Curso completo de Raciocínio Lógico, Passe em Concursos Públicos, Raciocínio Lógico Aula 20

Mari Concursos
1 Jul 201306:03

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses logical argumentation, focusing on the concept of logical equivalence in propositions. It uses an example involving Ana's beauty and Carinha's ugliness to illustrate the 'if-then' logical structure, explaining how the truth of one side dictates the truth or falsity of the other. The script further explores the implications of statements like 'João affirms that Paulo is rich and Maria is beautiful,' emphasizing the conditions under which such a statement would be a lie. It clarifies the difference between 'and' and 'or' in logical statements, highlighting that 'or' requires only one true condition, whereas 'and' necessitates both to be true for the statement to hold. The summary aims to simplify complex logical concepts for better understanding.

Takeaways

  • 📚 The lecture is about the 20th class on logical argumentation, focusing on logical propositions and connectors.
  • 🔄 The concept of logical equivalence is introduced, using the example 'If Ana is beautiful, then Carinha is ugly' to explain the relationship between the truth values of propositions.
  • 👍 The script explains the logical implication 'If A, then B', where B is true if A is true, and B can be either true or false if A is false.
  • 🤔 It clarifies that if 'Ana is beautiful, then Carinha is ugly' is false, it's because Ana is beautiful and Carinha is not ugly, not because Ana is not beautiful.
  • 🌞 The script uses the example 'If it's sunny, I'll go to the beach' to illustrate the conditional statement and its logical truth values.
  • 🏖️ It points out that going to the beach doesn't guarantee sunshine, but if you didn't go to the beach, it implies it wasn't sunny if it was supposed to be.
  • 🔄 The script discusses the negation of statements, emphasizing what needs to happen for a statement to be false.
  • 🗣️ An example of a statement is given: 'João claims that Paulo is rich and Maria is beautiful', which is true only if both claims are logically true.
  • 🤷‍♂️ The script explains that if João is lying, it means Paulo is not rich or Maria is not beautiful, as these are the only ways for the statement to be false.
  • 📊 The use of truth tables is suggested to determine the truth values of compound statements involving 'and' and 'or'.
  • 🚫 The script emphasizes that there is no concept of 'more false' or 'less false' in logic; a statement is either true or false.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the lecture?

    -The main topic of the lecture is logical argumentation, specifically focusing on logical propositions and logical connectors.

  • What is the example given to illustrate the concept of logical equivalence in the script?

    -The example given is 'If Ana is beautiful, then the face is ugly.' It is used to explain how the truth of one part of the statement can imply the truth or falsity of the other part.

  • What does the lecturer mean by 'logical connectors'?

    -Logical connectors are symbols or words that connect statements in a logical argument, such as 'and', 'or', 'if...then', which define the relationships between the propositions.

  • How does the lecturer explain the truth conditions for the statement 'If Ana is beautiful, then the face is ugly'?

    -The lecturer explains that if the left side ('If Ana is beautiful') is true, then the right side ('the face is ugly') must also be true for the statement to be true. If the right side is false, then the left side must also be false.

  • What is the logical fallacy discussed in the script?

    -The script discusses the fallacy of affirming the consequent, which is the mistake of assuming that if the consequent is true, then the antecedent must also be true.

  • What is the example used to explain the concept of 'if...then' statements?

    -The example used is 'If it's sunny, then I will go to the beach.' It illustrates that the absence of the consequent (not going to the beach) implies the absence of the antecedent (it's not sunny).

  • What is the concept of 'negation' in the context of logical arguments?

    -Negation in logical arguments is the statement that contradicts the original proposition, and it is used to determine the conditions under which the original statement would be considered false.

  • How does the lecturer use the names Ana and Carina to further explain logical propositions?

    -The lecturer uses the names Ana and Carina to create a scenario where if Ana is beautiful, then Carina is ugly, and vice versa, to demonstrate the logical relationships and the concept of negation.

  • What is the difference between 'and' and 'or' in logical statements according to the script?

    -In logical statements, 'and' requires both parts of the statement to be true for the whole statement to be true, while 'or' only requires at least one part to be true for the whole statement to be true.

  • How does the lecturer clarify the concept of lying in the context of logical statements?

    -The lecturer clarifies that lying occurs when the statement made is false, and it requires a specific condition to be met for the statement to be considered a lie, such as the person being rich and beautiful when in fact they are not.

  • What is the final point the lecturer makes about the truth value of statements in logical arguments?

    -The final point is that in logical arguments, a statement can only be considered a lie if it is false under the given conditions, and there is no concept of 'more or less' lying, only truth or falsity.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Introduction to Logical Argumentation

This paragraph introduces the topic of logical argumentation, also known as propositional logic or logical propositions. It discusses the concept of logical equivalence, using the example of a statement about Ana's beauty and Carina's ugliness. The speaker explains how the truth of one part of the statement affects the truth of the other, emphasizing the logical structure of 'if-then' statements and their implications. The paragraph also touches on the idea of negation and the conditions under which a statement would be considered a lie.

05:01

🔍 Analyzing 'And' and 'Or' Logical Connectors

The second paragraph delves into the logical connectors 'and' and 'or', using the scenario of Paulo's wealth and Maria's beauty to illustrate how these connectors work in logical statements. It explains that for a statement using 'and' to be true, both conditions must be true, while for an 'or' statement, at least one condition must be true. The speaker also explores the conditions under which these statements would be false, highlighting the importance of understanding the logical structure behind such assertions.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Logic of Argumentation

The logic of argumentation refers to the process of constructing and evaluating arguments based on logical reasoning. In the video, this concept is central to understanding the relationships between propositions and the validity of conclusions drawn from them. For example, the script explores the logical equivalence of statements and how they can be structured to be either true or false based on the premises.

💡Logical Propositions

Logical propositions are statements that can be evaluated as true or false. The video discusses how these propositions are connected using logical connectives and how they form the basis of argumentation. The script uses the example of 'if Ana is beautiful, then Carinha is ugly' to illustrate the structure and evaluation of propositions.

💡Logical Connectives

Logical connectives are symbols or words that connect logical propositions and define the relationships between them. The script mentions these as essential elements in forming compound statements, such as 'if...then...' which is used to express conditional relationships between propositions.

💡Truth Values

Truth values are the true or false values that logical propositions can take. The video explains how the truth value of a compound statement depends on the truth values of its constituent propositions. For instance, the script states that if the left side (antecedent) of 'if...then...' is true, then the right side (consequent) must also be true for the statement to be true.

💡Logical Equivalence

Logical equivalence occurs when two statements have the same truth value under all conditions. The video script provides the example 'if Ana is not beautiful, then Carinha is not ugly' to illustrate how the equivalence is determined by the relationship between the truth values of the propositions.

💡Negation

Negation is the logical operation that reverses the truth value of a proposition. In the video, negation is discussed in the context of determining when a statement is false. For example, the script explains that the statement 'if Ana is beautiful, then Carinha is ugly' is false if Ana is beautiful and Carinha is not ugly.

💡Conditional Statements

Conditional statements are statements of the form 'if P, then Q', where P is the condition and Q is the conclusion. The video uses these to explore the logical relationships between propositions. The script provides the example 'if it's sunny, then I'll go to the beach' to demonstrate how conditional statements work.

💡Contingent Statements

Contingent statements are those that are not necessarily true or false but depend on specific circumstances. The video script uses the example of going to the beach, which is not guaranteed by the sun but is a condition that could be met or not.

💡Logical Implication

Logical implication is the relationship between two propositions where the truth of one requires the truth of the other. The video discusses this in the context of 'if...then...' statements, explaining that if the antecedent is true, the consequent must also be true for the implication to hold.

💡Logical Fallacy

A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that leads to a false conclusion. The video script does not explicitly mention logical fallacies, but the concept is implied in the discussion of when statements are false or misleading, such as when the conditions for a true 'if...then...' statement are not met.

💡Truth Tables

Truth tables are used in logic to determine the truth values of logical expressions. The video script suggests using truth tables to evaluate the truth values of compound statements, such as 'Paulo is rich and Maria is beautiful', by listing all possible combinations of truth values for the individual propositions.

Highlights

Introduction to the 20th lesson on logic of argumentation, also known as propositional logic.

Explanation of logically equivalent sentences using the example 'If Ana is beautiful, then the face is ugly'.

Clarification that if Ana is beautiful, the face being ugly is not guaranteed but is a logical consequence.

Discussion on the logical equivalence and the negation of the statement 'If Ana is not beautiful, then the face is not ugly'.

Introduction of the concept that the truth of one side of a logical statement implies the truth of the other side.

Example given: 'If it's sunny, I'll go to the beach', illustrating the logical connection between two events.

Explanation of the logical fallacy that not going to the beach implies it was not sunny.

Introduction of the logical operator 'and' and its truth conditions.

Example provided with 'João states that Paulo is rich and Maria is beautiful', discussing the logical implications.

Explanation of the logical 'or' operator and its non-exclusivity, allowing for multiple true statements.

Discussion on the conditions under which João would be lying in his statement about Paulo and Maria.

Clarification that for João's statement to be false, both Paulo not being rich and Maria not being beautiful must be true.

Introduction of the concept of logical tables to determine the truth values of propositions.

Explanation of how to fill out a logical table to evaluate the truth of statements involving 'and' and 'or'.

Discussion on the practical applications of logical argumentation in everyday reasoning.

Emphasis on the importance of understanding logical connectors for clear and effective communication.

Final remarks summarizing the key points of the lesson on logical argumentation.

Transcripts

play00:12

muito bem gente vamos então enfim a

play00:16

nossa aula de número 20

play00:17

vamos falar da parte de lógica de

play00:20

argumentação certo questãozinha é de

play00:24

lógica de argumentação comece também

play00:26

pode ser chamado de áudio das

play00:28

proposições lógica proposicional lógica

play00:32

de argumentação é algo sobre as

play00:35

proposições conectivos lógicos nós já

play00:38

falamos sobre isso que ele tem em nomes

play00:40

diferentes mas que na verdade fala da

play00:42

mesma matéria

play00:43

vamos trabalhar aqui uma certeza

play00:45

logicamente equivalente a sentença se

play00:48

ana é bela então carinha feia bom é o

play00:52

fato é que se a ana é bela

play00:56

então carinha feia sé essa questão zink

play01:00

da esaf diz o que se ana bela então a

play01:03

carinha feia

play01:04

o fato é que se ela é bela então a

play01:07

carinha feia mas sim ano não foi bela a

play01:10

carinha pode ser feia ou não

play01:13

mas e se a carne ficou feia a ana pode

play01:16

ser bela ou não que se a cara e não for

play01:19

feia então é porque a ana não é bela

play01:22

gente perceba bem uma coisa essa

play01:26

afirmação aqui certo funciona do mesmo

play01:28

jeito com aquela já trabalhamos muitas

play01:31

vezes se fizer sol então eu vou à praia

play01:34

se faz só eu vou à praia se não faz sol

play01:37

eu posso ir à praia ou não se eu fui à

play01:40

praia não é uma garantia de ter feito

play01:41

sol mas uma coisa é certa se eu não fui

play01:44

à praia então por que não fez sol que se

play01:47

tivesse feito sol eu teria ido então eu

play01:50

perceba que sempre em todos e então se

play01:53

um lado esquerdo for verdade o lado

play01:55

direito é verdade esse lado direito o

play01:58

falso ala esquerda falso também portanto

play02:00

a equivalência desse ano

play02:02

ela então carinha feia é que se a ana

play02:05

não é se a cara e não é feia então a não

play02:09

é bela

play02:10

se aqui não é feio então aqui não é belo

play02:12

ok então essa seria a moça é que

play02:16

valência para essa questão

play02:19

bom agora o fato e se ana é bela então

play02:24

carinho é feia

play02:25

o que ele se ele disse isso seria que vá

play02:28

à falência mas se fosse a navegação se

play02:32

ana bela então carinha feia bons e

play02:35

anabela a carinha feia

play02:37

o que é preciso lembre-se negação

play02:39

significa o que é precisa acontecer para

play02:42

que eu esteja mentindo pra que eu esteja

play02:45

mentindo

play02:46

é preciso que a ana seja bela e acari

play02:50

não seja feia porque eu disse que se ela

play02:52

é bela então a carinha feia

play02:54

inclusive se a única maneira de o time

play02:58

time é a ana sé dela e acarinham ser

play03:02

feito de fato pelo menos a ana ea

play03:05

carinho que eu conheço são lindas né

play03:08

vamos em frente então a resposta correta

play03:11

e tem é a gente afirma joão afirma que

play03:17

paulo é rico e maria bonita gente eu

play03:21

estou dizendo que o paulo é rico e a

play03:24

maria bonita

play03:25

lembre se que o ei ele só é verdade se

play03:28

as duas coisas forem propriedades do

play03:30

ponto de vista lógico se o paulo está

play03:32

mentindo então podemos afirmar que gente

play03:35

na verdade é se o joão está mentindo

play03:39

porque quem está afirmando é o joão

play03:41

aqui não é paula joão viu joão afirma

play03:43

que paulo henrique maria bonita

play03:46

do ponto de vista lógico se joão está

play03:49

mentindo então podemos dizer que o fato

play03:53

é que o joão está dizendo que o paulo

play03:54

henrique é a maria bonita

play03:56

então pra que ele esteja mentindo só tem

play03:58

uma maneira a única maneira para que não

play04:02

seja verdade que o qual é rico e

play04:05

maria bonita é que o paulo não é rico ou

play04:08

a marina não é bonita ou seja pra eu tá

play04:11

mentindo basta que o paulo não seja rico

play04:13

ou é a maria não seja bonita porque a

play04:15

única maneira que está falando a verdade

play04:17

é que os dois sejam verdade é fazer

play04:19

tabelas e à verdade

play04:21

se o paulo é único ea maria bonita então

play04:24

aqui é verdade mas e se o qual é rico

play04:27

mas a maioria não é bonita pela que fica

play04:29

falso e se o paulo não é rico mas a

play04:32

maria bonita aqui fica falso e se nem o

play04:36

paulo é rico nem a maria bonita falso

play04:39

também não vai ficar mais falso - falso

play04:42

não tem essa história de mais mais

play04:44

mentira ou menos mentira mentira uma

play04:48

meia noite a medida

play04:50

tá bom a resposta correta é o item de

play04:54

dados

play04:56

bom mais pessoal a propósito se eu

play05:00

tivesse perguntado em vez d e e se eu

play05:03

tivesse pedido o paulo é rico ou maria

play05:07

bonita gente

play05:08

o oprah que eu esteja falando a verdade

play05:11

basta que pelo menos uma dessas coisas

play05:14

seja verdade

play05:15

lembre se que o ou ele não é excludente

play05:17

o fato do paulo ser rico não impede da

play05:20

maria bonita então se o paulo henrique é

play05:23

a maria bonita e estou falando a verdade

play05:25

e se o paulo é rico ea marinha não é

play05:28

bonita verdade também

play05:30

mas e se o paulo é rico mas a maria

play05:32

bonita verdade também a única maneira de

play05:36

eu estar mentindo é o paulo não ser rico

play05:39

ea marinha não ser bonita aí eu vou

play05:42

estar mentindo

play05:43

portanto a alegação de paulo é rico ou

play05:47

maria bonita é que paulo não é rico e

play05:50

maria não é bonita ou seja para que eu

play05:53

esteja mentindo no caso do ou só tem uma

play05:56

maneira as duas coisas têm que ser falsa

play05:59

mas no caso do e pra eu estar mentindo

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Logical ArgumentationEducational ScriptPropositionsLogical ConnectorsTruth TablesLogical AnalysisDeductive ReasoningConditional StatementsContradictionEducational ContentArgument Structure
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?