均感度は886dBで、周波数帯によって2.5dB程度のトレランスがあります。
• 🔄 R5 metaと比較して、元のR5モデルと比べて、ハイエンドの表現が少し控えめになり、より滑らかなインルーム応答が得られるようになっています。

Q & A

このスピーカーはどこで購入できますか？

このスピーカーはBest Buyで購入できます。

スピーカーの価格はどのくらいですか？

スピーカーの価格は約44,000ドルペアです。

スピーカーのスペックはどうですか？

スピーカーのスペックはオンラインで確認できますが、中距離から聞くと非常に良い音質を発揮することが示されています。

スピーカーのツイターの配置について教えてください。

スピーカーのツイターは、通常のリファレンス軸線から15°以上離れた場合、クロスオーバー領域でダイップが生じる可能性があります。

コーアクシアルスピーカーの特徴は何ですか？

コーアクシアルスピーカーは、ツイターとミドルレンジドライバーが一体化しており、通常は耳のレベルに配置するように設計されていません。

スピーカーの音質について教えてください。

スピーカーはニュートラルで、音源に忠実に再生される性質を持っています。ハイエンドはクリーンで、ブライトでもないし、ダウルでもないです。

スピーカーのミドルレンジについてどう思いますか？

スピーカーのミドルレンジには、若干の後退があると感じるかもしれませんが、これは極端ではありません。

スピーカーのベースの性能はどのようですか？

ベースの拡張は限られており、20Hzから50Hzまでの範囲が妥当な期待です。また、スピーカーはクローズドまたはポートを開放して使用することができます。

スピーカーの配置についてアドバイスを教えてください。

スピーカーは後壁から約2フィート（60cm）の距離に配置することが推奨され、壁に近づけすぎるとミドルレンジが損なわれる可能性があります。

スピーカーのカラーオプションは何がありますか？

スピーカーはブラックグロス、ホワイト、ウォルナットの3つのカラーオプションが用意されています。

スピーカーの測定データは何を示していますか？

スピーカーの測定データは、平均的な感度、歪み、および低周波応答を示しており、スピーカーの性能を客観的に評価することができます。

スピーカーのトレンドリングはどのようですか？

スピーカーのトレンドリングは、水平および垂直の角度で約40〜50°の範囲で一定の音質を維持することが示されています。

スピーカーの設計にはどのような特徴がありますか？

スピーカーは3ウェイ設計で、1インチドームツイター、Kのマット吸収技術、5インチミドルレンジコーアクシアルタイプ設計を特徴としています。

R5メタとR5オリジナルの比較はどのような結果が出ましたか？

R5メタは、100Hzから300Hzの範囲でより多くのミドルベースアウトプットがあり、ハイフレンジのオンアクス応答が若干低めになっていることが示されています。

スピーカーのレビューはどのように評価していますか？

スピーカーは非常に良いものであり、KEFの製品には重要なエンジニアリングが含まれています。ただし、非常に低い周波数を再生する場合はサブウーファーの使用を推奨します。

チャンネルをサポートする方法はありますか？

チャンネルをサポートするために、アフィリエイトリンクを使用するか、Patreon.comでサポートすることができます。

Outlines

00:00

🎶 ハイエンドスピーカーのレビューと割引販売の提案

この段落では、Best Buyから購入したハイエンドスピーカーについてレビューを行い、その素晴らしい音質を称賛しています。スピーカーは44,000ドルペアで、中立的な音で非常に自然な再生を実現していると評価されています。ただし、中域の若干の後退と、低域の拡張性の限界が指摘されています。また、スピーカーの設置についても、特にコーアクシアルタイプのスピーカーはツイーターの耳レベルに位置づけることが望ましいとされていない点に触れています。

05:01

🏠 小型ルーム向けのスピーカー特性と設置アドバイス

第2段落では、スピーカーのベースシェルフ基地応答について解説し、これは密封されたwooferのようにロールオフするが、ポートのチューニングが若干低いことを意味しています。これにより、スピーカーを壁に近く設置できるようになり、通常のスピーカーよりも低音の広がりが良くなります。しかし、スピーカーを部屋の奥行き3メートル以上に設置する予定がない場合は、この特性が活かされないと注意喚起しています。また、スピーカーの水平および垂直放射パターンについても詳細に説明しています。

10:03

📊 オブジェクティブなデータ解析とスピーカー性能の評価

第3段落では、スピーカーの測定データを分析し、平均感度、ハイフレQUENCYのトレンド、およびディレクティビティの特性について考察しています。スピーカーは、非常に良いディレクティビティを持ち、高域の平坦な放射パターンを示しており、これは部屋内でスピーカーの音が均等に分布するため望ましい特性です。また、スピーカーのカラーバリエーションや、クリップル近場スキャナーを使用した測定方法についても触れています。

15:05

🔍 R5メタとオリジナルR5の比較、レビューの総括

最後の段落では、R5メタとオリジナルR5を比較し、メタバージョンの改良点とその影響について解説しています。特に、メタバージョンでは高域の响应が若干低減され、より滑らかで自然な音の再生を実現している点に注目されています。また、スピーカーのトリムリングの調整の重要性についても触れ、レビューの総括として、Kefの製品に対する高評価と、スピーカーの低域の出力能力に対する注意喚起を示しています。

Keywords

💡Best Buy

Best Buyはアメリカの大手エレクトロニクス小売店です。ビデオでは、スピーカーを購入した場所として言及され、オーソドックスな小売店でのハイエンドオーディオ製品の入手について触れています。

💡スピーカー

スピーカーとは音を再生するデバイスで、ビデオではメインのテーマとして取り上げられています。スピーカーのレビューや性能、価格、およびオーディオの質についての議論が中心となっています。

💡ディスカウント

ディスカウントとは商品やサービスの通常価格から割り引きを適用することを指します。ビデオでは、スピーカーを割引価格で販売する機会を提供していることが示されており、視聴者がスピーカーを割引で購入できるかどうかをコメント欄で知ることができると述べています。

💡レビュー

レビューとは製品やサービスを実際に使用した後、その感想や評価を述べたものです。ビデオでは、スピーカーのレビューを行い、その音質、性能、および使用感について詳細に触れています。

💡ニュートラル

オーディオコンテキストで「ニュートラル」とは、音がソースから歪みがなく、自然な状態で再生されることを指します。ビデオでは、スピーカーがニュートラルな音を再生するように設計されていると述べられており、これはスピーカーの音質に関する重要なポイントです。

💡ミッドレンジ

ミッドレンジとは音域の中で中間的な周波数帯を指し、人間の声などが含まれます。ビデオでは、スピーカーのミッドレンジにおいて微妙な後退があると述べており、これは音の再生において若干の影響を与える可能性があるとしています。

💡ベース

ベースとは音楽や音声において低い周波数の部分を指します。ビデオでは、スピーカーのベース出力を評価しており、特にスピーカーが低音域でどの程度低く再生できるかについて議論されています。

💡ディレクトIVITY

ディレクトIVITYはスピーカーの音がどの程度広範囲に分布するかを示す指標です。ビデオでは、スピーカーのディレクトIVITYが非常に良いと評価されており、これはスピーカーの音が部屋内で均一に分布することを意味しています。

💡コーアクシアル

コーアクシアルとは、スピーカーのツイーターとミッドレンジドライバーが同じ軸に位置するという設計を指します。ビデオでは、コーアクシアルスピーカーの利点と、その設計がスピーカーの音質にどのように影響を与えるかについて説明されています。

💡アンプ

アンプとは、音源から出力される信号を強め、スピーカーで音を再生するためのデバイスです。ビデオでは、アンプがスピーカーの性能にどのように影響を与えるかについて触れており、特にスピーカーのベース応答について議論されています。

Highlights

Best Buy carries KEF speakers, which the reviewer purchased for personal evaluation.

The speaker costs around $44,000 per pair, offering impressive performance for the price.

The speakers are not large floor-standing models but still provide high-quality sound.

Concerns about speaker positioning and the effect on sound quality due to the tweeter's reference line.

Coaxial speakers like the reviewed model have a less problematic crossover region.

The speaker has a good range of about 40 to 50° for consistent sound quality regardless of listener position.

Coaxial speakers are generally not designed to be positioned at ear level with the tweeter.

The speakers provide a neutral sound, true to the source material without skewing frequencies.

A mild mid-range recess is noted, which may affect perceived dynamic range.

The speaker's bass output capability is limited, suggesting the need for a subwoofer for lower frequencies.

The speaker's design allows for closer placement to walls without causing excessive boominess or muddiness.

The speaker's radiation pattern is wider horizontally than vertically, contributing to a larger soundstage.

The speaker's three-way design includes a 1-inch dome tweeter and KEF's proprietary technology.

The average sensitivity of the speaker is 88.6 dB, with good tolerance levels.

The speaker's high-frequency response is tailored to be smoother in-room due to its constant directivity.

A mild mid-range dip is noted, which the reviewer found to be subjectively laidback.

The speaker's extended bass shelf is beneficial for placement near walls without losing bass impact.

Distortion levels are within acceptable ranges even without a subwoofer.

A potential issue with the speaker's trim ring needing adjustment after shipping is highlighted.

Comparison between the R5 meta and the original R5 shows improvements in mid-range and high-frequency responses.

The reviewer is impressed with KEF's engineering and the overall quality of the speakers.

The need for a subwoofer is reiterated for achieving low and loud bass output.

The reviewer offers to sell the reviewed speakers to recoup funds for future evaluations.

Transcripts

I don't know if you all know this but

Best Buy carries ke how do I know

because I actually bought these speakers

from my local Best Buy and if you're

interested in buying them from me at a

discounted

rate please let me know in the comment

section below so I bought these speakers

myself to review because I can't get

anybody to send them to me I'm not

buying any more speakers myself at least

not for months until I can recoup some

of my funds uh with that said these cost

about $44,000 per pair and

they're pretty awesome so like they're

not huge floor standing speakers I could

give you the specs but you can read them

online yourself I do suggest that maybe

you check them out and one of the things

that concerned me is when I first sat

down to listen to them my ears were

probably about this High about this high

this High about head height over the

mid-range in my

chair at the distance I was I was within

about maybe 15 15° above that Tweeter

line now

most speakers most if you're like 15

degrees above or below the the main

reference axis line you're probably

going to be maybe a little bit too high

and it may sound not quite as good

because what happens is when you are

above or below that Tweeter reference

line or wherever the reference line is

like where the speaker is designed to be

listened to from above or below

um there is usually going to be a dip in

the crossover region just because that's

how

speakers standard two or three-way

speakers are designed there's usually a

little bit of a dip in that crossover

region three-way speakers less

problematic but with a coaxial speaker

like this speaker it's much much less

problematic this speaker has a good

range of about 40 to 50° where you could

literally stand up and walk around in

your room and hear kind of the same

tamber the same

tonality as you would if you were

sitting down directly with your eyes

pointed at that Tweeter line and that's

one thing about coaxial speakers if you

watched my reviews you know by now that

coaxial speakers genuinely genuinely

generally aren't designed for you to be

positioned right at ear level with the

Tweeter if you ask most coaxial driver

manufacturers they'll tell you the same

thing I just told you so with that out

of the way how did they sound well they

sounded good they sound like a neutral

speaker when I say neutral what I mean

is true to the source you know so

whatever's playing on the speakers

either Music Television or

movie sounds natural it doesn't sound

like it's skewed so there's not a lot of

high frequency content it's not cilent

it's not sharp it's not Dull and the

only thing in terms of subjective sounds

that I heard with this particular

speaker is there is a mild recess in the

mid-range area that can sound a little

bit maybe not quite as dynamic or crisp

if you want to go for words like that

it's not to the extent that the ls50

meta has because that one has a scoop of

about 3 decibel or so through that

region whereas this one's probably

closer to about 1 D and

frankly if

I if I weren't really attuned to

listening to that kind of thing I

probably wouldn't even notice it with

movies and things like that I don't

think you're even going to pick up on it

with certain songs if you're very used

to hearing the attack then you might

notice it but overall I don't think it's

a big enough deal to really complain

about so I'm not complaining in fact

it's really the only thing that I can

talk about short of the Bas now the base

output capability of the speaker as far

as extension goes it doesn't really get

that low it's got two 5 and a qu inch

midwoofers above one above one below the

concentric

driver those 5 and a/4 inch midwoofers

I'm not expecting a lot of them I mean I

I've I'm 200 plus speakers in at this

point I kind of have an idea of what to

expect and there wasn't a whole lot of

low-end extension it got low enough to

mate properly with a subwoofer and

that's really probably what most people

are going to expect in other words they

don't go full range you're not going to

get 20 HZ you're not really going to get

30 HZ or 40 HZ 50 HZ is probably

reasonable to expect but on the flip

side part of the reason that they don't

get low is also part of the reason why

they will work better in smaller rooms

if you need a speaker that you can place

closer to a wall like the kef R3 and the

R3 meta and even the R5 non-meta that I

reviewed a couple years ago go these

speakers have what is called an extended

base shelf base response and what that

basically means is it rolls off kind of

like a sealed woofer but the port tuning

is a little bit lower than maybe other

speakers might have their port tuning

and what that does then is it just

extends the base a little bit further so

as it's rolling off then there's a

little bit of a kick up and you're going

to see this in the data that I'm showing

you in a minute but I'm just kind of

describing to you what that effect does

that allows you to put the speaker a

little bit closer to a wall

than you would be able to if it were

rolled off like a

typical speaker and in that way it

really just works to reduce the

boominess and the muddiness that you

might otherwise get if you placed it

close to a wall I would not recommend

the speaker if you're looking for a

speaker where you want to place it out

into the room 3et or more I just don't

think that you're really going to get

the the benefit of that but I also would

not recommend that you put it any closer

than about

2T from the rear wall behind it and when

I say 2 ft I mean from the back of the

speaker to the wall behind it I mean you

could go closer if you want to

especially if you have Equalization

where you can kind of reduce some Peaks

and dips but I think that if you go any

closer then you might start getting into

the point where you start mucking up the

mid-range because then there's also

boundary effects from the wall behind

the speaker that gets into the lower

mid-range and that's an area that really

try to keep as pristine as I can within

reason but yes the speaker does go well

for a smaller room when you can place it

near a wall but you're still going to

need a subwoofer the overall sound again

what I would consider neutral the

horizontal radiation pattern and the

vertical radiation pattern so I already

mentioned the vertical and what I mean

by that is the ability to stand up walk

around the room sit down whatever as

long as you're within about 40 to 50°

vertically of that Tweeter axis then

you're going to hear basically the same

sound

horizontally it's a little bit wider

it's closer to about 50° now my personal

Sweet Spot tends to be around 60° so

it's a little bit shy of my personal

preference but it's not so narrow that I

don't like it a speaker that has a more

narrow response

or radiation pattern uh is going to have

less reflection into the room so maybe

if you have a smaller room or

you have these speakers placed close to

the sidewalls or the room is very Lively

a narrow radiation pattern is going to

probably be more

advantageous a speaker that has a wider

radiation pattern generally would just

sound like it has a larger Sound Stage

and I kind of like that effect now the

stereo is an effect in and of itself I

fully understand that but I'm kind of

giving you an idea of where I'm coming

from the fact that its radiation pattern

isn't quite as

wide can work out to your advantage for

a smaller room on the flip

side it's not just the width or the

narrowness of a radiation pattern but

it's

continuity when the speaker sends out

room and when the speaker sends out

sound into the room you want those

sounds to be evenly dispersed you want

the mid-range to be as wide as the high

frequency because if you don't then the

sound Sound Stage can kind of collapse

and expand depending on what frequency

what instrument what vocal what sound

you're hearing so for example if you

have a vocalist and they're in the

mid-range between 2 to 400 htz and

they're 50° wide horizontally but then

the speaker collapses in the crossover

region because the radiation between the

Tweeter and the mid-range by the

designer was not well done in terms of

crossover that sound at a higher

frequency at 2 to 4 khz maybe like a

saxophone or something like that may

sound narrow it may sound a little bit

more inward of a vocal that's on the

bleeding edge of the Sound Stage so when

I talk about radiation I'm talking about

two things number one is how wide or

narrow is it number two is

how how much continuity there is between

that radiation and I'm going to show you

that in the data as well now this is a

three-way design it features a 1-in dome

Tweeter and K's matte absorber techn

techology inside of a 5 in midrange

coaxial type design and it does feature

two 5 and 1/4 in it is a ported design

it does come with little bungs that you

can plug up the ports if you want to so

you can make it sealed speaker comes in

three different colors that I'm aware of

at least black gloss white and then a

walnut color let's talk about the data

all the data that you're about to see is

captured using my clipple nearfield

scanner it is a state-of-the-art robotic

device that allows me to get anaco data

in a nonanoic room average sensitivity

of the speaker is 886 DB and we can see

that the tolerance is about 2 and 1/2 to

2 DB kind of depending on what frequency

range you're talking about overall it

looks pretty good now you may notice

this see how the mid-range is a little

bit above my average here and then above

about 1K this is where the average is at

86 DB and then above 7K The High

Frequency is tapered off a little bit

that's an interesting thing to note and

particular let me explain why with

speakers that have good directivity

which is they keep their dispersion

angle even regardless of how wide or

narrow it is it's even this is the thing

I was talking about earlier when they do

that typically what you'll find is if

the speaker is flat on Axis or

reasonably flat on axis then the high

frequency in the room is probably going

to be a little bit

too too flat maybe itself and it may

sound a little bit bright by a deciel or

two DB I've run into this with many

different speakers so while flat on axis

may look great sometimes flat on axis

isn't necessarily what you need when you

have really good directivity so these

are always tradeoffs in this particular

case what I believe is that the on-axis

response flatness in the high frequency

has

been compromised intentionally to be

somewhat tailored downward and that's

because this speaker has basically

constant directivity in the high

frequency so let me show you what I'm

talking about when I say constant

directivity this region right here where

this line is flat that means the sound

power or the sound radiation is pretty

much the same no matter the radiation

WID let me show you a better example of

what I mean here this is the graphic for

sound radiation

for those of you who don't know I'm

going to try to give you a real crash

course I've got a whole series of

understanding the measurements I I

encourage you to watch that but

basically goes back to what I was saying

earlier about the radiation you want it

to be constant most of the time again

there are exceptions but when it's

constant like this where this dark red

line these lighter shades of red are

pretty pretty much

linear that can

create higher frequency boosting for a

lack of better words in the room so

those Reflections pretty much had the

same power as the on-axis response and

those Reflections are adding up to the

on-axis sound so because of this

flatness in the horizontal and the

vertical

radiation the on-axis response is I

believe tailored down a little bit in

the high frequency which yields a nice

smooth estimated in room response like

you see right here the alternative would

be a response that has a downward

sloping response and then flattens out

in the high frequency and when it

flattens out in the high frequency in

the room that's going to sound a little

bit bright so what ke has done is

they've dropped that higher frequency on

axis and that winds up with you getting

a smooth downward sloping in room

response and I'm basically just calling

that out here e is smooth despite

decreasing on axis high frequency thanks

to the flat

di I noted a mild mid-range scoop that

sounds slightly laidback and this is a

line that's kind of based on what I

heard subjectively in the room so I'm

kind of mixing subjective feedback with

objective data you might hear something

different but this is what I heard in

the room and I'm kind of giving you an

idea of why I heard what I heard now on

the low end I noted the extended base

shelf so I'll get it back to this now

this is helpful for placement near a

wall and it may lack punch when pulled

too far from a wall now normally most

speakers what will happen is it'll

extend on up and then it'll roll off

kind of following this curve right here

if you can see my

mouse what happens when you put a

speaker like that that's close to a wall

then it'll wind up giving you bloomy

potentially muddy base this speaker with

its natural kind of rollof and then a

little bit of a scoop right here on the

low end that serves to allow you to put

the speaker a little bit closer to a

wall and to give you an example this is

what I'm talking about I said about 2 ft

from the wall 24 in or roughly 60 cm

from the back of the speaker to the wall

behind it this guy kind of reminds me of

Stanley Tucci by the way here we are at

the horizontal Contour plot again I'm

not going to say much about it other

than it's about plus or minus 50° based

on this -6db point this lighter red

right through here vertically you can go

about 40 to 50° above or below that

Tweeter axis same thing I mentioned

earlier Distortion to 86 DB looks good

96 DB still looks pretty good multi-one

Distortion from 70 DB to 96 DB looks

good and this is without a subwoofer but

if you cross this speaker over at 80 HZ

and above what happens you get something

like this Distortion still looks good

the compression of this speaker looks

pretty good until you get to this purple

line which represents about 26 DB of

dynamic range from 76 DB to 102 DB at 1

meter and on the lower end we can see

that there is a an odd kind of response

going on here a few years ago when I got

the kef R3

non-meta

there was an issue with their little

Shadow trim flare ring and that actually

had a

result or an impact on the sound and the

measurements of that speaker now with

the R3 meta when I received the speaker

the shadow trim ring was flush in with

the baffle no problem with these

speakers when I took them out of the box

one of them had the trim ring knocked

out about 1 mm and I say knocked out it

was forward of the baffle about 1 mm

which is what you're seeing here in this

left side picture so I measured the

speaker that way first and then I pushed

the trim ring in I flushed it up with

the baffle as good as I could and then I

remeasured it this is the result of

those two measurements so the trim ring

protruding about 1 mm out from the

baffle is in red and the triming sitting

flush with the baffle is in Black you

can see the on-axis response results

about 1 to 1 and 1/2 DB between 1 to 2

khz right through this region off axis

there would be more noticeable results

but I didn't see the point in showing

you all that the main thing I'm trying

to show you is if you have these

speakers or any other ke speakers when

you get them due to vibration and

shipment it's possible that the trim

ring around that concentric driver is

going to protrude a little bit it's

going to maybe have worked its way out

make sure that you take the time and

push that triming back in now it's

possible you might not hear the

difference but I think that I would

rather be safe and sorry so I'm giving

you that heads up now it is a measurable

difference it's very theoretical that

you could hear that difference in sound

and I'm willing to bet if you had a way

to AB it you would on its own you may

not but better safe than sorry I'm going

to do a quick comparison between the R5

meta and the R5 original what we have

here is the Ona response and by the way

I've done some cycle acoustic smoothing

via Rew just to make this a little bit

more legible because when you have the

graphs and you got the individual little

spikes sometimes it's hard to read

through it so psycho acoustic smoothing

is set into place here on AIS response

blue is the R5 meta black is the R5 so

you can see the R5 didn't quite have as

much lower mid-range upper

mid-base output on the 100 to 300 HZ

region so that was going to sound maybe

like the vocals could be a little bit

thin I didn't have any of that issue

with these R5 meta speakers these do

have a little bit of a dip in this 2 to

3 1: 3 khz region you might notice that

I kind of picked up on it a little bit

but the main thing is the high frequency

on axis is a little bit tailored off now

in the room what that results in is is a

more smooth in room response like I

showed you earlier compared to the R5

non-meta which was a little bit bright

in room so I think that ke made the

right decision by having that little bit

of a table or tailored down high

frequency response above 7 khz because

they're combining that with a very

uniform directivity speaker and what you

wind up with in the room is a more

neutral sound overall as opposed to the

R5 sounding just a tad bright at the end

of the day I I think these speakers are

really quite good they look really nice

there's some significant Engineering in

all of K's products and I'm just

continually impressed by what they put

out the output capability on the low end

is going to be a little bit limited

because they are 5 and a/4 inch mid-base

drivers they're not even 6 and 1/2 much

less eight so make sure you're using a

subwoofer with these if you plan to get

really low or really loud and that wraps

up this review if you would like to

support my channel I would certainly

appreciate it you can do so by using my

affiliate links I'll have some in the

comment section or the description

section below for this video just click

that link buy whatever you want if you

want to buy these speakers or something

else I don't care doesn't matter to me I

would just be very appreciative if you

took the time to use that link it does

earn me a small commission but it

doesn't change the data that you've just

seen alternatively you can follow me on

patreon.com and support me that way and

I would very much appreciate that as

well if you're interested in buying

these speakers please let me know cuz I

got to sell them and generate some uh

some more income get my money back for

them with all that said I will talk to

youall later take care peace