GCSE | PAPER 3 PRE-RELEASE 2024 (TUDELEY VILLAGE) | AQA

Summary

This video script offers a detailed overview of the AQA pre-release for the 2024 exam, focusing on the Toly Village Development proposal. It discusses the UK's housing challenges, the debate between Brownfield and Greenfield development, and the importance of sustainability. The script guides viewers through key figures, statistics, and potential exam questions, emphasizing the need for affordable housing and the impact of regional growth on housing demand. It also explores stakeholder perspectives, the potential consequences of urban sprawl, and the criteria for a sustainable settlement, ultimately prompting viewers to form their own opinion on the development's viability.

Takeaways

• 🏘️ The pre-release booklet for the AQA exam in 2024 focuses on the Toly Village Development proposal and whether it should proceed, highlighting the debate over Brownfield vs. Greenfield development sites.
• 📈 The UK faces a significant housing challenge, with a need for approximately 340,000 homes to be built annually, currently falling short with only 170,000 built in 2022.
• 📊 A regional growth projection map shows varying degrees of expected household growth, with some areas experiencing more significant increases than others.
• 🏚️ One in seven people in England are affected by a housing crisis, living in unaffordable or unsuitable homes, which could lead to issues like overcrowding and homelessness.
• 💰 There is a stark contrast in house prices to income ratios across different regions, with London having the highest ratio at 15 times greater income, compared to 7 times in the Northeast.
• 🌱 The debate over Brownfield vs. Greenfield development includes considerations of environmental impact, cost, existing infrastructure, and the potential for future expansion.
• 🏞️ The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) advocates for the redevelopment of Brownfield sites to alleviate the housing crisis without encroaching on Green Belt areas.
• 🌳 The proposal for the Toly Village Development includes a garden settlement approach, emphasizing sustainability, self-containment, and a mix of housing sizes to cater to different needs.
• 🚆 The development plan features a new railway station, public transport, and a focus on creating a community with its own facilities, aiming to minimize the need for residents to travel outside the village.
• 🏞️ High Weald, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, is a significant concern for stakeholders due to the potential impact of the development on the protected landscape.
• 📝 The final exam question may ask for an opinion on the sustainability and appropriateness of the Toly Village Development, requiring a balanced view considering social, economic, and environmental factors.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the pre-release booklet for the AQA exam in 2024?

The pre-release booklet for the AQA exam in 2024 focuses on the Tolyp Village Development proposal, discussing whether the plan should go ahead, and includes data and perspectives on housing challenges, urban sprawl, and sustainable development.

Why is it recommended to have the pre-release booklet in front of you while watching the video?

It is recommended to have the pre-release booklet in front of you to follow along with the video, make annotations, and highlight key points, as the video discusses figures and statistics from the booklet that are crucial for understanding the exam content.

What is the significance of the housing statistics provided by the National Housing Federation (NHF) in the booklet?

The NHF statistics highlight the gap between the demand for new homes and the current supply, showing that there is a significant shortfall in meeting the housing demand, which is a key issue addressed in the exam.

What is the target set by the government for the number of new homes to be built annually, and how does the actual construction compare?

The government has set a target of building about 300,000 homes per year, but the actual construction in 2022 was only 170,000, indicating a significant shortfall.

What is the projected increase in the total number of households in England from 2018 to 2040?

The total number of households in England is expected to rise from 23 million in 2018 to 26 million in 2040, indicating a significant growth in housing demand.

What are the consequences of the housing crisis in England as mentioned in the video script?

The consequences of the housing crisis include overcrowding, homelessness, lack of basic facilities, ill health, and children missing out on a good start to life.

Why is there a debate about the use of Brownfield and Greenfield sites for development?

The debate arises because Brownfield sites are previously developed land that can be regenerated, while Greenfield sites are undeveloped, often part of the green belt, and their development can lead to environmental concerns and loss of green space.

What is the position of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) regarding the development of Greenfield and Brownfield sites?

The CPRE advocates for the redevelopment of Brownfield sites to address the housing crisis, arguing that it could accommodate 1.3 million homes, thus preserving the Greenfield sites and the green belt.

What is the concept of a 'garden settlement' as proposed in the Tolyp Village Development plan?

A garden settlement is a type of development that emphasizes sustainability, integrating an agricultural landscape with a built environment, aiming to be self-contained with its own facilities and services to minimize the need for residents to travel outside the village.

What are the potential challenges of the Tolyp Village Development plan in terms of sustainability and community needs?

The challenges include the initial lack of facilities for the community, the risk of becoming a commuter settlement, the long-term development period of 30 years, and the potential impact on local infrastructure and services.

What is Urban Sprawl, and how does it relate to the Tolyp Village Development plan?

Urban Sprawl refers to the outward expansion of urban areas into rural landscapes, leading to the loss of green spaces. The Tolyp Village Development plan aims to address this by creating a self-contained, sustainable community to minimize urban sprawl.

Outlines

00:00

🏗️ Housing Crisis and Development Debate

This paragraph introduces the pre-release booklet for the AQA exam, focusing on the Tolyp Village Development proposal. It outlines the housing challenge in England, emphasizing the need for 340,000 homes annually, against a government target of 300,000, and an actual construction rate of 170,000 in 2022. The debate revolves around the use of Brownfield and Greenfield sites for future development, with implications for urban sprawl and housing inequality. Key statistics from the National Housing Federation highlight the housing demand and the government's shortfall. The paragraph also mentions the exam details, including the date, duration, and content, which includes sections on unseen fieldwork and geographical skills.

05:01

🏘️ Regional Housing Growth and Affordability

The second paragraph delves into regional differences in housing growth and affordability. It discusses the disparity between house prices and income, particularly pointing out the significant difference in London versus the Northeast. The paragraph suggests a potential link between these regional differences and the growth rates of areas, hinting at the possibility that affordability might influence population growth. It also touches on the concept of affordable housing and introduces the debate on Brownfield versus Greenfield land use, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each in terms of development costs, environmental impact, and existing infrastructure.

10:01

🌳 Environmental Impact of Urban Sprawl

This paragraph discusses the concept of Urban Sprawl, defined as the outward expansion of cities and towns, and its environmental consequences. It presents statistics on the annual loss of green land due to urban spread and debates the sustainability of this trend. The paragraph introduces the idea that while Brownfield development could potentially alleviate the housing crisis, it might not be sufficient to meet demand, suggesting that Greenfield development might still be necessary. It also mentions the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) and their stance on preserving green belts and promoting Brownfield development instead.

15:02

🛣️ Development Proposal and its Geographical Context

The fourth paragraph introduces a specific development proposal, focusing on its geographical context and features. It provides details about the location, size, and proximity to major roads and areas of outstanding natural beauty. The development aims to be a self-contained, sustainable community with its own amenities and infrastructure, including schools, public transport, and healthcare facilities. However, the paragraph also raises concerns about the initial phase of the development, which might not meet all the needs of the community and could result in a commuter settlement until the full development is realized over 30 years.

20:02

🏞️ Stakeholder Views on Development in Areas of Natural Beauty

This paragraph explores the perspectives of different stakeholders regarding the proposed development, especially its impact on an area of outstanding natural beauty. It discusses the potential benefits of the development, such as providing affordable housing and community facilities, against the concerns of local residents and environmental groups who oppose the loss of green space and the potential disruption to the countryside. The paragraph highlights the 'NIMBY' (Not In My Back Yard) phenomenon and the need to balance community needs with environmental protection.

25:02

🌿 Sustainability Features and Challenges of the Proposed Development

The sixth paragraph examines the sustainability aspects of the development proposal, detailing its environmental, social, and economic goals. It mentions features like the solar farm, public transport, and a range of housing sizes to cater to different needs. The paragraph acknowledges the potential for increased urbanization and the loss of woodlands as drawbacks. It also considers the timeline for the development's facilities to be fully operational, raising questions about the initial sustainability of the project and its long-term viability.

📊 Evaluating the Sustainability and Public Opinion on Village Development

The final paragraph synthesizes the information from the previous sections, encouraging the viewer to form an opinion on the proposed development. It suggests that while the development has many sustainable features, there are concerns about building on Greenfield land and the impact on areas of natural beauty. The paragraph ends with a prompt for the viewer to consider the evidence from all three figures and form a conclusion about whether the development should proceed, emphasizing the importance of a balanced viewpoint supported by evidence.

Keywords

💡Pre-release

A 'pre-release' in the context of this video refers to an advance release of examination material by an educational body, such as AQA, to prepare students for upcoming exams. The video discusses a pre-release booklet for a geography exam focused on the topic of village development. The script mentions that the pre-release cannot show figures due to copyright, indicating the importance of the booklet for exam preparation.

💡Village Development

Village development is the central theme of the video, referring to the planning and construction of new settlements. The script discusses a proposal for a new village development, exploring its potential benefits and drawbacks, including sustainability, housing challenges, and the impact on the environment and existing communities.

💡Sustainability

Sustainability in the video is a key aspect of the proposed village development, emphasizing the need for environmentally friendly, economically viable, and socially responsible growth. The script mentions features like a solar farm, public transport, and a self-contained community as elements of sustainable development within the village plan.

💡Brownfield and Greenfield Sites

Brownfield and Greenfield sites are terms used to differentiate types of land for development. Brownfield refers to previously developed land, often seen as a way to promote regeneration, while Greenfield refers to undeveloped, green spaces. The script debates the use of these sites for housing, considering environmental impacts and the availability of infrastructure.

💡Housing Crisis

The 'housing crisis' is a term used in the script to describe the shortage of affordable and suitable housing in England. It is mentioned that one in seven people are affected by this crisis, with 8 million people living in unaffordable or unsuitable homes, highlighting the urgency and importance of the village development proposal.

💡Urban Sprawl

Urban sprawl refers to the uncontrolled expansion of urban areas into rural and undeveloped lands. The script discusses the consequences of urban sprawl, such as the loss of green spaces and the impact on the environment, as a factor to consider in the debate over where new developments should take place.

💡Stakeholders

Stakeholders in the video are individuals or groups who have an interest or concern in the village development. The script mentions the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) as a stakeholder opposing the development on Greenfield sites, illustrating the various perspectives that need to be considered in such projects.

💡Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

An AONB is a designation given to areas of countryside in the UK that are considered to be of significant beauty and are therefore protected from inappropriate development. The script discusses the conflict between developing a new village in an AONB and the potential negative impact on the environment and local communities.

💡Garden Settlement

A garden settlement, as described in the script, is a type of urban development that integrates agricultural landscapes with built environments, emphasizing sustainability and community spaces. The proposed village development aims to be a garden settlement, with features like green spaces, walkways, and community facilities.

💡OS Map

An Ordnance Survey (OS) map is a detailed map of the UK that includes topographical and geographical features. The script refers to an OS map included in the pre-release booklet, which students are encouraged to use to understand the location and features of the proposed village development, demonstrating the importance of geographical skills in exam preparation.

💡NIMBY

NIMBY, or 'Not In My Back Yard,' is a term used to describe opposition to development in one's local area due to perceived negative impacts. The script mentions this concept in relation to the potential resistance from local residents to the new village development, particularly those living near the AONB.

Highlights

The pre-release for the AQA exam in 2024 focuses on the Tolyp Village Development proposal, examining its feasibility and impact.

The exam paper on June 14th at 9:00 a.m. is 1.5 hours long, covering unseen fieldwork and geographical skills, worth 76 marks.

Approximately 340,000 homes need to be built annually to meet demand, with the government's target of 300,000 homes per year already insufficient.

Only 170,000 homes were built in 2022, indicating a significant shortfall in housing supply.

The total number of households in England is projected to rise from 23 million in 2018 to 26 million in 2040, with regional disparities in growth.

One in seven people in England are affected by a housing crisis, with 8 million living in unaffordable or unsuitable homes.

Government spending on housing varies significantly by region, with the highest per capita spending in London.

The debate over using Brownfield or Greenfield sites for development is highlighted, with economic and environmental considerations.

Brownfield development is promoted by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) as a solution to the housing crisis.

The Mayor's perspective emphasizes the potential for Brownfield sites to become thriving, attractive areas for living and working.

Urban sprawl is identified as a problem, with the loss of 4,000 hectares of land per year due to outward city growth.

The proposal for a garden settlement in Tolyp Village emphasizes sustainability, including a focus on greenery and public spaces.

The development plan includes a mix of housing sizes, a new electricity substation, solar farm, and public transport to reduce reliance on cars.

Stakeholder views on the development are varied, with local residents potentially opposing the intrusion into an area of outstanding natural beauty.

The development's long-term sustainability is questioned, as many community facilities will only be available after 30 years.

The exam may ask for opinions on the sustainability of the development, requiring a balanced view considering social, economic, and environmental factors.

The final exam question may require students to agree or disagree with the development proposal, using evidence from all three figures provided.

Transcripts

welcome to this video recapping the AQA

pre-release for

2024 um this year's pre-release is based

on the toly Village Development um

essentially whether you think this plan

proposal should or should not go ahead

um I cannot show you any of the figures

from the pre-released booklet due to

copyright so I'd recommend that you put

your pre-release booklet in front of you

as we go through this video um may also

be helpful to annotate and perhaps use a

highlighter to make some notes as we go

through some of the figures and some of

the big key points that come up sort of

consistently throughout the

booklet in terms of like facts and

numbers this exam you're going to sit on

9:00 a.m. on the 14th of June the paper

is an hour and 30 minutes long remember

it comprises also sections on unseen

fieldwork and geographical skills it's

worth 76 marks in total that's a total

Mark for the paper but your pre-release

book CL if we come back to that is three

figures spread over six pages in

total as I mentioned then it's Ste into

three figures each figure sort of takes

a different stance then on what's going

on within the proposal so figure one

centers on England's housing challenge

in particular it gives you sort of an

overview of the inequality in housing in

the UK there's a big debate about the

use of brown food and Greenfield sites

and which one potentially we should

focus our development on in the future

and also it talks a lot about Urban spro

towards the end and what the problem is

with that and again brings it back to

well where should we be developing is

there a problem with a number of people

potentially within our towns and cities

so the first thing it sets out are these

statistics from the National Housing

Federation or nhf as they refer to them

in the booklet so the big stats I

suppose and the big takeaway points we

should take from this is the fact that

approximately 340,000 homes need to be

built every single year that's our sort

of current demand if you like the

government has set a target of building

about 300,000 a year so already we're

40,000 short on that demand however

we've only managed to build 170,000 in

2022 if you look at the graph beneath it

on figure one where it says new housing

Supply it's like a green bar chart

essentially what that's showing us there

is yeah we have got this increase in

growth we have got an increase in demand

um and it seems to support the

statistics above it I suppose the big

point I would make from this is already

based on the figures that we've got in

terms of demand and how much the

government's buil we're already 50% down

on where we should be in terms of

building the amount of houses that

picture then is seemingly echoed when we

start talking about projected regional

growth so if you look there like a

chloropleth map um that's of getting at

the stats that I'm going to talk about

now so they say to you at the top there

that the total number of households in

England is expected to rise from 23

million in 2018 to 26 million in 2040

the map underneath is sort of

highlighting some Regional differences

so we've got some Pockets where

potentially that growth is looking like

it's going to be far more significant

than others um un I suppose what we're

going to consider when we look through

this booklet now is where is the growth

happening why potentially is it

happening in those areas that's what I'd

sort of expect to see next and where are

those differences the tables towards the

bottom that I'll come back and talk

about in a minute where it says

government spending on housing and house

prices and household income sort of draw

on some of that data then that they show

you in the chlorop ple map the bit for

me that I think I now start to ponder a

little bit more in detail is the

consequences so the big consequences if

you take from blue box of the fact that

we've got one in seven people in England

hit by a housing crisis that's

approximately 8 million people also

living in unaffordable unsuitable homes

so in the exam they could ask you what

the consequences are of this they could

ask you why do you think this is

happening I think based on the rest of

the information that they give you in

this section they're likely to ask you

to perhaps State a challenge that's

Arisen from this or a consequence of

this so things like for example

overcrowding as it mentions in the

figure homelessness lack of basic

facilities ill health children missing

out on a good start to life would be

some of the possible answers then that I

might suggest if I was posed that

question in the exam where say

government spending on Housing and

Community

amenities I suppose the only other thing

I would suggest to you is where's that

spending the highest versus where is it

the lowest now is it a surprise for

example that spending is greatest per

head in London at

203 versus lowest potentially at 77 in

the southwest potentially

however we would expect potentially the

spending to be greater in London as it's

our capital city so more investment

there looking at those numbers as well

just one thing to point out ahead of the

exam they're relatively simple they do

lend themselves really well to

calculating things like mean median mode

so make sure you're able to do that in

advance of the exam have a practice of

it remember mode is the most common

range highest take lowest mean adding

them all up dividing by how many there

are again you're confident in doing that

prepping those answers sort of ahead of

time we'll save you some time and buy

back some precious minutes in that exam

as

well so if I consider then house prices

versus income this is the table in the

bottom right hand corner on page two the

big points here M has just got a

calculator out and started playing

around with the numbers I suppose is I

can see that where I've got the highest

average house price I also have the

highest average household income now in

London the difference between average

household income and house price is

about 15 times so it's 15 times greater

income um than what we've got elsewhere

if I consider what's going down in the

Northeast for example well in the

Northeast there's only a seven times

difference so between average household

income and house price I'm calculating

that by obviously doing 17096 times

roughly seven and coming out somewhere

in the region of 127

466 why is that significant well already

that's amplifying that difference isn't

it remember I was just talking about

Regional differences and Regional

household growth and where is projected

to potentially grow the most versus the

least well you could argue couldn't

there is there a difference here where

I've got this this 15 times and this

seven times is that leading to some

areas growing quicker than others where

we were talking previous about

unaffordable unsuitable homes well is

that making that difference much greater

depending on cost on level of income You

could argue potentially then that there

is a link between the two there I

suppose what they're now going to start

to draw from this is whether we need

affordable housing and if you look to

page three of your pre-released booklet

that's where it basically goes next so

it starts to talk about affordable

housing and then there's again another

bar graph here remember in the exam they

like to ask you questions like describe

the data Trend Factor normally should be

like your immediate thought process so

what's the overall pattern in the graph

can I quote some dayr or anything

doesn't quite fit that pattern when I

look at that graph there affordable

housing I'm thinking right there is a

slight decline it's not massive but

there is a slight decline there 145,000

homes to be built it mentions as well so

I suppose now what they're sort of

leaning more towards is yep we've got a

housing issue yetep we can see from all

of the information on page two figure

one that we've got some issues yes there

is increasing demand for homes yes we

need to make them affordable how do we

go about doing that is where the rest of

Page Three Now sort of starts to take us

on so the next thing it starts to bring

up now is this big geographical debate

about the use of Brownfield or

Greenfield land to recap Brownfield land

is land that's already been previously

developed Greenfield land obviously does

what it says on the tin it show new big

green spaces so huge advantages to using

Brownfield land is the fact that it's

already been built it's already got Road

Connections it's already connected to

things like power water and electricity

by using those sites you're massively

going to improve the look of an area so

it is some form of

regeneration however on the flip side of

that you could argue well instead of

starting from scratch you've got lots of

expensive upgrading to do if I think

about what that looks like in comparison

to using Greenfield land well I would

argue that Greenfield land is much

cheaper ER than Brownfield land because

it's not being developed already so I'm

starting aresh going to have loads more

space should you wish to develop

outwards in the future hugely attractive

to house buyers and businesses think

about your surroundings it's not just

going to be the home or the business

itself that's going to sell it but the

location and where it is so green fi

land would obviously look very

attractive to buyers downsides of using

this then you're obviously going to be

eating into the green belt so the green

Bel is that area of undeveloped land

that surrounds the city loss of habitats

loss of green space so actually

environmentally potentially using

Greenfield sites isn't necessarily the

best thing to do now where do we go from

here then well the CPR or the campaign

to protect rural England are one major

stakeholder in this so stakeholder is

anybody that holds a view or particular

opinion about something for example

you're a stakeholder within whichever

school or college you're at because you

have a view potentially on the uniform

you have a view on the mobile phone

policy whereas campaigns protect rural

England have a view on whether we should

or shouldn't develop Greenfield and

Brownfield sites so they make some big

points then so they're basically saying

well Brownfield land should we choose to

redevelop this instead of using

Greenfield could build about 1.3 million

homes so they're basically saying you

can solve some of this housing crisis if

you go back and redevelop your

Brownfield sites rather than eating into

the green belt they then give this

example of Carrington moss and they're

basically saying right in Caron Moss

look at what's happening they've got the

potential here to redevelop lots of

Greenfield types when actually they

could be developing the Brownfield

they're not particularly happy about

that I suppose is the overall view

they're making they then go on and talk

about the May and the May basically

starts saying right these places could

become really thriving they could become

attractive to live and work with the

nature nearby to be enjoyed so what the

mayor basically there is saying is leave

the countryside alone because the

countryside will attract people to move

to these Brownfield areas redevelop the

Brownfield sites cuz it's going to look

significantly better and the two of them

will look really good hand in hand side

by side together rather than just

developing the one or the other I

suppose the other big point to make then

would be to talk about Urban SPO which

is the only other thing on page three

that we haven't touched on yet Urban SPO

is like the outward growth of your city

or your town so currently we're losing

about 4,000 hectar every single year due

to Urban spr the Hector is like the size

of a really big football pitch I think

like an American football pitch for

example but 4,000 of those were losing

in terms of land so the point they're

making in the urban sproll box is

they're saying well we're losing 4,000

hectar every single year but you're also

suggesting that we could go back and

develop all this Brownfield land even if

we developed this Brownfield land we

still wouldn't have enough green land or

Greenfield s to be a better way of

phrasing that to develop in order to

keep up with current demand so we're

still going to have to use Greenfield

sites so I suppose just think about your

opinion on where you sit so they could

ask you in the exam to examine possible

solutions to the UK's housing crisis

if that question came up and I've

written it here on the screen for you as

well if that question came up just be

prepared to talk about Greenfield and

Brownfield sites the advantages and

disadvantages of both what do you think

like what's your opinion do you think we

should use Brownfield do you think we

should use Greenfield do you think urban

sprawl is potentially a problem now yes

no or why might that be the case those

are all the sorts of things that i' be

talking about in that six marker should

it come up so that's sort of pages two

and three that's figure one of your

pre-released booklet if you turn over

then and we start chatting about figure

two figure two can be found on pages

four and five it basically centers on a

few things I think figure two actually

is quite nice there's not a lot of text

there it's quite Visual and actually I

think looks really nice on the page in

terms of there's plenty of stuff you can

pick out and talk about it's a little

bit more open to

interpretation I think that the big

things I'd make sure I can do on figure

two I've obviously written them here but

where is it what are the features of

project can you do your OS map skills

they've given half half a page on page

five to an OS map which tends to make me

think they're going to ask lots of os

map based questions then in the exam the

obvious thing to be say is well can you

describe the location could you be asked

for a couple of marks to describe

exactly where it is you've got a map in

front of you they've given you some

basic facts they could ask you to write

this so like big points I might make is

to say well it's east of tumbridge it's

in southeast England um it's about a

village in terms of size it's just

outside Kent the b2017 runs through it

you've got an area of outstanding

National Beauty to the South You' got

about 10,000 hectar of protected land

involved within this area so it gives it

some sort of sense of scale and size I

think that would be more than enough in

terms of location if you're stuck on

describing the location if you go to

page four the sort of orangey yellow box

at the top gives you a couple of

sentences anyway to get you started and

just thinking about where it is the

other big suggestion I would make is

just to have a quick look at it the one

thing they say with pre-release is you

don't need to go and do loads of

research use the information in the

booklet but it's always helpful just to

bug it into Google and see where it is

on a map it helps to BU some sort of

context as

well so what's proposed then here at

development if you look through rest of

page four you've got a village plan at

the bottom it gives you some sort of key

features of the program as well um but

basically what they're suggesting is is

a garden settlement okay a garden

settlement essentially tries to focus

really on sustainability so it's going

to have this agricultural landscape but

also be a built environment too to as

part of that then they're putting

sustainability at the Forefront they

want to make this a self-contained

development so self-contained

development means you have houses that

also have a school that they can use

that have some public transport

potentially with a village hall or

something which they say they're going

to build it's got its own health care

facilities it's got its own sports Parks

So in theory people shouldn't need to

travel outside of the village to be able

to access all these things now that in

itself sounds really really good and

sounds amazing I suppose the only thing

I would urge you to consider if you're

going to sell that as a real positive in

the exam is remember they're saying

they're building all of this over a

period of 30 years so initially when

they start to put the first few houses

up they won't have all of these

facilities it's not till 30 years down

the line when this is an established

Community will have all of those things

so in the long run in terms of

sustainability and social sustainability

this sounds really good but short term

actually have they got everything to

meet the needs of that Community

probably not so you are running the risk

of this becoming a commuter settlement

people purchasing a house here and still

having to travel into neighboring towns

and Villages like tumbridge for example

to use the shops or to send their

children to school to start

with I did stress as well didn't I about

the OS map you can see the OS map at the

top of page five mine which slight

different I've gone for a different

scale um the best one to use would be

the one in the book because that would

be the one that they will use in the

exam here but just think about your

geography skills like can you do the

more can you do a four figure grid

reference for example can you do a six

figure grid reference are you you

comfortable with describing the location

of where this new development is going

to be so the new development for example

is going to sort of sit in this region

here so can you describe on an OS map

where that is in relation to tumbridge

so are you confident saying for example

that that's Southeast they might ask you

to give them a good reference they might

ask you to suggest potentially two

pieces of map evidence as to why the C

has been chosen if that was the question

about two pieces of map evidence I'd be

drawing on the fact that you've got

major roads here like the

20117 I'd be talking about the land use

here the fact that it is definitely

Greenfield sites I'd be looking at the

contour lines that I can see within this

region and say right well the land looks

relatively flat so lends itself to

development I think just be really

confident with knowing exactly what's on

that map so remember in the exam they'll

give you an insert which is all the OS

map symbols just check can you identify

for you on the map if you're really

stuck what symbols can you see what do

they mean on the key right why might

that be a good thing for example those

might be the sorts of things then that I

might talk about in the

exam the final thing and I know we're

whipping through figure two here is just

to draw your attention to high wield

which is an area of outstanding National

Beauty so think about their viewpoint on

this development so I suppose page four

is sort of selling you the plan isn't it

and it's saying this is why people would

want it this is why local communities

would love it remember it's got open

space it's got that Community feel it's

a self-contained development 2,800 new

homes isn't that amazing they're going

to have all these Community facilities

wow this sounds really great and then

page five starts to say well actually

here's a group of people that might

potentially really not like this

development because it's sitting within

this area of outstanding National Beauty

so it's made up of loads of farms nearby

it's quite a lot of Woodland and hedges

extensive use of the countryside so

actually are the local residents for

example going to be really happy with

this brand new development when they've

previously had beautiful country side

and it's now taken up by this brand new

Village probably not so they might have

what's described as a nimi view which

stands for not in my backyard so it

might mean they they don't want it

they're not opposed potentially to the

development but they just don't want it

near them and they don't want it taking

up their air of outstanding National

Beauty which I get that could be

something you talk about in the exam

would we want this area of Greenland

sites that's been there and protected

since 1980 with over 10,000 hectar being

destroyed by this brand new development

okay think about camp paying for rural

England for example they're going to be

dead against that because they're going

to want to protect that area of

outstanding National Beauty however you

might say well the local community for

example or those looking to buy property

in the area might be really for this

because they're seeing it sometimes as

affordable homes their chance to

purchase property so you're going to

have to be able to balance and sort of

counter the two for example in the exam

they might ask you to suggest who would

be really for this suggest who's against

this

they might ask you to discuss

stakeholder views here they might ask

you to what extent do you think the

development here is going to be

sustainable discuss why they might have

chosen this area for a development so

just be confident with making sure you

can give an opinion on all of these

things good practice would be to look at

figures in the booklet and say right who

would like this who wouldn't like this

why for every single section that will

help you to develop an overall stance or

a Viewpoint then that you can talk about

especially as you come into figure three

figure three is where most of the debate

is sort of centered and normally is

where they start to draw you towards the

N marker so in figure three they're

going to tell you about the differing

perspectives they tell you even more

about what's in the proposal so they're

trying to conjure out whether you're

going to really like this or not and

then they start telling you about who's

going to want this and who's not going

to want this so the key Point bit for

example at the top of the page starts to

talk you through and starts to say right

here's what there is within the

development so they're basically saying

well the main principle is the

sustainability here and that's what

they're hugely focusing on I've taken

some of the artwork from the village

plans just to sort of show you they're

putting huge emphasis here on Greenery

when I look at this the first color I

see is green green is normally

associated with sustainability but as I

look beyond that here I can see there's

lots of public space there are lots of

walkways I suppose one concern the local

community might have is think about

their traditional style housing is the

new modern type housing that's shown in

this picture here going to blend in with

that but then they show you The Village

plan that I've shown you previously and

they start to pull out other features so

they start to talk about protecting the

ancient Woodland they start to talk

about providing a range of housing sizes

why is that important or hang on a

minute in figure one they told me there

was a problem with inaccessible and

unaffordable housing for families so

they're trying to cater for that market

they're trying to put in a new

electricity substation to make it

self-contained well that was one big

feature they said they wanted of this

program they're trying to use the

existing water supply infrastructure and

upgrade that so there is some sort of

hint of Brownfield development there not

massive but there is some use of it

they're putting in their own solar farm

to generate electricity the new railway

station with a 10-minute walks they're

putting in loads of public transport so

they are trying to put sustainability at

the center of this it's just whether

people are going to get on board with it

and whether people are going to really

like it I suppose that's my next big

question the other thing they're

starting to do then is starting to think

now about who wants this and who doesn't

want this the green box at the bottom of

page six where it says adapted from

tumbridge Welles prese submission local

plan I suppose gives a little bit more

of a context to this so they start

really to sell it with the road networks

and the development what it provides for

this new low energy Vision the fact that

they're trying to make this minimal

waste they're really trying to push the

idea that this is sustainable but who's

going to be really happy with this so

just consider the different perspectives

people have got on page seven so for

example example you might say right what

are the real positives well the

positives out of this are the fact it's

got mixed jued housing the fact that

it's close to both urban and rural the

increase in shops and services this plan

is going to provide increased employment

opportunities you could therefore argue

Community facilities recreational space

improve local roads this new low energy

Vision all hints towards sustainability

that's the big point I'm going to make

now is remember sustainability isn't

just environmental sustainability can

also be social and economic so the

points I've raised there would tick off

multiple different things in terms of

negatives I suppose increased

urbanization would be like the big one

do you want increased urbanization in

Greenfield land probably not loss of the

woodlands the fact that I said before

this could become a communal settlement

with people traveling sort of in and out

of the area but not really staying there

for loads of time the increased traffic

on local roads parking the displacement

of local

businesses again remember the facilities

are only being put in once the whole

homes are built so you potentially got

to wait 30 years to see that new school

and that new sports

center is the infrastructure in the

local area going to be able to cope with

all of this probably not think about

total costs like how expensive is this

going to be the pressure it's now going

to put on local services for the next 30

years until that new school's built so

who's going to be really happy about

that with people moving in going to be

quite happy they've got a home they're

able to afford somewhere hopefully and

get themselves on the property ladder

however are the families that are living

in the neighboring Village is going to

be too happy and potentially their

child's School place is at risk or

they've got to wait longer to see a

doctor because these facilities don't

exist I suppose that's what I'd urge you

to sort of compare where it says in the

blue box on page seven the development

could be a

disaster they're starting to sort of

draw this out a little bit more aren't

they okay think about those points there

do you agree or disagree with them the

bullet points are supposed to the bits

that I would start with okay I'm not

going to read all of that to you as this

video would be half an hour long but

just check do you agree do you disagree

why do you think that the final sort of

things I want to draw on then is well

what defines this idea of a sustainable

settlement so I've already said that

sustainability has got to pull in the

ideas of people so it's got to be social

it needs to be environmental it's got to

be economic as well that bullet point

list they give you there is supposed as

they're like checklist isn't it as

towards how sustainable it is so does it

have access to quality affordable

housing well yes they've told us that in

the plan does it have Community

facilities yes but not for 30 years have

they got some Environmental Protection

there well yes they're trying to go with

this low energy Vision local employment

opportunities You could argue yes but

again potentially 30 years time things

like that Sports Center all needs met

locally I supp that's a harder one to

sort of agree or disagree with I would

potentially say yes initially minimum

waste created I think that's really hard

to tell from the figure so I'd be

tempted to say no how's they got

recycling opportunities it sort of hints

at it so I'd say yes renewable energy

definitely yes for that new solar Farm

sustainable transport yes they're trying

to put public transport at the center of

it so actually when I look through that

list on how many I've said yes to it's

quite a few so in terms of their initial

plan I would argue and prend to agree

with them that I do think it is quite

sustainable it's just whether you think

it's sustainable they're building on

this Greenfield land when figure one

told us we've got all of this Brownfield

space that we could go back and develop

so I think the N marker at the end of

all of this is going to be something

along the lines of or do you agree or

disagree that this Village Development

should go ahead normally in the exam

there's like a tick box for yes no and

then it asks you to explain your answers

using all the evidence on figures 1 two

and three again it doesn't matter

whether you say yes or no here it just

matters that you're able to give your

opinion and you're able to back it up

with evidence from each of the three

figures the one thing that people will

do wrong on this question will be just

to talk about figure three on its own to

get maximum credit on a nine marker like

this you must take evidence from figures

one two and three so if I was going to

answer this question I would say well

yes I think it should go ahead because

well figure one tells us we've got a

problem with the amount of new homes

there's not enough being built and this

development will help to build those

figure two tells us for example about

it's going to be multi-use it's going to

have loads of facilities it's going to

help develop this land however other

people might disagree with me because

it's going to take some of this area of

outstanding National Beauty and develop

on Greenfield sites but in figure three

it then talks about sustainability yes

then I would agree this development

should be built because it's got all the

features of a sustainable development

and in 30 years time if it is truly

sustainable we will have reaped the

rewards from that so overall I agree in

my conclusion could be like a rough idea

of a plan that I might go with for this

nine marker of course you can disagree

that's absolutely fine it's just about

having a Viewpoint and being able to

explain it and the one I've modeled

there I've just gone with yes I would

highly encourage you to practice this

nine mark question um and show it to

your geography teacher for some feedback

as always any questions please come and

ask