⚡️ШЕЙТЕЛЬМАН: одна фраза путіна спалила всю контору - пролито світло на стрілянину в Крокус Сіті

Телеканал Прямий

24 Mar 202416:51

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses a terrorist incident in Bryansk, Russia, where attackers were pursued and captured. It details a horrific act where an ear was cut off a captive and forced to eat it. The conversation then shifts to a terrorist attack at a concert hall, 'Krokus City,' in 1958, where over 100 people were killed in a meticulously planned 18-minute operation. The attackers, dressed in bulletproof vests and armed with automatic weapons, managed to escape in an old Renault car. Speculations are made about the involvement of Islamic State and the FSB, suggesting a possible setup with look-alike decoys. The speaker also criticizes the Russian government's response and the credibility of the FSB, questioning the authenticity of the incident and the role of propaganda.

Takeaways

🔍 The script discusses a violent incident involving terrorists being chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, with one of them having his ear cut off as a form of punishment.
🎥 It references a chronology of events at a location called 'Krokus City' in 1958, where terrorists carried out a shooting and set fire to a hall, killing over 100 people within 18 minutes.
🚓 The terrorists were equipped with bulletproof vests and automatic weapons, and they behaved in a highly organized manner, not discarding their weapons but storing them somewhere.
🚗 After the attack, the terrorists allegedly escaped in an old Renault car, which was later intercepted near the Ukrainian border.
👥 There is speculation about the identity of the people who captured the terrorists, with suggestions that it could have been the FSB, a private military company, or other unidentified individuals.
📸 The script mentions that the terrorist group 'Islamic State' claimed responsibility for the attack and released photos of the alleged terrorists.
🤔 The speaker raises questions about the credibility of the official narrative, suggesting that there might be more to the story than what is being reported.
👮‍♂️ There is criticism of the FSB and the Russian government's handling of the situation, with implications that they may have been involved or complicit in some way.
🌐 The script touches on the broader context of the conflict, suggesting that the incident could be used as a pretext for further military mobilization.
🗣️ The speaker expresses skepticism about the Russian propaganda machine, questioning the authenticity of the information being disseminated to the public.
🚨 The script ends with a discussion about the potential for further mobilization and the challenges of equipping a large number of mobilized individuals with adequate weaponry.

Q & A

What incident is being described in the transcript?
-The transcript describes a terrorist attack where individuals were chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, and one of them had his ear cut off as a form of punishment.
What is the significance of the 'Renault' vehicle mentioned in the script?
-The 'Renault' vehicle is significant as it is the car used by the terrorists to escape from the scene of the attack at the concert hall.
How quickly did the terrorists carry out the attack in the concert hall according to the script?
-According to the script, the terrorists carried out the attack in the concert hall within 18 minutes, which included killing security personnel, setting the hall on fire, and causing the death of over 100 people.
What is the role of the 'Krokus City' in the script?
-Krokus City is the location where the terrorists began their attack by shooting in the hall and setting it on fire.
What was the response time of the emergency services after the attack?
-The emergency services, including firefighters, arrived at the scene 12 minutes after the terrorists had left, and an operational headquarters was set up at 20:45.
What is the speculation about the terrorists' escape route mentioned in the script?
-The script speculates that the terrorists were possibly allowed to escape towards the Ukrainian border, suggesting that a 'window' on the border might have been prepared for them.
What is the role of the 'ear' in the narrative described in the transcript?
-The 'ear' is part of a gruesome act where one of the captured terrorists had his ear cut off, and there are claims of forcing him to eat it as a form of punishment.
What does the script suggest about the authenticity of the terrorists' identities?
-The script suggests that there might have been a switch, with the real terrorists being replaced by look-alikes dressed in similar clothing to mislead the public and authorities.
What is the connection mentioned between the FSB and the terrorists in the script?
-The script implies a possible connection or complicity between the FSB and the terrorists, suggesting that the FSB might have facilitated the escape or prepared the border crossing.
What is the speculation about the FSB's role in the aftermath of the attack?
-The script speculates that the FSB might have been involved in creating a narrative or cover-up after the attack, possibly to mislead the public about the true nature of the event.
What is the implication regarding the Russian propaganda mentioned in the script?
-The script implies that Russian propaganda has been consistently spreading misinformation and cheap fakes, which raises doubts about the authenticity of the information provided by the authorities, including the FSB.

Outlines

00:00

😨 Terrorist Capture and Gruesome Act

The first paragraph discusses a disturbing incident where terrorists were chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, Russia. The captured individuals were subjected to a brutal act of having their ear cut off and being forced to eat it. The speaker also mentions a terrorist attack at a venue called 'Krokus City,' post 1958, where terrorists opened fire in the lobby, killed security personnel, and set the hall on fire, resulting in over 100 deaths. The attackers, dressed in bulletproof vests and armed with automatic weapons, executed the attack within 18 minutes and fled in an old Renault car. The paragraph ends with the mention of the terrorists being caught and the ear-cutting act being captured on camera.

05:03

🕵️‍♂️ Speculations on FSB and ISIS Involvement

The second paragraph delves into the speculation of the involvement of the FSB (Russian Federal Security Service) and ISIS in the terrorist attack. The speaker suggests that the FSB and ISIS might be one and the same, citing Biden's comment that Hamas and Putin are no different. The paragraph also touches on the swift and efficient execution of the attack, questioning the logic behind the terrorists' escape in an old Renault car. The speaker hypothesizes that the terrorists might have been set up to take the fall for the attack, with the real perpetrators being different individuals. The paragraph concludes with the speaker expressing their belief that the FSB might have been complicit in the attack and the subsequent escape.

10:06

🚨 Alleged FSB Complicity and Border Breach

The third paragraph focuses on the alleged complicity of the FSB in the incident and the ease with which the terrorists could have crossed the border into Ukraine. The speaker is shocked by the suggestion that a 'window' or opportunity was prepared on the Ukrainian border, which would imply coordination or complicity. The paragraph also discusses the implausibility of the terrorists' escape plan, questioning why they did not change vehicles during their escape. The speaker speculates that the FSB might have been trying to sell a cheap narrative to the public, similar to their handling of the ongoing war. The paragraph ends with a rhetorical question about why anyone would believe the FSB would act genuinely during a real terrorist attack when they are involved in spreading propaganda.

15:10

🗣️ Putin's Response and Mobilization Concerns

The final paragraph discusses Putin's response to the incident, particularly his interaction with journalist Yulia Navalnya. The speaker also addresses the concern about the potential mobilization of Russian citizens for war against Ukraine. They argue that while Putin could mobilize people, the real issue is the availability of resources and weapons to equip them for battle. The paragraph highlights the impracticality of mobilizing a large number of people without the necessary military equipment and the potential futility of such an endeavor. The speaker expresses a grim satisfaction at the thought of such an ill-equipped force facing the reality of modern warfare.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡terrorists

The term 'terrorists' refers to individuals or groups that use violence and intimidation, particularly against civilians, to achieve their political aims. In the video's context, it is mentioned that terrorists were chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, where they were subjected to brutal acts such as having their ear cut off. This term is central to the video's theme, which appears to discuss acts of terrorism and the response to them.

💡Krokus City

Krokus City is mentioned in the script as the location of a terrorist attack. It seems to be a significant event within the video's narrative, where terrorists began shooting in the hall, leading to a fire and the death of over 100 people. The reference to Krokus City is used to illustrate the scale and impact of the terrorist act discussed in the video.

💡Renault

The 'Renault' is referred to as the old car used by the terrorists to escape from Krokus City Hall after the attack. The mention of the specific make of the car is used to add detail to the narrative of the terrorists' escape and subsequent capture. It's a key element in the story, as it is linked to the suspects' capture and the unfolding investigation.

💡FSB

FSB, which stands for Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, is mentioned in the script as a possible entity involved in capturing the suspects or in the narrative surrounding the terrorists' escape. The FSB is Russia's principal security agency, and its involvement suggests a state response to the terrorism depicted in the video.

💡Islamic State

The 'Islamic State' or ISIS is referenced as the organization claiming responsibility for the attack. The script suggests that ISIS released photographs of the terrorists, which is a common tactic used by such groups to assert their actions and spread their message. This keyword is crucial for understanding the ideological motivation behind the act of terrorism discussed in the video.

💡Bryansk Oblast

Bryansk Oblast is the region where the terrorists were reportedly captured after the attack. It is significant as it provides a geographical context to the narrative of the video, indicating where the suspects were apprehended and where the brutal act of cutting off an ear took place.

💡Ukraine border

The 'Ukraine border' is mentioned in the script as the destination the terrorists were allegedly heading towards after the attack. It suggests a possible international dimension to the act of terrorism and raises questions about the ease of crossing borders, which could be relevant to the video's discussion on security and state response.

💡propaganda

The term 'propaganda' is used in the script to describe the dissemination of information, particularly by the Russian authorities, which the speaker suggests may not be entirely truthful. It is a key concept in understanding the video's theme of questioning the narratives presented by authorities in the wake of terrorist attacks.

💡mobilization

Mobilization refers to the act of calling up and assembling military or civilian forces for service. In the video, it is discussed in the context of Putin's potential actions following the terrorist attack, suggesting a possible military response or escalation.

💡Hamas

Hamas is mentioned in the script as expressing condolences, contrasting with Zelensky's reaction to the ISIS attack. Hamas is a Palestinian political organization with a military wing, and its mention in the video adds to the discussion of different reactions and stances taken by various groups in response to acts of terrorism.

💡Biden

The script refers to a statement made by 'Biden,' presumably U.S. President Joe Biden, suggesting that he equated Hamas and Putin as being the same. This keyword is significant as it indicates the geopolitical context and the views of international leaders on the events discussed in the video.

Highlights

The transcript discusses a violent incident involving terrorists who were chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast.

It is mentioned that one of the captured terrorists had his ear cut off and was forced to eat it, with footage of the act existing.

The narrative describes a chronology of events where terrorists arrive at a venue and begin shooting, killing security personnel and setting fire to the hall.

Over 100 people were killed in the attack, which was executed in just 18 minutes, showcasing the terrorists' efficiency and planning.

The terrorists were equipped with bulletproof vests and automatic weapons, indicating a high level of preparedness.

A Renault car is mentioned as the vehicle used by the terrorists to escape, which was later found and became a point of discussion.

There is speculation about the identity of the people who captured the terrorists, with suggestions including the FSB or a private military company.

The transcript raises questions about the terrorists' escape route and the feasibility of their journey, suggesting possible state involvement.

The speaker hypothesizes that the captured individuals might not have been the actual perpetrators but decoys dressed in similar clothes.

There is a mention of a statement by Putin, indicating that the terrorists were heading towards the Ukrainian border.

The transcript discusses the response time of emergency services and the establishment of an operational headquarters after the attack.

The speaker questions the authenticity of the terrorists' affiliation with ISIS and the reliability of the information provided.

The narrative includes a critique of the Russian propaganda machine and its role in shaping public perception of events.

The speaker speculates on the possibility of the FSB being involved in the incident, suggesting a complex web of deception.

The transcript touches on the topic of foreign nationals in Russia, questioning their presence and safety in the current climate.

Discussions about the potential for mobilization of Russian citizens into military service are presented, with skepticism about the feasibility.

The speaker reflects on the psychological impact of the incident on the public and the trust in state institutions.