🔥АСЛАНЯН: побоїще у Крокус сіті було підготовлене, це був спецназ ФСБ - є докази

Summary

The video script discusses various theories surrounding a tragic event at the Krykus City Hall in Ukraine, suggesting possible involvement of the FSB and a lack of preparedness by authorities. It delves into the professionalism and tactics of the attackers, implying a military background. The conversation also touches on the political climate, with implications of blame on Ukraine and the West, and the challenges of truth and accountability in Russia's information landscape. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting events within the context of propaganda and the potential for misinformation.

Takeaways

• 😐 The speaker discusses three main theories regarding the incident at the Krykus City hall in Ukraine, suggesting it could have been a planned operation by the FSB, a misstep by authorities, or an unplanned event used by Putin for further escalation and mobilization in Ukraine.
• 🕵️‍♂️ There is an implication that the FSB may have had prior knowledge of the incident but chose not to prevent it or possibly even facilitated it after elections.
• 🚨 The speaker notes a lack of coordination and preparedness from authorities, using the example of the undermining of the DnieperGES and the capture of individuals involved in its destruction from the 1940s.
• 🔍 The incident at Krykus City hall is analyzed in detail, with the speaker pointing out the military precision and coordination of the attackers, suggesting they were not common criminals but rather professionals likely trained by Russian special forces.
• 🤔 The discussion raises questions about the attackers' lack of body armor and the strategic use of fire as a weapon, indicating a high level of planning and execution.
• 🔥 The fire in the hall was not a result of Molotov cocktails as some suggested, but rather a professional use of thermite charges, which are used by the military and can cause a rapid and intense fire.
• 💥 The fire suppression system was either disabled or non-existent, which is unusual given the building's supposed high level of safety and security.
• 👥 The attackers were organized into pairs, a tactic used by special forces, and were equipped with military-grade weapons and suppressors, indicating a level of training and preparation.
• 🛡️ The attackers' actions showed a clear understanding of their next steps and a guarantee against unforeseen circumstances, suggesting a level of professionalism and experience.
• 👨‍👨‍👧‍👦 The discussion also touches on the use of scapegoats, referring to the Tajik individuals who were apparently used as a diversion and later captured, possibly to be used for interrogation or as a cover story.
• 🗣️ The speaker reflects on the broader implications of the incident, suggesting that it may be part of a larger strategy by Putin to manipulate narratives and deflect blame, particularly onto Ukraine or Western influences.

Q & A

What are the three main versions discussed regarding the incident at the Krykus City hall?

The three main versions discussed are: 1) The incident was a planned operation by the FSB from the very beginning. 2) The FSB knew something was going to happen two weeks in advance but didn't prevent it, possibly even asking for it to be done after the elections. 3) Putin was not prepared for this incident and it was not planned, with current attempts to use the situation for further mobilization and escalation in Ukraine.

What is the significance of the FSB's involvement in the discussed incident?

The FSB's involvement is significant because it suggests a level of state control or foreknowledge of the incident. The discussion implies that the FSB may have either planned the incident, known about it in advance and failed to prevent it, or is using the situation for political gain.

How does the speaker describe the FSB's usual operational style in the context of the discussed incident?

The speaker describes the FSB's operational style as highly coordinated and professional, with a focus on pairs or groups of two for executing tasks. This suggests a military or special forces background, which contrasts with the disorganized actions of other groups mentioned.

What is the role of the 'ovtsy' or 'sheep' in the context of the incident?

The 'ovtsy' or 'sheep' are individuals who were used as scapegoats or fall guys in the incident. They were apparently told to carry passports and were led to believe they would be allowed to cross the border into Ukraine, but were instead set up to be captured and likely killed.

Why does the speaker suggest that the incident was planned to involve a fire?

The speaker suggests that the fire was planned because of the professional nature of the operation, including the use of thermite charges, which are used by the military. Additionally, the fire suppression system was either disabled or non-existent, which is unusual for a secure facility.

What is the significance of the location of the Krykus City hall in relation to the incident?

The location of the Krykus City hall is significant because it is situated in a semi-enclosed area, surrounded by various government and security installations. This suggests that the incident was planned with the knowledge that it would be difficult to escape, and that the area could be easily secured after the event.

What does the speaker imply about the FSB's response to the incident?

The speaker implies that the FSB's response was slow and deliberate, suggesting that they may have been complicit in the incident or at least aware of it. The FSB is described as not acting until it was clear that there was no further danger, at which point they moved in to apprehend the scapegoats.

How does the speaker characterize the professionalism of the individuals involved in the incident?

The speaker characterizes the individuals involved in the incident as highly professional, with military or special forces training. They are described as having a high level of coordination, precision, and a clear understanding of their roles and objectives.

What is the speaker's view on the Russian government's handling of the incident?

The speaker criticizes the Russian government's handling of the incident, suggesting that it was either complicit or grossly incompetent. The speaker implies that the government is more concerned with maintaining power and control than with the welfare of its citizens.

What does the speaker suggest about the potential international implications of the incident?

The speaker suggests that the incident could be used to further political agendas, particularly in relation to Ukraine and Western powers. There is an implication that the incident could be used to justify further aggression or escalation in the region.

What is the speaker's opinion on the likelihood of the truth about the incident ever being fully revealed?

The speaker is pessimistic about the likelihood of the full truth being revealed. They suggest that there is a culture of secrecy and misinformation, and that even if some information were to be disclosed, there would still be a significant portion of the population who would not believe it or accept it.