David Suzuki - Economics Is A Form Of Brain Damage
Summary
TLDRDavid Suzuki, a geneticist and activist, critiques conventional economics, arguing that it is fundamentally disconnected from the real world and destructive. He highlights how economists prioritize financial growth over environmental sustainability, viewing natural resources like forests, water, and biodiversity as 'externalities.' Suzuki emphasizes that nature provides essential services, such as filtering water and fertilizing plants, which are disregarded by economists. He stresses that economics is not a science but rather a set of values pretending to be one, leading to decisions that harm the planet.
Takeaways
- đ° **Profit Over Sustainability**: Clear-cutting forests and investing the money in banks or countries like Malaysia or Papua New Guinea can yield much higher returns compared to preserving forests.
- đł **Neglect of Natural Resources**: The script criticizes the disregard for the long-term value of natural resources like forests, suggesting that money is being prioritized over ecological balance.
- đ **Shifting Investment Focus**: It implies a pattern of exploiting one resource until it's depleted and then moving on to the next, such as from forests to fish to computers.
- đ **Disassociation from Reality**: The script suggests that conventional economics is disconnected from the real world and is more focused on monetary gains than the health of the planet.
- đ§ **Economics as Brain Damage**: The metaphor of 'brain damage' is used to describe how conventional economic thinking is destructive and harmful to the environment.
- đ **Pseudoscience**: The script challenges the scientific legitimacy of economics, suggesting that it is more of a set of values disguised as a science.
- đ± **Nature's Services**: It highlights the importance of natural processes and services that are vital to the planet's health, such as the hydrologic cycle and soil creation.
- đ **Insects' Role in Ecosystem**: The script emphasizes the role of insects in fertilizing plants, which is crucial for the ecosystem but often overlooked by economists.
- đ **Externalities**: The term 'externalities' used by economists to dismiss the value of natural resources is criticized as absurd and indicative of a flawed economic model.
- đ” **The Need for Change**: The airy music at the end suggests a call for a shift in perspective towards a more sustainable and nature-centric economic model.
Q & A
What is the main critique of economics presented in the transcript?
-The main critique is that economics is fundamentally disconnected from the real world. It treats vital natural resources like forests, water, and biodiversity as 'externalities' and focuses on maximizing profit without considering the long-term environmental damage.
Why does the speaker believe that conventional economics is a form of brain damage?
-The speaker believes conventional economics is a form of brain damage because it promotes profit over the preservation of nature and ecosystems, leading to destructive policies that ignore the real-world consequences of economic activities.
What examples does the speaker give to illustrate the destructive nature of economic thinking?
-The speaker uses examples like clear-cutting forests for short-term profit, and once the forests are gone, moving investments to other sectors like fish or computers, showing that economic thinking disregards long-term environmental sustainability.
How does the speaker describe the way introductory economics is taught?
-The speaker describes introductory economics as being presented with impressive diagrams showing the economy, but argues that these presentations are misleading. The diagrams make economics look like a science, when in fact it is just a set of values disguised with mathematical equations.
What does the term 'externalities' refer to in economics, according to the speaker?
-In economics, 'externalities' refer to the important environmental and ecological factors, like the ozone layer, aquifers, topsoil, and biodiversity, which are treated as irrelevant or secondary to economic models focused on profit and efficiency.
What natural services does the speaker mention that are vital to the planet?
-The speaker mentions the hydrologic cycle that filters water, microorganisms that create soil, and insects that fertilize flowering plants. These natural services are essential for maintaining the health of the environment but are disregarded in conventional economics.
What is the speaker's opinion on the mathematical equations used in economics?
-The speaker believes that mathematical equations in economics are used to pretend that it is a science. However, these equations ignore critical environmental factors, making economics disconnected from the real-world consequences of its models.
Why does the speaker compare conventional economics to a view of Mars?
-The speaker compares conventional economics to a view of Mars because it is so disconnected from the real world. By ignoring the environmental costs and externalities, economists are creating a model that might as well be based on an entirely different planet.
What alternative perspective does the speaker suggest we should have about the economy?
-The speaker suggests that we should recognize the importance of the web of life, the natural services provided by ecosystems, and understand that the economy must be rooted in the real-world processes that sustain life, rather than ignoring them for short-term profit.
What is the overall message the speaker is trying to convey about the relationship between economics and the environment?
-The overall message is that the current economic system is destructive because it ignores the value of natural ecosystems and the services they provide. The speaker argues for a more integrated approach that recognizes the importance of environmental sustainability in economic decision-making.
Outlines
đ° The Profit-Driven Destruction of Natural Resources
This paragraph discusses how conventional economics encourages the exploitation of natural resources like forests for short-term profits. Economists argue that clear-cutting forests and reinvesting the profits can yield significant returns, leading to disregard for the environment. The speaker criticizes the focus on profit over sustainability, pointing out that when one resource is exhausted, profits shift to another, like fish or computers, showing a disconnection from the reality of nature. Money, which is growing faster than the real world, becomes the priority, disregarding the true value of the natural world.
đ§ Economics as a Form of Brain Damage
David Suzuki criticizes economics, calling it a form of 'brain damage' because it is disconnected from the real world. He argues that economics pretends to be a science through the use of complex equations, but fundamentally, it is based on a set of values. Economists overlook critical elements of the natural world, like the ozone layer, aquifers, topsoil, and biodiversity, by labeling them as 'externalities.' Suzuki contends that these essential natural services are crucial for life on Earth, and ignoring them in economic models is dangerous.
đ The Vital Role of Nature in Sustaining Life
The final part emphasizes the importance of natural ecosystems in providing essential services for life. Suzuki highlights that the web of life, including microorganisms in the soil, insects that pollinate plants, and the hydrologic cycle, all contribute to the planet's health. These processes are vital for human survival, yet economists dismiss them as externalities, further illustrating the disconnect between economic theory and the real world. The paragraph concludes by labeling this perspective as 'nuts,' stressing the need to recognize nature's irreplaceable value.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄClear-cutting
đĄExternalities
đĄOzone layer
đĄBiodiversity
đĄEconomics as a form of brain damage
đĄServices of nature
đĄFish depletion
đĄDisconnected from the real world
đĄMoney growth
đĄDavid Suzuki
Highlights
Economists argue that clear-cutting forests and investing the money elsewhere yields higher financial returns, disregarding environmental impact.
Clear-cutting and reinvesting in countries like Malaysia or Papua New Guinea can lead to profits as high as 30-40%, raising ethical concerns.
The focus on economic profit overlooks the environmental consequences of deforestation and depletion of natural resources.
David Suzuki criticizes conventional economics as 'brain damage' due to its disconnect from the real world.
Introductory economics courses often portray the economy with charts and diagrams that fail to include critical natural resources like biodiversity and topsoil.
Suzuki emphasizes that economics is not a science but a set of values disguised as science with mathematical equations.
Economists dismiss crucial environmental factors such as the ozone layer, aquifers, and biodiversity as 'externalities.'
This reductionist approach in economics essentially ignores the real-world processes that sustain life on Earth.
Nature provides essential services like water filtration through the hydrological cycle, which is unaccounted for in economic models.
Microorganisms play a vital role in creating soil, which allows for food production, yet are not included in economic calculations.
Insects, through pollination, ensure the reproduction of flowering plants, another key 'externality' overlooked by economists.
The vital services provided by nature, such as biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, are foundational to planetary health.
The current economic model treats these essential environmental processes as irrelevant to financial systems.
Suzuki argues that a more integrated approach is needed, one that values natural resources as intrinsic to economic success.
Conventional economics, with its disregard for environmental sustainability, could lead to the collapse of ecosystems and long-term harm.
Transcripts
The economists say:
If you clear-cut the forest,
take the money and put it in the bank,
you can make 6 or 7%.
If you clear-cut the forest, put it into Malaysia or Papua New Guiena,
you can make 30 or 40%!
So who cares whether you keep the forest?
Cut it down, put the money somewhere else.
When those forests are gone put it in fish.
When the fish are gone, put it in computers.
Money doesn't stand for anything
and money now grows faster than the real world.
Conventional economics is a form of brain damage.
David Suzuki geneticist/activist
Economics
is so fundamentally disconnected from the real world,
it is destructive.
If you take an introductory course in economics,
the professor in the first lecture will show a slide of the economy.
And it looks very impressive, you know -
raw materials, extraction process, manufacturer,
wholesale, retail, with arrows going back and forth.
And they try to impress you because they think
(they know damn well economics is NOT a science)
but they're trying to FOOL us into thinking that it's a real science. Itâs not.
Economics is a set of values that they then try to use
mathematical equations and all that stuff and pretend that it's a science.
But if you ask the economist:
âIn that equation, where do you put the ozone layer?
Where do you put the deep underground aquifers of fossil water?
Where do you put topsoil or biodiversity?â
Their answer is âOh, those are externalities!â
Well then you might as well be on Mars.
That economy's not based in anything like the real world.
Itâs life, the web of life, that filters water in the hydrologic cycle.
It's microorganisms in the soil that create the soil
that we can grow our food in.
Nature performs all kinds of services.
Insects fertilize all of the flowering plants.
These services are vital to the health of the planet.
Economists call these "externalities." That's nuts!
[âȘ Airy music â«]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)