Reprehensible Characters and Emotional Engagement in NBC’s Hannibal | Video Essay

Beth.
13 Jun 201717:46

Summary

TLDRThe video script delves into the complexities of audience emotional engagement with morally ambiguous characters, using NBC's 'Hannibal' as a case study. It explores cognitive film theory to understand our attraction to characters like Hannibal Lecter, despite his heinous acts. The analysis examines narrative and aesthetic strategies that create a conflicting response, suggesting that our emotional reactions are a blend of moral evaluation, familiarity, and meta-emotions, influenced by the show's long-form narrative and visual style.

Takeaways

  • 🎬 Emotional Engagement: The script discusses the deep emotional connections audiences form with fictional characters on screen, which is central to the appeal of film and television narratives.
  • 🧠 Cognitive Film Theory: It introduces cognitive film theory as an interdisciplinary approach combining neuroscience, film studies, and philosophy to understand the complex nature of the audience's emotional response to characters.
  • 🤔 Moral Complexity: The analysis delves into the audience's ability to emotionally engage with morally reprehensible characters, questioning how viewers can empathize with characters that go against their own beliefs and values.
  • 📺 Hannibal Case Study: The script uses NBC's series 'Hannibal' as a case study to explore the audience's complex emotional engagement with a character that is both charming and horrifically evil.
  • 🎨 Aesthetic and Narrative Techniques: It highlights how the showrunners of 'Hannibal' use aesthetic and narrative features to create a conflicting response in viewers, drawing them into a sense of collusion with the character.
  • 👁️ Perspective of Will Graham: The script emphasizes the importance of Will Graham's point of view in shaping the audience's perception of Hannibal, creating a tension between attraction and repulsion.
  • 🎭 Intertextual Knowledge: It discusses how viewers' prior knowledge of Hannibal Lector from other media influences their engagement with the character in the TV series.
  • 🖼️ Visual Style: The series' unique visual style, which combines elements of horror with beauty, is identified as a key factor in eliciting meta-emotions and a dual response of repulsion and fascination.
  • 📚 Moral Evaluation and Allegiance: The script touches on cognitive film theorist Mari Smith's concept of moral evaluation and allegiance, suggesting that viewers may form partial or perverse allegiances with characters based on their actions and traits.
  • 💭 Meta-Emotions: It introduces the concept of meta-emotions, where viewers have emotions about their emotions, allowing for a more complex understanding of their response to characters.
  • 🔍 Reflection and Evaluation: The analysis encourages reflection on the nature of emotional engagement with characters, suggesting that viewers weigh the art and morality presented in the narrative.

Q & A

  • What is the central theme of the analysis on emotional engagement with characters in film and TV narratives?

    -The central theme is exploring the complex emotional engagement with morally reprehensible characters, particularly focusing on the character of Hannibal Lecter from NBC's 2013 series 'Hannibal'.

  • How does cognitive film theory contribute to understanding the emotional connection between audiences and characters?

    -Cognitive film theory is an interdisciplinary approach that draws on neuroscience, film studies, and art philosophy to grapple with the nature of the connection between audiences and characters, revealing that our emotional responses are more complex than initially realized.

  • What is the significance of the character Hannibal Lecter in the context of the analysis?

    -Hannibal Lecter is a provocative case for examining audience-character engagement due to his morally reprehensible actions, yet the series 'Hannibal' depicts him as charismatic and seductive, inviting viewers to grapple with conflicting feelings.

  • How does the long-form narrative structure of a TV series like 'Hannibal' impact the audience's emotional engagement?

    -The long-form narrative structure allows for a slow luring of the audience into a sense of collusion with Hannibal, drawing them deeper into his world and creating a high degree of familiarity and partiality.

  • What role does the character Will Graham play in the series 'Hannibal' in terms of audience engagement?

    -Will Graham's point of view is used to express the competing aversion and attraction to Hannibal, mirroring the audience's own struggle with their fascination and repulsion towards the character.

  • How does the series 'Hannibal' use aesthetics and narrative features to create tension in the audience's emotional response?

    -The series uses striking visuals that are both poetic and grotesque, and narrative features that juxtapose Hannibal's charming and civilized persona with his evil nature, creating a tension between awe and horror.

  • What is the concept of 'allegiance' in the context of cognitive film theory as discussed in the script?

    -Allegiance in cognitive film theory refers to the process of assessing a character's attitudes, traits, and actions, resulting in a more or less sympathetic or antipathetic response towards the character.

  • How does the concept of 'perverse allegiance' differ from typical allegiance in cognitive film theory?

    -Perverse allegiance is a form of allegiance where viewers align themselves with an immoral character not in spite of, but because of their odious traits, often driven by fascination and curiosity.

  • What is the role of 'meta emotions' in understanding the audience's response to transgressive characters like Hannibal?

    -Meta emotions, or emotions about emotions, help explain the conflicting response to certain characters. They involve a higher level of cognitive complexity, allowing viewers to evaluate their primary emotions in response to the character's actions.

  • How does the series 'Hannibal' manipulate the audience's emotional engagement through its visual style and narrative pacing?

    -The series expertly balances the nature and intensity of the audience's engagement by staging discussions about the toll of looking at death and darkness, and by using the visual style to provoke a higher level evaluation of the horrors presented.

Outlines

00:00

🎭 Emotional Engagement with Fictional Characters

This paragraph discusses the natural human tendency to form emotional connections with fictional characters on screen. It introduces cognitive film theory as an interdisciplinary approach to understanding these connections, which are more complex than initially thought. The analysis focuses on the audience's engagement with morally reprehensible characters, using NBC's 'Hannibal' and its titular character as a case study. The character of Dr. Hannibal Lecter is examined for his ability to draw viewers despite his abhorrent actions, suggesting a conflict within the audience's emotional response.

05:01

🔍 The Complexity of Viewer Engagement with 'Hannibal'

The second paragraph delves into the narrative techniques used in 'Hannibal' to create a sense of collusion with the audience. It discusses the use of aesthetic and narrative features to engage viewers emotionally, despite the main character's monstrous actions. The series is distinguished by its long-form narrative structure, which allows for a slow build-up of engagement with Hannibal. The character is portrayed as charming and charismatic, contrasting with the audience's intertextual knowledge of his true nature. The use of Will Graham's perspective further complicates the viewer's emotional response, as it invites both attraction and aversion towards Hannibal.

10:02

🤔 Affective Processes and Emotional Response to 'Hannibal'

This paragraph explores the affective processes that shape the viewer's emotional response to 'Hannibal'. It introduces the concepts of moral evaluation and allegiance, where viewers may form partial or perverse allegiances with characters based on their actions and attitudes. The series challenges traditional notions of allegiance due to the absence of moral traits in Hannibal. Additionally, it discusses meta-emotions, or emotions about emotions, which can help explain the conflicting feelings viewers have towards the character. The long-form narrative structure and the use of Will's perspective are highlighted as key factors influencing the viewer's emotional engagement.

15:03

🎨 Aesthetic and Narrative Features Influencing Emotional Engagement

The final paragraph examines how the aesthetic and narrative features of 'Hannibal' influence the viewer's emotional engagement. It discusses the role of familiarity and partiality in reducing moral evaluations and the series' ability to provoke meta-emotions. The long-form narrative structure and the use of Will's perspective are shown to elicit partiality and interest, rather than moral approval or disapproval. The series' striking visuals and the juxtaposition of horror and beauty serve to both repulse and fascinate viewers, reflecting the complex nature of emotional engagement with morally ambiguous characters.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Emotional Engagement

Emotional engagement refers to the deep connection and response that audiences develop with fictional characters in film and television. In the video, it is central to understanding how viewers can become invested in characters, even those with morally reprehensible traits. The script discusses how cognitive film theory explores this engagement, highlighting the complexity of our emotional responses to characters like Hannibal Lecter.

💡Cognitive Film Theory

Cognitive film theory is an interdisciplinary approach that combines elements of neuroscience, film studies, and art philosophy to understand the nature of the connection between audiences and characters. The video uses this theory to dissect how viewers emotionally engage with characters, particularly those who are morally complex, like Hannibal Lecter, and how this engagement can be influenced by narrative and aesthetic features.

💡Narrative Structure

Narrative structure refers to the arrangement of events and the way they unfold in a story. The script mentions that the long-form narrative structure of the TV series 'Hannibal' allows for a slow build-up of the audience's relationship with the character, drawing them into a sense of collusion with Hannibal. This structure is crucial in understanding how viewers can become emotionally engaged over an extended period.

💡Aesthetic Features

Aesthetic features encompass the visual and auditory elements of a film or TV show that contribute to its artistic appeal. In the context of the video, the aesthetic features of 'Hannibal' are used to create a sense of allure and fascination, even in the face of horrific acts, thus complicating the audience's emotional response to the character and his actions.

💡Character Engagement

Character engagement is the process by which viewers form emotional connections with characters in a narrative. The video discusses how this engagement is manipulated in 'Hannibal' through the use of other characters' perspectives, particularly Will Graham's, to create a complex emotional response that oscillates between attraction and repulsion.

💡Moral Evaluation

Moral evaluation is the process of assessing a character's actions and attitudes based on moral standards. The script explores how viewers might form partial allegiances with immoral characters, such as Hannibal, despite their actions. This concept is key to understanding the conflicted emotional engagement viewers might have with characters who are both charming and monstrous.

💡Allegiance

Allegiance, in the context of the video, refers to the emotional bond or loyalty that viewers form with characters. The script discusses how this allegiance can be partial, based on certain traits or actions, or perverse, where viewers are drawn to characters because of their immoral traits. This concept is used to explain the complex emotional responses to characters like Hannibal.

💡Meta-Emotions

Meta-emotions are emotions about emotions, a higher level of cognitive processing where viewers reflect on and evaluate their emotional responses. The video uses this concept to explain how viewers might experience conflicting feelings towards characters, such as feeling repulsed by Hannibal's actions while also being fascinated by the narrative and aesthetic presentation.

💡Intertextual Knowledge

Intertextual knowledge refers to the understanding viewers bring from other texts or media, such as previous films or books about a character. The script mentions how this knowledge can influence viewers' perceptions of characters like Hannibal, creating a sense of complicity and tension between the character's presented persona and their known monstrous nature.

💡Partiality

Partiality in the video refers to the favoritism or bias that viewers might develop towards characters, often influenced by the narrative structure and aesthetic features of a show. The script discusses how this partiality can override moral evaluations, allowing viewers to become emotionally engaged with characters despite their immoral actions.

💡Transgressive Characters

Transgressive characters are those who violate societal norms or moral codes. The video focuses on how viewers can emotionally engage with such characters, like Hannibal Lecter, despite their transgressive actions. This engagement is explored through the lens of cognitive film theory, examining the complex interplay of emotions and evaluations.

Highlights

Film and TV narratives evoke emotional connections with fictional characters, which is an intuitive response.

Cognitive film theory emerges as an interdisciplinary approach to understand the audience's emotional engagement with characters.

Emotional responses to characters are more complex than initially thought, involving cognitive processes and ideological beliefs.

The analysis explores how audiences can emotionally engage with morally reprehensible characters, such as Hannibal Lecter.

Hannibal, a 2013 NBC series, presents a provocative case for examining audience engagement with a morally complex character.

The series depicts Hannibal as both charismatic and malevolent, inviting a conflicting audience response.

Cognitive film theory is used to explore the conflicting emotional response to Hannibal's character.

Aesthetic and narrative features of the show contribute to the audience's complex emotional engagement.

The long-form narrative structure of the TV series allows for a slow build-up of audience engagement with Hannibal.

Hannibal's character is portrayed through the perspectives of other characters, showcasing his charm and humanity.

Viewers' intertextual knowledge and narrative omniscience create tension between Hannibal's monster and man personas.

The use of Will Graham's point of view positions the audience to experience the competing aversion and attraction to Hannibal.

The series' visual style evokes both revulsion and fascination, reflecting the audience's conflicting feelings towards Hannibal.

Affective processes, including moral evaluation and self-reflective emotional evaluation, shape the audience's response to characters.

Moral evaluation and allegiance to characters are influenced by their moral traits and actions.

The concept of 'perverse allegiance' is introduced, where viewers align with immoral characters due to their negative traits.

Meta-emotions, or emotions about emotions, help to understand the audience's conflicting response to transgressive characters.

Familiarity and partiality towards characters can increase over time due to the long-form narrative structure of TV series.

The series uses aesthetic and narrative features to provoke and manage meta-emotions, influencing the audience's engagement.

The analysis illustrates the complex, multi-layered nature of emotional engagement with screen characters.

The need for further discussion on the merits of different affective processes in relation to emotional engagement is highlighted.

Transcripts

play00:00

film and TV narratives invite us to make

play00:02

emotional connections with fictional

play00:04

onscreen characters we are so

play00:06

predisposed to this that it is almost an

play00:08

intuitive response to say we identify

play00:11

with characters we find them relatable

play00:13

we see ourselves reflected in them their

play00:18

Joy their

play00:23

sadness Their

play00:28

Fear emotional response to characters is

play00:31

at the heart of film and television and

play00:33

contributes to much of what we find so

play00:34

appealing about screen narratives recent

play00:37

approaches to film and TV Studies have

play00:38

taken to exploring this emotional

play00:40

engagement more deeply in particular

play00:43

cognitive film theory has emerged as an

play00:45

interdisciplinary approach drawing on

play00:47

branches of Neuroscience film studies

play00:49

and art philosophy to Grapple with the

play00:51

nature of this connection between

play00:53

audiences and

play00:54

characters in doing so it is apparent

play00:57

that our emotional responses are

play00:58

considerably more complex than than we

play01:00

perhaps first

play01:01

realized moving beyond the more

play01:03

colloquial phenomena of identifying

play01:05

liking and relating to characters we

play01:07

come to deeper questions about emotional

play01:09

cognition and the relationship between

play01:11

character engagement and our beliefs

play01:13

values and

play01:15

ideologies these complexities are

play01:17

especially revealed when the creators of

play01:18

screen narratives invite us to engage

play01:20

with characters that operate on a set of

play01:22

beliefs vastly different to our own for

play01:25

instance can we say that we identify

play01:26

with fictional serial killers drug

play01:28

dealers and s can we hold positive

play01:31

attitudes toward them even when at the

play01:34

same time we know we would LOE them in

play01:35

real life in short how can we understand

play01:39

our emotional engagement with morally

play01:41

reprehensible characters this analysis

play01:43

aims to explore this question with a

play01:45

focus on one of the most morally

play01:47

reprehensible characters in narrative

play01:48

fiction and the title character in NBC's

play01:51

2013 series

play01:58

Hannibal

play02:00

[Music]

play02:03

played by Danish actor mads mikkelson

play02:05

the character of Dr Hannibal leca

play02:07

provides a particularly provocative case

play02:09

for examining audience character

play02:11

engagement hbal doesn't just manipulate

play02:13

and murder people he eats them an act so

play02:17

prohibited and abominable that it well

play02:19

and truly violates what we consider

play02:21

acceptable behavior and yet NBC's

play02:23

Hannibal depicts a monster as Suave as

play02:25

he is dangerous as charismatic as he is

play02:28

malevolent the series invites us to be

play02:30

seduced by Hannibal while at the same

play02:32

time confronting us with his

play02:33

irredeemably evil nature using a

play02:36

cognitive film Theory approach we can

play02:38

explore the way in which the showrunners

play02:39

C us to have this conflicting response

play02:42

and how we accommodate these opposing

play02:43

feelings within our own psyche the

play02:45

central argument of this analysis is

play02:47

that we can understand our emotional

play02:49

engagement to Hannibal as a complex

play02:51

intertwining of affective processes that

play02:53

can shift in nature and intensity in

play02:55

response to aesthetic and narrative

play02:57

features there's a lot here to unpack

play02:59

and so this analysis will be served as a

play03:01

three course meal all these elements

play03:04

combined will help us to gain insight

play03:06

into how we account for our feelings

play03:07

towards characters we find morally

play03:09

reprehensible firstly we need to examine

play03:12

how the showrunners invite us to respond

play03:13

to Hannibal's character in other words

play03:16

what aesthetic and narrative features

play03:17

they employ to engage us emotionally an

play03:20

interesting place to

play03:26

start Hannibal Lector is a legend of

play03:28

narrative fiction after first appearing

play03:30

in Thomas Harris's original novels he

play03:32

was later cemented as a cultural icon

play03:34

with Anthony Hopkins portrayal in the

play03:36

film adaptation of Silence of the lamps

play03:39

audiences are well acquainted with

play03:40

Hannibal the cannibal however NBC's

play03:43

series is distinct in a number of ways

play03:46

being a screen adaptation there is the

play03:47

obvious audio visual element that the

play03:49

literary version does not have and while

play03:51

the film adaptations share the audio

play03:53

visual features afforded by screen

play03:55

mediums the TV series is again

play03:57

distinguished by its long form narrative

play03:59

structure

play04:00

three seasons of Hannibal have aired

play04:02

with a total of 39 episodes that's a lot

play04:04

of time in which the audience is

play04:06

engaging with the character the TV

play04:08

format also fits well with a Creative

play04:10

Vision of the series writer and

play04:12

executive producer Brian Fuller

play04:13

commented that every moment of the

play04:15

series consciously plays with a ja

play04:17

opposition of gorgeousness and visceral

play04:19

Terror with the effect at times of

play04:22

slowly luring the audience into a sense

play04:24

of being in collusion with Hannibal the

play04:26

long form narrative structure afforded

play04:28

by television lends itself well to this

play04:30

slow luring as with each episode we are

play04:32

drawn deeper and deeper into Hannibal's

play04:34

World furthermore our view of Hannibal

play04:37

is frequently filtered through the

play04:38

perspectives of the other characters

play04:40

around him their interactions showcase

play04:42

Hannibal as an honorable and even gentle

play04:44

person who displays an old world

play04:46

European charm in the very first episode

play04:49

of the series we encounter an almost

play04:51

compassionate display from Hannibal as

play04:52

he holds the hand of Abigail Hobbs a

play04:54

young girl who has been hospitalized

play04:56

after her father attempted to Slit her

play04:58

throat we see his association with high

play05:01

society and even a dry sense of humor

play05:03

before we begin you must all be

play05:06

warned nothing here is

play05:11

vegetarian

play05:13

what he is continually calm polite and

play05:18

restrained of course it was Hannibal

play05:20

that provoked the attack on Abigail

play05:22

that's not rast lamb and underneath the

play05:25

calm exterior Hannibal is a cold blooded

play05:28

killer

play05:30

our intertextual knowledge and

play05:31

omniscience in the narrative give us

play05:33

more information than the other

play05:34

characters and is a key part of how we

play05:36

engage with henni's character firstly it

play05:39

exemplifies this idea of collusion that

play05:41

Fuller referred to by sharing in hen

play05:44

secret we enter into a sort of sinister

play05:46

fellowship with him one where we are

play05:48

complicit in his crimes secondly it

play05:51

creates tension between our impression

play05:52

of Hannibal as a monster and as a man

play05:54

who manifests qualities that invite

play05:56

approval The Narrative feeds us these

play05:58

moments of Hannibal's Humanity only to

play06:01

leave us in unpleasant aftertaste as we

play06:03

are reminded of his true nature the

play06:05

showrunners most effectively create this

play06:07

tension by positioning us to see things

play06:09

from the perspective of Will Graham a

play06:11

criminal profiler recruited by the FBI

play06:13

to help with their investigations the

play06:15

use of Will's point of view is a

play06:17

technique that is clearly established

play06:19

right from the very beginning of the

play06:20

series in the opening scene will surveys

play06:23

a bloody crime scene and the audiovisual

play06:25

cues then take us inside Will's mind we

play06:27

hear his heartbeat the color get

play06:29

brighter and the room comes into greater

play06:31

Clarity we see him peeling back the

play06:33

layers of the crime Scene It is a

play06:36

representation of his psychological

play06:37

processes as he assumes the mind of the

play06:40

Killer and reenacts the murder that has

play06:42

just taken place from this moment on our

play06:45

view of Hannibal's world is linked

play06:46

inextricably to Will's view it is

play06:48

through his perspective that we

play06:50

experience the blood and gore and his

play06:52

struggle to face these Horrors mirrors

play06:54

our own Shake It

play06:56

Off keep on looking

play07:00

good it is also through will that we

play07:03

most strongly Fear The Lure of Hannibal

play07:05

as will is the primary target of

play07:06

Hannibal seduction through Hannibal and

play07:09

Will's relationship the series explores

play07:11

the idea of being drawn to something

play07:13

that could kill you even knowing the

play07:15

extent of Hannibal's immorality both

play07:17

will and the audience remain captivated

play07:19

by his character this idea is further

play07:22

reinforced by the Striking visuals

play07:24

poetic and grotesque horrific yet

play07:27

elegant the series has developed a

play07:29

unique style that simultaneously evokes

play07:31

revulsion and Fascination though we

play07:34

rarely see the murders being committed

play07:36

we follow will as he confronts the

play07:37

aftermath the bodies of the victims

play07:39

turned into disturbingly Artful forms

play07:42

and of course

play07:44

meals Fuller has explained his

play07:46

purposeful visual approach quote if

play07:49

we're going to show horrible things they

play07:51

have to be beautiful I think that horror

play07:54

is so easy to make ugly because that is

play07:56

what it is intrinsically we wanted to

play07:58

challenge the audience from Will's point

play07:59

of view as a guy who will look at things

play08:02

and will want to look away but can't

play08:03

because they draw him to them this

play08:06

tension between awe and horror

play08:07

stimulated by the visuals corresponds to

play08:10

our conflicting feelings towards

play08:11

Hannibal there is a desire to distance

play08:14

ourselves but at the same time we're

play08:16

compelled to

play08:17

linger so we have a combination of

play08:19

aesthetic and narrative features the

play08:22

long form narrative structure which

play08:23

allows for us to be slowly lured into

play08:25

collusion with Hannibal the Charming and

play08:28

charismatic version of Hannibal

play08:29

conflicting with our intertextual

play08:30

knowledge and narrative omniscience and

play08:33

the use of Will's point of view to

play08:34

express the competing aversion and

play08:36

attraction to both Hannibal and the maab

play08:38

a theme that is further reinforced by

play08:40

the visual style through these features

play08:43

the series invites us to engage with the

play08:45

character of Hannibal but as has been

play08:47

shown this invitation is loaded with

play08:49

tension and just opposing ideas

play08:52

therefore our emotional response is

play08:53

likewise going to be grappling with

play08:55

these conflicting

play08:56

messages our attention now turns to the

play08:59

the affective processes that make up our

play09:01

emotional response to Hannibal's

play09:02

character while a distinction is often

play09:04

drawn between cognitive and affective

play09:06

processes for the sake of Simplicity

play09:09

this analysis will use these

play09:11

interchangeably the term affected

play09:13

processes is used here to broadly refer

play09:15

to the dynamic psychological phenomena

play09:18

that shape how we connect and respond to

play09:20

the

play09:20

[Music]

play09:24

world affective processes includes a

play09:26

whole range of phenomena and though

play09:28

there is much to explore with each of

play09:30

these in the interest of time the

play09:31

following will provide a brief overview

play09:33

of two key processes that are pertinent

play09:35

to transgressive characters a process of

play09:38

moral evaluation that constitutes

play09:40

allegiance to characters and a process

play09:43

of self-reflective emotional evaluation

play09:45

whereby we appraise our own emotional

play09:48

response Mari Smith a formative

play09:50

cognitive film theorist argues that we

play09:52

engage in a process of assessing a

play09:54

character's attitudes traits and actions

play09:57

in other words we evaluate the morality

play10:00

the result of this is a more or less

play10:01

sympathetic or antipathetic response

play10:04

towards a character if a character earns

play10:06

moral approval and we sustain a positive

play10:08

attitude towards them this is what Smith

play10:11

labels

play10:12

Allegiance in discussing allegiance to

play10:14

immoral characters Smith proposed two

play10:17

further distinctions firstly we can form

play10:19

a partial Allegiance wherein we Ally

play10:22

ourselves with some of the characters

play10:24

actions and attitudes and not others

play10:26

that is we find them sympathetic despite

play10:28

their I

play10:30

traits however Hannibal poses a tricky

play10:33

case firstly he's not a typical

play10:35

anti-hero the series doesn't explore his

play10:38

backstory so there's no tragic Fall From

play10:39

Grace There's No Redemption Arc in which

play10:42

he displays remorse for his actions he

play10:44

doesn't even show vulnerability except

play10:46

perhaps in his obsession for will there

play10:49

is an absence of moral traits for us to

play10:51

Ally ourselves with in the first

play10:53

place we can certainly see some aoral

play10:55

traits that might elicit a positive

play10:57

emotional response his Dr humor his

play11:00

intelligence even his taste for fine

play11:02

clothing music and art however in

play11:05

Smith's view moral assessment of

play11:07

characters constitutes a kind of center

play11:08

of gravity that these amoral factors may

play11:11

inflect but not displace moral

play11:13

evaluation lies at the core of

play11:15

Allegiance it's hard to think of cases

play11:17

in which a film elicits strong sympathy

play11:19

towards a character largely on the basis

play11:21

of aoral attributes characters who

play11:24

appeal through wit or charm for example

play11:26

command our sympathetic Allegiance

play11:27

because these aoral traits coexist in

play11:29

the character with at least some morally

play11:31

positive traits the problem with NBC's

play11:34

Hannibal is that there are no morally

play11:36

positive traits for these positive aoral

play11:38

traits to coexist with perhaps then we

play11:41

can turn to Smith's second distinction

play11:43

what he calls perverse Allegiance

play11:45

whereby we Ally ourselves with an

play11:47

immoral character not in spite of but

play11:49

rather because of their odious traits

play11:52

for this however other factors need to

play11:54

come into play such as Fascination and

play11:56

curiosity a second key affect process

play11:59

pertinent to transgressive characters is

play12:01

the interplay between what an bch refers

play12:04

to as primary and secondary emotions or

play12:06

meta emotions Bart draws on the idea

play12:09

that we can have emotions about our

play12:11

emotions much like we can have thoughts

play12:13

about our thoughts different disciplines

play12:16

give varying theories on the processes

play12:17

that give rise to this phenomenon though

play12:20

bch argues that they all involve three

play12:21

levels of cognitive

play12:23

complexity the experience of meta

play12:25

emotions comprises all three of these

play12:27

levels and can help us understand our

play12:29

conflicting response to certain

play12:31

characters for example we may laugh at

play12:33

Hannibal's humor though our meta

play12:35

emotions will tell us that this laughter

play12:37

is inappropriate in this process the

play12:39

quick and automatic reaction of laughter

play12:41

seems to become overlaid by the slower

play12:43

stimulus processing activity of higher

play12:46

levels conversely we may feel disgust

play12:48

and revulsion and yet we find Value and

play12:51

even Delight in that we're presented

play12:53

with such an effectively stimulating

play12:54

experience even if a Primary Emotion has

play12:57

a negative Valance this can be be

play12:59

modified by the reflective and

play13:00

evaluative capacity of meta

play13:02

emotions it's rare that effective

play13:04

processes occur in isolation instead

play13:07

they build upon each other and are in

play13:08

constant interaction furthermore these

play13:11

processes cannot be separated from their

play13:12

aesthetic and narrative features as it

play13:15

is these features that largely make up

play13:16

the object of our evaluation we now draw

play13:20

these together to gain insight into how

play13:21

effective processes can shift in nature

play13:23

and intensity in response to aesthetic

play13:25

and narrative

play13:27

features

play13:29

[Music]

play13:31

as already mentioned one of the features

play13:33

of NBC's Hannibal is the long form

play13:35

narrative structure we spend a lot of

play13:37

time with the character of Hannibal leca

play13:39

and see him in a variety of situations

play13:41

and interacting with other characters

play13:44

while our moral evaluation may not grant

play13:45

that we form a true Allegiance with him

play13:48

the long form narrative does give us a

play13:49

high degree of familiarity and

play13:52

partiality Arthur Rainey argues that

play13:54

because we engage with fiction for

play13:55

entertainment our desire to enjoy

play13:57

ourselves takes priority

play13:59

consequently viewers can trade moral

play14:01

scrutiny for partiality and favoritism

play14:04

and give characters greater moral

play14:05

license to ensure that enjoyment is

play14:07

experienced building on this Margarita

play14:10

Brun vage contends that television

play14:12

narratives are particularly effective at

play14:13

eliciting partiality the long form

play14:16

narrative structure has the capacity to

play14:18

reduce the intensity of our moral

play14:20

evaluations furthermore a TV serious has

play14:23

greater opportunity to draw attention

play14:24

away from a character's immoral

play14:26

behaviors or traits this is evident with

play14:28

Hannibal particularly in the earlier

play14:30

episodes where we can spend 30 minutes

play14:32

with the Charming and civilized version

play14:33

of his character with only a few

play14:35

cleverly timed reminders of his evil

play14:37

nature additionally though we may not

play14:40

form allegiance to Hannibal we are

play14:42

invited to form an allegiance to will

play14:44

his character is much more likely to

play14:46

elicit moral approval due to our being

play14:48

aligned with his point of view and a

play14:50

recognizable similarity between his

play14:52

response to the horror and our own as

play14:54

will as seduced by Hannibal our

play14:56

allegiance to him can help us to imagine

play14:58

that we are also being seduced and

play15:00

though we may not share in Will's

play15:01

attraction to Hannibal through our

play15:03

Allegiance we can gain an appreciation

play15:05

for it the use of Will's point of view

play15:07

then supplemented with our partiality

play15:09

towards Hannibal can lead to an

play15:11

emotional engagement based on appeal and

play15:13

interest rather than a moral approval or

play15:16

disapproval furthermore Hannibal's

play15:18

aesthetic and narrative features are

play15:20

particularly effective at provoking the

play15:21

elicitation of meta emotions while our

play15:24

primary emotions may be reeling in

play15:26

disgust and squeamishness at the horrors

play15:28

of Hannibal world the series will stage

play15:30

a searching discussion about the toll

play15:32

that looking at death and darkness takes

play15:33

on the human psyche appealing to us to

play15:36

engage in a higher level evaluation of

play15:38

what we are seeing is it me or is it

play15:40

becoming easier for you to look I tell

play15:42

myself it's purely an intellectual

play15:46

exercise consider too in relation to

play15:48

Hannibal's character our repulsion at

play15:50

seeing Hannibal cook and prepare his

play15:52

victims while the classical music and

play15:54

fine dining setting can be appraised as

play15:56

being entirely civilized by playing to

play15:59

our capacity to evaluate our emotions on

play16:01

different levels the series expertly

play16:03

dances with the nature and intensity of

play16:05

our

play16:09

engagement the purpose of this analysis

play16:11

is not to provide conclusions about what

play16:13

our emotional response toenable is but

play16:16

rather to illustrate that we can

play16:17

understand our emotional engagement as a

play16:19

complex intertwining of affective

play16:21

processes that are influenced by

play16:22

aesthetic and narrative features as the

play16:25

series of Hannibal unfolds we are

play16:27

presented with conflict Laden stimuli

play16:29

which in turn initiates psychological

play16:31

attempts to dissolve emotional tensions

play16:34

to control undesirable emotions to

play16:36

disambiguate themes and to weigh art

play16:38

against

play16:39

morality perhaps what this analysis has

play16:42

demonstrated most of all is how

play16:44

difficult it is to fully capture the

play16:45

complex multi-layered and even downright

play16:48

messy nature of our emotional

play16:52

engagement as a final note while in

play16:54

trying to Encompass the complexity of

play16:56

emotional engagement there is also a d

play16:58

danger of being impractically

play17:00

pluralistic there is much need for

play17:02

further discussion about the merits of

play17:03

different affective processes in

play17:05

relation to emotional engagement and the

play17:07

extent to which specific filmic features

play17:09

can inflict upon these while ever screen

play17:12

characters continue to Captivate Us

play17:14

particularly morally reprehensible

play17:16

characters this question will remain a

play17:18

significant area for further

play17:21

[Music]

play17:27

consideration

play17:29

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Emotional EngagementFilm TheoryCognitive ApproachCharacter AnalysisMoral ComplexityNarrative StructureAesthetic FeaturesViewer ResponseHannibal LecterTV SeriesCultural Impact
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?